Liberty Explained – Mala In Se – Mala Prohibita

From John Russell

Here are five documents, 66 pages
CAVEAT

I amm not an attorney. I do not practice law and do not have a license to practice law. I do not give legal advice. Nothing I say herein is meant to be legal advice. It is my opinion.
We hold these truths to be self-evident …"
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than your philosophy will allow"-.–Shakespeare (Hamlet)
—The Gadianton wool has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.—
Mala in se Law is for the living man on this land.
Mala prohibita Legal acts are for the citizen at the expense of unalienable Rights.
The term sovereign citizen is an oxymoron
Reducing the national debt under public policy is an oxymoron
The United States, the Federal Government, is a Federal Corporation
by definition per 28 USC 3002, (15). That makes court actions civil in nature.
It is your free will choice
.
-To whom do you pray for a remedy in any situation of need. Do you pray to the state under mala prohibita acts or to the Creator under mala in se Law?-
Always know if you are a legal fiction or a living man on the land
Freedom can become a natural consequence of the 1933 USA bankruptcy if you do it right through the Declaration of Independence.
There is no need for another revolution and constitution. The Constitution doesn’t need fixing, just a few adjustments; particularly in the area of penalties and enforcement for errant functionaries.
My awakening came when I realized that I now hear different, more profound, relevant messages from my spiritual leaders in otherwise pleasant and nice sounds which make me feel good.
I now hear and realize more vital and timely prompting
and directions from those spiritual leaders and guides.
INTRO
The difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is that the Declaration of Independence can set you free through unalienable Rights. The Constitution can be used to enslave you as a citizen subject under de facto government. The Constitution recognizes no power beyond man; any moral value or principle therein derives from subjects of the Constitution. However, there are solutions to any problem you find. They are found in administrative and commercial processes and procedures under the Constitution and in the natural consequences of the bankrupt condition imposed on United States, the people and the states united under the philosophy of HJR 192 and the change from public Law to public policy in 1933.
The Declaration of Independence acknowledges and declares that you are a creation of, and by nature, subject to natural Law based on moral values and principles from a supernatural source, a Creator, which can set you free; and it provides you an opportunity to claim individual natural sovereignty under Law as given by the supernatural source.
The Constitution is a creation of man, all be it an inspired document, which can be used to enslave you. The Constitution recognizes no value or principle beyond the conscience of man. It assumes you to be a legal fiction and a subject, resident, inhabitant, person of the state, granted rights, privileges and licenses by the state under the acts of the legislature! It provides for you only those legal rights, privileges and licenses created by man which, at best, may only appear to resemble unalienable Rights from a supernatural source. The Constitution does not necessarily recognize or acknowledge Law based on moral values and principles from a supernatural source. The Constitution depends exclusively on the conscience and acts of man to define moral values and principles, for good or for evil. The Constitution is a neutral document. A creation of man.
The Constitution lacks authority to access the declared supernatural Creator, natural Rights and natural sovereignty. There are no natural sovereign rights under the Constitution. It does not address, provide for or mention sovereignty. The only rights under the Constitution are legislative rights, privileges and licenses granted to subjects of the state and present in this land; all without necessarily considering basic moral values and principles from the Creator. You don’t have to believe in the Creator but, In this country, it is a fact of Law by declaration if you choose to believe and act by it.
What I am about to say may seem to make as much sense as Carroll’s tales in Wonder land. But, like the fantasy tales of Lewis Carroll, they are all about the real world in which we live in spite of what you now think and have been taught to believe. The intent of this document is to discuss Law, its meaning and basis in terms of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The Declaration became the philosophy and Lawful position of the people in the several republic colonies united on the American continent in 1776. It was the driving force which initiated the Revolutionary War and which overcame the dominance of the British Empire and secured the land for the people as the reward to victors in armed conflict. It began the creation of a new independent state – "conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."- The Founding Fathers declared -"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." They concluded their Declaration in these words, -"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."- They wagered everything to claim Mala in se Law as a Natural Right and to provide for sovereignty in the individual and in the people collectively on this chosen land.
The Declaration of Independence is a statement by the people in America expressing discontent with the existing government and mala prohibita legal acts of Great Briton. It is a declaration that the people intend to separate themselves from England to form an independent state based on the mala in se Law values and principals clearly stated; which values and principles were not available to them under British mala prohibita legislative acts. The Declaration is a religious document prescribing mala in se Law for the land and the people. Mala in se is Law based on natural principles and values originating with a supernatural Creator. This natural Law was not available to the people under British mala prohibita legislation. It was against this British mala prohibita legislation that the people objected and fought to free themselves. The Declaration of Independence is a religious statement because it declares -"their Creator"- as the source of self-evident truths and unalienable Rights, Identifying a supernatural source for Law. The Declaration identifies mala in se principles and values for this land and the people. Mala in se Law became available to the new nation through the Declaration and verification by fifty six signatories, confirmation by the people, when duly served on the British Crown, and became certain after the defeat of Great Britain. The revolution precipitated when the people of America realized that they had no other way to extricate themselves from British mala prohibita legislative acts. Particularly offensive were those statutes dealing with banking and taxing practices. The Declaration of Independence resulted in the defeat of British rule and the creation of a new state under the possibility of mala in se Law, for the first time in the history of man, with only a few brief and local exceptions.
The Declaration of Independence makes clear the intent of the Founding Fathers to provide for the people to be sovereign under mala in se Law as the Law of the land if they so choose. Soon after the Revolution people decided they also wanted the Right to have the principles and values of mala prohibita acts of legislation available to them as a free will choice. This they did in 1787 when the people created the Constitution. Which Constitution provides for a form of government and employment and control of government functionaries; whose duty the people hoped would be to honor, preserve, protect and defend the natural Rights of the people. The Constitution also provides for the people, as a matter of free will choice, the opportunity to become subjects of the government which will provide legal statutory rights, privileges and licenses for the benefit of those government subjects. Licensing results when a sovereign chooses to give up his sovereignty and to ignore his Rights in favor of citizenship and subjectivity. Sovereignty in the people is a result of the Declaration of Independence and the rewards to victors in armed conflict through inspiration and the wisdom of the Founding Fathers. I suggest that We the People through apathy, inattention and irresponsibility are allowing the Federal Government Corporation to cunningly usurp that sovereignty, replacing it with a de facto jurisdiction and replacing our status as free men and women on the land by legal fictions.
To understand the difference between mala in se natural Rights and mala prohibita legal rights, privileges and licenses Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, defines the terms as follows:
Mala in se: – Wrongs in themselves; acts morally wrong, offenses against conscience.-
Mala prohibita: -Prohibited wrongs or offenses; acts which are made offenses; acts which are made offenses by positive laws, and prohibited as such. Acts or omissions which are made criminal by statute but which, of themselves, are not criminal. Generally, no criminal intent or -mens rea- is required and the mere accomplishment of the act or omission is sufficient for criminal liability. The term is used in contrast to mala in se which are acts which are wrongs in themselves such as robbery.-
License: -The permission by competent authority to do an act which, without such permission, would be illegal, a trespass, or a tort. People v. Henderson, 391 Mich. 612, 218 N.W. 2d, 4.-
The uniqueness of the Constitution is in requiring government to recognize mala prohibita legislative acts. It was not necessary to require a new constitution to recognize, as a "self-evident" truth, the self-evident mala in se Law declared by the Founding Fathers in 1776, but the government must abide by mala in se Law because the Founding Fathers declared it and procured the Right to proclaim it in these words: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."- In other words the Constitution controls the actions of government functionaries and all other subjects subscribing to it and includes the rules to be followed by mala prohibita legislation and its subjects. What man creates man can control. Not so with mala in se Law which man does not create. Mala in se Law is in the realm of the Creator and not accessible to the control of man. What man can not create, man can not control. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution work together to define and execute principles of Law and acts of legislation in this new land. The Declaration of Independence acknowledges mala in se Law from a supernatural source, the Creator. The Constitution acknowledges the influence of man in the form of mala prohibita acts of the legislature. Both must be equally operative in this land. The religious man can the believe the Constitution to be endowed with sovereignty by the Creator of man to be free to exercise agency and be responsible for the exercise of choice; and the non religious man is free to believe whatever he chooses, but even the non believer must accept the -"declared truth"- to be a fact of Law, whether he believes it to be self-evident truth or not.
Provision for mala prohibita acts of the legislature is found at Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution where-in it says: -"No State shall … pass any Bill or Law impairing the Obligation to Contracts. …"- Without the Declaration of Independence and self-evident truths a constitution is nothing more than what the Founding Fathers had under the British Crown, mala prohibita acts of the legislature. The Declaration of Independence clearly identifies the Creator as the source of self-evident truths which are clearly in the realm of the supernatural, the Creator, which is clearly not within man’s capability to control. The Declaration is then a religious document defining moral values as gifts from the Creator specifically identifying them as … unalienable Rights, "… that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." This is the basic philosophy for Law in this country.
There was no need to explicitly provide for mala in se Law under the Constitution because the Founding Fathers declared the principles and values of mala in se Law as a "self-evident truth" for this country if the people choose to follow and adhere to it. The Constitution, a creation of man, provides for and control of functionaries of government. Therefore, the man-created Constitution made provision for Mala prohibita acts of the legislature or legal contracts under the authority of Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution. Thus making possible the free will choice for man made mala prohibita legislative acts or mala in se Law from a Declared supernatural source of power as a free-will choice. In other words a choice between principles and values recognized to be gifts from -"their Creator"- under mala in se Law or creations under the man-made Constitution, mala prohibita acts, called statutes or codes under the acts of the legislature.
The mala prohibita statutes, or codes, developed by the people under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution clearly provide for reserving mala in se Rights defined as self-evident truths. This reservation of mala in se Rights is found in the man made mala prohibita law of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) at Section 1-207, entitled – Performance or acceptance Under Reservation of rights; where-in it says:
"A party who with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as without prejudice, under protest or the like are sufficient."
That should help give meaning to Article III of the Constitution which Article addresses the Judicial Department of Government. Recent legal research suggests that Article III of the Constitution has been and is cleverly being ignored by secret conniving people under mala prohibita legislative acts. That’s another subject for another document. One prominent religion teaches, since the early 1800's, that the Constitution will hang by a thread and if it is to be saved it will be by Elders of the Church.
This should help you understand why you will hear a judge in a civil or a government court, a statutory court that is, say to an accused before that court -There are no "unalienable Rights" issues before this court.- And the judge is right! Before a civil or a legislative statutory government court there are no constitutional issues. There are only legislative issues. It’s not the judge, the court or the system that is to fault. If you do not understand that, it is you who is to fault. You don’t understand who you are in relationship to the court. If you don’t understand that, the problem is that you don’t know that you are a victim of your education and generally available information. You now have all the information you need to figure it out for yourself if you will. The rest of this document will help if you have trouble. There is still time to address – The Awful Situation- discussed by Dr. Jack Monnett in his book -Awakening to the Awful Situation-, if you will!
You can choose to act under mala in se Law or under mala prohibita government statutory codes. To act under mala in se Law you must know that you are sovereign man on the land and act like it. You can not concede jurisdiction into a mala prohibita authority. The remainder of this discussion will, hopefully, help explain and help you understand what that statement means.
This document suggests a way to extricate yourself from mala prohibita acts of the legislature, as much as you choose to do so. The message is, -you don’t have to be a subject under mala prohibita acts of the legislature with rights, privileges and licenses in place of -unalienable natural Rights-, gifts from the Creator. If you are a religious person concerned with moral principles, good and evil or the Creator and Satan, you don’t have to sacrifice or compromise your faith and principles based on Deity or good to the capricious whims of functionaries and people in whom you only hope are trustworthy and of good report. In the words of George Gordon, – "All you have to do is stop signing your name and you will become free by default."- You can add to that, if you don’t forget who you are, who you are not and how to act as a sovereign manno the land.
A declaration is a statement of fact which must be admitted into evidence in a court if not challenged successfully. Which statement of fact must be accepted as true when properly verified, confirmed, duly entered, served, and successfully defended. The verification, confirmation, service process in the case of the Declaration of Independence became the cause of the American Revolution against a reigning sovereign power resulting in armed conflict with those who would challenge the right to make such a declaration. When the people in the American colonies united, successfully defended and defeated the British Crown authority in armed conflict the American people earned the right to form government according to the dictates of their conscience. The Declaration of Independence is a clear and explicit statement of choice. It refutes all other authority and defends that choice to this day against all who would attempt to challenge it. In other words, by the right of victors in armed conflict, and against all who would challenge that right, the people of the American republic states united defend this choice to this day according to the self-evident truths declared as explicitly stated in the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It is a fighting document against all who would challenge the right of the American people to act in accordance with their conscience. It now stands to defend all those who are or will be present in this country, regardless of citizenship or subjectivity to external authority. On this turf you don’t even have to believe in that declared statement, but for now, in this country it is a fact supported and defended by Law. That doesn’t mean that government functionaries adhere to, enforce , believe, or defend the principles so well defined. It simply means for now you have access to the moral principles laid down and declared to be self-evident truths. These de jure principles are available to you and backed by Law. You, not the law, decides if this condition will continue or be done away with. We still have the opportunity to exercise free will under Law. Reality shows us that forces are working, very successfully, to do away with the de jure principles laid down by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. For now we can do something about the outcome for the future. If we don’t act now to preserve the de jure principles the people of this country generally proclaim, the opposing forces will prevail. This is no time for apathy, laziness, indecision, for feeling good about the situation, or in hoping for a savior to come to solve the problems we have allowed to prevail. I don’t happen to believe that a savior would be pleased with the condition we, as the people, allowed to fester in apathy. And we can’t honorably use the excuse that we are victims of our public education and information.
The Constitution, be it inspired, is a kind of after thought, an idea for a form of government for the American people, a suggestion to provide for functionaries and a means to do the bidding of those newly liberated self-determined people in the American states united. At their best, the people under the Constitution assume the principles and self-evident truths stated in the Declaration of Independence. I believe the Constitution is a kind of indenture to insure that its subjects, government functionaries, perform for the benefit of the beneficiaries, the people, as prescribed by the truths stated by the Declaration of Independence. I believe that the people as beneficiaries of the Constitution are not necessarily subjects of the Constitution as are functionaries under the Constitution. The people are the authority for creating the Constitution and use it as a mechanism to facilitate the employment and control of government functionaries to do their bidding. The Constitution does not create any natural Rights for the people. It can only provide privileges and licenses as the people will allow. Natural Rights are in the realm of the Creator, so says the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution is not a tool to create Rights for the people. It is a tool to keep legislative or de facto government functionaries under control by the people.
When the Founding Fathers acknowledged unalienable Rights as self-evident truths gifted by a Creator and the people endorsed that statement it made the Declaration of Independence a religious document. By definition, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, religion is:
-Man’s relation to divinity …obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition … Nikulikoff v. Archbishop, etc., of Russian Orthodox Greek, Catholic Church, 142 Misc. 894, 255 N.Y.C. 653, 663.
As used in constitutional provisions of First Amendment forbidding the establishment of religion. The term means a particular system of faith and worship recognized and practiced by particular church, sect, or denomination. Reynalds v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145, 25 L.Ed. 244; Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229, 97 S.Ct. 2593, L.Ed.2d 714; Roemer, et ai. V. Board of Public Works of Md., 426 U.S. 736, 96 S.Ct. 2337, L.Ed.2d 1.
By declaring "their Creator" and identifying unalienable Rights as gifts to man as self-evident truths recognizes and identifies de jure attributes of a supernatural force, the Creator, and moral principles and values characteristic of that Creator. These are beyond the control of man and government. What man can not create, man can not control. Since none of these attributes mentioned in the Declaration of Independence is within the control of man as truths, but only the response to them is, they become a suggestion to man in forming government to insure worth while de jure moral values and principles to live by. There is documented evidence and even scriptural doctrine that this, the American continent, is to become a great and major influence in world affairs, a choice land to be inhabited by unique people capable of understanding and providing for the moral values and principles, based on choice and responsibility, clearly identified in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration becomes a religious statement about a supernatural force, the Creator, which defines de jure moral principals and values, sometimes described as conscience. None of which can man or government control, but only react to. The First Amendment to the Constitution made by the people clearly prohibits functionaries of government from making any law respecting the establishment of religion, can only mean man made religion. The First Amendment must, therefore, refer to something which man may control, i.e., It cannot mean anything pertaining to the supernatural as does the Declaration of Independence.
In the First Amendment the people were mandating that what man can not create man can not control. Religion, referring to the Creator, became a fact by declaration for any new Government. You don’t have to believe it but Government functionaries must abide by the concept and values mandated by the moral principles as laid down by the philosophy that holds -"… these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."-
As you read this you should keep in mind the law book definition of -DEMOCRACY and REPUBLIC. According to Black’s Law Dictionary they are:
-Democracy. That form of Government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, autocracy, or oligarchy.-
-Republic. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government.-
Webster’s Dictionary defines republic as a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law. The term -republic- means different things to different people.
I believe you will find that the term -republic- does not have or imply an absolute definition. It is a relative term and usually a function of law, rule or controlling influence. Russia, for instance, is known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). France claims to be a -republic-. Those definitions and concepts of the term -republic- are each unique and are much different from each other and each is different from the term -republic- assumed and used in the American pledge of allegiance, wherein it says -"I pledge allegiance to the flag… and to the republic for which it stands…"- Individuals, a people or citizenry define the term -republic- In that sense the term -republic- means whatever the united individuals want it to mean to describe their union.
The term -republic- means different things to different people; even within the same country. You might say that there is a unique definition for the term republic for each government. That means that in the union of states united in America there is a unique definition for those choosing to associate themselves as the sovereign natural man, or woman, on the land under the authority of the Declaration of Independence and within the authority of mala in se Law. There are also those who by free-will choice or by default associate themselves as subjects under the corporate jurisdiction of the Constitution. Yes, the Constitution is a mala prohibita creation of man, albeit an inspired document. In this land the people, by Right, are at liberty to make a free-will choice of mala in se Law as provided under the Declaration of Independence or they may freely choose to be governed by mala prohibita legislative acts of man such as the Constitution, a civil creation of man. Proof of that fact is found in the constitutional definition of the term Federal Government found in the acts of the legislature at Title 28 United States Code(USC) Section 3002, paragraph(15). Wherein it defines the United States and the Federal Government as a Federal corporation. That means that all acts of the legislature under the Constitution and therefore the Federal Government are civil or administrative in nature and do not deal with Law. Acts of the legislature may coincidentally use the same words and sound like provisions of mala in se Law. None the less, they are mala prohibita enactments of the legislature and not mala in se Law. Acts of the legislature under the Constitution are acts under the legal authority or jurisdiction of man and only coincidentally appear to be made to appear like the mala in se Law from -their Creator-, a supernatural power.
You will find that the United States and the Federal Government, by definition, is a Federal corporation. See 28 USC 3002, (15). That means that all legal actions by the Federal Government are administrative or civil in nature. There are those in this country who choose to be governed by various and sundry jurisdictions. Unfortunately some of these various jurisdictions are not compatible with the principles and moral values the Founding Fathers hoped to propagate and provided for in the Declaration of Independence The Founding Fathers and other good men understanding the need for opposition in all things so that man can willfully make choices for which he must be held accountable, anticipated these incompatible jurisdictions in the affairs of men on this land. They, I believe, in their inspired wisdom, provided the Lawful mechanism for those whom they also knew would get the vision and dedicate their lives, fortunes and sacred honors to preserve, protect and defend, the gifted self-evident truths, provided for them by the Lawful power of declaration.
I do not believe that -We the people- can put the blame on -"their Creator"- or attribute to any -Good supernatural force-, -the way and manner in which government functionaries under the Constitution today are cleverly and with design influencing the administering of the Constitution in a manner foreign and opposed to the intent of the Founding Fathers and good men. Which way and manner appears to have the consent of the people without meaningful and dedicated opposition; so many seeming to put their hope in being rescued from their follies by the ‘Second Coming’-. I don’t believe a virtuous creator would find much joy in -fools- endowed with unalienable Rights as truth, who would not use the given wisdom and ability to act, to preserve, protect and defend, the truths of unalienable Rights gifted to them.
For you of faith or interest in scriptures, I suggest you read the historical account of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the Bible; the enslavement of the Jews and the exodus lead by Moses; to the occupation of the promised land; the accounts of Samuel , Saul and David in the Book of Samuel; the accounts of the kings of Israel from the Books of Kings; and the accounts of the final scattering of and loss of Israel as a nation. These are accounts that mirror what is happening in this country today and I believe for exactly the same reasons. The historical accounts tell of a nation created and influenced through a prophet by a supernatural force. As long and whenever the people followed and practiced guidance of the mala in se Law, people flourished. Whenever they failed to follow the basic moral principles given, the people suffered and eventually disappeared as a viable nation.
In a democracy you may have one opportunity to vote in the affairs of government if you are of the proper class or status. In a republic such as we have there are three opportunities to cast your vote in the control of government. You have the opportunity to be on a grand jury and have your say based on the dictates of your conscience and values. You have the opportunity to cast your vote in general elections to be heard by government on your conscience and values. The third opportunity to vote is as a member of a jury in a court trial where you can exercise your right to jury nullification based only on your conscience and values with impunity regardless of anything a judge says or in jury instructions. In addition, you, as a body of population in a unique location, cultural, spiritual, educational, and intellectual environment, have an opportunity to be heard to influence and control government according to the dictates of your independent and community conscience. See the Citizens Rule Book, generally distributed to jurors at one time, now difficult to obtain generally but available through many patriot groups.

Keep in mind that your opportunity to vote is a statutory provision, right or privilege under mala prohibita acts of the legislature. It is properly controlled by the people who are subjects of the government based on their free will choice. When you go into a government court of your own free will and request or pray for adjudication from a government judge you are requesting de facto adjudication from a de facto judge under mala prohibita law. In this government court there are no such things as natural Rights. There are only statutory rights, privileges, licenses and decisions.
You can not claim mala in se Rights in a statutory court. If you want to exercise natural mala in se Law or Rights you must exercise your de jure status. You must learn to understand and to distinguish between de jure natural status and the contrary de facto status. See the definition of the United States and Federal Government in Title 28 USC 3002(15). They are a Federal corporation.
If you want to try appearing before a constitutional(corporate) court you can try to properly notice a statutory court, on the record, of your de jure, natural status and declare your identity by proper appellation as a natural man, or woman on the land exercising natural Rights under the Declaration of Independence; and declare that you are not a straw man, artificial, corporate subject or citizen under the Constitution and therefore do not want to enter into contract with the court. Good luck. You will need it. They will look askance at you, as if you just fell off the turnip truck or a spaceship from Mars. The court may pacify you in the interest of judicial economy, but the court knows that you don’t know what you are doing and you are not worth the financial effort for them to continue. That does not mean that you win.
An alternate approach when appearing in a de facto court is to understand and try to apply the Constitution Article III approach. You must understand what Article III is all about and get to an Article III judge, one acting under the authority of Article III of the Constitution. Or, you can try making a statutory judge act like an Article III judge. I don’t believe these attempts are impossible. If you try this approach you must convert any statutory claim into a criminal violation of your de jure Rights. Sound like double talk? It is not! It is mala in se Law.
If you want to become subject under mala in se Law you must learn and understand who you are and who they are. -That entails learning that mala prohibita acts of the legislature in the form of administrative and commercial remedies and procedures contain provisions for claiming mala in se Law in the real world of man-. To do that it is wise for you learn to understand the message contained in Matthew 10: 16. You can’t expect a mala prohibit statutory judge to be sympathetic to your point of view. He can’t do it! He doesn’t have to. He is bound to a corporate contract under an oath of office to do the bidding of mala prohibita statutory acts and codes under the authority of Article,1, Section 10 of the Constitution wherein it mandates that No State shall …pass any Bill…or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts… . That’s Law, in spite of what you think you learned in school and what public information, judges and licensed members of the bar would have you believe. It’s not the court or the system that’s to fault. It is you who doesn’t know who you are in relation to the court! You don’t understand the difference between -de jure- authority and -defacto- jurisdiction. This is the Law as long as we still have a viable Constitution. When we no longer have the Constitution we will be under de facto mala prohibita acts and sovereign Rights will vanish. That’s where we started.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 and victory in the Revolutionary War made mala in se Law, based on moral principles, unalienable Rights and experience, available to the free and independent people on the land as a matter of Right. The Constitution had nothing to do with that. The Constitution did not come around until 1787. And just like Israel at the time of Saul, the people wanted a king just like the big guys of the time. So, in 1787, the people insisted on having a constitution that provided for the free will choice of the people to be governed by corporate mala prohibita acts of the legislature; which has become a recreation of de facto Roman mercantile equity, and the opportunity to become corporate subjects under administrative privileges, rights, and licenses, just like the big countries of the time. Thus providing for the free will choice of the people to be governed by -"Divine providence" – or at the whims of a legislature without considering moral principles, natural Rights and experience. The Constitution is legislation for its subjects and public functionaries, not for the sovereign individual and people claiming and acting under mala in se sovereign status.
The Constitution at its best can provide for basic principles similar to those under mala in se Law. They do this within the mala prohibita codes and statutes. The idea here is to concentrate on basic principles and moral values, not on the body of statutory provisions. Mala prohibita acts are not inherently good or bad. The individual basic principles and application are the good or bad parts. If a constitution provides for legislative acts based on good principles and moral values it may not matter much if you claim the principles to be from mala in se Law or mala prohibit statutes and codes. The good or bad part is the principal and application, not the name of the law; unless you want to be true to your recognized Creator.
Government functionaries tend to use words or names as propaganda tools to keep the people under control. Remember, the primary objective of government, functionaries, is to control, not to define moral vales, except as they serve to meet the objective of government and control. As Federal Judge Robert Bork says in his book "The Tempting of America", -referring to Supreme Court justices -"…’they decide as they wish without consideration for anything in the Constitution

whenever they know they can get away with it. – That means that moral values are in the hands of the people, not the government. You can not blame government for the faults you find under government control when you fail to change, challenge and correct the actions of government functionaries, when you can.
The message behind this treatise is as old as man and his affairs. The message repeats itself in many ways throughout the ages, in scriptures and other ancient writings. One of the notable retelling of the message is over 2500 years old as is found in Plato’s Republic Part VII; which begins with a detailed description of the -shadows of the images. The modern retelling of this same message is found in the popular TV movie series called The Matrix. Wherein -Orpheus tells Neo what the Matrix is. Orpheas explains to Neo that -The Matrix is a world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Don’t get discouraged, yet, at what you think you see and hear This report contains specific remedies for any discouraging thoughts you may now have. It also gives hopeful remedies you can apply that will give you power to alter defects you may now see. Learn administrative remedies and commercial processes and how to use them. Then adhere to sacred moral principles and values. I maintain that if you understand and stand on the the sovereign status of the man on the land under mala in se Law there is no need to argue, consider, or get involved in mala prohibita acts of the legislature.
There is nothing wrong with the Constitution as it is. The Constitution contains provisions to make changes as the people find necessary. Any changes desired by the people reflect the moral values of the people. It is good to change the Constitution when specific situations arise which require change so long as changes are consistent with virtue and good moral values based on good and sound basic principles. The Founding Fathers realized this and made provisions for it. The Constitution is not a static artifact. It is a living document capable of meeting the needs of the people. The Constitution has nothing to do with, and in no way can change, modify or influence, the rule of de jure Law declared as self-evident truths, which define the moral principles and values laid down as Law in the Declaration of Independence by the Founding Fathers. The problem is with the people. Most don't understand what the Constitution is for and what it does. The Constitution is a type of indenture for the implementation of government and the employment of functionaries. Government employees are the subjects of the Constitution. The people are not. The people are not necessarily and automatically subjects of the Constitution. They may make a free will choice to become subjects or they may be treated as subjects by default if they are not careful. Government functionaries do their thing under contract, Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. This they do as subjects, or workers under contract, the Constitution. Their job is to work for the beneficiaries of the Constitution, if the people make them. The beneficiaries of the Constitution are the subject people and the sovereign man on the land.
The Declaration of Independence, it's successful certification, service and defense at arms, provides for the people on this land and their posterity the opportunity to live by mala in se Law. Mala in se Law was not available to the people on this land before the Declaration of Independence and its defense. Mala prohibita acts of the legislature was and still is the rule in Great Britain. This is the de facto law against which the Founding Fathers extricated themselves. Mala prohibita legislative acts are the government law exercised over most of the people in the world and under which these people are subjects of government, by free will choice, or by tyranny under threat of force. In the republic states united on the American continent the Right to freely become a subject of a corporation is found in the Constitution at Article I, Section 10. The Federal Corporation acts under civil, admiralty or maritime statutes; see United States Code Title 28, Section 3002 paragraph (15). The Federal corporation calls its subjects, citizens. The American sovereign is a status occupied by someone who claims subjectivity only to the supernatural source of power, acknowledged by, recognized by and declared by the Declaration of Independence, to be "their Creator"; and refuses to relinquish his endowment of unalienable Rights to any claim of superior authority and control. In that sense one is not a citizen of the United States Corporation or to any other man made mala prohibita authority. One is sovereign; someone who chooses to be governed by the principles provided for and defended by the Declaration of Independence; as is one’s Right to do so, under mala in se Law. The difference between a mala in se Law sovereign and a mala prohibita legislative citizen under the Constitution is in the source of one’s authority to act and be acted upon. Under mala prohibit legislative jurisdiction the citizen claims to be a subject, and therefore a citizen under the jurisdiction of the Constitution authorized by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution and the acts of the legislature or man-made codes and acts. Under mala in se Law the people claim authority under "their Creator". A super natural source of authority based on basic moral values and principles of nature’s Law. The Founding Fathers based their Declaration of Independence on a profound conviction of the reality of a Creator. That makes the Declaration of Independence a statement in the nature of religious principles. But it is not a statement or endorsement of religion.
Did you ever ask yourself the question -what makes me a citizen in this country?- The correct answer is, the Constitution. I believe the question is ambiguous and presumptuous. In a way, the answer to the question is like an oxymoron in that it could imply that there are no other possibilities. Technically the answer to the question is that a citizen is one who prescribes to a particular unique form of government or societal rule over him. What if the individual claims to be a natural sovereign? The title sovereign refutes any claim to citizenship. The two terms are mutually exclusive. See what interesting games and quandaries you can get into when all you want to do is what is best for you?
There is an easy way to tell the difference between a Right and a privilege. You must ask for offerings, rights, privileges and licenses. You demand Rights. If you are to claim your natural gifted Rights and sovereignty you must know who you are and you must learn how to claim your natural Rights and identify yourself properly. Whenever you fail to properly identify yourself or to timely and properly defend and demand your natural Rights, or whenever you partake of corporate United States offerings to its corporate subjects (citizens), the United States Corporation assumes and treats you as one of their subjects and under their jurisdiction. That is the definition of a straw man.
The Constitution mandates that government functionaries must provide all people, citizens of the United States under the Constitution and the free people, sovereigns, under the Declaration of Independence in a republic of the union of republics, with the same kind of public services, defense, protections and opportunities provided for under the Constitution except for the duties, limitations, responsibilities, and obligation expected and required from corporate subjects.
Mala in se Law was, and is, the Law of the land until the people decided they also wanted a constitution. This they got in 1789 . The Constitution makes provision for mala prohibita acts of the legislature by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. This is not the Law made possible by the Declaration of Independence. Mala prohibit acts of the legislature, as you know, are acts at the whims of the legislature without consideration for moral principles, values, or experience. It is the opposite of mala in se Law. Look it up in Black's Law dictionary!
The Constitution gave the people an alternative to mala in se Law. It recognizes the Right of the people to be governed by man-made legislative acts; the best to the worst of man-made codes and statutes, at the whims of the acts of the legislature, whatever the people will allow. The Constitution is not the cause of the "Awful Situation" we now find ourselves in. Dr. Jack Monnett competently describes and documents the historic cause of this situation in his recently published book -Awakening to Our Awful Situation-. The direct cause of this Awful Situation is in the ignorance and apathy of the people. Those same people who are willing victims of cleverly manipulated education and public information. See Dr. Monnett’s book.
The Constitution also contains remedies for the ‘Awful Situation’. These remedies are found in the statutory provisions of administrative remedies and commercial procedures and processes. The remedies are there. You must learn to use them, if you choose to do so. You can’t blame any one for your failure to use them. It is for you to discover them. Winston Shrout and Mary Elizabeth Croft, readily available on the internet and Sam Kennedy, who can be heard on the Republic Broadcasting Network(RBN); and George Gordon, available by simply typing -George Gordon- into a computer search engine, understand this as do many others available on alternate view information radio and Internet websites.
Consider sovereignty. The Declaration of Independence recognizes and acknowledges the ultimate sovereignty of a super natural Creator by declaration. Sovereignty, by definition, is unlimited in extent, absolute, autonomous, independent, and supreme power to create and direct activities within a specific, well defined realm. The sovereignty extended to the people through the Declaration of Independence is that made available from the ultimate source of sovereignty, the Creator, made available to man in this country through the Declaration of Independence for the benefit of the people to govern themselves within the capabilities and realm of man. That is a statement of fact in this country. That fact is not a statement on religion and is not an endorsement of any religion. Within the capacities and realm of man in this country sovereignty resides in the man and the people. The people here, generally believe, recognize, accept and expect sovereignty to be available to them as a resident gift, individually and collectively, from a supernatural superior source of sovereignty, a Creator. The people, individually and collectively, can ignore, relinquish or not respond to this gift. The people here are free to grant to governments, federal, state, county, local and any others, limited jurisdictions over them as a matter of free will choice. These subservient jurisdictions provide for serving the needs of the people. This they do by allowing for the various governments to function as corporations and other civil authorities. Corporations are mala prohibita legal creations of the people exercising inherent natural mala in se Rights to create a mala prohibit civil authority under which civil authority each individual may freely choose to become a member or citizen by relinquishing his individual gifts of sovereignty and unalienable Rights from the Creator.
Governments have only the sovereignty the people allow. The people can reclaim, foreclose, or change governments, their employees, authority, acts and property at any time. As an example, the people conditionally authorize the U.S. Government to perform its required duties and obligations. Each republic has the power and authority to take back any and all property granted to the U.S. Government for failure to perform. You will find proof of this fact in many of the constitutions of the original thirteen colonies, now called states united, when forming the union of colonies, or independent republics at the conclusion of the revolutionary war when the people formed into a new country. That fact is as true today in every state as it was then. You probably just never heard about it. Blame it on controlled education, press and other generally available information sources.
The cause of the ‘Awful Situation’ we discussed earlier is due to the ignorance and apathy of the people to understand what the revolutionary war and the Founding Fathers was all about. The reason for this is due to the fact that conniving secret combinations, sometimes called Gadianton robbers, and groups of clever people are diligently working to propagate, implant and secure concealed agendas. Read Dr. Jack Monnett’s book! The object of these secret agendas is to control the world and the people. They are doing it very successfully. Their most effective tools are control of the money system, ignorance, exploitation of people’s self-interest and preoccupation with material stuff, manipulating education and information, and clouding the issue of moral principles to obscure values and good principles. Controlling the education process and public information sources is a very effective means of controlling the people through control of the language, definitions and meanings of words; as you will see later.
You probably have never heard the terms mala in se Law and mala prohibita legislative acts before this. Most people have not. You might ask yourself why that is so. Without a clear understanding of those two terms and their opposite meaning, you can not understand the importance of the Declaration of Independence and what it did in this country to provide for Law based on moral principles, values and experience. Without an understanding of the term mala prohibita acts of the legislature you are incapable of comprehending the Constitution and what it did, and why you can so easily be conditioned to become a subject under a government corporation employing codes and statutes without concern for moral principles and values. The Founding Fathers did not trust government functionaries. That is why they -bound them down by the chains of the Constitution through an oath of office- to be personally responsible for their individual actions. Religions today preach the difference between good and evil and most admonish doing good. I believe that as a competent human being you can develop an understanding of moral principles and values. But without adequate education and exposure to truth and reality you can be cleverly conditioned through calculated information to violate sound moral principles and acts and feel good about it. It is not enough to preach good and evil without the education and truth in reality to decide how to act in wisdom. This is particularly true when dealing with government and government functionaries. The Founding Fathers advised -Eternal Vigilance- . You are a fool if you only have faith in the hope that government functionaries are of good report! It is extremely foolish and unwise to put your faith in mala prohibit government functionaries on matters of moral principles and values. Mala prohibita acts do not require consideration for moral values and good principles or even truth and fact.
The only source of moral values under mala prohibita acts is in the exclusive hands of the people and maybe, to some extent, in the hands of good men elected to public office.
One last thought is to reinforce the idea that government and government functionaries, including the courts, are not bound under the Constitution to consider the unalienable Rights declared by the Founding Fathers unless they are forced to do so. United States Code (USC) 28, Section 3002, under Definition (15) clearly states that the United States and the Federal Government is a Federal Corporation. That means the Federal Corporation is a creation of man through the Constitution. That makes the government, including Constitutional courts, civil in nature. I believe that a natural man properly claiming the status of a free man or woman on the land can claim sovereignty and Rights from the declared Creator by making the government refute or otherwise disprove the natural man’s status and claim to sovereignty and prove that man , necessarily assumed to be a straw man by government, is a subject of the de facto federal government corporation and therefore of a government court.
If you have taken all this information seriously then you may be wondering what you can do about it. The answer is simple but not easy for most. As you ponder what has been said here you may begin to realize that the Gadianton wool has truly been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. That wool originates in our general education system and is continually being reinforced by a life-time of generally available public information sources mostly controlled and designed by those with concealed agendas. These are known as secret societies, combinations and Gadianton Robbers. This is most likely disturbing to those with strong and dedicated religious convictions, particularly those whose faith admonishes being subject to governments in the various forms. I do not believe religious admonishment to support government is unconditional. History and sacred scriptures teach us that the condition must always be to virtue, truth, moral sound and good principles which enhance the benefit, happiness, well being and the good of man and propagate the ideals of liberty, self reliance, involvement and responsibility. Read the Declaration of Independence and you will find that the Founding Fathers made those same ideals the very cause of the Revolutionary War against a de facto government that denied those ideals to the people on this land. As victors in that revolution the Founding Fathers made those ideals available to the people in these lands as a matter of choice.
People generally find good, liberty, faith, accomplishment, progress and virtue in following natural good principles. These good principles extend over the spectrum of individual differences limited only by capability and the intersection of individual natural Rights. That is why I find faith and encouragement in the conscience of good men. If it seems like something is wrong, there probably is. We must not assume that It is for government to make it right for the people, it is for the people to make and keep government right. We hear lots of talk about changing the Constitution to make government functionaries more responsive to change in these times and to the people and their liberties and Rights. Government will always be as responsive as the people will tolerate. And I believe the people will tolerate an existing government up to the point of revolution. The problem is not with the Constitution. It is with our tolerance level. I believe that the tolerance level is now at the point of confusion. The point at which we want somebody else to do it for us; to solve our problems, looking for the second coming to solve our problems. So, the people say, let’s change the Constitution. There is nothing wrong with the Constitution. But, soon after writing the organic Constitution the Congress decided they needed to include a BILL of Rights to also legalize certain unalienable Rights. With or without the legal Bill of Rights the sovereign man on the land claims all his natural Rights by mala in se Law. The sovereign man on the land needs no legal permission or privilege to act on unalienable Rights from his Creator!
I believe the Constitution to be a document created by inspired men. It contains the elements necessary to accomplish the objectives of the people generally, whether for good or evil. It also makes provision for the wide individual variations in values and hopes. Be those objectives good or bad, sacred or evil, the Constitution can be no better nor worse than the people generally will tolerate. If you want to know what you can do, follow your conscience. Embrace and respond appropriately to good and evil wherever and whenever you encounter them. Don’t look to government for guidance. Look to your faith, the principles of good and the influence of evil. Decide if you will follow the Law of natural principles or act on and be acted upon by the minds of men. Whatever you do, if you are doing it right and have the courage to follow liberty and Right, it will most likely lead to an encounter with government and the court system. You had better know who you are, who they are and how to courageously respond on your own.
I will support, protect, preserve and defend the Constitution with my life and being. I believe the Constitution contains all the elements necessary to do the job for which the Founding Fathers intended. Through the Constitution we have the capability to make it work for us exactly as the Founding Fathers intended. I will now discuss how I make it work for me. I believe It works only through faith in the Creator and His Word. I believe you must understand the difference between mala in se Law and mala prohibita legal acts; know who you are and who government and its functionaries are; confront evil firmly with mala in se truths as unalienable Rights; know how to preserve and defend your status as a living man or woman on this land; and give legal and lawful notice. This, I believe, you must do without fear, secure in the knowledge that the Declaration of independence is the door to mala in se Law through a sacred document called the Constitution; which man and his creations have defiled, made impotent and inferior by legal means under mala prohibita acts of evil men and their false ideals. Remember that mala in se Law supersedes and is superior to the mala prohibita acts of man because what man can not create he can nor destroy or replace. The Declaration of Independence acknowledges the existence of the Creator and makes Lawful, not just legal, for us, through the power of Lawful declaration, the self-evident truths of unalienable Rights. Here, then, is what I consider to be he most powerful document to be served on anyone who attempts to claim authority under the Constitution to act against or challenge you as a living man or woman on the land in the lawful pursuit of happiness. We call it the Controversy of Law Notice and Declaration of Status and Intent.
This is how I invoke mala in se Law Rights. Those self-evident unalienable natural truths from "their Creator". Those unalienable Rights held as self-evident truths, as in "We hold these truths to be self-evident", which the Founding Fathers recognized, acknowledged as self-evident, accepted, assumed and declared to be truths to be made available to the living man or woman, called the people, on this land when creating government for the benefit of the people. The Founding Fathers lawfully secured the Right to so act before the peoples of the world and their courts; to enforce their Declaration for the benefit of themselves, their posterity and any living man or woman present in this land. The Declaration became certain when lawfully certified, noticed, served, then successfully defended against all objections and challenges as it does to this day.
 
 
 
NOTICE OF CONTROVERSY IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Jat
And
DECLARATION OF STATUS AN D INTENT
To whom it may concern
I, first name, middle name, of the family, name, a living man on the land not a fiction of law, declare that It appears the state, in its corporate capacity, by means of some type of adhesion contract, makes a conclusion of law that anyone who enters state territory has lost his Creator given Rights, guaranteed as unalienable by the national and state constitutions, and upon entering state territory the statutes and ordinances of the state are the supreme law; upon which statutes, criminal actions may be brought, wherein the only due process is the right to be heard upon the letter of these statutes.
I object to that conclusion of law, my having made a contrary conclusion of law after exercising necessary diligence, that the Rights declared by the Declaration of Independence and guaranteed as unalienable by both the national and state constitutions carry with me wherever I travel within the territory of the fifty states united; and before any criminal action can be levied against me, a grand jury indictment, a corpus delicti, a certified duly filed verified complaint from a damaged complaining party or a valid contract showing me to be a party, must be in evidence for any court to recognize a criminal authority or jurisdiction over me as an accused.
I do not want to be unfair to the state and if the above conclusion of law attributed to the state could be improved upon I will gladly give the state the opportunity to make such improvement. However, upon failure to make any improvement within fifteen (15) days of notice or knowledge of this NOTICE, the conclusion of law attributed to the state as stated above will, by tacit procuration, become the state's precise conclusion of law which they must live with in any future litigation. Before the state can move foreword, this controversy of law must be settled by an Article III court acting under constitutional judicial power as provided by Article III of the federal constitution, to make a legal determination between the state's conclusion of law and my conclusion of Law.
Notice is hereby given that I do not wish to willfully and knowingly engage in contract with the state. I am a peaceful, living man on the land. I am a creation of the Creator declared by the Declaration of Independence to be a self-evident truth. I am not a legislative creation or straw man, party or person. I declare my status as a living man on the land under mala in se Law, without threat, not wishing harm to you and not wishing to claim fraud on the court. I wish no harm or damage to any one in obedience to my Creator. I, hereby, reserve all my natural Rights, those unalienable Rights clearly made available to me as a self-evident truth under the Declaration of Independence. Any other right or notice offered or served I accept without prejudicing my natural Rights. Any license, privilege, legal right, benefit or presentment to which you believe me to be subject I ‘accept for value’, without prejudiceing my natural Rights.
Notice is hereby given that I will only ‘accept for value’ or refuse for cause and make an offer to satisfy any lawful presentment from any one or the state. If, for any reason, you require my presence you must so notify me and include your authority, the nature and cause of action and admit to receipt and cognizance of this NOTICE. Otherwise I may not respond of my own free will, only under duress, threat of force and violence, to any communication from you.
Notice is hereby given of the following:
If I do not hear from you, complete with certified authority, within fifteen(15) days, your failure to respond will be your admission, confession and acknowledged acceptance of this notice and the consequences thereof;
I am over the age of majority, competent to act and speak for myself, acting of my own free will and not being under threat or duress to so speak;
I have read and do understand the above, having exercised necessary diligence. I do state and declare this notice to be true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, faith and belief, having no thought, wish or intention to threaten, interfere, delay or unduly claim fraud on the court or any one. To all this I do state and declare, under those penalties reserved by my Creator for those who speak falsely.
_______________________________________________
first name, middle name, of the family, name Date: dd month year
 
witnesses; 1. 2. 3.The next
The next sections, called Money and Sovereignty, will prepare you for specific action if you dare. It will introduce you to people who are having success in learning about sovereignty and living in the real world while all about them are in Oz. You will read about the bankrupt United States Government and the people. You will discover the greatest secret government has cleverly kept from the people which is the following:
"The Federal Government took our lawful money out of circulation in 1933 but Congress had to provide the people a remedy. "Public Law Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112" under HJR 192 is that remedy and in part states that the Federal Government will discharge all our debts, public and private, dollar for dollar. This has been the best kept secret in this bankrupt Nation."
When man violates the dictates of intelligence and conscience, which is information from the spirit communicated to the brain, he builds a system that will self destruct; not because it is unreasonable but because it violates sound principles. The Constitution does not concern itself with moral values. Any moral values and basic principles found under and within the Constitution results from the influence of good men. If government functionaries are not good the creations of not-good-men can not be for good. The Declaration of Independence, on the other hand, concerns itself only with truth, moral values and basic principles which are for the good of man.
____________________________________end of INTRO_________________________________________
 
MONEY
ilu
The United States Government no longer uses money. It has not since 1933 when the Government changed from Public Law to Public Policy. The Government convinced the people that public policy was a good idea. This government functionaries did without openly disclosing the facts and consequences of their plan for financial salvation. And the people bought into the greatest promotional scheme since Lucifer laid out his plan for salvation.
Whenever I use the term man it means a living creation of a supernatural supreme Creator. Ladies, that includes you unless you buy into all that feminist propaganda and want to degrade yourself. In that case you probably won’t want to read the rest of this.
In 1913 the people, through the Congress, authorized the Federal Government to create and establish the Federal Reserve system to print paper called Federal Reserve Notes for use as a convenient alternative in place of real money. The Federal Reserve, a private enterprise, created fiat money out of imagination, green paper and ink, for which they charged interest on the amount printed on each paper bil. The actual cost to the printer for each paper bill is about 3.5 to 4.0 cents per bill, regardless of the amount printed on each note. They Then began to print and distribute Federal Reserve Notes. Remember, these notes are items created out of thin air. They are IOU’s created out of imagination, green paper and ink. The Government propaganda system convinced the people that they could use these bills as a medium of exchange,
not money, in commerce. Government encouraged the people to think of these Federal Reserve Notes, called green-backs, and treat them as if they were money to buy and sell things. They are in fact fiat money. To understand the money issue you must understand the nature of money; what it is and what it is not. To do this it will help to look up the definition of money in a common dictionary and in Black’s Law Dictionary. A prominent historical scholar and researcher says that all major governments having a fiat money system have historically been shown to have a life expectancy of about 100 years before they fail.
In this country you must volunteer into slavery, at least for now. To understand the impact of this statement you need only to understand the medium of exchange system in the United States In the words of a Russian journalist when approached by an American claiming that Russians are such slaves, the Russian replied -‘the only difference between you me is that I am a slave and know it!’ The way you become a slave in the United States is to exercise your Right under the Declaration of Independence and apply it at Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution and volunteer into a corporation. This makes you a corporate subject or slave called a citizen. When you do that, you relinquish what the Founding Fathers called unalienable Rights in exchange for corporate benefits, rights, privileges and licenses and other offerings.
.
In this country all beginning students of economics learn how to create something out of nothing. You simply write a check. In these modern times there is an easier way, use a credit card. Then all you have to do is swipe the plastic card through a slot in a machine. What could be simpler? A pretty neat way to create something out of nothing and we think of it as money and go on our way never giving it another thought.
Every time you write a check, use a credit card or make a transfer of funds you create something out of nothing. That something is evidence debt. The people were lead to believe that all these checks, transfers, and credit charges assume there is valuable substance available to back-up the thing we think of as money. The backing is supposed to be the substance that gives value to the printed paper. Not the paper itself. Like colored rocks or shells as used in some societies.
Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines money in terms of value. Black’s Law Dictionary also defines money in terms of valuable substance and adds this, – … and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidence of debt, or other personal or real estate. Lane v. Riley, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W. ZC 2d 74, 79, 81.- In other words, it is the backing which gives value to the thing we call money. No backing, no money. No backing, we have only a medium of exchange, a fiat money system.
Until
1933 the government functioned pretty much under mala in se common Law as provided by the Founding Fathers as a matter of Right from a "Creator" when they proclaimed the Declaration of Independence and extricated the people from British mala prohibita law. In 1933 government functionaries, with the people’s consent, proclaimed -Public Policy for government functionaries and for public consumption. This they did through House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 and by 48 Statutes at Large 112. HJR 192 replaced the way the U.S. Corporation conducts business. It did away with Public Law, common Law, for the government and put in -Public Policy- in its stead as the way for the government and the subjects to conduct business. 48 Statutes at large 112 confiscated, stole, all gold and jewelry from the people. This made the U.S. Government Corporation liable for all debts at Law. Since 1933 the Government of the United States, a Federal corporation, by definition, see 28 USC 3002, at (15), is bankrupt. It no longer pays its debts at Law. Until you understand that and the natural consequences of that action you will not be able to understand the real word in which we live today and therefore are bound to live in a fantasy word of make believe, a world of Oz.
Government provides for the people to become fictions of law under a corporation through our declared Right to contract as authorized in Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution and to likewise conduct our personal affairs according to Public Policy if we choose to do so. When you choose to become a citizen you become a creation of government, a fiction of law called a straw man. The catch is that when you admit to being a fiction of law the government has the right to assume that you are a subject (slave), a citizen of the government. Which means that you are willing to become this fiction of law as created by government and are bound by Public Policy. Forget about any religious notions you have about Creator-given unalienable Rights. You are now a fiction of law, a straw man, as a creation of government. It is your choice. You no longer can pay your debts at law. You can only tender payment in the accepted medium of exchange, fiat currency. The authority for this action is found in Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. Public Policy is not the Law provided for by the Declaration of Independence as a matter of free will choice. Public policy is a mala prohibita statutory act provided for under the Constitution as a matter of choice. The significance of this is that by definition under 28 USC 3002, (15) the United States is a Federal corporation. The Corporation of the United States assumes the people coming before it are its citizen subjects (slaves) under Public Policy, a creation of man. The Constitution does not require government to recognize the Creator. And so, government does not recognize the Creator spoken of in the Declaration of Independence. Government is under no obligation to acknowledge and serve the Rights Declared by the Founding Fathers unless the sovereign man on the land learns to invoke his sovereign authority under Law and offers legislative subjects to serve him or be found in violation of mala in se Law. The people allowed this to happen. Government made it so without objection from the people. Along with Pubic Policy came a change in Supreme Court opinions and decision making. Before HJR 192 the Supreme Court opinions considered the edict of the Declaration of Independence and the Rights proclaimed to be unalienable gifts of the Creator. Since about 1933 the Supreme Court considers only violations and benefits, rights, privileges and licenses granted to subjects (slaves), citizens of the Corporation of the United States under statutory mala prohibita acts, which is another name for Public Policy. Corporate courts do not consider unalienable Rights from the Creator. They consider only legislative violations and benefits, rights, privileges and licenses granted under statutes. Don’t forget the Supreme Court is mala prohibita. That’s why you may hear a judge in a government court say -‘There are no Constitutional issues before this court.’- And the judge is right. There are no Constitutional issues under man made statutes dealing with unalienable Rights. That does not mean that you no longer have available to you the unalienable Rights provided through the Declaration of Independence; but you do have to know how to invoke those Rights. Hopefully you will begin to learn how to respond as a free man, a creation of the Creator in place of a subject, legal fiction, a straw man, a citizen under a corporate master. At least I hope you will begin to ask the right questions to discover the way leading to unalienable Rights. It is a simple matter. It may not be easy. But you must learn things you were never taught in school or in public media.
Government encourages us to think of dollars as money. That is a half-truth. The truth depends on how you define dollar. A dollar is money only if you define it properly. Look on any green-back printed since 1913. It clearly states that it is a Federal Reserve Note. It is only evidence of debt. Somebody owes somebody else some wealth, something of intrinsic value. Intrinsic value comes in many forms. it is the basis for real wealth. We will discuss that later. If you don’t believe the somebody else won’t come to collect in value on the note, you are living in Oz and only hope that some Wizard will stick up for you.
Under public policy, government uses your evidence of debt, green-backs, in a fractional banking system. By definition, fractional banking allows banks to create fiat money, imaginary, phoney money, in any amount based only on evidence of a small percentage of fiat money on deposit. Banking in a real money or wealth system uses substance of real value such as gold, silver, beans, other commodities, etc. in the same way. This real substance on hand may include any intrinsic value substance, a bonded security instrument or some alternate type of settlement in the form of a commodity, work, real estate, capitol assets, energy, or the like. That’s right, expenditure of energy is a kind of wealth, work, or substance in a real banking system.
You satisfy any contract by satisfying the terms and conditions of the contract with acceptable real wealth, your signature on a binding contract or evidence of debt, federal reserve notes. That is what a bank check is all about, in lieu of any other acceptable terms under the contract. A binding contract requires an offer and an acceptance among other things. When someone offers you something and you accept that offer, he produces the something for you and you accept his offer by giving him something acceptable to the giver in return. The thing you give in return we call a satisfaction or payment. That is what we do whenever we buy something at the store. Frequently now, instead of cash, we make satisfaction in the form of a credit card or we sign a sales agreement when the store lets us take the stuff home with us. When we do not pay cash for something delivered we make satisfaction in the form of a credit card of some type or we sign a sales slip. Each of these require our signature on a contract. Our signature is the supplier’s evidence of our willing acceptance of an agreement contract to pay. The sales slip or the credit card receipt is the evidence that something was given for something received. I go into this detail to help you understand how simple, fair and reasonable the fractional banking system appears to operate under the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC). I also want to focus your attention on how valuable and necessary your signature is in commerce. It is the basis for making the system work. To illustrate, take the simple act of writing a check. When you sign a check and offer that worthless piece of paper and ink as satisfaction for goods delivered, you create something out of nothing in exchange for goods of real value. What you probably never fully realized is that when your worthless piece of paper containing a dollar amount and your signature reaches the bank, magical and mysterious things happen. Your signature on that worthless piece of paper allows the bank to create something they do not have out of nothing more than thin air, imagination. They then loan that figment of imagination to others many times over and charge fees and interest on it. That’s right , your signature on that worthless piece of paper and ink makes it possible for the bank to loan out to others many times over much more than the dollar amount you write on your check. For which slight of hand service on an accounting book, the bank charges fees and interest on money that they do not have and on something that does not exist. Well, that’s not exactly correct; because of the basic law of compensation, which your conscience will tell you all about if it has not yet been rendered unconscious by education, tradition and public policy. We will talk about that later. When you enter a legal, not lawful or valid, contract to tender a presentment in a dollar amount, that contract becomes a legal marketable commercial item. By allowing the packaging of these evidence of debts, corporations, creations of the state, market these packaged evidence of debts, selling them on the market. Yes, your evidence of debt is a very marketable item. To verify this contact any stock broker. The Republic Broadcasting Network is a good source for alternate information, if you can take it, on this subject and of the U.S. bankrupt condition, the marketability of evidence of debt, the fiat money fractional banking system and legal fictions.
The Gross National Product, GNP, is one of the government public scoreboards on which they keep score of how well the economy is doing. It counts the total of all goods and services sold in the national economy. Which supposedly is the total of goods and services sold within the economy. To add to the GNP all you have to do is to write a check or swipe a credit card. The government will add that to the GNP and print that much in paper greenbacks. The government adds the amount printed in greenbacks, called fiat currency, to the GNP, gross national product, or whatever they call it now days, it all amounts to the same thing. Remember that this is a real accounting of fictitious, imaginary, money on an accounting record of the gross expenditure for goods and services in this country denominated in what it calls dollars. The GNP is a published record of how well the economy is expanding and growing which equates in political terms to how well we are doing. We never had it so good. Just look at all the so-called money we have. Isn’t it great!
Another
interesting statistic to track is the balance of payments. This is the total amount of payments into our economy minus the total of payments out of our economy. In recent times the balance of payments has been negative. That means more is going out of our economy than is coming into our economy. That equates to a constant drain of our substance. The question facing us is, -how long can we sustain this drain until there is nothing left?- The obvious answer to this question is, until the substance is gone. What happens then? The answer should be obvious. We will cease to exist as a free and independent state.
The reason the dollar has been so widely accepted is because people see the growth and richness of the country and believe they can exchange the worthless pieces of paper for substance of value whenever they want. People don’t stop and think. They just react because everybody does it. Like sheep, they just follow the other guy. They don’t ask why or where. And most of the time they get what they want to satisfy them and are relatively comfortable and don’t even have to think of there well being. They get along just fine. Periodically they do have to follow the other guy into a situation where they have to go through a fleecing or shearing process. That’s a little pushy and tolerably uncomfortable but they don’t mind too much. Eventually each follows his neighbor up a ramp and is gone, sheep that is. Never more to worry again. Why do sheep go through this process? Because somebody else becomes enriched at the expense of the sheep. If that somebody else could not be enriched by the sheep, the critter would be on his own out in the wide world without care or support.
The
passage of the act of April 2, 1792 provided for establishing a mint, 1 U.S. Stat. L. 346; and the first coinage of dollars began in 1794. The Constitution authorized Congress to establish the value of the dollar to contain 37125 grains of pure silver or 416 grains of standard silver. That is the standard of value for the dollar. Silver is a substance of value in the general commercial realm usually referred to as the civilized world. Don’t ask me why. That is a philosophical question to which I have no answer. And to which it doesn’t matter. So long as it works. It doesn’t have to make much sense but does help to simplify things, especially to those who have faith in the reasoning process. As an aside, for those religiously inclined, I consider the reasoning process one of the most valuable arrows in the Devil’s quiver. Why? Because it depends on a basic assumption. Which assumption, by definition, is a figment of the imagination. And besides, how do you interpret or how do you know when you arrive at a meaningful conclusion in the real world? Only in terms of what seems useful in a near sighted perspective. Most conclusions reached through the reasoning process have shown to be short sighted in the real world in time. Think of the flat earth. Which brings us back to the here and now and the impact of imagination on reality. It is quite an argument for developing a healthy sense of humor.

Government, functionaries, started issuing paper dollars as a convenient way to handle money in commerce. You could turn in your wealth in valuable substance and the government would issue a kind of receipt called green-backs. These green-backs supposedly represented the value of real substance you turned over to the government for good keeping. You see, Government, public functionaries, convinced the people that if they would deposit their wealth in substance with the government, or a bank, a corporation created by government. The government controlled functionaries would take good care of it for the people. Government functionaries promised to keep it in a safe and secure depository. They promised to care for it wisely and use the excess on deposit for good purposes. They did provide a way to make the people believe they were well off and could think of the green paper provided them as if it were valuable substance or as gold and silver. A very interesting concept. Like the very popular phrases, ‘it’s as good as gold’ and ‘it’s like having money in the bank’. Government, functionaries, before 1933, issued you silver certificates denominated in numbers representing the exact equivalent in real silver dollars on redemption. Redemption, that supposedly means you could get your valuable substance back on demand. That scheme went along fine for about 157 years. In 1913 government, functionaries, started replacing the silver certificates with federal reserve notes. All without a complaint. A note is a promise to pay. It is an IOU. Some time after 1933 the government told the people they would no longer redeem silver certificates for 371.25 grains of pure silver. Government told the people that after a certain date they would redeem the silver certificates in federal reserve notes only, dollars for federal reserve dollars. They effectively declared that we are now on a fiat money system. This they did without too much complaint and with compliance. That means that money is no longer backed by silver or gold. They convinced the people through a reasoning process that it was a good idea. Remember the fleecing process? To complain or to criticize was un-patriotic, un-American, politically not correct.
The

great industrial capacity of the country began to vanish. We now find ourselves involved in military actions with countries not directly threatening war on us or the U.S. The balance of payments is out of the country. We continue to expend great amounts of substance and so-called money on military action and social programs and especially for increasing expenditure of resources for interest on an ever increasing national debt. In short, we find ourselves in a situation where the only buying power we have left is our reserved wealth. That is the total of valuable property we own and the total of goods and services that others want and the work we can produce. Major foreign countries are beginning to refuse to accept our dollars because we have lost what competitive edge we had and the capacity for us to produce anything thy want to afford on the world market. Look at the balance of payments. That’s where that score is kept. It appears that the only thing we have to offer is buying power. The world likes our buying power. That equates to disposing of valuable substance. That means we can last no longer than we have the capacity to by goods and services and produce work. Prices appear to be escalating. This is not because the value of goods and services is going up. It is because the value in the dollar is going down. We are seeing a growing militarization of our police to control the people, the good people on the land. I believe these to be irrefutable facts.
There is something we can do about it as long as we have a viable Constitution. How long that hope will last I don’t know. What I do know is that we must stand up and be counted as defenders of the right. We can no longer patronize wrong or evil in the name of peace. Peace is the easiest thing to obtain. All you have to do is to ignore principles and established values. Stop thinking in terms of good and evil. Be nice. Give up everything of moral value. Be legal. Forget about mala prohibita law and in mala in se Law. Think of the sheep we just spoke of and acquiesce.
Now consider these facts. During the past several decades the people have allowed government functionaries to systematically dispose of or neglect to develop the major part of the industrial strength and capacity including agriculture, mining, drilling and resource development in this country. Just look at the industrial products available on the market place. Ask yourself, What is the resource strength of this country today? I believe you will realistically discover that it is to consume. I believe our primary resource is the capacity to consume. That means the capacity to expend our reserve wealth in substance and effort for the purpose of consuming what the world has for us to consume. You might be impressed to inquire as to the duration of this capacity to consume. And then what happens? I believe the answer to that question gives you insight into the amount of time we, as an independent country, have to exist. That may be the reason many people are expectantly awaiting The Second Coming to solve their problems.
Do you begin to see why it appears that prices are going up. It takes more green-backs to purchase the same items as before. It is not because there is more value in the items. The value remains relatively the same and based on the basic principals of supply and demand. It takes more green-backs because the imagined value represented by the numbers on the green-backs is going down. I will give you an example. In 1940 the you could purchase a loaf of bread for one silver dime, 10 cents. Today you pay about one dollar for a loaf of bread or one silver dime. Not because the value of the bead went up. It is because the value of the dollar went down. It now takes more green-backs to purchase the same amount of substance than it did several years ago. In other words the value of the green-back on the open market is going down. Another example. Several years ago you could buy a new suit for one gold eagle. Today you can still buy the same quality suit for one gold eagle. Several years ago you paid less than one hundred dollars for a gold eagle. To day you pay around a thousand dollars for the same gold eagle. The value of the substance has not gone up. The value of the money, dollars, currency and medium of exchange has gone down.
At one time we are told that Fort Knox was the gold bullion depository for the wealth backing the green-backs. But several years ago they informed us that we really did not need that gold just hanging around. That the backing for the green-backs was not necessary because it was backed by the good name of the country. So the government, functionaries, cranked up the presses and now manufactures paper money as fast as they decide they need to without consideration for substance and value. They also do the book keeping. This way they total the amount of denominated green-backs printed to let the people know how good the economy is by tracking what they call the gross national product (GNP), or what ever they call it now, which is supposed to represent the total dollar amount of goods and services produced in the country. That is supposed to be the gross amount of goods and services sold in the country. The total includes all the checks written plus the total of the green-backs printed and IOU’s given. That number no longer has meaning because we no longer have an established standard for real wealth.
Government, functionaries, like to report the GNP which makes all of us feel good because, as the government reminds us, it represents a growing economy and prosperity for all. Indeed, all is well in Oz. We pay no attention to the periodic reminders from the wizards of Oz that the amount of the paper entries on the accounting books of the economy are increasing geometrically. But we pay no attention to that. No time to bother with what we know is a matter for the protectors of our peace and well being and we continue to authorize it. That means, to allow it to happen. As long as we still have our check book and credit card and the printing presses are rolling we are in good shape. Of course you know that you can’t make something out of nothing. Even reason has not been able to crack that one. You also know that the wealth to be given eventually is a claim on our property, or stuff, and effort, a measure of our real wealth. If you question how well off we are doing look at almost any news report. All is well in Oz. After all we trust and have faith in our functionaries. They are honest and people of good report. This is going to proceed so long as people with the privilege of writing or charging against an account in this country believe there is sufficient value to collateralize the dollar for whatever they want to spend it for. That ,I believe, is a true statement. But, not in the way you think of it. I will get to that later. For there is a remedy.
Government doesn’t seem to pay much attention to the meaning of the numbers on the books they keep. After all they are just numbers. As long as the rest of the world is willing to take government’s word for it we get along fine. Besides, who would consider the faith and confidence of the richest country on earth to be faulty or the word of government to be anything but good and true and of good report? Who wants to face reality anyway? We have a thriving economy. We are making significantly more than our parents. We are all getting rich and the economy is expanding. We never had it so good. Just ask anyone who has ever made lots of money by being an early inner to a con-job. It’s like a grand pyramid promotion scheme. The problem with any pyramid scheme is thateventually the population required to maintain or support the growth exceeds the growth potential of the population. In the money scheme there is a real net value of the goods and services in the country. By disposing of our capacity to produce goods for the available market we limit our productive capacity to the services industry. Our competitive potential for services must match or be below any other labor supplier in the world. It should be obvious we can’t or won’t compete in that market. The only thing we have left is our reserved wealth. Which has a fixed value. We are then reduced to a consumer status for as long as our wealth lasts. Thus leaving us on par with the weakest status possible. Say goodby to the Founding Fathers and their high ideals.
We are Now beginning to notice that prices of goods and services is going up much faster than we are capable of entering into our check books amounts to satisfy our creditors. Gas goes from forty nine cents a gallon to more than three or four dollars or more a gallon. We learn that there is no real shortage of crude oil even if government tries to make us believe otherwise. We finally realize that the reason that gas and almost everything else seems to be going up faster than we would like, so we can maintain the image of prosperity, is not due to the scarcity of the goods but to the over value on the free market of what we call the dollar. Up till now we depended on the rest of the world to trust us at our word, relying on our historic image. In addition, the world notices that we have chosen to dispose of most of our productive capacity to the point that we are no longer capable of producing anything others are interested in. And we have very little to produce for them but hot air and green paper; commodities of decreasing demand. The world sees that the only commodity we have is the capacity to pay for what others have to sell. When we look around at what we have to buy with we see that all we have is paper money entries in our check books. Which entries don’t seem to interest anybody very much. Particularly when they see the list of demanders seeking what real value there is in the marketable goods available. At the rate of something like several billions of dollars being added in interest daily to the already exaggerated worthless entries on the books of Oz we appear destitute and not worth the keeping. And the wizard is jumping ship in a balloon. At one time we had something the world envied. It was in terms of our ingenuity and capacity to produce. With that disposed of we have nothing of interest to the world except what value there still exists in our purchasing power which is a rapidly diminishing commodity. With no visible means of replenishment we will in time run out. Leaving only dinosaur tracks in the sands of time, the Constitution, a page in some archaic relict
for some future archeologist to discover and muse at.
Money
loses its perceived value when people can no longer afford the amount of stuff or services they want or need compared to what they are accustomed to offering for the stuff. That means when they have to give more money than they used to for the same amount of goods and services.
Let’s now look at our present situation in this country. We should first look at what made this the productive and most powerful country in the world. How did that happen within about 228 years? It was due to the ingenuity and development of the productive capabilities and powers to satisfy the needs and wants of people in the world. The people in this country learned and developed the capacity to satisfy the needs and wants of people throughout the world. As a result the country grew fat and sassy and accumulated resources and vast amounts of wealth. The availability of this wealth made it possible to devise a scheme for making it easier and simpler to carry on commerce. Enter the banking system which had always been around in some form. The banking system made it possible for the people to deposit wealth in some form with a bank and then through a bookkeeping system making it possible to write checks denominated in dollars. A check is an IOU or a promise to pay on demand to the holder a fixed value denominated in dollars. The functionaries assured people that the banks and depositories generally contained sufficient wealth to convert the cash dollar amounts from the checks written on depositors accounts into substance. People generally had confidence in the banks so that they could depend on the banks to convert the wealth amount written on a promise to pay from a check denominated in dollars into good stuff. The dollar became the medium of exchange because the Congress fixed the value of the dollar into a fixed amount of silver or gold on reserve. This became the standard fixed amount of substance denominated in the dollar for payment on demand for a promise to pay in real substance. In the real world of today we find that the medium of exchange, still called the dollar, bears no relationship to that established standard. You may ask why. The simplest, most direct and honest answer to that question is –because the people did not make Government functionaries obey their oath of office and their charge as servants of the people–. Judge Robert Bork explains for you the answer to the question of why. In speaking of the Justices of the Supreme Court when asked the question, -‘Why does the Supreme Court seem to decide unconstitutionally the way they do?’- Justice Bork states in his book -The Tempting of America- -‘The Supreme Court decides as they do without regard to the Constitution whenever they know they can get away with it.’- Think about that if you want to place the blame. They do as they please because they know they can get away with it. That says it all. As one saying goes, ‘Look to yourself for the faults you find in others.’
Fear-not, all is not yet lost! There is hope built into the system. I believe all good hopes come in the form of a sleeping giant. A giant with wisdom and power in need of awakening and prodding to do his work. But, like all good sleeping giants in the bowels of the repository of the creator of both evil and good-will among men, that is in the founding documents, if you will, he is in need of gentle but firm awakening. The answer to the problems and hopes for man, what-ever side you choose, like the man said, ‘lies within,.’ Also, as The Good Book, of your choice, says, ‘Seek and ye shall find.’ These hopes take the form of mala in se Law and man-made administrative remedies and commercial processes. If, as The Good Book, choose the one you want, sort of says, ‘if you have eyes let him see and ears let him hear.’
Besides such things as gold and silver, gems and other precious metals as real substance consider the availability of real property or real estate. Do you believe you can claim your home and the real estate it sits on as an unassailable possessor and owner? Think again Few can claim real owner rights under fee-simple title. Most real estate is held under some type of grant deed or weaker title and subject to a superior claim. Do the research The State may be securing its debt by property which you believe belongs to you. You might ask yourself the question, ‘If I own the property how does the State get the idea that they can assess or charge me property tax or limit my use to restricting acts of the legislature?’. The power to tax and restrict goes to controllers of the property not to residents. Taxes and restrictions become corporate obligations to you as a subject of the corporation for partaking of benefits and exercising privileges. You choose that position, believe it or not. Again, do the research. Do you begin to see how the government, a Federal corporation, see 28 USC 3002, (15) can do with their property what they want? They can even use it as collateral for their debts. And you put up with it. You have noting to complain about . It is your choice. And it is, almost, Constitutional. See Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution. There is something you can do about it though. The answer is found in mala in se Law and under the constitutional administrative and commercial processes and acts and remedies of the legislature. You were just never exposed to that idea by your education and information sources. Again, do the research!
You may have heard something about the United States being bankrupt. Remember that the United States is a creation of the Constitution. It is not a state and it is not one of the union of individual republic states. The Constitution says that the United States is to be no more than a specific piece of property not to exceed ten miles square. This land is to be given up by surrounding states on the Potomac River. The United States may include other property for such things as docks, arsenals and other such land necessary to carry on the functions of government. By definition the United States is a Federal corporation created by the people under the authority of the Constitution and the acts of the legislature, See 28 USC 3002, (15), See also the many references in the Constitution where it speaks of the United States and the individual states. Clearly the United States and the union of individual republics are different things.

What is bankruptcy? Bankruptcy, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, is: The state or condition of one who is unable to pay his debts as they are, or become due. The only commercial assets one in a state of bankruptcy has are property, personal capabilities, and evidence of debt. Evidence of debt becomes a commercial asset to another when some one can use the evidence of debt as an asset on a financial statement. That is how you can use another’s evidence of debt to your advantage in commerce. Check it out. What happens to the guy in bankruptcy? His assets become available and usable to the holder of the evidence of debt. It’s just that simple. How to collect on the evidence of debt is another subject. Generally collection involves enforcement, and or conflict(war). Do you begin to see the importance of a healthy money system where you can pay your debts instead of discharging them?. In this country, under government functionaries we have allowed to prevail, we can only tender, not pay, debts with evidence of debt. Look at any modern dollar bill.

If you still believe the bankruptcy is a rumor just look at House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 issued in 1933 AND 48 Stat.112. That is when Public Law ended and public policy took its place. It’s easy to find on the internet. That’s when government began to actively make and assume we are all subjects of the government corporation along with all the evils that go with that title and assumption. If you are religious you might like to think of it as the time when man replaced God or the Creator as the supreme being, legally, and we ceased to function under public Law. See what free-will choice will do for you when you fail to act responsibly? If you can overcome the victimization of your education and public information and learn who you are in spite of all the assumptions men want to make you believe, there is still hope as long as we have a viable constitution. For, within the confines of the Constitution is a potential for extricating yourself from the assumptions of man if you learn who you are and how to properly identify yourself; not as a legal fiction, a straw man, citizen but as a free man on the land. Ladies, please don’t give into the modern mind warping nonsense that goes along with the corporate mind-set to manipulate people to do their bidding. I only use the term man and men in a generic sense. It’s easier that way.
You have probably become aware that when man violates sound and good principles he creates a bed of self destruction. So it is with the current situation. Within that same constitution responsible for the legal chaos developing lies the phoenix of liberty stirring in the ashes. The form is in mala in se Law and the acts of the legislature called administrative remedies and commercial processes. You probably have never heard of these. But they are there. And they have the power to destroy the developers of chaos if you learn who you are and what you are not; and learn to control them to your benefit in the attitude of good will as admonished in 10 Matthew: 16.
Go back and read the essay entitled INTRO. That should give you what you need know to get started. Learn that you can live under mala in se Law if you choose. Learn the difference between mala prohibita and mala in se. Learn there is a legal and lawful way to reserve Rights when necessary. Learn to use and spell your natural appellation and make your claim; to identify yourself and refute any attempt to identify you as a legal fiction, a straw man, a corporate subject, a citizen, a person, an individual or a resident. Look-up the definition of straw man in the dictionary. Avoid referring to yourself as a person, resident, citizen, an individual, or driver on all legal documents and in court. All these identify you by a misnomer as a legal fiction, a straw man and subject of a corporation. If you have to go into court always claim your natural status as the sovereign man on the land and put them on notice that you do not choose to enter a contract with government or the court and always answer their questions with a question. Learn what it means to claim sovereignty under the authority of the Declaration of Independence. All this is to help you understand who you are, a creation of a super natural Creator, if you don’t want to be considered a corporate subject under public policy. And there is much more for you to learn if you choose to live under the provisions of the Creator as the Founding Fathers declared and not under subjectivity to man and his creations. You don’t have to be religious or even believe in a creator to reap the benefits of the Declaration of the Founding Fathers. As an inhabitant within the several states united on the American continent you can take advantage of the mala in se philosophy of the Founding Fathers and their efforts to secure the Rights they declared. As an inhabitant on this turf you become a beneficiary of the blessings they provided for. To claim those Rights you must know who you are, who they are, and how to properly identify yourself by appellation; then you must tread only on hallowed ground where you belong and are secure. Don’t forget that you can get into trouble when you trespass. It is a crime.
You may now begin to realize and appreciate the difficulty Moses had keeping the children of Israel out of Egypt. The people continually wanted to rush back to mala prohibita law and subjectivity called slavery; that was much easier and predictable. They lacked the faith of their claimed convictions. It was too much effort to be free in the real world.
If you want to learn more about the philosophy of this land and mala in se Law, as opposed to the consequences of public policy under mala prohibita law so predominantly taught, preached, advocated, and rammed into our minds for the enrichment of the corporate world, try alternative media as found on the Republic Broadcasting Network, RBN. Especially become familiar with Mary Elizabeth Croft by simply typing that name into a good search engine. There are numerous other stations and sites on the internet. These offer alternative points of view to enlighten the mind and offer some foundation for us to hold on to in the real world. Which alternate information sources you don’t see or hear about in the controlled information media. Stations like RBN and alternate view stations tend to balance dominating public policy propaganda to help keep us in touch with the real world. I call these dominating information sources Oz networks and publishers. RBN contains a lot of nonsense. But it also contains vital information if you are to leave Oz and enter the realm of mala in se Rights from a super natural creator.
The message behind all this is as old as man and his affairs. The message repeats itself in many ways throughout the ages; in ancient writings and sacred scriptures One of the notable retelling of the message is over 2500 years old as is found in Plato’s Republic Part VII; which begins with a detailed description of the -shadows of the images. In the mid 20th century one of the most popular movies ever made tells the same story in -The Wizard of Oz.- But few ever got the point and took it seriously; the yellow brick (gold) road leading to the fantasy emerald city of Oz where some powerful wizard supposedly makes all wishes come true and solves all problems; encountering three loveable but impotent characters searching for something believing the objects of their longing to be found in the presence of the great wizard; discovering that the wizard was a phoney, a real fiction, incapable of even satisfying his own longings, who vacates the scene by taking-off in a balloon to follow his own fantasies; The encounter with the forces of evil which are overcome by facing reality and discovering that achieving success in the real world is found within, not with-out. The modern retelling of this same message is found in the popular TV movie series called The Matrix. Wherein -Orpheas tells Neo what the matrix is. Orpheas explains to Neo that -The matrix is a world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.-
The
secret to freedom under mala in se Law is to understand status under Law. Remember the quotation, -Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s…- Equate that with -render unto the corporation that which is the corporation’s-. If you are a corporate subject, fiction of law, straw man, forget about Rights secured by the Founding Fathers and do as the corporation demands. If you’re not a corporate subject then act like a sovereign living free man (woman) on the land. If you don’t know what that means, find out! There are lots of people doing it. Remember one thing, you have no right to approach corporate functionaries to do your bidding having anything to do with Rights under the Declaration of Independence. It’s out of their authority. A government court is a court of equity. A modern version of Roman mercantile equity. The Roman law which permitted Christ, an innocent man, to be crucified by the Jews. A corporate court has no authority beyond, or outside of, corporate activity. When you go before a corporate court to demand Rights under the Constitution and the judge tells you there are no constitutional issues before this court, the judge is constitutionally correct. There are no constitutional issues and you have not raised a constitutional issue before that court. The judge knows who he is. It is you who doesn’t know who you are in this situation. When you begin to understand what is going-on you will begin to understand that it is not double-talk it is constitutional law. If you want to be a free man on the land you must act like a free man (woman) on the land. The way you do that is to begin to know and understand mala inse Law and administrative remedies and commercial process under mala prohibita acts. Learn the difference between -Lawful and legal-, -mala in se and mala prohibita-.
Under the Constitution, man’s law, government is under no obligation to recognize, believe-in or consider the Creator and gifts of unalienable Rights. The Founding Fathers meant to provide for a form of government as a free-will choice to allow the free men and women on the land to live by choice under the Law of the Creator as the sovereign on the land
There are only two theories of government. One is the natural theory which believes that everything that happens in government happens by natural forces including chance, whatever that is. The second theory of government is the belief that everything that happens in government happens by design
There
are only two (2) basic types of economies. One is -asset based economy- and the other is -debt based economy-. Asset based economy uses wealth, intrinsic value real substance to back all commercial transactions. Debt based economy uses imaginary debt, IOU’s and promises to pay in some idea of imaginary form to convince participation in a fictitious currency bartering or exchange system.
The debt based economy and public policy system of government provides for man to create fictions of law. These fictions of law, called straw man parties, become subjects
or slaves bound to the state-created Federal Corporation by free-will choice. The Federal Government Corporation treats any individual who freely partakes of government benefits and offerings like a corporate subject; which is rightly so under acts of the legislature and legal statutes and codes. By making a free-will choice to receive corporate benefits and offerings, in the form of legal offerings, rights, privileges and licenses, an individual must relinquish his natural unalienable Rights available under the Declaration of Independence.
Consider this as a parting bit of public information. To, so-called, pay-off the national debt in this year of 2008, we are told, requires $30,000.00 from every person in the county. If we were to , tender-, since we legally and lawfully can not pay but only tender debts in Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s), the national debt would be doubled. That would make the, so-called, national debt -($30,000.00) times (300, 000, 000) plus ($30,00000) times (300,000,000) which equals (18 followed by 12 zero’s)-. Because the Federal Reserve manufactures every FRN and for which each FRN government has agrees to legally to tender full face value plus interest to the Federal Reserve Banking system, a private corporation, the so-called national debt can only increase and never decrease. Does that make sense to you? That is what public policy has done for us. We can not legally pay off the national debt with fiat currency. We can only add to it! But, that is OK since, I must say, the national debt is only in the form of bookkeeping entries representing factitious imaginary money. For that reason I do not believe government intends to pay-off the national debt since it is only an imaginary figure created to make the people believe they owe such a debt and must work to pay it off. When in reality I believe the people have already paid off that imaginary debt with their labor, wealth and substance and government has agreed to pay all the peoples debts. That is what 48 Stat. 112 says and is all about. Government must do that slight of hand trick to satisfy the axiom of Law which states, "Whoever creates a liability must also create a remedy at Law or be found guilty of a crime." And you know that the government would not want to be found guilty of a real crime.
We can only, Lawfully, pay-off debts in money of real value. Real money is wealth and substance of value; gold, silver, precious gems, real estate, capitol assets, property, commodities, labor and things like that. It does not include evidence of debt or Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s). Every dollar denominated in fiat currency created under public policy only adds to the national debt. See what the recent bail out does to us?
Some
of you older people may remember when you learned to wright the dollar sign -S- with two vertical lines through it. That notation represented real dollars denominated in valuable substance, usually gold or silver. In 1933 government, with the peoples consent, replaced public law with public policy resulting in drastic changes in the way we conduct business. Government legally stole, an oxymoron, all the gold and jewels from the people and made it illegal to own gold and pay debts at Law. Government made Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s) the medium of exchange. Since the people could not legally pay their debts at Law, government required them to tender, not pay, debts with FRN’s. With the advent of public policy, the replacing of public Law by public policy, the change and replacement of real substance with paper and ink imaginary evidence of debt, the Federal Reserve Note, called the medium of exchange, the symbol for the basic unit of exchange, the dollar, changed to this symbol -$-. Another evidence of what is going on.
Recently there has been some vociferous prominent so-called patriot advocates challenging the efficacy of HJR 192 as the underlying document responsible for claiming that the government is bankrupt. They seem to propagate the claim that HJR 192 has been repealed. So what? HJR 192 has never been law. It is just what it purports to be, an administrative resolution; an idea for administrators under the corporate constitution to act by. The bankruptcy was the natural consequence when government enacted 48 Statutes at Large 112, confiscated all the gold and jewelry, replaced public Law with public policy, made the Federal Reserve Notes the medium of exchange, refused to redeem or to honor silver certificates for reclaiming silver substance, and removed silver and gold from coinage; all of which made it illegal for government and the people to pay debts at Law and only legally tender debts with evidence of debt, fiat money, Federal Reserve Notes.
Remember the maxim of Law that states, -‘Whoever creates a liability must also provide a remedy for that liability or be found guilty of a crime.’- This made it necessary for government to legally provide a mechanism for the payment of debts at Law. If government failed or refused to provide that legal remedy for the people to pay debts at Law, government and government functionaries would have been in serious violation of Law. Had government not legally provided the remedy, government functionaries would be guilty of a serious common Law crime, or a natural Lawful criminal offense. To prevent this criminal offense and the natural consequences of their clever actions to alleviate a self induced banking and economic financial crisis, government did the Lawful thing when changing from public Law to public policy. When government confiscated all the real wealth under public policy and made it legally impossible for the people to pay their debts at Law government assumed all liability for the people’s debts. See 48 Stat. 112in response to HJR 192. Those debts are to be paid sometime in the future. That’s right! government, through an act of the Congress, without the people being fully informed and without the people objecting, Lawfully became obligated to assume all the people’s debt by statute. You were never informed of this, were you? And to this day you probably don’t know about it. Read and understand 48 Stat.112. And that is the situation and dilemma we find ourselves in right now. Government functionaries depend on ignorance, inattention, blind trust, irresponsibility, apathy, and foolish confidence in public officials whom the people only hope will be virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy. What we now see is government flailing around attempting to disprove a negative proposition. As any educated thinking man knows, -it is impossible to disprove a negative proposition without demonstrating and or producing the negative.- That is an oxymoron. The negative proposition in this case is: -it is not impossible to pay debts at Law with fiat currency-. Government can not prove or demonstrate that negative proposition. Without government being able to prove and demonstrate that it can satisfy a mala in se Lawful debt with fiat currency, government is trying to convince its subjects that the fantasy world of Oz is real. And even worse than that, I don’t believe government can do that without modeling and creating a world after George Orwell’s novel 1984" or Aldous Huxley’s novel, Brave New World. Sound familiar? Sound something like -New World Order?
The natural consequence of fractional banking is this: . -when dealing with subjects under the fractional banking scheme banks don’t need to care about what is written in the dollar amount space on checks, they will gladly tender that amount in Federal Reserve Notes to the payee and legally shuffle all debits and credits when duly authorized by the signature of the maker, so the books always balance. –
In banks dealing with a knowledgeable sovereign man who understands fractional banking, one who is not a subject of de facto government, it is a different story. I believe the informed sovereign can employ a willing bank, for a fee, under a civil contract, to tender satisfaction in fiat currency on a check in any draw amount when duly made out and signed for payment to a specific payee. All the bank wants is the signature of the maker to activate the financial benefits of fractional banking and satisfy the bookkeeper by making the books balance. The bank is not interested in the amount of draw entered as payment on the check, so long as all players in the game perform their proper task which makes the bookkeeping entries balance. All the bank player wants is the signature on the check so they can create something out of nothing. Now, any astute person knows that creating something out of nothing is impossible. The illusion appears to be working. See why I suggested that reason is a good excuse for developing a healthy sense of humor.
What you need to know is a few simple facts. The facts are the easy part. Believing the facts is probably going to be the hard part for most of you. The consequence is that if you refuse to accept the facts you will continue to live in a fantasy world of make believe never knowing what is going on and unable to figure it out. I am going to suggest that if you become an informed game player there may be rules of the game which you can use to your advantage which may help solve some of the problems you see. The alternative is to choose to continue to not care what is going on and wait to become part of the natural consequences.
I don’t have all the intricate detailed facts. Let’s leave those for historians. I would like to stick to the documented facts and what I believe to be the natural consequences of the facts. I would also like to ignore speculations and judgement of motives as much as possible. To do this may require some independent research. I’ll try to give you the key references, websites and names to check-out.
Let’s start with 1933; the change from public Law to public policy; the confiscation (theft)of all gold and jewels; replacement of real substance to pay debts at Law with evidence of debt in the form of Federal Reserve Notes, thus making evidence of debt, an IOU, legal tender as presentment for obligations in place of money (real valuable substance) as a medium of exchange in commerce. Public policy makes it illegal for the people to pay debts at Law. It also provides for government to assume the obligation to pay all the people’s debts at Law some time in the future or be in violation of a Lawful crime. All this through claimed acts of the legislature under the Constitution with the people’s consent. I call your attention to what I believe is an irrefutable basic Law of nature; -the Law of compensation-. This Law has many forms. Some call it justice, others think of it as right and wrong, good and evil. Scientists think of it as the Law of gravity, or Newton’s first principles. That Law boils down to, -‘You can’t get something for nothing’-. I am sure you can add many more forms to the list. You know what I am talking about.
All that stuff confiscated in 1933 went someplace. It’s not important where it went or where it is. All we need to know is that government, in the form of functionaries, took it and became responsible for it under the basic law of compensation. The natural consequence of that action means that we no longer can or have to worry about it. The real valuable substance still exists someplace and government must at some point in time make available all the valuable substance to pay all the people’s debts at Law. That’s the Law of Compensation in action. How government is going to do that is no longer our concern. That’s their concern. In the mean-time we are left with fiat currency, Federal Reserve Notes, to play the game by tendering all our debts under the acts of the legislature. We can no longer legally concern ourselves with the details. That Right has legally been denied us.
At this point we need to review the acts of 1933 and the consequences. Collecting all the gold and jewels and creating the debt based money system through the federal reserve system was only the beginning. Government proceeded to confiscate the human and natural resources. This they did through licenses, taxes and other clever legal, illegal and unlawful schemes. Did you ever ask yourself the questions, why do I need a birth certificate, a marriage license, a mortgage, a driver’s license, a social security number, etc.? These are all creations of the state. They are documented evidence of admitted liability to the state. Those evidences of liability become marketable asserts of the state which government uses in commerce. They become statutory commercial paper, negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code. I believe government claims all the substance and human productive capacity created under and voluntarily conceded to government by willing subjects or citizens under the Constitution. I say this only to suggest to you that you don’t have to concern your self with the issue of where government is going to get the means to pay all the people’s debts at Law. Government already has the capacity to pay all the people’s debts at Law and will have for the future, maybe. We can’t waste our time on that, yet.
I recently discovered people that understand this issue and are exposing how government makes it work. What I am about to say I believe to be true. It is from sources I will reveal later so you can check them out for yourself.
Whenever you apply for and receive a birth certificate, a Social Security Number, a passport, a marriage license, a drivers license or any other corporate legal document and other such things offered and made available from a legal fiction, the legal fiction always automatically identifies you, the one appearing before it as a corporate subject. Therefore you must be a legal fiction also. The legally created documents become a type of negotiable instrument in commerce for the government. The living man on the land with Rights needs no privilege from a legal fiction. Because, if the living man on the land wants benefits, privileges, or license from a legal fiction he must relinquish his status as a living man and assumes the status of a subject, straw man, person, citizen or resident under a legal fiction, the government. You can’t have it both ways. Whenever you apply, petition or pray for a corporate benefit the corporate legal fiction immediately asks for you to verify a name. That name is the legal fiction. If you acknowledge or recognize the name you are admitting to being the legal fiction because it is the name of a straw man subject, person. Remember a legal fiction can only create another legal fiction called a straw man. The way to identify a straw man by name is to look at the spelling given by the legal fiction corporation to the created legal fiction straw man subject, citizen, person when the applicant gives a name to the legal fiction corporation as spoken or as written. The legal fiction corporation will always make sure first, middle and last names start with a capitol letter or that all letters of the name are in capitol letters. A living man on the land quickly learns how to protect and preserve his appellation and not to trespass on corporate territory. How does a legal fiction create a straw man subject? By the way he spells the applicant’s name. If the applicant does not object or protest the applicant becomes a subject, citizen or person, a straw man created by a legal fiction, the government.
–Mr. First Middle Last name, Example: Thomas A. Jones– This is a straw man!
Remember 1933, the change from public Law to public policy, the legislative declaration of bankruptcy, by definition, of the government and the people; the confiscation of, let’s call them, assets and all the legal documents created? Those became the collateral for payment of the national debt. Who is going to argue about the wealth of the United States? The stuff confiscated plus all the other assets of the United states, plus all the created negotiable instruments is the backing for performance on the accumulating debt recorded on the government books. By statute, the Treasurer of the United States just happens to be the executor for the bankrupt United States Government, whose books always seem balance.
So what is the benefit to you? You may have a mechanism to tap in to that accounting system maintained by the Treasurer of the United States and a cleverly contrived type of bank called the Depository Trust Corporation(DTC). There are people claiming to being able do just that. They create a fiat currency draw from a nearly unlimited account accessible under the Social Security Account Number(SSN) of the straw man as a consequence of the confiscation and declared bankrupt condition in 1933. This they claim to do by using a few simple forms created under the Uniform Commercial Code and the IRS and instructing the Secretary of the Treasury to properly offset the account so the bookkeeping system balances. It really doesn’t matter whether the account exists or not since government is responsible for keeping its own books.
I believe the procedure requires you, the living man on the land, not a subject under contract to a legal fiction de facto government, to Lawfully contract with your straw man to transfer all straw man assets and holdings over to you; for the straw man to give you unlimited and exclusive power of attorney to speak and act for him in any capacity as his exclusive agent; whose straw man identity includes a duly filed SSN; You, the living man on the land, under your sovereign appellation through a legal and Lawful duly executed financial claim of assets now have a valid Lawful claim to all legal and Lawful interest in all straw man holdings under his legal identity and SSN. This procedure will usually include an unlimited power of attorney from the straw man to you. I believe that once you obtain Lawful claim to all straw man assets as the duly authorized agent for the straw man, you can then immediately make an offer to satisfy or pay, any claim made on the straw man under his SSN as his duly authorized exclusive agent. I believe You can create a negotiable instrument as a voucher for a draw, or a certified bonded note or a certified check, as payment in the amount, any amount you want to claim, payable to the account of a specific trust or a government official, such as a judge, a clerk or a prosecutor, etc., thus making him (them)a fiduciary in the case to satisfy a legal claim being made against the straw man. I believe you need to include complete instructions to the payee for properly processing the tendered amount through the Secretary of Treasury for offset from the straw man account. I believe that if the government official to whom you make the offer of payment refuses to properly conduct the transfer in the tendered amount or if anyone objects and refuses to do so because they do not understand, I believe you simply file notice of tendered payment identifying the payee(s)complete with your properly certified power of attorney to the fiduciaries, naming all government principles in the transaction as fiduciaries for properly processing the funds so you can prove the payment was made.
I discovered that justification for this procedure can be found on the internet and is available at
"The Federal Government took our lawful money out of circulation in 1933 but Congress had to provide the people a remedy: Public Law "Chap. 48,48 Stat.112" under HJR 192 is that remedy and in part states that the Federal Government will discharge all of our debts public and private, dollar for dollar. This has been one of the kept secrets in this Bankrupt Nation."
This confirms that the government assumed the liability for payment of all the people’s debts to satisfy the remedy mandate of Law when government confiscated all the people’s gold and jewels in 1933 and mandating it impossible for the people to pay their debts at Law. I believe that means that government has already agreed to lawfully pay for every thing you want or need to buy. They just never informed you of that fact. There are people claiming to be doing it. Find them on the internet and learn how! You can start with Sam Kennedy on Republic Broadcasting Network generally found on satellite radio. or some local fm stations Also try Mary Elizabeth Croft and Winston Shrouts on the Internet.
The Revolutionary war has already been won. The Declaration of Independence is in place. I do not believe there is need for any other conflict if we will use the mala in se Law sovereign powers already available through the Founding Fathers to dispense with subservient errant inferior mala prohibita functionaries under the Constitution as we encounter them in violation of our unalienable Rights as individual and collective sovereigns on the land. That is what the Notice of Controversy of Law and Declaration of status and Intent is all about! That NOTICE can be found in the essay entitled INTRO. The sovereign under mala in se Law can exercise his sovereign power to convene a court, to arrest and command the Sheriff to take into custody any public functionary or any one else found in violation the unalienable Rights the living man under mala in se Law. He can also bring suite for damages against any one and seek compensation and, if necessary, confinement and punishment under the common law and lien for damages incurred by violations of his unalienable Rights. This is not the case for subjects of mala prohibita acts of the legislature under the Constitution unless provided for by statute and then only within mala prohibita jurisdiction.
When man violates the dictates of conscience and intelligence, which is knowledge communicated
from the soul to the brain without reason, man is in conflict with the real world. If he builds a system on that which violates conscience and intelligence the system will self-destruct; not because it is unreasonable but because it violates conscience and intelligence which mandate adherence to basic principles in the real world. If man creates something that violates conscience and intelligence he builds a bed of self destruction.
One parting muse for your consideration: -It is legally impossible to ever pay off the national debt under public policy! – Public policy deals only with imaginary fiat currency by statute. Fiat currency is Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s). If you can only tender an obligation in FRN’s, which only the Federal Reserve can legally create, FRN’s can only add to the debt. FRN’s can not decrease the debt! –Reducing the national debt under public policy is an oxymoron–; which means, when talking about that oxymoron you can only acknowledge the fact, lie, or talk non-sense. Do you really believe that government ever intended to pay off the national debt? If you do, then how is that legally possible under public policy with FRN’s. I believe government has created the greatest ponzi scheme since Satan proposed his plan in the beginning. We have allowed government to create the impossible and convince the people that it is good.
____________________________________end of MONEY_____________________________________
 
SOVEREIGNTY ilu
I am not an attorney. I do not give legal advise. I make no claim to being a lawyer or a member of the Bar. I do not choose to do those kinds of things. What I say is the result of independent research and experience in life and in the court room.
You are either sovereign or you are not. There is no in between! The key to understanding and exercising sovereignty is knowing who you are and exercising the will and courage to defend your status as a sovereign natural man on the land against all attacks. If you can’t do that, sovereignty and mala in se Law are only a meaningless ideas. For sovereignty will be wrenched from you by force, by cunning coercion, or by ignorance, usually based on apathy or laziness. I have discovered that it is unwise to worship the acts and creations of man; particularly at the expense of faith and hope in a supernatural source of sovereignty and freedom.
What I am about to say may sound like religion. It is not. It is reality in a world of fantasy; and remains reality on this land so long as we have the viable Constitution created by inspired Founding Fathers and good men. You don’t have to be religious or know or have interest in religion to understand the Declaration of Independence and the forms of government for which it provides. The Declaration of Independence is a religious document. It is religious in nature simply because it recognizes and acknowledges a supernatural creator and gifts of unalienable Rights active in the lives and existence of man. -Please don’t consider that I am prejudiced against women. Any use of the term man or men is generic. It includes women also.
In this land The Declaration of Independence of 1776 provides for mala in se Law and for sovereignty in the natural people on this land through "self-evident truths" of unalienable Rights as gifts from the "Creator the supreme source of sovereignty. Mala in se Law by definition is Law based of moral values and basic principles from a supernatural source See the definition of mala in se in Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition. When I refer to Law, spelled with a capitol "L" it means mala in se Law. Whenever I mean mala prohibita acts of the legislature or law in general I will spell law with a lower case "l".
The principles so well stated and defined in the Declaration of Independence became a fact of Law by declaration when the Founding Fathers timely made, certified, served, and successfully defended the Declaration in armed conflict on this land. This Declaration states and defines the values and basic principles to be made available to the people on this land and for any form of government to be established for the benefit of the people by the "Creator" This it does in these words, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." These words clearly convey sovereignty from a supernatural source to the people on the land. It does not convey that sovereignty to any form of government or to any creation of man, only to the people, collectively and individually. The sovereignty gifted to man is that which is within man’s capability as a natural man on the land. Don’t confuse that with fictional misnomers, de facto governments, and titles of nobility.
Sovereignty, by definition is the supreme or ultimate power to create, define and make law and enforce it. Jurisdiction is the realm within which a specific sovereignty operates. In that sense sovereignty and its jurisdiction are relative concepts. The use of the term "Creator" in the Declaration of Independence recognizes and acknowledges a supernatural source of power as a matter of Lawful fact. Any law created by man, such as the Constitution and acts of the legislature, is , by definition, mala prohibita. Again see Black’s Law Dictionary. Mala prohibita is, by definition, the opposite of mala in se. Mala prohibita acts are man made civil rules made at the whims of the acts of the legislature under the Constitution In other words, when forming government and creating mala prohibita acts of the legislature mans civil rules are subservient to and must recognize the existence of the superior supernatural source of power, a "Creator," as a fact of Law and provide a remedy for the sovereign people on the land to exercise their inherent unalienable Rights. Mala prohibita legislative acts under the Constitution require that Government functionaries recognize, acknowledge and provide for the existence of the superior sovereignty and unalienable Rights gifted to "all men" by the "Creator", the supernatural source of power on this land. Another way of putting it is that mala prohibita acts of the legislature, man made acts, can not refute or preempt the supernatural source of power, the "Creator" nor the superior gifts of sovereignty to the natural people on this land. The only way the people can loose the gift of sovereignty is by free will choice, by force, cunning coercion, by failure to act, by failure to persist in defending it, by ignorance, apathy or laziness. Failure to act generally stems from ignorance, fear, or by exercising free will.
The Declaration of Independence acknowledges that man does not create himself. It identifies a sovereign supernatural force as the Creator of man You don’t have to believe that, but you must accept it as a fact of Law in this land or live in a fantasy world of imagination and ignorance In this country man made governments must accept natural sovereignty and unalienable Rights as a fact of Law. When forming government and law on this land the people must provide for those who choose to believe in natural sovereignty and Rights. Government must provide for the people to exercise their inherent superior natural sovereign Rights. This is the Law of the land unless any man chooses to ignore or chooses to relinquish his natural sovereign Rights in favor of mala prohibita legislative acts. Natural sovereignty is a gift to man on this land. Subjectivity under mala prohibita legislative acts is a condition imposed by free-will choice at the expense of superior natural sovereignty and unalienable Rights.
Sovereignty can only come from a superior source of sovereignty. Under the Declaration of Independence on this land, man is sovereign within his realm by nature. Man is inherently sovereign on this land. That portion of the sovereignty given to man remains subject to the originator of sovereignty, the "Creator". Man is only capable of exercising that sovereignty granted him by the "Creator". Which gift-given sovereignty must be within man’s capacity to exercise. Likewise, any subservient right created by man is bound by limitations specified by man and the capacity of his creation to exercise the power so given. Man, under natural Law secured by the Declaration of Independence has Rights and is sovereign within his realm in this land. The Right for man to choose and be responsible for his choices is fundamental.
The Constitution created by men on this land in 1787 makes provision for any natural man to relinquish gifted unalienable Rights and sovereignty in favor of civil jurisdiction. This, the natural man does by free-will choice. Don’t forget that the term man or men includes women. All Sovereign man has the Right to exercise free-will choice to choose to become a subject under man-made legislative acts. Man can choose to relinquish or ignore his sovereignty and gift of unalienable Rights but he can not sell, give, reassign, alien, lease or otherwise dispose of his sovereignty or unalienable Rights to another. That is why I believe the Founding Fathers used the term "unalienable" in the Declaration of Independence. The Founding Fathers did not use the term -inalienable- as you find in modern versions of the Declaration of Independence. The natural man can ignore or choose to relinquish his natural sovereignty and Rights in favor of mala prohibita codified statutory acts of the legislature. These mala prohibita creations include privileges, offerings , rights, and licenses. Access to these creations of man is found in the Constitution at Article I, Section 10. This and the Right to jury trial as found in Article III, Section 2, paragraph 3of the Constitution are the only articles in the organic Constitution, I find, that specifically addresses fundamental sovereign Rights of natural man on this land. The Constitution does not provide for nor concern itself with sovereignty. The Constitution addresses administrative and commercial issues and provides for specific civil public services for the people, subject or not. Natural sovereignty is a function of natural Law. There is no natural sovereignty under the Constitution. He who creates the law makes, and defines, rights and sovereignty. Since the Declaration of Independence identifies the source of unalienable Rights to be self-evident truth from a supernatural source, the Declaration of Independence becomes the source of the basic and fundamental Law of the land. The Declaration clearly states that -"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness."- In those words is sovereignty conveyed to man on this land. The Declaration of Independence clearly defines the Law and sovereignty to be made available to all people on this land as a matter of self-evident unalienable Right if they choose to possess or otherwise exercise it. This is the supreme Law on this land. The Constitution is not the supreme law of the land to those who choose to recognize and act on unalienable Rights gifted by the "Creator. The Constitution is only the professed supreme law of the land to those people on the land choosing to become subjects or citizens under mala prohibita statutory codes created as legislative acts by consent of subjects. Sovereignty under the supernatural source preempts Constitutional claims and rights under the authority of man. What man can not create man can not destroy. Under United States Code(USC), 28 USC 3002,(15) entitled Definitions, states :
(15) "United States means:
(A) a Federal Corporation;
(B) agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States
or
(C) an instrument of the United States."
That’s right, the United States is a man-made corporation. A careful reading of the Constitution will demonstrate that the Founding Fathers made it abundantly clear in creating the Constitution that there is a clear and distinct difference in the meaning between the -United States- and -the republics united- or the union of republics. They are different geographical areas and different things. The Constitution gave the people the legislative right to exercise their Right to free-will choice in favor of man-made mala prohibita codes and statutes. The same way the Torah is the written body of wisdom and law for the children of Israel and the Jews. Remember that the Torah is the written wisdom and law of the Jews. It replaced the wisdom and law from their God as history recounts the story of the prophets Moses through Samuel and the Kings of Israel. The Declaration of Independence declared and made clear mala in se Law for the people on this land as a free-will choice. The republics united are collections of natural sovereign inhabitants on the land in various locations unified by a common philosophy and sovereignty, individually and collectively, and subject only to the consequences of free-will choice and natural Law, called public law, by the Government until 1933. In 1933 the Government under House Joint Resolution HJR 192 and legislative action 48 Stat. 112 did away with -public Law-, replaced it with –public policy- and made Federal Reserve notes, IOU’s, legal tender for debts. Government confiscated, stole, all gold and jewels making it impossible for the people to pay debts at Law, made Federal Reserve notes legal tender to satisfy commercial obligations, and made it illegal to pay debts at Law which act, I believe, rendered the Government of the United States and the people bankrupt and kicked the Government into a self destructive inevitability now becoming obvious.
My research and experience convinces me that man-made legislation and forms of government are civil in nature. See the legal definition of United States and Federal Government in the Constitutional legislative act called Title 28 United States Code (USC), 3002, at (15). Statutory enactments of the legislature, public policy, are, therefore, civil in nature, mala prohibita. Mala prohibita, by definition, is -the opposite of mala in se-. Mala prohibita enactments are not necessarily unlawful in nature. Enactments of the legislature are made illegal through codifying these enactments into positive law. That does not mean that civil legislative enactments are a crime under Law. It simply means that some acts are made illegal by enactments of positive law, legal statutes, at the whims of the acts of the legislature. Violations of these positive laws by those subject to statutory enactments can be found guilty of a crime by performing the specific prohibited acts which are made illegal by statute. These illegal acts may have noting to do with unlawful acts. Unlawful acts require a _-"mens rea"- which, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, means: -"A guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent…. " -Illegal acts require no -"mens rea"- as do violations under natural Law.- -It would be wise for you to gain a clear understanding of the terms: – legal- and -Lawful-, -mens rea-, -mala in se- and -mala prohibita.- See Black’s Law dictionary for the definitions. Illegal acts performed by subjects under the Constitution may not be unlawful under natural gifted unalienable Rights. Remember, the superior sovereignty is defined by Law, mala in se Law. This is different from mala prohibita legislative citizenship and man-made sovereignty.
If you don’t have a clear and decisive understanding of who you are and who your government is then you are incapable of understanding the term sovereignty in this country. Governments are creations of men, generally in the form of corporations or other acts under mala prohibita legislative acts. Governments may also come into existence by autocratic force, custom or election. Check your form of government and those to which you choose to become subject. You will probably discover that it has been incorporated under mala prohibita statutes or codes. People do this to take advantage of benefits, privileges, licenses , citizenship and other offerings of mala prohibita acts of the legislature. — Accepting any offering of a corporation could require that you give-up claim to natural sovereignty and unalienable Rights when your natural Rights conflict with corporate rule, act or statute. The only exception may be if you can invalidate a claim of subjectivity over you as a party under contract by demonstrating trickery or deceit or any of the other indicia required to invalidate a contract–. This is usually not difficult to do.
At this point I wish to point out that under the Constitution, mala prohibita legislative enactments can, by statute, provide for rights which appear like or similar to and have much the same effect as the natural unalienable Rights declared by the Declaration of Independence. This, I believe was the hope and intent of the Founding Fathers when they created the Constitution for the people.
Sovereignty proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence can not be legislated out of existence. Any thing created under mala prohibita statutory acts can be. True , government can legislate criminal, unwise or destructive acts in an attempt to control the actions of the people, but it can not ultimately control the will and conscience of man. That is what the Revolutionary War was all about.
I believe the Founding Fathers envisioned and hoped that the Constitution would become as close to mala in se Law as it ever has. Read and understand what the Constitution says and provides for. I believe that through the Constitution, Gadianton type Government functionaries have and are cleverly legislating rights similar to natural mala in se Rights out of existence Compare the enactments under the Constitution with moral values and principles and unalienable Rights under the Declaration of Independence. I believe you will find that so many of the natural Rights you thought were supposed to be preserved, protected and defended by Government functionaries through an oath of office under penalties of the "chains of the Constitution" have been violated by clever manipulations through the acts of the legislature with the uninformed consent of the people. Remember the words of Federal Judge Robert Bork, referring to the Supreme Court and opinions thereof, -‘They decide any way they like without consideration for anything in the Constitution when they know they can get away with it.’- This, I believe, to be the influence of secret combinations influence active in politics, education and generally available information sources; which forces and means tend to legislate the concept of natural sovereignty out of existence and warp to incomprehensibility the natural Rights of the people on this land. This they do by the acts of the legislature and common consent and use under public policy. And things are getting worse, not better! I believe Rights and the idea of sovereignty have become a figment the imagination under public policy in a legislative fantasy land of Oz.
Every thing I say I discovered and do believe to be true and correct. Statutory
Government functionaries assume you are under their jurisdiction whenever you appear before them. They will try to identify you by a manufactured misnomer as a straw man subject. This they will do by the use of a misnomer that sounds like your natural appellation when spoken and will appear to look like your natural identity when written. I believe the sovereign must refute these clever attempts to cunningly coerce him into any unwanted claim of jurisdiction. The sovereign refutes any unwanted claim of jurisdiction over him and demands proof that he is a valid party to any unwanted contract claiming him to be a willing party. Failure to do this is fatal to a claim of sovereignty. Unless the sovereign properly and timely puts a claimant of jurisdiction on notice of his natural status and identity he will loose his claim to sovereignty. You must refute all claims or assumptions of jurisdiction if you are to claim your natural sovereignty. What that means is that Government assumes you are one of their subjects unless you duly and timely put them on notice that you are a creation of the Creator, claim your proper natural identity and status and require them to prove their claim of jurisdiction over you. You must then courageously stand firm on your convictions against all attacks. If you intend to claim sovereignty as intended under the Declaration of Independence you must learn how to duly notice and refute any claim of unwanted jurisdiction over you. This You must do or be treated as a statutory subject. Remember that a statutory corporate subject has no claim to natural Rights. Government’s only Lawful claim over you is as a subject under Mafa prohibit public policy and the acts of the legislature. I believe that if you have difficulty understanding or accepting all this it is because you have become so severely victimized and duped by your education and generally available information sources as to render you out of touch with your natural instincts and conscience which incapacitates you to comprehend the real world and makes you fit only for a make-believe land of Oz and fantasy. You can not look to the Constitution for much help the way it is being administered. In fact, I am trying to see to it that I never am forced into a situation where it becomes necessary for me to make an appearance before a Mafa prohibit court for any reason. This is not always easy but it an be done.
I hope that makes you angry enough to try to prove me wrong; or at least be a little more receptive to entertaining a remedy that will put you in touch with reality. In this country I believe the remedy can also be found in the codified statutory enactments of the Mafa prohibited statutes legally created under the Constitution and documented in the official records of Government. For this and other reasons, I believe the Constitution to be a document created by inspired men. It contains all the essential elements necessary to address the important issues pertaining to Mala in se unalienable Rights and sovereignty of the natural people on the land.
The Constitution is like warning from a deja vu situation repeating itself from the
history of the rise and fall of the children of Israel recorded in history and for the same reasons. The children of Israel became a chosen people lead by prophets inspired by a supernatural force to a promised land where they prospered. As they followed the prompting from the prophets they prospered. When they failed to follow the prophets they suffered. The people grew haughty, self-centered and proud. Thy decided they wanted to be ruled by man in the form of a king like the big countries of the world at the neglect of their prophet. They got their king which ultimately lead to the demise of the children of Israel as a sovereign people and nation.
I will now discuss what I consider to be the key issues responsible for creating some of the most devastating problems we have. What I say now is what I believe to be true based on my independent research and on my personal experience with law, courts and before judges in this county. In 1913 government proposed and the ignorant and irresponsible people supported by consent to the creation of the Federal Reserve system. This system provides for the establishment of a fiat (false, fake, phoney, make-believe) money system which we have today. In 1933 through House Joint Resolution (HER) 192, the people allowed the government to do away with Public Law, and replaced it with Public Policy. In doing so, Government functionaries declared bankruptcy for the United States, the people and the country. Bankruptcy, by definition, is the inability for one to pay his debts at Law. Look carefully at the Constitution and you will find that the Constitution makes clear that the United States, a creation of man under the Constitution, and the republic states united, the land or real estate inhabited by the people, are different things. The United States, meaning the property occupied by the District of Columbia, up to a ten mile square on the banks of the Potomac River, and the country composed of the independent republic states, are two different things. It would be wise for you to clearly understand the difference. The Constitution makes a clear distinction if you learn how to read and understand what it says. By means of HER 192, the Government, by statute, did away with Public Law and replaced it by statute with what government now calls Public Policy. Remember that HER 192 is not a law. It is a resolution that is exclusively for Government functionary consumption. It is not addressed to the subjects, citizens, subscribing to corporate membership. Government confiscated, stole, the peoples gold and valuable jewelry and later removed most silver from coinage, rendering the United States and the Government for the people incapable of Lawfully tendering or paying there debts at Law in this country. The new medium of exchange became Federal Reserve Notes and coins of greatly reduced or of very little real value. If you will check any good dictionary you will find that the definition of a note is a promise to pay. A Federal Reserve Note is an IOU. Federal Reserve Notes have no intrinsic value beyond about 3 cents worth of green paper and ink, each, regardless of the amount numbers printed on them, and can not be redeemed for anything more in fiat currency than what Government claims or allows. Their stated and true value is imaginary. I go into that subject in greater detail in a paper called MONEY. Conscience suggests that if the Government confiscated, stole, all the real valuable substance called money and replaced it with intrinsically valueless fiat currency as tender in commerce, I believe that the Government should accept IOU’s in the form of bonded secured notes tendered to government and its agencies to satisfy presentments made. I encountered that idea some time ago. There are people claiming to be successfully doing that within the states united and Canada. You have probably never hear of such a thing. I will tell you later how the secured notes are being Lawfully and legally tendered, or monetized, to Government and being collateralized by the Treasurer of the United States, whom I believe is the administrator for the bankrupt government for the U.S. Your ignorance of all this is a consequence of controlled education and information sources. I believe that the natural man on the land can claim his natural sovereignty and use it to his advantage and liberty. Corporate subjects can not! Herein lies the key for the sovereign to demand his unalienable Rights as defined in the Declaration of Independence. Corporate subjects do not have such Rights. The people relinquished their Rights when choosing to become subjects, persons, citizens, of Government; or they let themselves become cunningly coerced into giving up their claim to those Rights by allowing Government to treat them as a legal fiction or straw man subject under the acts of the legislature. The remedy for the sovereign natural man on the land, I believe, is to refute Government’s claim or assumption that he is a subject straw man. To do this, I believe, the natural man on the land must understand and believe in his Rights and follow Lawful processes under the Declaration of Independence. He must learn to take advantage of administrative and commercial provisions under the Constitution and courageously assert and use what is left of his conscience to guide him in challenging corporate threats against his sovereignty, freedom and Right to Happiness. I believe the remedy is simple. but it may not be easy.
The sovereign knows that there is a difference in the way he identifies himself and the way Government officials must extort a particular type of misnomer identification from him so they can foreclose by extortion his natural sovereignty and Rights. The sovereign knows that there is a difference in identifying the sovereign and the misnomer required by government to claim jurisdiction over a subject under Mafa prohibit legislative acts. The sovereign declares his proper appellation so that no one can attempt to foreclose by extortion his natural sovereign identity. Government officials must, under Mafa prohibit legislation, assume that everyone appearing before them is a corporate subject. If the sovereign enters for any reason before a Government official without conceding jurisdiction, the government official must assume him to be a subject citizen of government. That is, until the sovereign properly puts a statutory creation official on the spot by notice and declaration and requires that corporation official to prove jurisdiction over him.
Government can refute any claim to sovereignty by: 1) producing a valid waver of Rights from the a subject invalidates any claim to sovereignty; 2) producing a valid contract showing the one claiming sovereignty to be a willing, informed party to a valid Mafa prohibit contract also invalidates any claim to sovereignty; 3) conceding jurisdiction in open court; or 4) openly and notoriously choosing to knowingly and willingly take advantage of Mafa prohibit contract benefits and offerings without objection or protest also invalidates any claim to sovereignty. Lacking any one of these, Government can not refute an individual’s claim to sovereignty and, therefore, must concede the man’s claim to sovereignty. I believe that most people in this country can Lawfully refute government’s claim to jurisdiction if they want to. I discovered there are several indicia for a valid contract to be enforceable; 1) It must be an understandable agreement between two or more parties, 2) something of value must be exchanged, given and accepted, 3) the parties must be equal, 4) the parties must be over the age of majority, 5) the parties must be willing and informed , 6) the parties mut be competent, 7) time limits , initiation and termination dates must be specific and understandable to all parties, 8) All terms must be specific and understandable to all parties, 9) an understandable copy of the agreement must be given or made available to each party, 10) Each party must sign the agreement. Any one of these indicia lacking invalidates the contract. If any individual knowingly, notoriously, willingly, competently and of his own free-will choice takes advantage of contract offerings and privileges he has no legal standing to claim sovereignty as a natural being under Law. Failure of any corporation to refute the sovereignty of a sovereign living man or woman on the land overcomes any corporate claim of jurisdiction and the corporation must back-off. If the corporate official is tenacious, the sovereign will produce a common law warrant for the arrest of the corporate official’s bond and possibly accuse the corporate official with a real crime under violation of his oath of office and the commission of a real crime under common Law. Remember the difference in identity between the sovereign and the assertion of criminal action against a factitious misnomer attributed to the sovereign by a corporate official? That is a statutory crime and a real Lawful crime. Public officials have been fired for those offenses and some even imprisoned. Do you begin to see and understand the power in the hands of an informed sovereign on the land?
I believe the remedy to the bankruptcy and its consequences will be found in the maxim of law that states – "Whoever creates a liability at Law must create a remedy or be found guilty of a Lawful crime."- Check it out! Check-out 48 Stat. 112, wherein it reads:
"Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to acquire payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, hereafter or hereafter incurred ,whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law."
I found the following on the internet by invoking -Government Brainstorm- and http//sturly.com6w1 before 26 June 2009:
"The Federal Government took our lawful money out of circulation in 1933 but Congress had to provide the people a remedy. Public Law "Chap.48. 48 Stat. 112" is that remedy and in part states that the Federal Government will discharge all of our debts, public and private, dollar for dollar. This has been one of the best kept secrets in this Bankrupt Nation."
Sovereignty in this land, historically and for now, under the Declaration of Independence is an unalienable Right. It refutes and supercedes any provision of the Constitution not compatible with that declared Right to sovereignty.
I accept the Constitution as a creation of inspired good men to the extent that it is compatible with the principles and values that provide for the natural man on the land to follow and obey the ideals which cause him to accept and be responsible for the natural consequences of his actions; not violate another’s Rights; seek and pursue Happiness and property; pay his debts at Law; conform to the Law and expectations of his "Creator"; follow the articles of his faith as they do not violate the Rights of others; following his conscience in pursuing righteous values, and not violate another’s Rights in the pursuit of Right, happiness and property.
No provision under the Constitution, man’s law, can refute the Law, principles, moral values and sovereignty provided for by the Declaration of Independence. I believe the Constitution, as far as it has been inspired, was meant to conform to and be completely compatible with the Declaration of Independence. I do not believe that is now the case as presently administered and executed.
I believe one can become sovereign under the Declaration of Independence by claiming the proper status and learning to understand how to use and apply the Constitution as the Founding Fathers intended in spite of conniving people and Government functionaries with concealed agendas cleverly frustrating, misleading and clearly violating the intent and purpose of the Declaration of Independence to benefit the people on this land.
I believe the term sovereignty under the Constitution can not mean the same thing as sovereignty provided for by the Declaration of Independence. In terms of the sovereignty from the "Creator", Constitutional sovereignty has become an oxymoron. I believe the natural man on the land was meant to exercise the unalienable Right to sovereignty. This he can do if he will learn how to use the Constitution and the acts of the legislature to his purpose.
I do not believe that any natural man(generic) on this land can claim sovereignty through creation, declaration, due service, and victorious defense under the Declaration of Independence unless that natural man(generic) can stand in the public domain of any public policy legislative legal court in the country, before any legal judge, prosecutor, bailiff, and clerk and refute legal jurisdiction by a de facto court over him; and then, if necessary, convene a common-Law court of Law on the spot, produce Lawful warrants for the arrest of bonds of offending public officials acting under de facto government titles to cause harm and damage to the natural child of the "Creator" known as the sovereign man on the land. Or in the alternative, as the exclusive agent speaking for and in behalf of a legal fiction, to Lawfully make an offer to settle any legal presentment served on a legal fiction, straw man, by public policy Government court or officials. Any one not understanding the foregoing statement and exactly what it means is incapable of understanding or claiming sovereignty. The sovereign knows well what it means and how to execute it. The sovereign knows whether he is meant to serve nature and the "Creator" or man!
Failure of any corporation to refute the sovereignty of a sovereign living man on the land overcomes any corporate claim of jurisdiction and the corporation must concede. If the corporate official is tenacious, the sovereign man will produce a Lawful warrant for the arrest of the corporate official’s bond and possibly accuse him of a real crime under violation of his oath of office and the commission of a real crime against the sovereign man. Remember the difference in identity between the sovereign man and the assertion of criminal action against a factitious misnomer attributed to the sovereign man who has been damaged by a corporate official? I believe that is a Lawful crime and could be a statutory crime. Public officials have been fired for those offenses and some even imprisoned. Do you begin to see and understand the power in the hands of an informed sovereign man on the land?
You may wonder –‘How am I going to get a corporate Constitutional police officer to act against one of their own?’- You need to understand the office, position and status of Sheriff for the sovereign natural man on the land. I do not believe the police authority claimed by the Constitutional corporate subject calling himself a sheriff to be a subject under Mafa in se or Common Law. He can not be because only Constitutional subjects participate in his election and he swears an oath of office, under penalties of perjury, to the Constitution and to the United States Corporation. Yet nowhere in the Constitution do I find any provision for a sheriff. He must therefore be an interloper within the jurisdiction of the sovereign natural man on the land.
I maintain that only the Sheriff who has been appointed or elected by the sovereign people on the land is the Law enforcement officer in the county for the sovereign people on the land. The Sheriff is a Common Law appointment by the sovereign on the land. Sovereignty in this land resides in the natural people jointly. This raises the issue: Who, then, is the county sheriff who so frequently issues traffic tickets and arrests for violations under constitutional corporate statutory codes? I maintain he is an interloper in the affairs of the sovereign on the land. The constitutional corporate subject sheriff, I believe , has no Lawful authority within the authority of the "unalienable Rights" and the "pursuit of Happiness" of the sovereign people on the land. The Constitution is mala prohibita and is not for the sovereign and it is not the source of sovereignty on the land to those who claim sovereignty by authority of mala in se Law. The only sovereignty claimed under the Constitution is that of a corporation created under the authority of man through mala prohibita acts of the legislature as clearly specified in the Constitution. That corporate sovereignty does not include the sovereignty declared by the Declaration of Independence which is meant for the natural sovereign on the land under mala in se Law from – "their Creator"-. Why does the sovereign natural man on the land not exercise his sovereign authority, which supercedes all constitutional authority, and unite that authority in the county, operate in the public domain, elect a Sheriff, create a sovereign court with clerk, appoint judges, and sue for trespass? I will address that issue in another paper. I maintain that it is the Sheriff appointed or elected by the sovereign people on the land under mala in se Law who does the Law enforcement for the sovereign man on the land; whose lawful authority includes all public domain.
Freedom requires that the sovereign assert and defend his sovereignty against all attacks at all times. If the sovereign becomes unwilling to do that, freedom and sovereignty become meaningless.
__________________________________end of sovereignty_______________________________
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTICE OF CONTROVERSY IN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
jap
AND
DECLARATION OF STATUS AND INTENT
To whom it may concern
I, first name, of the family, name a living man on the land not a fiction of law,
reserving all my rights to correct and or modify this notice and declaration as necessary, declare that It appears the state, in its corporate capacity, by means of some type of adhesion contract, makes a conclusion of law that anyone who enters state territory has lost his Creator given Rights, guaranteed as unalienable by the national and state constitutions, and upon entering state territory the statutes and ordinances of the state are the supreme law; upon which statutes, criminal actions may be brought, wherein the only due process is the right to be heard upon the letter of these statutes.
I object to that conclusion of law, my having made a contrary conclusion of law after exercising necessary and special diligence, that the Rights declared by the Declaration of Independence and guaranteed as unalienable by both the national and state constitutions carry with me wherever I travel within the territory of the fifty states united; and before any criminal action can be levied against me, a grand jury indictment, a corpus delicti, a certified duly filed verified complaint from a damaged complaining party or a valid contract showing me to be a party, must be in evidence for any court to recognize a criminal jurisdiction or authority over me as an accused.
I do not want to be unfair to the state and if the above conclusion of law attributed to the state could be improved upon I will gladly give the state the opportunity to make such improvement. However, upon failure to make any improvement within fifteen (15) days of notice or knowledge of this notice, the conclusion of law attributed to the state as stated above will, by tacit procuration, become the state's precise conclusion of law which they must live with in any future litigation. Before the state can move foreword, this controversy of law must be settled by an Article III court acting under constitutional judicial power as provided by Article III of the federal constitution, to make a legal determination between the state's conclusion of law and my conclusion of Law.
 
Page 1 of 2
Notice is hereby given that I do not wish to willfully and unnecessarily engage in contract with the state. I am a peaceful, living man on the land. I am a creation of the Creator declared by the Declaration of Independence to be a self-evident truth. I am not a willing legislative creation or straw man, party, person or resident. I declare my status as a living man on the land under mala in se Law, without threat, not wishing harm to you or any one and not wishing to claim fraud on the court. I wish no harm or damage to any one in obedience to my Creator. I, hereby, reserve all my natural Rights, those unalienable Rights clearly made available to me as a self-evident truth under the Declaration of Independence. Any other right or notice offered or served I accept "without prejudice". Any notice, license, privilege, legal right, benefit or presentment to which you believe me to be subject I ‘accept for value’, "without prejudice".
Notice is hereby given that I may only ‘accept for value’ or refuse for cause and make an offer to prove or satisfy any presentment from any one or the state. If, for any reason, you require my presence you must so notify me and include your authority and the nature and cause of action otherwise I will not respond of my own free will, only under duress, threat of force and violence, to any communication from you.
Notice is hereby given of the following:
If I do not hear from you, complete with certified authority, within fifteen(15) days of the date, or knowledge of this notice, your failure to respond will be your tacit admission and acknowledged acceptance of this notice and declaration;
I am over the age of majority, competent to act and speak for myself, acting of my own free will and not being under threat or duress to so speak;
I have read and do understand the above, having exercised necessary and special diligence. I do state and declare this notice to be true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, ability, faith and belief, having no thought, wish or intention to threaten, interfere, delay or unduly claim fraud on the court or any one. To all this I do state and declare, under those penalties reserved by my Creator for those who speak falsely.
____________________________________
First name, of the family, name
Dated:
witnesses; 1. 2. 3.
page 2 of 2
jap
 
 
 
 
 
I consider the above most powerful document you can notice to a constitutional government functionary.
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Sheriff jas
I maintain that the Sheriff who has been appointed or elected by the sovereign people on the land under mala in se, God’s Law, through the authority of the Declaration of Independence, is the lawful Law enforcement authority in the county for the sovereign man on the land. The Constitution, even given it to be a divinely inspired document, is mala prohibita. It is not mala in se Law. What man does not create, man can not supercede, influence or destroy. The so-called sheriff elected exclusively by registered voters under the Constitution is an interloper on the natural sovereignty of the people on the land acting under the authority of mala in se Law through the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution is mala prohibita. It is mans creation, a corporation, under the acts of the legislature by Title 28 United States Code(USC) 3002, (15). Title28 United States Code(USC) 3002, (15) legally prevents the mala in se sovereign man on the land, under the authority of the Declaration of Independence, from legally participating in the corporate election of the so-called sheriff unless the sovereign man denies and relinquishes his sovereignty under mala in se Law and becomes a registered voter under the mala prohibita legislative acts of man. This raises the issue: who, then, is the so-called county sheriff who claims to act legally in Law enforcement(an oxymoron) under constitutional corporate statutory codes? Who is he whom only registered voters elect? I maintain he is an interloper in the affairs of the sovereign man on the land choosing to live by and function under the exclusive authority of mla in se Law? The constitutional corporate subject sheriff, I believe, has only legal mala prohibita authority. He has no lawful authority until authorized by the sovereign on the land under mala in se Law. The constitutional subject, voter elected sheriff has no lawful authority within the mala in se realm of "unalienable Rights" and "pursuit of Happiness" "endowed by their Creator" by Declaration to the sovereign people on the land under mala in se Law. Constitional subjects have only mala prohibita legislative rights, privileges, licenses and other corporate offerings to subjects. These are subservient to the mala in se sovereign man on the land. He who is the natural sovereign man on the land having the superior sovereignty of the the sovereign people on the land under mala in se Law through the Declaration of independence. The Constitution, as mala prohibita, is not for the sovereign and is not the source of sovereignty on the land to those who claim sovereignty by authority of mala in se Law through the Declaration of Independence. The only sovereignty claimed under the Constitution is that of a corporation created under mans legal authority. That constitutional corporate sovereignty is inferior to and does not include the mala in se sovereignty declared by the Declaration of Independence which is meant for the natural sovereign on the land under mala in se Law from – "their Creator"-. Why does the sovereign natural man on the land not exercise his sovereign authority, which supercedes all constitutional authority, and unite that authority in the county, operate in the public domain, elect or appoint a Sheriff, create a sovereign court with clerk, bailiff and judges, and sue for trespass? I will address that issue in another paper. I maintain that it is the Sheriff appointed or elected by the sovereign people on the land under mala in se Law who does the Law enforcement for the sovereign man on the land; whose lawful authority includes all public domain and sovereign issues.
Freedom requires that the sovereign assert and defend his sovereignty against all attacks at all times. If the sovereign becomes unwilling to do that, freedom and sovereignty become meaningless.
RJ:  Here are five documents, 66 pages.


Related Articles:


Martial Law – Since the 1930’s in America

Top 3 Americans – We Lost Our Standing When We Lost Lawful Money

Top 5 Lies from DC – Federal Rules for IMF Livestock

USA Inc – Title 28 Turned Americans in to Slaves

Redeemed Lawful Money vs Federal Reserve Democracy Slave Notes

Voluntary Servitude & Our Constitution – Federal Commercial Services Contract

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Liberty Explained – Mala In Se – Mala Prohibita”

  1. Sarah says:

    Awesome article.

  2. Appreciation to my father who shared with me concerning this webpage, this
    website is actually amazing.

  3. What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable knowledge on the topic of unpredicted feelings.

Leave a Reply