Planet X U-Turn – Impending Celestial Catastrophe Scare

John DiNardo & Prof James McCanney
Sat, Aug 22, 2015
Subject; Planet X U-Turn

"as stated in my Diamond Principle book … someday earth will be
labeled (again) by the passage of one of the large MANY planet X

I am responding to Joyce Riley's Power Hour challenge for
"anyone who is man enough and who has enough guts" to ask you
Prof. McCanney, my photocopied NEW YORK TIMES report (below)
cited the late Dr. Robert S. Harrington, chief astronomer of the U.S.
Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., as believing that the one, the
sole, the colossal "Planet X,"
— gravitationally detected by astronomers worldwide for nearly the
past two centuries, and, in 1983, about to be successfully sighted
by N.A.S.A.'s "Infrared Astronomical Satellite" —
is a "brown dwarf star".
Over the years, I have never heard or read your estimation of the
mass range of what you often term "Planet X objects" and "Planet X-
type" objects. Please tell me what, in Earth-masses, is the
approximate range of masses of what you, personally, have frequently
termed "Planet X objects" and "Planet X-type objects"? The mass of a
brown dwarf star is defined as being at least three Jupiter-masses,
which translates to about one thousand Earth-masses.
So, I would logically think that your frequent mention of "Planet X-
type objects" should likewise refer to objects of at least one thousand
Earth-masses. Does, in fact, such a colossal magnitude of mass come
anywhere near your unstated mass range of your frequently mentioned
"Planet X-type objects"?

-> Answer, if you please.

… as i have stated there is no verifiable astronomical data
that anyone has presented to date that would suggest an impending
celestial catastrophe this fall 2015 (there is no verifiable
astronomical data that has been presented that would suggest either
a planet X (comet X) object or asteroids will affect earth this fall)

I do not follow the reports which you rightfully ridicule about "CIA
shills predicting that Planet X will strike Earth this fall." Quite the
opposite should be expected. In my studies of this **ONE**
N.A.S.A.-DECLARED dwarf star and its accompanying gang of
gravitationally captured planets, comets, etc., it is ludicrous to
believe that Dr. Harrington's very real dwarf star will pass Earth
on its way to the Sun any time soon, because, as you know, our
Solar System is incredibly spacious, and, as you and I both know:
as N.A.S.A.'s *DECLARED* "Planet X" "brown dwarf star" is pulled
ever closer to our Sun by our Sun's great gravitational force field,
the dwarf star will not hit, but will overshoot the Sun, and thus,
the dwarf star will decelerate as it overshoots the Sun, sort of like
a boy wearing suspenders running past a big strong man, and the
man pulls back on the back of the boy's suspenders.
In its deceleration, the speed component of the dwarf star's velocity
vector will decelerate to zero and will begin to accelerate in the
opposite direction, back toward the Sun, while the directional
component of the dwarf star's velocity vector will continually change
toward our Sun, which is pulling back on it. Hence, over the time
progression of the dwarf star's velocity vector, the dwarf star will be
making a relatively slow, lazy U-turn around our Sun. This slow lazy
U-turn by the dwarf star would naturally take some appreciable
length of time — several years or even a decade, perhaps.
Now, since I can only glean a few clues about the distant regional
location in our Solar System of this Planet X U-turn
[by searching out past science reports (from the turn of this century
to the present) describing certain aberrations that have been
appearing in and around the outer planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus,
and Neptune (e.g. comet crashes into Jupiter, the astounding and
temporary disappearance of Jupiter's Belt, unprecedented storms
on Saturn, etc.)]
it would, therefore, be quite difficult for folks like us — who are
barred from observing our funded secret activities of N.A.S.A.'s
astronomers, astrophysicists, and astrometricists — to discern the
regional location in our Solar System in which this dwarf star's
U-turn around the Sun is currently proceeding.
My questions to you are: Are you able to surmise the current
location of this N.A.S.A.-DECLARED dwarf star? Has it traveled up
from the southern skies, below the Ecliptic yet? Has it overshot
the Sun yet?
[I suspect that it has at least overshot the Sun, judging from my
as yet inadequate study of waxing and waning earthquake trends
over the past decade].
My suspicions may be wrong. What does your information suggest
about this object's current position and its possible deceleration and
then its reverse-directional acceleration, in its loop around the Sun?

-> Answer, if you please.

JOYCE RILEY: The Power Hour Radio Show, July 6, 2015:
"Now is the chance for anyone who has enough manhood and
enough guts to ask James McCanney a question."

Joyce, even boys and girls have the right to ask questions. When I
taught high school physics, my way was to encourage my students,
not to intimidate them, like a Marine drill instructor!

This means that a massive gravitational/magnetic dwarf star has
captured many thousands of space bodies in deep space, and this baby sun
is being gravitationally pulled into our Solar System by our own adult Sun's
superior gravitational force field. As this celestial beehive cruises in, above
Earth's orbital path, Earth will gravitationally suck in many of the celestial
bees (meteors and smaller bolide [bullet-like] boulders, etc.] swarming
within a radius of many millions of miles around their parent mini-sun,
this incoming dwarf star, which NASA has, for decades, called "Planet X."
THE WASHINGTON POST frontpage: NASA Discovers the Long-Sought "Planet X"

In their 1983 WASHINGTON POST report, they tried to conceal the identity
of this dwarf star, captured within the outer bounds of our Sun's
gravitational force field. They claimed, "We Don't Know What It Is!"
However, earlier that same year, they emphatically declared that they knew
exactly what it was that they were launching their Infrared Astronomical
Satellite to find: They announced that they were seeking "Planet X."
NASA, we are not stupid. We know that earlier you announced your space
search for "Planet X," even though you later feigned ignorance when you
found precisely what you had announced you were seeking.
THE NEW YORK TIMES: "Clues Get Warm in the Search for PLANET X"

Related Articles:

Top 10 Planet X Evidence – John DiNardo interview

Planet X – Oil Disaster in the Gulf is Not Over

Pentagon Run for Cheyenne Mountain StarGate Base – Mega Tsunami Warnings

Planet X Silence – Earth Now Reeling To & Fro

Global Warning – Methane Evidence of Global Cataclysm

Planet X – The Destroyer – NASA Knows it’s Coming

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply