Top 20 Conspiracy Facts on 9/11 – Still Hiding 9/11 Evidence

BBC News, Newsweek, ABC News, etc…
Fri, Sept 5, 2014
Subject: Top 20 Conspiracy Facts on 9-11

[9/11] Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well
2001-09-23, BBC News
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the [9/11] suicide attacks on
Washington and New York has turned up alive and well. The identities of four of the
19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt. Saudi
Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had
deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11
September. His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on
television around the world. He told journalists there that he had nothing to do
with the attacks. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities. He
acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United
States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year [and] became a pilot
with Saudi Arabian airlines. Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight
11 hijack suspects … says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost
his passport while studying in Denver. Meanwhile … a London-based Arabic daily
says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi. He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in
the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. And there are suggestions that
another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive. FBI Director Robert Mueller
acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is
in doubt.
Note: The deceptions in the official story of 9/11 are nowhere more clearly shown
than in this important story. The FBI never revised its list of alleged hijackers,
and these four are all later listed in the official 9/11 Commission report as the
hijackers. Click here and scroll down a little over half way to see their photos in
the official report. For more on this, click here. For an abundance of reliable
information suggesting a major 9/11 cover-up, click here.

Alleged [9/11] Hijackers May Have Trained At U.S. Bases
2001-09-14, Newsweek Magazine
U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the
alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in [the 9/11] terror attacks received
training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s. Three of the alleged
hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the
Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. — known as the “Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation,”
according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source. Another of the alleged hijackers may
have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery,
Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received
language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were
former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the
Pentagon source. The five men were on a list of 19 people identified as hijackers by
the FBI on [September 14]. The three foreign nationals training
in Pensacola appear to be Saeed Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the four
men who allegedly commandeered United Airlines Flight 93. That flight [ended in]
rural Pennsylvania. The third man who may have trained in Pensacola, Ahmed
Alghamdi, allegedly helped highjack United Airlines Flight 75, which hit the south
tower of the World Trade Center. Military records show that the three used as their
address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on which residences for
foreign-military flight trainees are located.
Note: For more on this vitally important news, see the Washington Post news article
available here and the Los Angeles Times news article here. So what’s really going
on here? For our reliable 9/11 Information Center, click here.

A New Look at the 9-11 Commission
2009-09-11, Time magazine,8599,1921659,00.html
Former New Jersey attorney general John Farmer served as senior counsel to the 9/11
Commission, tasked with investigating the government response to the attacks. His
new book, The Ground Truth, picks up where the commission left off — taking a deeper
look at the government’s … response to the attacks and exposing officials
determined to hide their failings from the inquiry. Farmer uses newly released
transcripts and recordings to cast doubt on the official version of events. He spoke
with TIME. [Time:] Why do you think officials tried to obscure [the truth about
9/11]? [Farmer:] It’s almost a culture of concealment.
You have someone like Sandy Berger … taking rather extreme measures to remove
documents from the National Archives and hide them at a construction site where he
could retrieve them later and destroy them. There were interviews made at the FAA’s
New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of
the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was
distorted and was completely different from the way things happened. If what the
government is telling you isn’t true, then the truth could be anything. I think
there is evidence that the truth wasn’t told and that at least some of that was
Note: Many respected scholars, officials and professionals have questioned the 9/11
Commission’s report. Click here and here to read some of their statements. For lots
more reliable, verifiable information from the major media questioning the 9/11
Commission’s report, click here and here.

The Disbelievers
2006-09-08, Washington Post
A recent Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll of 1,010 Americans found that 36
percent suspect the U.S. government promoted the attacks or intentionally sat on its
hands. Sixteen percent believe explosives brought down the towers.
A Zogby International poll of New York City residents two years ago found 49.3
percent believed the government “consciously failed to act.” The loose agglomeration
known as the “9/11 Truth Movement” has stopped looking for truth from the
government. The academic wing is led by [Prof. David Ray] Griffin, who founded the
Center for a Postmodern World at Claremont University; James Fetzer, a tenured
philosopher at the University of Minnesota; and Daniel Orr, the retired chairman of
the economics department at the University of Illinois. The movement’s de facto
minister of engineering is Steven Jones, a tenured physics professor at Brigham
Young University, who’s … concluded that the collapse of the twin towers is best
explained as controlled
demolition. Catherine Austin Fitts served as assistant secretary of housing
in the first President Bush’s administration. [Robert] Bowman was chief of advanced
space programs under presidents Ford and Carter. Fitts and Bowman agree that the
“most unbelievable conspiracy” theory is the one retailed by the government. It was
a year before David Ray Griffin, an eminent liberal theologian and philosopher,
began his stroll down the path of disbelief. He wondered why … military jets
failed to intercept even one airliner. He read the 9/11 Commission report with a
swell of anger. Contradictions were ignored and no military or civilian official was
reprimanded. Griffin’s book, “The New Pearl Harbor” … never reviewed in a major
U.S. newspaper, sold more than 100,000 copies and became a movement founding stone.
Note: If the above link fails, click here.

9/11 Commission Heads: We Still Don’t Know the Whole Truth of 9/11
2006-08-09, CNN News
A shocking new book by the 9/11 Commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton
says Americans still don’t know the whole truth about their government’s initial
response to those terrorist attacks that day. [The book] outlines repeated
misstatements by the Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration. Fog of war …
could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations, and
public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was
untrue. Untrue — the military’s original timeline of United Flight 93. Equally
untrue, the government’s timeline for American Flight 77 and details about fighter
jets scrambled to intercept it. DOD did not accurately report to the 9/11 Commission
on the response to the September 11, 2001 hijackings. So far, government
investigators stopped short of calling all of these inaccuracies lies. If all of the
after-action reports are untrue, for whatever reason, that’s a lie.
Incompetence and ineptitude on the part of this government … in the weeks leading
up to 9/11 are established. The fact that the government would permit deception …
the fact that they would continue and perpetuate the lie suggests that we need a
full investigation of what is going on and what is demonstrably an incompetent and
at worst deceitful federal government.

Sept. 11 panel considered Pentagon probe
2006-08-05, MSNBC/Associated Press
The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the
Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered
an investigation into possible deception, the panel’s chairmen say in a new book.
Republican Thomas Kean and Democrat Lee Hamilton also say in “Without Precedent”
that their panel was too soft in questioning former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani,
and that the 20-month investigation may have suffered for it. The book … recounts
obstacles the authors say were thrown up by the Bush administration, internal
disputes over President Bush’s use of the attacks as a reason for invading Iraq, and
the way the final report avoided questioning whether U.S. policy in the Middle East
may have contributed to the attacks. “Fog of war … could not explain why all of
the after-action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and
NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue,”
the book states. The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton “a
low point” in the commission’s examination of witnesses during public hearings. “We
did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put
on the public record.” In their book, which goes on sale Aug. 15, Kean and Hamilton
recap obstacles they say the panel faced in putting out a credible report in a
presidential election year, including fights for access to government documents and
an effort to reach unanimity.

FAA Received Alert About 9/11 Hijacker
2006-01-07, ABC News/Associated Press
Federal aviation authorities were alerted in early 2001 that an Arizona flight
school believed one of the eventual Sept. 11 hijackers lacked the English and flying
skills necessary for the commercial pilot’s license he already held. A Federal
Aviation Administration inspector even sat next to the hijacker, Hani Hanjour, in
one of the Arizona classes, checked records to ensure Hanjour’s 1999 pilot’s license
was legitimate but concluded no other action was warranted. Hanjour is believed to
have piloted the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11. The operations
manager for the now-defunct JetTech flight school in Phoenix said she called the FAA
inspector that oversaw her school three times in January and February 2001 to
express her concerns about Hanjour. “I couldn’t believe he had a commercial license
of any kind with the skills that he had,” said Peggy Chevrette, the JetTech manager.
She also has been interviewed by the FBI. Marilyn Ladner, a
vice president for the Pan Am International Flight Academy that owned JetTech
before it closed in the aftermath of Sept. 11, said the flight school expressed its
concerns and believes the FAA official observed Hanjour’s weaknesses firsthand. The
Arizona school’s alert is the latest revelation about the extent of information the
government possessed before Sept. 11
Note: This article fails to mention the key fact the Hanjour is officially listed as
the hijacker pilot who executed an extremely sophisticated 330-degree diving turn to
crash the plane into the Pentagon (see official report at this link). Yet this
article claims his flight instructor said his skills were so poor she couldn’t
believe he had any pilot’s license. How can that be? For more information suggesting
Hanjour was assisted by U.S. authorities in obtaining his license, click here. And
why has the Pentagon only released a few of the many dozens of security camera
videos they have of the 9/11 Pentagon crash? And these few show nothing conclusive.
For lots more reliable information questioning what really happened on 9/11, click

Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman?
2005-01-11, Los Angeles Times
Is it conceivable that Al Qaeda, as defined by President Bush as the center of a
vast and well-organized international terrorist conspiracy, does not exist? To even
raise the question amid all the officially inspired hysteria is heretical. Yet a
brilliant new BBC film produced by one of Britain’s leading documentary filmmakers
systematically challenges this. “The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics
of Fear” … argues coherently that much of what we have been told about the threat
of international terrorism “is a fantasy that has been exaggerated and distorted by
politicians. It is a dark illusion that has spread unquestioned … around the
world.” Why have we heard so much frightening talk about “dirty bombs” when experts
say it is panic rather than radioactivity that would kill people? Why did Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claim on “Meet the Press” in 2001 that Al Qaeda controlled
massive high-tech cave complexes in Afghanistan, when
British and U.S. military forces later found no such thing? The film … directly
challenges the conventional wisdom by making a powerful case that the Bush
administration, led by a tight-knit cabal of Machiavellian neoconservatives, has
seized upon the false image of a unified international terrorist threat to replace
the expired Soviet empire in order to push a political agenda. “The nightmare
vision of a uniquely powerful hidden organization waiting to strike our societies
is an illusion. Wherever one looks for this Al Qaeda organization, from the
mountains of Afghanistan to the ‘sleeper cells’ in America, the British and
Americans are chasing a phantom enemy.”
Note: If above link fails, click here. This highly revealing film by one of
Britain’s most respected documentary makers is available for free viewing on the
Internet. For the link and lots more on this amazingly revealing documentary, click
here. For an excellent review of the film in one of the U.K.’s leading newspapers,
click here.

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA’s Back Pocket
2004-10-19, Los Angeles Times
It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until
after the election, and this one names names. “It is infuriating that a report which
shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner
before 9/11 is being suppressed,” an intelligence official who has read the report
told me. [The] release of the report, which represents an exhaustive 17-month
investigation by an 11-member team within the agency, has been “stalled.” First by
acting CIA Director John McLaughlin and now by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican
House member (and chairman of the Intelligence Committee) who recently was appointed
CIA chief. The official stressed that the report was more blunt and more specific
than the earlier bipartisan reports produced by the Bush-appointed Sept. 11
commission and Congress. “The report found very senior-level officials responsible.”
By law, the only legitimate reason the CIA director has for
holding back such a report is national security. None of this should surprise us
given the Bush administration’s great determination since 9/11 to resist any
serious investigation. The president fought against the creation of the Sept. 11
commission, for example, agreeing only after enormous political pressure was
applied by a grass-roots movement led by the families of those slain. And then Bush
refused to testify to the commission under oath. Instead he deigned only to chat
with the commission members, with Vice President Dick Cheney present, in a White
House meeting in which commission members were not allowed to take notes.
Note: If the above link fails, click here. For other reliable information on the
9/11 cover-up, click here.

Connections And Then Some
2003-03-14, Washington Post
The Carlyle Group [is] an investment house famous as one of the most well-connected
companies anywhere. Former president George H.W. Bush is a Carlyle adviser. Former
British prime minister John Major heads its European arm. Former secretary of state
James Baker is senior counselor, former White House budget chief Richard Darman is a
partner, former SEC chairman Arthur Levitt is senior adviser — the list goes on.
Those associations have brought Carlyle enormous success. The Washington-based
merchant bank controls nearly $14 billion in investments, making it the largest
private equity manager in the world. It buys and sells whole companies the way some
firms trade shares of stock. But the connections also have cost Carlyle. It has
developed a reputation as the CIA of the business world — omnipresent, powerful, a
little sinister. Media outlets from the Village Voice to BusinessWeek have depicted
Carlyle as manipulating the levers of government from
shadowy back rooms. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) even suggested that
Carlyle’s and Bush’s ties to the Middle East made them somehow complicitous in the
Sept. 11 terror attacks. It didn’t help that as the World Trade Center burned on
Sept. 11, 2001, the news interrupted a Carlyle business conference at the
Ritz-Carlton Hotel here attended by a brother of Osama bin Laden. Former president
Bush, a fellow investor, had been with him at the conference the previous day.
Bush[‘s] primary function is to give speeches for Carlyle that attract wealthy
foreigners in places where the former president is especially revered, such as
The company has rewarded its faithful with a 36 percent average annual rate of return.
Note: If the above link fails, click here. To understand the amazingly powerful role
of this low-profile, yet extremely wealthy and influential group, click here to view
free a 48-minute documentary shown on Dutch national TV which clearly depicts the
depths of corruption and deceit at the highest levels of government.
You will be thankful that you watched this highly educational film.

Defence redefined means securing cheap energy
2002-12-26, Sydney Morning Herald (One of Australia’s leading newspapers)
As troops and equipment pour into the Gulf for a looming war with Iraq, United
States military thinkers admit that “defence” means protecting … cheap oil. As far
back as 1975, Henry Kissinger, then secretary of state, said America was prepared to
wage war over oil. Separate plans advocating US conquest of Saudi oilfields were
published in the ’70s. So it should come as little surprise that … four months
before the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York – a battle plan for
Afghanistan was already being reviewed by the US Command that would carry it out
after September 11. Military strategists were highlighting the energy wealth of the
Caspian Sea and Central Asia and its importance to America’s “security”. The Indian
media and Jane’s Intelligence Review reported that the US was fighting covert
battles against the Taliban, months before the “war on terrorism” was declared. Over
several months beginning in April last year a series of military and
governmental policy documents was released that sought to legitimise the use of US
military force in the pursuit of oil and gas. A spring 2001 article by Jeffrey
Record in the War College’s journal, Parameters, argued the legitimacy of “shooting
in the Persian Gulf on behalf of lower gas prices”. Mr Record [is] a former staff
member of the Senate armed services committee (and an apparent favourite of the
Council on Foreign Relations). [He] advocated the acceptability of presidential
subterfuge in the promotion of a conflict. Mr Record explicitly urged painting over
the US’s actual reasons for warfare with a nobly high-minded veneer, seeing such as
a necessity for mobilising public support for a conflict.
Note: This highly revealing report on the military planning of wars for oil
is well worth reading in its entirety, at the link above. For lots more on major
deception and manipulation around the event of 9/11, click here.

Pipeline politics taint U.S. war
2002-03-18, Chicago Tribune
Outside this country, there is a widespread belief that U.S. military deployments in
Central Asia mostly are about oil. An article in the Guardian of London headlined,
“A pro-western regime in Kabul should give the U.S. an Afghan route for Caspian
oil,” foreshadowed the kind of skeptical coverage the U.S. war now receives in many
countries. Author George Monbiot
… wrote that the U.S. oil company Unocal Corp. had been negotiating with the
Taliban since 1995 to build “oil and gas pipelines from Turkmenistan, through
Afghanistan and into Pakistani ports on the Arabian sea.” Unocal pulled out of the
deal after the 1998 terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were
linked to terrorists based in Afghanistan. The terrorist acts of Sept. 11, though
tragic, provided the Bush administration a [pretext] to invade Afghanistan, oust the
recalcitrant Taliban and, coincidentally, smooth the way for the pipeline. To make
things even smoother, the U.S. engineered the rise to power of two former Unocal
employees: Hamid Karzai, the new interim president of Afghanistan, and Zalmay
Khalizad, the Bush administration’s Afghanistan envoy. [Uri] Averny, a former member
of the Israeli Knesset
… argues that the war on terrorism provides a perfect pretext for America’s
imperial interests. “If one looks at the map of the big American bases created for
the war, one is struck by the fact that they are completely identical to the route
of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean.” No wonder the rest of the world
is a bit skeptical about our war on evildoers.
Note: Why do so few people know that these two top officials of Afghanistan were
once paid by an American oil company? For important reports from major media sources
on the realities of the “war on terror,” click here.

Experts Urging Broader Inquiry In Towers’ Fall
2001-12-25, New York Times
Saying that the current investigation into how and why the twin towers fell on Sept.
11 is inadequate, some of the nation’s leading structural engineers and fire-safety
experts are calling for a new, independent and better-financed inquiry that could
produce the kinds of conclusions vital for skyscrapers and future buildings
nationwide. Experts critical of the current effort … point out that the current
team of 20 or so investigators has no subpoena power and little staff support and
has even been unable to obtain basic information like detailed blueprints of the
buildings that collapsed. Some structural engineers have said that one serious
mistake has already been made … the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns,
beams and trusses that held up the buildings. Interviews with a handful of members
of the team, which includes some of the nation’s most respected engineers, also
uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled
with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses,
examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like recorded
distress calls to the police and fire departments. Members have been threatened
with dismissal for speaking to the press.
Note: Our website has over 30 full articles posted from the New York Times. This is
the only article for which the Times threatened to sue us if we didn’t remove it. We
were allowed to replace it with this short summary. For more on this, click here.
For a two-page summary of many more major media news articles suggesting a major
cover-up of 9/11, click here.

Engineers Suspect Diesel Fuel in Collapse of 7 World Trade Center
2001-11-29, New York Times
Almost lost in the chaos of the collapse of the World Trade Center is a mystery that
under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city
and the world. That mystery is the collapse of a nearby 47-story,
two-million-square-foot building. Engineers and other experts … were for weeks
still stunned by what had happened to 7 World Trade Center. [They] struggle to
explain the collapse. That building had housed, among other things, the mayor’s
emergency command bunker. It tumbled to its knees shortly after 5:20 on the ugly
evening of Sept. 11. Experts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced
high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire, and engineers have
been trying to figure out exactly what happened and whether they should be worried
about other buildings like it around the country. “Even though Building 7 didn’t get
much attention in the media immediately, within the structural engineering
community, it’s considered to be much more important to understand,” said William
F. Baker, a partner in charge of structural engineering at the architectural firm
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. “They say, ‘We know what happened at 1 and 2, but why
did 7 come down?'” Jonathan Barnett,
a professor of fire protection engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
said a definitive answer to the question of what happened in 7 World Trade Center is
perhaps the most important question facing investigators. “It’s just like when you
investigate a plane crash. If we find a weakness in the building or a deficiency in
the building that causes that collapse, we then want to find that weakness in other
buildings and fix it.”
Note: Though this articles blames the collapse on a diesel fuel fire, over 2,000
architects and engineers say this is impossible. A New York Times article states
that some of the I-beams at WTC 7, “once five-eighths of an inch thick, had
vaporized.” For powerful evidence presented by experts that World Trade Center 7 was
brought down by explosives, click here. And don’t miss the PBS special, “9/11
Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out”, in which 40 whistle-blowing architects and
engineers present astounding evidence of controlled demolition at
World Trade Center 7.

‘We’ve Hit The Targets’
2001-09-13, Newsweek
Could the [9/11] bombers have been stopped? NEWSWEEK has learned that while U.S.
intelligence received no specific warning, the state of alert had been high during
the past two weeks, and a particularly urgent warning may have been received the
night before the [9/11] attacks, causing some top Pentagon brass to cancel a trip.
Why that same information was not available to the 266 people who died aboard the
four hijacked commercial aircraft may become a hot topic on the Hill.
Note: This most astounding information is buried in this long article. Yet it is
repeated in a Newsweek article 11 days later (9/24/2001), which states, “On Sept.
10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel
plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns.” It was again
buried in a longer article, yet the author felt it important enough to include. Why
was there no follow up?’s Fred Burks
has a reliable
deep cover CIA contact who says he was informed just hours before the attacks that
there was going to be a major attack on Washington on 9/11. For an abundance of
reliable verifiable information suggesting a major cover-up around 9/11, click here
and here.

How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy
2014-02-24, The Intercept
Western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online
discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. Today, [The
Intercept is] publishing [a document from GCHQ’s previously secret unit, JTRIG, the
Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group], entitled “The Art of Deception: Training
for Online Covert Operations.” Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are
two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to
destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it
considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the
tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting
material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim
blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the
individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative
information” on various forums.Government plans to monitor and influence internet
communications, and covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow
dissension and disseminate false information, have long been the source of
speculation. Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the
White House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government employ teams
of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate”
online groups and websites, as well as other activist groups. Sunstein also
proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even
real-space groups” which spread what he views as false and damaging “conspiracy
theories” about the government.
Note: To see a guidebook developed by intelligence agencies full of charts and
information on how to infiltrate and deceive the public, click here. The Intercept
is the new media source being funded by Pierre Omidyar and featuring Glenn Greenwald
and other top reporters known for
their independence. Note that Greenwald fails to mention that Sunstein’s almost
exclusive focus was on “conspiracy theories” advocated by the 9/11 truth movement.
For more on his call for what amounts to a new COINTELPRO, see David Ray Griffin’s
book Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11
Conspiracy Theory.

Admiral: ‘Destroy’ photos of Osama bin Laden’s corpse
2014-02-12, USA Today/Associated Press
Less than two weeks after the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, a top Pentagon
official ordered all photos of bin Laden’s corpse be destroyed or turned over to the
CIA. In an e-mail dated May 13, 2011, Adm. William McRaven, the U.S. Special
Operations commander, wrote: “One particular item that I want to emphasize is
photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point — all photos should have been
turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them
to the (redacted).” Shortly after the raid in Pakistan, President Obama said he
would not authorize the release of any images of the al-Qaeda leader’s body. Days
before the order to destroy the photos, watchdog group Judicial Watch and the
Associated Press had separately filed a Freedom of Information Act request for
photos, videos and documents regarding bin Laden during the raid. Typically, when a
Freedom of Information Act request is filed to a government agency under the
Federal Records Act, the agency is obliged to preserve the material sought — even
if the agency later denies the request.
Note: Why would a top military commander order all photos of bin Laden’s dead body
destroyed? Why would Obama prevent the release of any images of the body? For
powerful evidence that the dead body was not, in fact, bin Laden’s, click here and
here. For other solid evidence that the official story of 9/11 is riddles with
holes, see our 9/11 Information Center available here.

The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered by Expert Panel
2012-09-10, MarketWatch/Wall Street Journal
A Panel of 22 researchers into the history of 9/11 has uncovered evidence of fraud
in the photographic images of Muslim hijackers prior to boarding the planes on 9/11.
Court exhibits state that leader Mohamed Atta took a commuter flight from Portland,
Maine, to connect to AA Flight 11 out of Boston, which hit the North Tower. The
dubious images heighten the mystery of why Atta left Boston, where Flight 11 was to
be hijacked, and risked the failure of his entire mission by driving to Portland
September 10, staying overnight, and booking a tight connection back to Boston early
September 11. The [9/11 Consensus] Panel’s in-depth review shows the Portland story
to be peppered with inconsistencies and revisions, placing the entire hijack theory
in question. Similarly, at Washington’s Dulles International Airport, five hijackers
allegedly passed through security before flying AA Flight 77, carrying CNN
correspondent Barbara Olson, into the Pentagon. Yet no
images were released from the 300+ security cameras at Dulles that morning, nor
were Arabic men reported in FBI interviews of airport staff. The Panel has produced
28 Consensus Points of “best evidence” regarding the official claims of 9/11 — the
trigger event for the Middle East wars of the last decade. Its investigations
cover: explosives at the Twin Towers and Building WTC-7; the inadequate flying
skills of the alleged Pentagon pilot; the missing debris from “Let’s Roll” Flight
93; the [many] military drills coinciding on 9/11, and the allegedly absent
political and military commanders.
Note: This article appears to have been removed from the MarketWatch website, though
you can still read it using the Internet Archive. Don’t miss the PBS special, “9/11
Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out”, in which 40 whistle-blowing experts present
evidence of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center. For lots more
verifiable evidence suggesting a major cover-up around 9/11, click here.

Architect Richard Gage Explains His 9/11 Theory
2011-04-19, WJBK Fox 2 (Detroit Affiliate of Fox News)
It is a day of infamy – 9/11.
The official investigation concluded that intense heat from the crash and the jet
fuel melted the support beams causing the [WTC] towers to collapse. But architect
Richard Gage doesn’t believe that. He is the founder of Architects and Engineers for
9/11 Truth. [Gage:] There is evidence to suggest that explosive demolitions have
brought down all three World Trade Center skyscrapers. We have now 1,500 architects
and engineers calling for a new investigation based on this evidence, including the
third skyscraper that most people know nothing about. This is a 47-story skyscraper
that collapses at free fall acceleration, straight down … into its own footprint
just like a controlled demolition. This is extraordinary evidence, along with the
chemical evidence of high-tech nanothermite composite explosives or incendiaries
found in the all the World Trade Center dust. The architects and engineers are
highlighting the specific evidence in these three
skyscrapers, because its so clear that they’re explosive demolitions. We have
[found] in all of this massive quantity of dust … iron microspheres the size of
the diameter of a human hair. Billions of them … are found. These contain the
evidence of ignited thermite. There is no other explanation for them. What the
1,500 architects and engineers that
I represent are calling for is an investigation that is thorough that uses the
scientific method [and] analyzes all of the evidence. Once this evidence is all
analyzed, we’ll let the chips fall where they may. We don’t have conspiracy
theories. What we want is a real investigation.
Note: The text above is taken from the video news report at the Fox News link above.
To watch the symmetrical fall of the third World Trade Center building, click here.
For lots more reliable, verifiable information questioning the 9/11 official story,
see our 9/11 Information Center.

9/11 third tower mystery ‘solved’
2008-07-04, BBC News
The 47-storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the
twin towers. Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different
floors caused the collapse. Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower
was brought down in a controlled demolition. Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was
not hit by a plane. The National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] … is
expected to conclude in its long-awaited report this month that ordinary fires
caused the building to collapse. That would make it the first and only steel
skyscraper in the world to collapse because of fire. [NIST’s] lead investigator, Dr
Shyam Sunder, spoke to BBC Two’s “The Conspiracy Files”: “Our working hypothesis now
actually suggests that it was normal building fires that were growing and spreading
throughout the multiple floors that may have caused the ultimate collapse of the
buildings.” However, a group of architects, engineers and
scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse is
impossible. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a
controlled demolition. The founder of the group, Richard Gage, says the collapse of
the third tower is an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives.
“Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this
building falling at virtually freefall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see
that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to
the path of least resistance”, says Gage, “they don’t go straight down through
Note: To watch a one-minute clip of the fall of WTC 7 from a PBS documentary, click
here. For a two-page summary of some unanswered questions about what really happened
on 9/11, click here. To learn about over 2,000 architects and engineers who claim a
major cover-up around 9/11 click here.

Note: Read even more major media news articles revealing stunning information on a
9/11 cover-up. Then explore our full index to revealing excerpts of key major media
news articles on several dozen engaging topics. And don’t miss amazing excerpts from
20 of the most revealing news articles ever published.

What you can do:
* Inform your media and political representatives of the vital information in these
9/11 news articles. To contact those close to you, click here.
Urge them also to join in calling for the release of secret documents and for a new,
impartial investigation of 9/11.
* Explore the wealth of reliable, verifiable information on 9/11, including several
excellent documentaries, in our 9/11 Information Center available here.
* Learn more about 9/11
and the secret societies likely involved in this powerful lesson from the free
Insight Course.
* Spread this news to your friends and colleagues, and recommend this article on
key news websites

Related Articles:

Hillary 9/11 CoverUp – Saudi 9/11 Clinton Foundation $2mil Bribery

9/11 Unsolved – The Lie Americans Believe In

Top 3 Dangers on Sept 27 – Bunker Obama Now

Christine LeGarde & IMF In Bed With Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Top 51% U.S. Politically InCorrect – Americans Demand Muslim Vetting

Economic Collapse – Vatican is Complicit

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply