Revocation of Election Letter to the IRS – Involuntary Slavery Solution

Dario Busch & Patriot UnKnown
Wed, Nov 6, 2013
Subject: Revocation of Election Letter to the IRS 

 Send your Questions or Comments to  Drobin88@myfairpoint.net

Dario Busch 2012 Strawman Freedom Sovereignty UCC1 – YouTube John MacHaffie7:59 AM
Dario Busch 2012 Strawman Freedom Sovereignty UCC1 – YouTube

YouTube Preview Image


The People are just beginning to learn facts that have been intentionally hidden from them via the government schools.

They have been taught to patriotically claim that they are "citizens of the United States". The United States that this applies to is the United States Inc. which is limited to the District of Columbia (Washington D.C.) and the federal territories and enclaves of the Democracy. Whereas People in the 50 States are NOT citizens of the United States. They (we) are Citizens of the United States of America, which is not the Corporation United States. Citizens of the United States of America which is the Republic are presumed to the Citizens of the United States Corporation which is the Democracy UNTIL THEY OBJECT TO THE PRESUMPTION WITH THE TRUTH.

Citizens of the Republic are exempt from taxation whereas citizens of the Democracy are subject to the IRS inividual income tax.

John MacHaffieYesterday 9:41 PM


Bombshell: Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling "Gov't Offices are Vacant"- All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors"
Submitted by The South on Sun, 10/14/2012 – 18:25

Politics, General + Law(s)

Yes, you read that correctly; it is true, and is now on the court record; black ink on white paper. Please read on:

A lot of us have been exposing the crime of the UNITED STATES corporation for many years, but until recently, no one has had the proof that all government offices are vacant; no one is home; those supposed government offices/agencies are being occupied by PRIVATE CONTRACTORS and are NOT being occupied by a legitimate government body.

This is equivalent to the ice cream man knocking on your door and extorting taxes from you. He has no lawful authority to do anything other than drive the ice cream truck – he's not a government official; he's an ice cream man.

Your supposed government officials are nothing more than ice cream men/women who are fraudulently extorting money from you and your family; throwing you in prison; taxing you to death; stealing your children and imposing their will on you, and enforcing their own internal-statutory rules and codes upon you and your family.

Rod Class has now received FOUR Administrative Rulings that prove what many of us have felt to be truth: What you think is government; what you think are legitimate Government Officials/Senators/Congressman/Policeman/Governors/Tax Collectors, etc. are nothing more than private contractors, extorting money from American Citizens and failing to pay off the public debt as they are instructed to do by the 1933 bankruptcy.

What they have done is this:

These people have switched places with the average American Citizen. They are enforcing their own Administrative codes, that are only meant for THEM, upon regular Citizens who are not being paid by the corporation. The supposed elected officials have hoodwinked the country into an employment position without pay. They themselves are taking public money to occupy government seats/positions/agencies, when they are nothing more than private contractors … Felony!

They are treating us as if we are paid government employees; enforcing their own internal rules-regulations-codes, and statutes on the average Citizen, as well as conveniently forgetting to send us our weekly/monthly government employment check.

I've been preaching this for the last year + with no avail on this forum. Perhaps now, people will begin to listen and take action.

In these radio shows, Rod explains his Administrative Rulings from the various Judges; explains the con, and shows you, where in their very own US Codes the above aforementioned information is spot on.

There are a few shows you need to listen to, and here are some bullet points of those shows:

1. All BAR attorneys are prohibited from representing John Q. Public; can only represent gov't officials and employees within their own agencies, their BAR Charter says so.

2. Any Judge that prohibits you from representing yourself or hiring a defense other than a BAR attorney, are in fact, committing a felony on the bench in violation of the Taft-Hartly Act (running a closed union shop) and the Smith Act (overthrow of Constitutional form of Gov't)

3. Anytime an BAR attorney represents someone in a case against you, you can now claim that person is incompetent; a ward of the state, with no standing to sue.

4. Any and all tax collectors, police officers, sheriffs dept's, DOT, tag agencies, BAR attorneys, Judges, Highway Patrol, supposed elected officials, are nothing more than private contractors, who can now be brought up on fraud charges for impersonating a public official while receiving federal funding.

5. Any and all home, vehicle, credit card loans are supposed to be discharged through the Treasury window, in compliance with the 1933 bankruptcy laws. These scumbags are double dipping and never discharging the debt like they are supposed to. They are embezzling the funds and pocketing them for themselves.

6. Every person sitting in prison today was railroading by a BAR attorney who's first allegiance is to the State; who had no lawful authority to represent them; who worked in concert with the State to perpetrate a fraud upon it's victims.

7. Orders from Administrative courts prove for the fourth time, an agency of the State is NOT an agency under the State.

8. Elected Officials are claiming 11th Amendment sovereignty, when it's actually you and I that hold 11th Amendment sovereignty. They are getting paid by the corporation, you and I are not.

9. They have admitted to the crime of no one actually holding a public office; they are filling corporate seats and defrauding the public.

10. Political subdivisions are not getting their 40% funding from the Feds as they are supposed to get.

11. These Judges have admitted (black ink on white paper) that all these State Offices are ……….. EMPTY!

12. Now we have Administrative paperwork – ruling these public offices aren't part of the State agencies.

13. Attorney Generals may not practice law; can't represent the people who are not public officials.

14. If the State is a 3rd party interloper in your Marriage (marriage license); Vehicle Title (State Registration), etc. then they are liable for 1/3rd of the cost to manage the daily activities of that contract.

15. If the State demands you have a Drivers License and Tag your vehicle because it is registered with the State, then as the owner of the vehicle, the State is required to pay for the vehicle, the tags, licensing, fuel, tires, oil, etc. and they are also to pay you a salary for driving a State owned vehicle; it says so in their own Highway Safety Act and USC – CFR rules and regulations.

16. We now have the court orders that goes back and nullifies any and all IRS and Tax cases, Foreclosures, Credit Card Debt, cases or actions. These people never had the lawful right to demand anything of you; they are corporate actors, not a legitimate government body.

17. Judge admits the 1933 bankruptcy, and no way to pay off anything because of Federal Reserve Notes; all public debt is t be discharged through the Treasury.

18. Only the Secretary of Transportation can hear traffic cases; all traffic cases are civil, not criminal.

19. If you're not being paid for you time, you are not required to have one of their CDL or CMV licenses; it's prohibited.

20. Says we now have a major labor dispute on our hands; US corporation running a slave racket against American Citizens without the pay.

21. United States Codes (USC) and Titles #1 thru #50 are void; have never been passed by Congress; all have been repealed.

As I've been saying for a very long time on this forum: If you are not getting a weekly or monthly paycheck from the so called federal government aka UNITED STATES or one of it's sub corporations such as the STATE OF ***, then their statutory rules (not laws), codes and regulations DO NOT APPLY TO YOU ……… Period!

There is so much information packed into these last six calls, I can't even begin to share it in this post. If you want your freedom; if you want to know with 100% surety that the foreign corporation known as the UNITED STATES has zero authority over you unless you are receiving a weekly paycheck from them, take the time to listen to call #646 through #651 here:


Scroll down the page and click on the orange "Listen" button; a pop up player will appear for your listening pleasure.

And believe me: This is pure listening pleasure, with the court filings; rulings and US Code to back it all up.

By the time you finish these few short shows, your fear of the government will be a thing of the past.

Also, many of Rod’s current filings against the infrastructure are at:http://harveyw26.minus.com …some may be easy to download, some may not !

And for those of you who are new to the forum and want to get a better grasp of all this prior to or after listening to the calls, here are some of my more informative posts on the matter at hand:

Public Notice to Gun Grabbing Politicians:


So the Government wants you to collect a sales tax?


Your Home Loan was paid the day you signed the note:


The real reason for the 14th Amendment:


What's the One Document in your possession that gives you the authority to rule over my life?


Can the State be an actual injured party? ….. No, it cannot!


Having a Social Security # is not a contract with the State/Feds:


Trust Law, your Rights and how to enforce them:


Why you should never hire an attorney:


Hopefully now in light of these Administrative Court Rulings people will now come to realize the fact, that Unless You Are Getting A Weekly Check From Government, Their Statutory Rules-Codes-Regulations They Put Off As Laws, Have Zero Force Or Effect On You Personally

No Contract = No Jurisdiction

Did you fill out an employment contract with the State; are they paying you for your services? If not, why the hell are you following their rules?

This is how we change our current form of Government back to the Republic is was initially intended to be.

If you don't take the time to listen to at least those last six shows at the link above, you are overlooking the most important information ever to come to light within the Liberty Movement.

Stop looking for a savior to save us from tyranny and listen to the shows I've provided. Now you are your own savior – Individually, now you can make a HUGE difference in our political structure and form of government.
Jesus Loves You

Read More…

Revocation of Election Letter to the IRS


Certified Mail <0000 0000 0000 0000 0000>

Director of International Operations

Internal Revenue Service

Washington, D.C. (20225)

Subject: Notice of Revocation of Election and Request for Concurrence and Update to My Taxpayer Status.

Ref: 26 CFR 1.871-10

Dear Sir(s),

In accordance with 26 CFR § 1.871-10(d)(2)(iii), this letter is being submitted in pursuit of a Revocation of Election to treat any or all of my income and assets as a nonresident alien from being considered by the IRS as "effectively connected with a trade or business in the ‘United States’", as defined in 26 U.S.C. §864(b).

Information about myself in fulfillment with the above CFR is as follows:

1. Name:

2. Address:

3. Former SSN:

4. Applicable taxable year(s): 5. Grounds for the request.

The Grounds for my request are My constitutional right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, privacy, respect, the fruits of my common right labors under common law, and the right to own and control property (including labor and the fruits of my labor) without any interference from government, or requirement to report, account for, such income or assets on such property.

This letter is by no means an admission in any way that I ever made an Election to treat any of my income or assets as effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States, but instead is submitted to ensure that my status is properly reflected in your records and that you do indeed concur with and respect this notification of request for your concurence.

I do not now nor have I ever lived in the ‘United States’ as defined in 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7701, nor do I have any intentions of doing so in the future. I am sorry if I ever gave you the idea that I did by, for instance, mistakenly filing an IRS form 1040 in the past, which was the incorrect form. The correct form is and always has been the 1040NR form.

Please note that I already have an IRS form W-8 on file with my employer and have accurately declared myself to be a Nonresident Alien of the Corporation United States. I reside outside of the foreign jurisdiction to which the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) operates, which is the District of Columbia and federal territories.

"The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." (N.Y. re: Merriam, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, Affirmed 16 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L.Ed. 287).

"In the United States of America, there are two (2) separated and distinct jurisdictions, such being the jurisdiction of the states within their own state boundaries, and the other being federal jurisdiction (United States), which is limited to the District of Columbia, the U.S. Territories, and federal enclaves within the states, under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17." (Bevans v. United States, 16 U.S. 336 (1818)).

"State: The term ‘State’ shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title." (26 U.S.C. Sec. 7701).

"United States: The term ‘United States’ when used in a geographical sense includes [is limited to] only the States [the District of Columbia and other federal territories within the borders of the states] and the District of Columbia." (26 U.S.C. Sec. 7701).

"A canon of construction which teaches that of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States." (U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949)).

"The term ‘United States’ may be used in any one of several senses. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends [324 U.S. 652, 672], or it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution." (Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 1945).

Foreign government: "The government of the United States of America, as distinguished from the government of the several states." (Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition).

Foreign Laws: "The laws of a foreign country or sister state." (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition).

Foreign States: "Nations outside of the United States…Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state. The term ‘foreign nations’, …should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought; and hence, one state of the Union is foreign to another, in that sense." (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition).

Treasury Decision 3980, Vol. 29, January-December, 1927, pgs. 64 and 65 defines the words ‘includes’ and ‘including’ as: "(1) To comprise, comprehend, or embrace… (2) To enclose within; contain; confine…But granting that the word ‘including’ is a term of enlargement, it is clear that it only performs that office by introducing the specific elements constituting the enlargement. It thus, and thus only, enlarges the otherwise more limited, preceding general language…The word ‘including’ is obviously used in the sense of its synonyms, comprising; comprehending; embracing."

"Includes is a word of limitation. Where a general term in Statute is followed by the word, ‘including’ the primary import of the specific words following the quoted words is to indicate restriction rather than enlargement." (Powers ex re. Covon v. Charron R.I., 135 A. 2nd 829, 832 Definitions-Words and Phrases pages 156-156, Words and Phrases under ‘limitations’).

"In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes, it is the established rule not to extend their provisions by implication beyond the clear import of the language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. In case of doubt they are construed most strongly against the government and in favor of the citizen." (Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, at 153).

Almost a century ago, Congress declared that "The right of expatriation [including expatriation from the District of Columbia or “U.S. Inc”, the corporation] is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” and decreed that “any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any officers of this government which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.” (15 Stat. 223-224 (1868), R.S. § 1999, 8 U.S.C. § 800 (1940). [1] Although designed to apply especially to the rights of immigrants to shed their foreign nationalities, that Act of Congress “is also broad enough to cover, and does cover, the corresponding natural and inherent right of American citizens to expatriate themselves.” (Savorgnan v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 491, 498 note 11, 70 S. Ct. 292, 296, 94 L. Ed. 287. [2] The Supreme Court has held that the Citizenship Act of 1907 and the Nationality Act of 1940 "are to be read in the light of the declaration of policy favoring freedom of expatriation which stands unrepealed." Id., 338 U.S. at pages 498-499, 70 S. Ct. at page 296. That same light, I think, illuminates 22 U.S.C.A. § 211a and 8 U.S.C.A.§ 1185. (Walter Briehl v. John Foster Dulles, 284 F2d 561, 583 (1957)).

Thank you for your prompt and expeditious processing of this Revocation of Election.

Please forward your certification and response to my address above. I respectfully request that you give a detailed explanation and legal justification of any determination or basis you might make regarding the disposition of this notification. This includes citing any authority you are exercising and the regulation or statute from which it derives, as well as any court cites, Treasury Decisions, etc that may be relevant to the foundation of your delegated authority for making a determination of disposition. This letter shall serve as formal legal notice that if you DO NOT respond within 45 days, then by your default and silence, the Revocation of Election is granted and there is no need to further contact us.

I affirm, under penalty of perjury, under the Common Law of America – from without the United States – that the foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, per 28 U.S.C. 1746(1); and,

I now affix my own signature to all of the above affirmations WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308.

Your name in Caps and Lower Case FOR Your name in ALL CAPS.


Related Articles:

Meet Your Strawman – Slavery Legaleez

Demonic History Behind Vatican – Every Man Has a Strawman

Top 5 Blows to Freedom in America – UNITED STATES INC

Top 5 Beligerent Acts – Where Did Our Rights Go?

American Nationals – US Congress Jurisdiction for District of Columbia Only

28th Amendment Surprise – Constitutional Convention UnNecessary

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses for “Revocation of Election Letter to the IRS – Involuntary Slavery Solution”

  1. John Borman says:

    You ought to be a part of a contest for one of the best sites on the internet. I will highly recommend this website!

  2. Steve Lelkendey says:

    I have read all about your explanation on the Revocation of Election. It is fascinating. I am very interested to submitting my application on this subject, & I am interested in taking further, there are others in our group that are interested as well. I would very much appreciate speaking to someone on this topic. My cell # is (865) 789-7782. I am in Tennessee. If possible I would really like to speak with RJ. However if not, I do understand. I do look forward to hearing from someone. Thank You.

    Steve Lelkendey

Leave a Reply