Martial Law Looting of America – Abe Lincoln Secret History

Judge Anna Von Reitz
Mon, Nov 23, 2015
Subject; Abe Lincoln Secret Martial Law

I am an American Common Law
Superior Court Judge in Alaska where operation of the Seventh Amendment
Courts started up again in conjunction with the Common Law Grand Juries
more than a year ago and I also serve as a Federal Postal District Court
Judge for the Western Region.

As you can clearly see by reading the Seventh Amendment all matters
pertaining to living people and their property must be addressed to Common
Law Courts. How then, are the Hammonds being addressed by federal
admiralty courts?

The answer lies in the past.

During the Civil War the normal court system owed the people in the South
shut down and did not immediately reopen. Commanders in the military
districts in ten states appointed civilian tribunals to function under
"Special Admiralty"—– a euphemism. For the purposes of these military
tribunals, people and property could be addressed in an arbitrary fashion
without regard for the Law of the Land. This was very convenient for the
administrators and very unfortunate for the people.

In 1866 the Supreme Court addressed the situation in Milligan Ex Parte and
decided that so long as the American Common Law Courts were running there
was no excuse for the use of any form of martial law. Be advised that the
American Common Law Courts are up and running.

But both the military administrators and the judges and most particularly,
the Bar Associations, had a taste of arbitrary power and the bit in their
teeth back then— and a concerted effort to shut the Common Law Courts
down began, so as to usurp their jurisdiction and "move the venue" of the
local courts off the land and into the international jurisdiction of
martial law and the sea, where power could be exerted against the people
and their assets on the land in a comparatively arbitrary fashion.

By 1965 the rats had achieved their ends and almost all Common Law Courts
in America were either shut down or functioning with only two offices—
justice of the peace and notary publics.

This allowed the members of the Bar Associations to impose admiralty law on
the people and to avoid the guarantees of The Constitution. The use of
"Special Admiralty" in a courtroom is signified by the heavy gold fringe on
the flag.

A word here about the Bar Associations and some facts about the ABA that
deserve to be far more widely known, also some information about the
current Court System that you probably don't know:

The American Bar Association is an offshoot of the London Lawyer's Guild,
an avowed Communist organization. The American Bar Association and the IRS
are both owned and operated by Northern Trust, Inc. They are private,
foreign debt collection agencies, not units of government, not
"professional associations", and certainly not "non-profit organizations".
As an organization representing a foreign (British) government, the Bar
Associations are only allowed to function here via a Treaty (the last one
in 1947) that they have abundantly violated. Their members are required to
present Foreign Agent Statements as part of their credentials in open
court, which they hardly ever do.

As a result of their misdeeds and usurpations against the Law of the Land
and the people and their violations of both their corporate charter and
their Treaty, a commercial obligation lien of $279 trillion dollars has
been assessed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar
Association, and the "US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"—-which, it turns out, is
just another private subcontractor performing "governmental services" and
doing a criminally bad job of it.

The "US District Courts" are also private for-hire subcontractors that run
all the related courts in their districts. Please see Title 28, Sections
80 to 131. All these "State" Courts and "County" Courts are being run as
franchises of the "US District Court"—and they are all private corporate
institutions having no public office or function at all, and being related
to the actual state and county only insomuch as they are operating within
the geographical boundaries of a state and a county. This can be readily
proven by looking up the Dunn and Bradstreet Numbers, CAGE numbers, and
corporate filings of these organizations. And, as was recently
demonstrated by the Lufkin Case in Texas, neither the "US District Court"
nor its "State" and "County" affiliates have any authority to collect debts
outside the ten square miles of the District of Columbia.

We should also clear up another misunderstanding. Back in 1864, the
"United States Congress" acting as a Board of Directors for The United
States of America, Inc., changed the meaning of several words by executive
fiat, without telling the rest of us. For their purposes and from June 30,
1864 onward, the words "state" and "State" and "United States" are code for
"District of Columbia Municipal Corporation". Thus, instead of "US
District Court" you should be reading "District of Columbia Municipal
Corporation District Court" and the "Idaho State Supreme Court" for
example, should be read as "Idaho District of Columbia Municipal
Corporation Supreme Court".

Are you beginning to feel as if you have landed in the Land of Oz?

Yes, all this means that until you make some important decisions, you
*aren't *working for the people of your county as an elected *public* peace
officer. You are working as an employee of a federal corporation franchise
in a private capacity. Your election is being "interpreted" as an
election to an office in a private corporation. You are presently acting
as a mall cop. You have no public office, no public bond, and no public
oath. If you are like most members of the "law enforcement community" you
are not even licensed or bonded or insured in a private capacity by your
cheapskate employers. You are working for The Man, not the people.

And all this got off track 150 years ago.

So all those "federal agents" who are harrassing the Hammonds and who are
offering to arrest them and transport them to a private prison facility?
They are private corporate employees of a franchise or subcontractor of
the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation having no more authority
than a floorwalker at JC PENNY, despite their pretensions otherwise. They
are misinformed as to their authority and also misinformed regarding the
identity of the Hammonds. These "federal agents" are literally foreign with
respect to the Hammonds and have no jurisdiction related to them at all.

As part of the overall outrageous circumstance and fraud scheme the members
of the American Bar Association have also contrived to change the
citizenship of American State Citizens—- people born on the land of the
Continental United States like the Hammonds have been "kidnapped on paper"
and their civil records have been falsified— which is in violation of
international law, the Law of War, and the United Nation's Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, which both the Federal United States and the
British Government have signed.

An examination of the paperwork will reveal that virtually every single
American State Citizen has been deemed a "foundling" and ward of the state,
the unwanted child of an unwed mother—- almost 400 million of us, and not
a Daddy to be found? This is the result of a systematic and repugnant
scheme by international commercial banks and the ABA, and again, all
serving to change the natural venue on the land to a court venue in the
international jurisdiction of the sea.

The fact is that although human slavery has been outlawed worldwide since
1926, *it is not against the law to enslave a corporation.*

So what have the criminals among us contrived to do? To "redefine" living
people as corporations—- specifically as foreign situs trusts doing
business under names styled like this: John Quincy Adams, and ESTATE
trusts operating under names styled like this: JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, and now,
most recently, Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this:

Look at the paperwork in your hands seemingly addressed to the Hammonds.
Depending on the style used to write their names, you can tell whether the
documents are addressed to foreign situs trusts owned and operated by the
"State of Oregon, Inc." , a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust owned and operated
by the "STATE OF OREGON, INC." or a public transmitting utility owned and
operated by "OREGON"—- a franchise of the UN Corporation.

Please bear in mind that these "legal fiction entities" were created
without the Hammond's knowledge or permission and they are completely,
100%, the responsibility *of those who created them*. If the HAMMONDS
referenced are ESTATE trusts belonging to the "STATE OF OREGON" it is high
time for someone who is responsible for the "STATE OF OREGON" to pay any
debts related to the franchise without delay—-and without bothering the
living people these franchises are named after.

It also behooves them to leave the living people and their property
strictly alone and forego any pretense that the living Americans known as
the Hammonds have knowingly or willingly agreed to act as Federal United
States Citizens or have any agreed upon responsibility to act as
"co-trustees" of the Public Charitable Trust, which they most likely don't
make use of and don't even know that it exists.

*Bottom line— these "courts" and their presentments and "orders" have
nothing whatsoever to do with the Hammonds as living people, nor their
actual physical property assets at all. They have to do with the
mis-administration of public trusts and "legal persons" operated by
private, mostly foreign-owned corporations which are attempting to entrap
and enslave Americans and lay false claims against their property via
probate fraud, identity theft, and coercion.*

This is the kind of criminality and fraud we are dealing with, Sheriff
Ward, and at the end of the day, the pedal hits the metal in your office.

The British Government contrived the means to "press gang" the "land
assets"—living people and their property assets— of America into the
jurisdiction of the sea during the Second World War. They enslaved us and
our property assets under false pretenses and via the use of legal
chicanery "for the war effort" — and after the war, they simply continued
on with these abuses.

You have a choice.

You can continue to operate as a good little debt slave of the Queen acting
on "automatic" and taking orders regardless of where those orders come
from—– that is, you can act as a corporate mall cop in a private
capacity and take your licks when the people catch up with you, or you can
honor the truth—- that the people of your county elected you in Good
Faith, with the understanding that you would enforce the guarantees of The
Constitution owed to them and faithfully impose the land jurisdiction of
the united States of America on any British agents who put a tentacle
outside their actual jurisdiction.

As a Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county and operating the
land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States you have the
authority to take your lawful Oath of Office, obtain a bond for your own
security, and deputize as many men as you require to restrict the "federal
agents" to their actual capacity. It is your duty to inform these foreign
agents that the living people known as the Hammonds do not "reside" in any
"federal territory" nor act in any capacity subject to the District of
Columbia Municipal Corporation. You also have the right to collect Bounty
from the Secretary of State and the US District Court under the terms of
the 14th Amendment to cover any costs you incurr as a result of having to
deal with these improper demands and false claims made by their agents.

If these "federal agents" persist, you have the authority to address the
"US District Court" responsible and request their removal from your
county. If they still won't behave and honor The Constitution and the
actual limits of their own jurisdiction, you have the right and
responsibility to arrest the whole kit and kaboodle, just as you would
arrest the keepers of a tavern operating outside the Public Law.

You also have the right and responsibility to inform the "US District
Court" and their franchise affiliates operating the "State" and "County"
Courts that the American Common Law Courts and Grand Juries are in
operation again and any use of martial law including "Special Admiralty" is
no longer excusable.

Acting as an elected Officer of the American Common Law Court indigenous to
your county, along with the justices of the peace and the notary public, it
is your duty to convene the Common Law Grand Jury chosen at random from
among the landowners of your county to investigate crimes, including this
one against the Hammonds, and to convene a Common Law Trial Jury if
necessary before the Justice of the Peace, to decide any and all matters
affecting the living people and actual property assets of the county on the
land. If there is no one able and willing to serve as Justice of the Peace
in your County, a Justice of the Peace may be appointed by any Federal
Postal District Judge in your region. Contact me if you need help.

Please also know that as the Sheriff duly elected by the people of your
county you have the authority and responsibility to demand the return of
any American State Citizen being held in "federal custody" for a
non-capital crime (murder or assault with a deadly weapon) within 72 hours
of their arrest. So if the "federal agents" make the mistake of arresting
the Hammonds under false pretenses and holding them in a private capacity,
it is your right and role to present a Public Custody Order to the "US
District" or other court responsible demanding that the Hammonds be
released to your custody. You may then use your own discretion whether to
keep them in custody or release them on parole pending final resolution of
the jurisdictional complaint.

These are matters that affect millions of people and they must be addressed
openly and with determination. The British Monarch has acted in Breach of
Trust against the Americans, Canadians, Australians, and others. This
criminality and the resulting surreptitious use of the Americam Bar
Association members as licensed privateers operating on our shores is a
serious international crime which is being addressed.

The misrepresentations of Americans as "foundlings" and "bastards"
resulting in them being declared wards of the corporate "state" and further
misrepresentations leading to them being declared "legally dead" are
criminal acts of self-interested fraud carried out against us by avowed
"allies" and "friends in perpetuity"– parties who are bound by the most
solemn obligations of international trust and treaty, who have abused
America and Americans for their own profit.

This same pattern of lying about us and making false claims against us and
seeking to "re-venue" us to foreign jurisdictions has also been attempted
against our federation of nation-states as a whole. Two weeks ago,
international banks and governmental services corporations in their employ
appeared before the UN Trust Committee—North America, and claimed that
the States of America no longer exist. They claimed among other things
that we no longer have a national currency in circulation. They claimed
that all 400 million Americans had voluntarily accepted Federal United
States Citizenship. They claimed that our country is "civilly dead" and
"de-populated" and that there are no American State Citizens.

This was, of course, done behind our backs by people representing secondary
creditors of defunct federal "governmental services corporations" claiming
to be the beneficiaries and/or creditors of our estates.

It's time to set the records straight and for us to act in our naked
sovereign capacity.

A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty was issued by lawful heirs of the
National Trust(s), together with Sovereign Letters Patent in behalf of the
United Colonies of America, the united States of America, and the Native
American Nations and delivered to the UN Trust Committee–North America and
to the UN Security Council, the Pope, the Queen, Ban Ki Moon, the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, and the Bank of International Settlements.

The criminals responsible for this circumstance are being recognized for
who and what they are and the die is cast. We are going to get down to the
bottom of this fraud and misrepresention once and for all.

If you wish to be called "Sheriff" of a county in America, you must now
step up and earn the title and begin operating the land jurisdiction owed
to the Continental United States. You are under moral and lawful
obligation to protect the Hammonds against any "federal agent" and to fully
inform those agents of the limitations of their jurisdiction while standing
on our soil. If there is no American Common Law Court presently operating
in your county, it is your duty to organize one without further delay. In
most counties there are active Justices of the Peace who still perform
private marriage ceremonies and public notaries are still active. You may
draft your Grand Jury and if needed, Trial Juries, from among the
landowners listed in the county land records. All actions of the actual
County Court should be stamped in red and signed in black. All actions by
admiralty courts —by whatever name they operate under—are stamped in

Sovereign Debt Crisis – Whistleblower Martin Armstrong

Martin Armstrong
Mon, Nov 23, 2015
Subject; Princeton Economics Financial Collapse Disclosure

Who is Martin Arthur Armstrong ——— Princeton Economics

MARTIN ARMSTRONG, once a US based trillion dollar financial advisor, developed a
computer model based on the number pi and other cyclical theories to predict
economic turning points with eerie accuracy. In the early 80s he established his
financial forecasting and advising company Princeton Economics . His forecasts were
in great demand worldwide. As Armstrong's recognition grew, prominent New York
bankers invited him to join "The Club" to aid them in market manipulation. Martin
repeatedly refused. Later that same year (1999) the FBI stormed his offices,
confiscating his computer model and accusing him of a 3 billion dollar Ponzi scheme.
Was it an attempt to silence him and prevent him from initiating a public discourse
on the real Ponzi scheme of debts that the world has been building up for decades?
Armstrong predicts that a sovereign debt crisis will start to unfold on a global
level after October 1, 2015 – a major pi turning point that his computer model
forecasted many years ago.

Here is a break down of the link above, once the first segment has played it will
automatically go to the next segment.

The link above is NOT THE MOVIE—– The movie is EXCELLENT — you can get it here:

1. Theatrical Trailer 3:24 minutes
2. Film premiere in Stuttgart, this segment says info in English then repeats in
German it's 25:56 minutes
3. Securing the Algorithm 2:24 minutes
4. You don't make a Billion dollars disappear 3:24 minutes
5. The consultant in the hole 4:14 minutes
6. Why the US media avoiding the Armstrong Case 5:47 minutes
7. Cycle of Imprisonment 4:43 minutes
8. Judge Owen 6:18 minutes
9. The Fall of Rome 1:15 minutes
10. Unlocking the mystery of coins 3:11 minutes
11. The Club 8:31 minutes
12. Flaws in Euro 2:36 minutes
13. Official Trailer 2:17 minutes
14. Marcus Vetter on the Forecaster 2:52 minutes
15. Theatrical Trailer 3:24 minutes
16. Official Trailer (Swiss peg) 2:39 minutes

Martin Armstrong website

With the model, Martin can Fall or RISE a Nation.

War on Terror by Design – CIA Agenda of Disruption

Devvy Kidd
Wed, Nov 18, 2015
Subject; CIA Agenda of War on Terror


The world was shocked, again. Savage Muslims executed a well coordinated terrorist attack in six separate locations in Paris. Dead bodies piled up in a concert hall swimming in blood (Warning: photos graphic). Soft targets: 4 diners/cafes, stadium and concert hall. Heartbreaking pictures. A woman hanging out of a window screaming, "Help, help, I'm pregnant". Eye witness accounts of killers just standing there opening fire without regard to anything but carrying out their madness.

Barbarians armed with Kalashnikovs and grenades. Satan's Soldiers doing their dastardly, inhumane acts of violence. Gunmen shout 'Allah Akbar' and 'It's for Syria'. They were sent by ISIS. One of them we know came through Greece as a Syrian 'refugee' and into France. A country with open borders. Like America's virtually open southern border. After the slaughter, President Francois Hollande declared a national state of emergency and immediately implemented border control checks at all crossings and entry points – after 135 of her citizens are murdered.

135 confirmed dead and 350 injured; hospitals overwhelmed by the number of injured. Chaos. Crying. People wandering around in shock. How horrible it must have been during those three hours. How much more horrible it must have been when the sun came up the next morning and one would see the carnage in the light of day. When families and loved ones have to identify human remains and deal with their loss forever.

Everyone was so surprised. According to reports intelligence from both the U.S. and Great Britain indicated there was no chatter, no warning despite their most sophisticated spying tools. Unlike the U.S. and 911:

On July 10, 2001, Bush, JR, was informed by the CIA during an emergency meeting a 'spectacular' attack was imminent here on U.S. soil. The much over rated former NSA Director, Condi Rice, passed along to former president Bush that Al Qaeda was planning major attacks in the coming weeks or months.

‘The Attacks Will Be Spectacular’ – An exclusive look at how the Bush administration ignored this warning from the CIA months before 9/11, along with others that were far more detailed than previously revealed, November 12, 2015

"By May of 2001, says Cofer Black, then chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center, “it was very evident that we were going to be struck, we were gonna be struck hard and lots of Americans were going to die.” “There were real plots being manifested,” Cofer’s former boss, George Tenet, told me in his first interview in eight years. “The world felt like it was on the edge of eruption. In this time period of June and July, the threat continues to rise. Terrorists were disappearing [as if in hiding, in preparation for an attack]. Camps were closing. Threat reportings on the rise.” The crisis came to a head on July 10. The critical meeting that took place that day was first reported by Bob Woodward in 2006. Tenet also wrote about it in general terms in his 2007 memoir At the Center of the Storm.

"But neither he nor Black has spoken about it publicly in such detail until now—or been so emphatic about how specific and pressing their warnings really were. Over the past eight months, in more than a hundred hours of interviews, my partners Jules and Gedeon Naudet and I talked with Tenet and the 11 other living former CIA directors for The Spymasters, a documentary set to air this month on Showtime.

"Tenet vividly recalls the White House meeting with Rice and her team. (George W. Bush was on a trip to Boston.) “Rich [Blee] started by saying, ‘There will be significant terrorist attacks against the United States in the coming weeks or months. The attacks will be spectacular. They may be multiple. Al Qaeda’s intention is the destruction of the United States.’” [Condi said:] ‘What do you think we need to do?’ Black responded by slamming his fist on the table, and saying, ‘We need to go on a wartime footing now!’”

“What happened?” I ask Cofer Black. “Yeah. What did happen?” he replies. “To me it remains incomprehensible still. I mean, how is it that you could warn senior people so many times and nothing actually happened? It's kind of like The Twilight Zone.” (I recommend reading the rest of that article)

On Saturday following the attacks, Hollande promised a “merciless” response. He said the attack was an 'Act of War'. Suddenly, some eyes are finally opened to the reality of what has been unleashed on Europe by their own foolish policies:

France promises 'merciless' response to attacks

"This comes as a blow to Angela Merkel and other European leaders who allowed a flood of hundreds of thousands of migrants despite the potential threat from ISIS to infiltrate the west. Merkel responded to the massacre by calling for people to express “tolerance” towards the migrants and respect for “the right of everyone to seek his fortune and live.”

“We believe in the right of everyone to seek his fortune and live, to the respect for the other and tolerance,” said Merkel. “We know that our free life is stronger than any terrorist. Let's give the terrorists the answer by living our values confidently. And as we affirm these values throughout Europe. Now more than ever.” Numerous experts have warned “that rolling out the red carpet to migrants from the Middle East would substantially heighten the risk of terrorists being able to cross into Europe, although such concerns were dismissed by many at the time as fearmongering,” noted InfoWars."

Merkel is a damn fool, always has been. She of a dowdy appearance on par with a 'char' worshipping at the altar of political correctness and blind stupidity about Islam.

Returning to the article above:

"Far-right National Front party leader Marine Le Pen issued a call for “urgent action” on Saturday, saying, “Islamist fundamentalism must be annihilated, France must ban Islamist organizations, close radical mosques and expel foreigners who preach hatred in our country as well as illegal migrants who have nothing to do here.”

“It is absolutely necessary that France regains control of its borders,” she said – a message likely to resonate with French voters worried over the recent massive influx of Muslim migrants. In a little-noticed story from a German newspaper, Bavaria’s state premier Horst Seehofer told a party conference there was “reason to believe” that a 51-year-old man arrested last week with several weapons in southern Germany was linked to the Paris attack."

Naturally talk of stopping ISIS, Satan's Soldiers, has cranked up again. I would ask where was Germany, Britain and France in 2014 when ISIS went on the rampage against innocents, the Yazidi people?

ISIS's ideology of rape

"There is a scene early in Rukmini Callimachi's deeply reported New York Times story on ISIS's "theology of rape" in which an ISIS fighter binds, gags, and violently rapes a sobbing 12-year-old child. Even after a year of reading about one ISIS atrocity after another, this was a special kind of horror that left my palms clammy and my stomach lurching. I suspect I was not alone.

"What Callimachi describes is a vast infrastructure of sexual violence and slavery. Victim after victim told her of being kidnapped, enslaved, and sold by ISIS, always for the express purpose of religiously sanctioned rape:

"Every time that he came to rape me, he would pray," said F, a 15-year-old girl who was captured on the shoulder of Mount Sinjar one year ago and was sold to an Iraqi fighter in his 20s. Like some others interviewed by The New York Times, she wanted to be identified only by her first initial because of the shame associated with rape. "He kept telling me this is ibadah," she said, using a term from Islamic scripture meaning worship.

"ISIS's systematic enslavement and rape of Yazidi women, Callimachi reports, now has not just a theological justification but "a persistent infrastructure," as well. That includes "a network of warehouses where the victims are held, viewing rooms where they are inspected and marketed, and a dedicated fleet of buses used to transport them."

I would remind everyone ISIS is in the back yard of Germany, Britain and France; go look at this map. Those three countries all have major military capability, not to mention nearby Russia. As soon as ISIS stuck it's grotesque head up and showed the world what they were doing, those countries should have gone and sent them to Hell where they belong. An all out massive bombing day in and day out based on intelligence on the ground and from satellites until they were wiped out like the foul vermin they are. No, instead, it's 'tolerance' of 'moderate' Muslims while making little whimpering noises at such violence taking place in Iraq.

Iraq, the land George Bush, Jr., was going to liberate.

Giving Thanks Today For War, Killing, Destruction, Murder

"Iraq was destined to be picked off a long time ago. The way to do it was to convince the American people Iraq was a threat to America and when that didn't work, resort to justifying invasion as a "war of liberation."

"March 20, 2004: President justifies U.S. war of 'liberation.' "There are still violent thugs and murderers in Iraq, and we're dealing with them," Bush said. "But no one can argue that the Iraqi people would be better off with the thugs and murderers back in the palaces. Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open? Who would wish that more mass graves were still being filled? Who would begrudge the Iraqi people their long- awaited liberation?"

"Really? 5.1 MILLION Iraq's are now displaced in their own country or are refugees abroad. Estimates are more than one million dead since the yippy-kay-yay cowboy, George Bush, Jr., decided to invade that country. Recall the vomit spewed by former SOS, Mad Madeleine Albright during a 60 Minute interview with Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

"Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it." Somehow I doubt the parents of those children think it was worth it. The people of Iraq and Afghanistan don't hate us because of our freedom, they hate us for invading their countries and the wholesale slaughter of men, women and children who have nothing to do with foreign policy or terrorism.

"Long awaited liberation," Mr. Bush? After killing a million or more human beings and destroying their countries, the US has liberated their population? Let me provide a bit of history here: Seven times the U.S. government has engaged in unconstitutional nation building – Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo, Sierra Leone, East Timor and Liberia. EVERY time it's been a monumental failure just as Iraq and Afghanistan will be down the road. The U.S. Constitution does not authorize Congress to steal from the people's treasury to reconstruct or rebuild any foreign country.

From author Jeri Lynn Ball, a superb writer and thorough researcher who wrote long ago:

"In Stalin's Russia, notes Mikhail Heller, enemies were blamed for everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968), the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980, and so on. The Soviet Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for "liberation wars" for humanity.

"Using Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese, and U.S. ruling elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populations with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They have used them …to manipulate Americans into supporting government hunts for "traitors," "terrorists," and these never ending "wars of national liberation." Their aim is to manipulate whole populations into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not only the sovietization of "liberated" underdeveloped countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and sovietization of the United States and other Western nations."

"Our government created and groomed "terrorists" like Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. When the time came, "our" government turned the tables and went after them with the might of our military while feeding the masses reprehensible lie after lie after lie."

A most outstanding piece, which is normal for the very gifted writer and thinker, Mark Steyn, laid it all out: The Barbarians Are Inside, And There Are No Gates

"Visiting the Bataclan, M Hollande declared that "nous allons mener le combat, il sera impitoyable": We are going to wage a war that will be pitiless.

"Does he mean it? Or is he just killing time until Obama and Cameron and Merkel and Justin Trudeau and Malcolm Turnbull fly in and they can all get back to talking about sea levels in the Maldives in the 22nd century? By which time France and Germany and Belgium and Austria and the Netherlands will have been long washed away. Among his other coy evasions, President Obama described tonight's events as "an attack not just on Paris, it's an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values we share".

"But that's not true, is it? He's right that it's an attack not just on Paris or France. What it is is an attack on the west, on the civilization that built the modern world – an attack on one portion of "humanity" by those who claim to speak for another portion of "humanity". And these are not "universal values" but values that spring from a relatively narrow segment of humanity. They were kinda sorta "universal" when the great powers were willing to enforce them around the world and the colonial subjects of ramshackle backwaters such as Aden, Sudan and the North-West Frontier Province were at least obliged to pay lip service to them. But the European empires retreated from the world, and those "universal values" are utterly alien to large parts of the map today.

"And then Europe decided to invite millions of Muslims to settle in their countries. Most of those people don't want to participate actively in bringing about the death of diners and concertgoers and soccer fans, but at a certain level most of them either wish or are indifferent to the death of the societies in which they live – modern, pluralist, western societies and those "universal values" of which Barack Obama bleats. So, if you are either an active ISIS recruit or just a guy who's been fired up by social media, you have a very large comfort zone in which to swim, and which the authorities find almost impossible to penetrate.

"And all Chancellor Merkel and the EU want to do is make that large comfort zone even larger by letting millions more "Syrian" "refugees" walk into the Continent and settle wherever they want. As I wrote after the Copenhagen attacks in February:" (Do read the rest)

Now we come around to home here in the U.S. What did I say in my column, States MUST refuse to take any more refugees, September 21, 2015, citing an article by Seumas Milne, "What's clear is that Isis and its monstrosities won't be defeated by the same powers that brought it to Iraq and Syria in the first place, or whose open and covert war-making has fostered it in the years since. Endless western military interventions in the Middle East have brought only destruction and division. It's the people of the region who can cure this disease – not those who incubated the virus."

One can only pray France, Germany, Great Britain join with Russia and go after Satan's Soldiers with every bit of firepower they possess. Our military fired a rocket from a drone last week after months of planning and watching which took out 'Jihadi John', a ruthless murderer who has now gone to Hell where he belongs for eternity. Those countries have the capability and they should begin to eradicate the cancer now.

I also said in my column: "Unless we the people stand up and demand our states refuse those refugees don't start crying about your next tax bill or when a football stadium, mall or big hospital is blown to smithereens." There is good news on that front which you should let your mayor, city council, your state rep and senator and governor know:

U.S. state draws line in sand against Islamization, November 12, 2015, WND

"A third South Carolina county has barred the door to any Third World refugees being resettled in their community, and at least two others are considering the same move. The Berkeley County Council unanimously passed a resolution Monday that bars any refugee funds from flowing into that county. The resolution calls for “all South Carolina public officials to immediately cease and desist” from helping to resettle Middle Eastern refugees anywhere in the state until the legislature can act on the issue and pass legislation reflecting the will of the people.”

"Anderson and Pickens counties already passed similar resolutions. Two more counties – Greenville and York – are expected to vote soon on similar resolutions. South Carolina is the only state that gives local governments the option of rejecting, not necessarily the refugees, but the state and federal tax dollars that flow to their aid when they are resettled in a city."

Gov. Nikki Haley in the article above says she trusts the vetting of refugees pouring into her state. Another damn fool in a skirt just like Merkel. The criminal impostor in the White House has managed to get 500,000 Muslims into this country since he usurped the office of president. Thousands of Syrian and Afghani refugees are flooding cities across this country because of our foreign policies. Not only are stupid politicians like Haley taking a chance terrorists are among those refugees – like one of them in Paris and who knows about the others – those hordes are going on federal welfare (unconstitutional) which you and I will be raped in taxes to pay for. It's not just young, healthy males between the ages of 18 – 30. One of those terrorists in Paris was a female.

Predictably, the anti-gun extremists were ready with their thread worn shout-outs. However, Presidential hopeful Donald Trump had the right response: Unarmed people are sitting ducks. An armed population defend themselves.

There is bad trouble brewing in this country. Yes, we are heavily armed, but not organized. How anyone can deny at this point there are terrorist cells in this country? The ones who are so brain washed they can't see the barrel of a gun pointed right at them. But, make no mistake: Paris is coming to American cities and when it happens, the same thing we saw in Paris we will see here unless state legislatures man up and reconstitute the constitutional militia.

For those ignorant charlatans in the 'mainstream' media and cable news networks who routinely either dismiss the word militia as something akin to malaria, you people are a major part of the problem. Not only do you have zero understanding of the Second Amendment, you also have zero understanding of warfare. But, what can one expect from a bunch of sissies who sit around with their latte's and laptops?

We constantly hear gutless weenie politicians and media slugs say Americans don't need semi-automatic weapons. Really? What did those murderers in Paris use to mow down 87 people inside that concert hall? AK-47 Kalashnikov-series assault rifles. What do you think a couple of them could do inside the National Cathedral Christmas eve or inside an airport the day before Thanksgiving? TSA is useless. Airport security should be turned over to the private sector and we'll see how cowardly terrorists fare up against retired military or law enforcement on duty.

I firmly believe one of the reasons we haven't seen more hits on 'soft' targets here in the U.S. is because we're armed. But, a few of those killers in Paris blew themselves up believing they were going to Allah's heaven to be with 72 virgins or some other such crap. There's not enough police, sheriffs or other law enforcement in any one place to either stop Muslim killers or at least minimize the killing by killing them. You don't do that with a .22 pea shooter.

Now, either we get serious about defending our own or, tragically, like all those who died in Paris, we're sitting ducks. Just like the shooting in October 2015 at Umpqua Community College in Oregon where nine Americans lost their lives.

There is a difference between militias operating in this country and the constitutional militia as mandated IN the Second Amendment. I have covered this in many columns as has Dr. Edwin Vieira since 2005. So far only one state, Arizona, passed a state militia bill that was signed into law. While it is sorely lacking, I highly advise Arizona to put the infrastructure into place and provide the funding to activate trained militia under state guidelines.

I have said so many times and I'll say it again: Militia groups operating in this country are doing a great job training to be prepared for natural disasters like Katrina and tornadoes that wipe out whole towns. But, they have no legal authority behind them and therein lies the problem. All those existing militia will be of great value once a state reconstitutes the constitutional militia – before Americans by the hundreds are mowed down like what happened in France.

Where do you begin?

I put a few of Dr. Edwin Vieira's very precise historical and legal columns regarding the Second Amendment and the constitutional militia on a CD. You can download it to some electronic gadget or listen to it as you sit in commute traffic, around town or long haul truckers as they bring food and goods to our stores or at home. Do as I did several years ago and give a copy to your county sheriff.

When I first put out that CD I shipped (for a grand total of $2 bux each) 18,000 of them across this country. There was no money made; I did it to help Americans understand the issue as I did not until I began reading Edwin's thoroughly researched colums and books.

I don't know how many times that CD has been downloaded, but now it's time for you to help get the truth out to our fellow Americans. Top of the list is your state rep, senator and governor. Okay, we know the reality of states like California, New York and others who are too damn stupid to understand how to save themselves much less their citizens. But, it still doesn't hurt to get a copy to state reps and senators in your legislature that profess to be supporters of the Second Amendment. Like all our other battles, it takes boots on the ground and educating anyone who is interested in saving our country and either stopping or minimizing the next terrorist attack because there will be one, mark my words. We're dealing with zealots who have no regard whatsoever for human life.

Read this very important 3-part series so you know: True vs. False Militia and Why The Difference Matters

And, third, take the time to also read (hey – do it at lunch time or on the weekend when the weather is howling out there) two books. One is slightly over 100 pages: Thirteen Words. "Dr. Vieira has managed to break the Second Amendment down to its bare minimum. As Dr. Vieira has stated, if one cannot bother to read, and understand thirteen words, there is little hope for saving our republic. Fortunately, the good doctor makes it easy to understand the historic background of this Amendment. Moreover, he manages to illuminate the importance of the entire Constitution, Bill of Rights, and even the basis for these documents as provided by the great Declaration. This is a great work in a small package."

Another reviewer wrote: "Through the years we have been fooled by miseducation into not understanding the Second Amendment. This book makes it clear just how important the militia is. Without the militia we cannot be free." How very true.

The second book is a bit longer, but vitally important: Constitutional Homeland Security : The Nation in Arms. "Homeland security" is the most serious issue challenging Americans today. How they deal with this problem will determine whether the United States will preserve individual liberty and economic prosperity, or degenerate into a centralized bureaucratic police state. This book explains why "the Militia of the several States" are the only establishments the Constitution explicitly empowers to provide the crucial elements of homeland security. And it describes the practical steps Americans should take to revitalize the constitutional Militia in each of the States."

Do we wait until after Paris comes to American cities or do we act now?

Do we send a clear message to terrorists already here in the U.S. they will die first?

Do we send a clear message to scum coming out of the Middle East or do we sit back and hope "it doesn't happen here"?

Open Range is an excellent film with a message: A man has the right to protect what's his which is why the media hated it. At one hour eight minutes into the film, Kevin Costner and Robert Duvall are talking with a man in the saloon. He tells Costner and Duvall how one big bad ass land owner owns the sheriff and has terrorized the entire town. The man talking with Costner says it's a shame what their town has come to. Costner says they can do something about it. The man responds with what can they do, after all, he's just a freighter? Costner replies: You're men, ain't you? The man replies he didn't raise his sons just to get killed. Costner then replies: You may not know this, but there's things that gnaw on a man worse than dying.

[Just a short note about 9/11. The cost of America’s undeclared “war” (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars – massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I’ve purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It’s very powerful simply because it’s one ‘ordinary’ man’s story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. Also, must see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take Back Your Power.]

U.S. Education System Abusing America’s Children

Walter Williams
Wed, Nov 18, 2915
Subject; Dumbing Down America's Children 2015

The 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress report, also known as The Nation’s Report Card, shows that U.S. educational achievement, to put it nicely, leaves much to be desired.

When it comes to reading and math skills, just 34 percent and 33 percent, respectively, of U.S. eighth-grade students tested proficient or above — that is, performed at grade level or above. Recent test scores show poor achievement levels in other academic areas. Only 18 percent of eighth-graders are proficient in U.S. history. It’s 27 percent in geography and 23 percent in civics.

The story is not much better when it comes to high schoolers. According to 2010 and 2013 NAEP test scores, only 38 percent of 12th-graders were proficient in reading. It was 26 percent in math, 12 percent in history, 20 percent in geography and 24 percent in civics (

Many of these poorly performing youngsters gain college admission. The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education reports, “Every year in the United States, nearly 60 percent of first-year college students discover that, despite being fully eligible to attend college, they are not ready for postsecondary studies.” That means colleges spend billions of dollars on remedial education. Many of the students who enroll in those classes never graduate from college. The fact that many students are not college-ready takes on even greater significance when we consider that many college courses have been dumbed down.

Richard Vedder, emeritus professor of economics at Ohio University, argues that there has been a shocking decline in college academic standards. Grade inflation is rampant. A seminal study, “Academically Adrift,” by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, argues that very little improvement in critical reasoning skills occurs in college. Adult literacy is falling among college graduates. Large proportions of college graduates do not know simple facts, such as the half-century in which the Civil War occurred.

Vedder says that at the college level, ideological conformity is increasingly valued over free expression and empirical inquiry.

While educational achievement among whites is nothing to write home about, that for blacks is no less than a disaster. Only 13 percent of black eighth-graders score proficient or above in math, and only 16 percent do in reading. In 2013, only 7 percent of black 12th-graders scored proficient in math, and only 16 percent did in reading. The full magnitude of the black education tragedy is seen by the statistics on the other end of the achievement continuum. “Below basic” is the score given when a student is unable to demonstrate even partial mastery of knowledge and skills fundamental for proficient work at his grade level. In 2013, 62 percent of black 12th-graders scored below basic in math, and 44 percent scored below basic in reading.

Dr. Thomas Sowell has written volumes on black education. The magnitude of today’s black education tragedy is entirely new. He demonstrates this in “Education: Assumptions Versus History,” a 1985 collection of papers. Paul Laurence Dunbar High School is a black public school in Washington, D.C. As early as 1899, its students scored higher on citywide tests than any of the city’s white schools. From its founding in 1870 to 1955, most of its graduates went off to college. Dunbar’s distinguished alumni included U.S. Sen. Ed Brooke, physician Charles Drew and, during World War II, nearly a score of majors, nine colonels and lieutenant colonels, and a brigadier general.

Baltimore’s Frederick Douglass High School also produced distinguished alumni, such as Thurgood Marshall and Cab Calloway, as well as several judges, congressmen and civil rights leaders. Douglass High was second in the nation in black Ph.D.s among its alumni.

The stories of the excellent predominantly black schools of yesteryear found in Sowell’s study refute the notion of “experts” that more money is needed to improve black education. Today’s Paul Laurence Dunbar and Frederick Douglass high schools have resources that would have been unimaginable to their predecessors. Those resources have meant absolutely nothing in terms of academic achievement.

Nightly Mind Control – The News Dumbing Down U.S.

Jon Rappoport
Wed, Nov 18, 2915
Subject; Nightly Mind Control on the News

Every television newscast: staged reality

"The news is all about artificially manipulating the context of stories. The thinner
the context, the thinner the mind must become to accept it. If you want to visualize
this, imagine a rectangular solid. The news covers the top surface. Therefore,
the mind is trained to work in only two dimensions. Then it can't fathom depth,
and it certainly can't appreciate the fact that the whole rectangular solid moves
through time, the fourth dimension." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Focus on the network evening news. This is where the staging is done well.
First, we have the image itself, the colors in foreground and background, the blend
of restful and charged hues. The anchor and his/her smooth style.
Then we have the shifting of venue from the studio to reporters in the field,
the reach of coverage: the planet. As if this equals authenticity.
Actually, those reporters in the field rarely dig up information on location. A
correspondent standing on a rooftop in Cairo could just as well be positioned in
a bathroom in a Las Vegas McDonald's. His report would be identical.
The managing editor, usually the elite news anchor, chooses the stories to cover
and has the final word on their sequence.
The anchor goes on the air: "Our top story tonight, more signs of gridlock today
on Capitol Hill, as legislators walked out of a session on federal budget
The viewer fills in the context for the story: "Oh yes, the government. Gridlock
is bad. Just like traffic on the I-5. A bad thing. We want the government to
get something done, but they're not. These people are always arguing with each
other. They don't agree. They're in conflict. Yes, conflict, just like on the
cop shows."
The anchor: "The Chinese government reports the new flu epidemic has spread to three
provinces. Forty-two people have already died, and nearly a hundred are
The viewer again supplies context, such as it is: "Flu. Dangerous. Epidemic.
Could it arrive here? Get my flu shot."
The anchor: "A new university study states that gun owners often stock up on weapons
and ammunition, and this trend has jumped quickly since the Newtown, Connecticut,
school-shooting tragedy…"
The viewer: "People with guns. Why do they need a dozen weapons? I don't need
a gun. The police have guns. Could I kill somebody if he broke into the house?"
The anchor: "Doctors at Yale University have made a discovery that could lead to
new treatments in the battle against autism…"
Viewer: "That would be good. More research. Laboratory. The brain."
If, at the end of the newscast, the viewer bothered to review the stories and his
own reactions to them, he would realize he'd learned nothing. But reflection is
not the game.
In fact, the flow of the news stories has washed over him and created very little
except a sense of (false) continuity.
It would never occur to him to wonder: are the squabbling political legislators
really two branches of the same Party? Does government have the Constitutional
right to incur this much debt? Where is all that money coming from? Taxes? Other
sources? Who invents money?
Is the flu dangerous for most people? If not, why not? Do governments overstate
case numbers? How do they actually test patients for the flu? Are the tests accurate?
Are they just trying to convince us to get vaccines?
What happens when the government has overwhelming force and citizens have no guns?
When researchers keep saying "may" and "could," does that mean they've actually
discovered something useful about autism, or are they just hyping their own work
and trying to get funding for their next project?
These are only a few of the many questions the typical viewer never considers.
Therefore, every story on the news broadcast achieves the goal of keeping the context
thin—night after night, year after year. The overall effect of this staging is
small viewer, small viewer's mind, small viewer's understanding.
Next we come to words over pictures. More and more, news broadcasts are using the
rudimentary film technique of a voice narrating what the viewer is seeing on the
People are shouting and running and falling in a street. The anchor or a field
reporter says: "The country is in turmoil. Parliament has suspended sessions for
the third day in a row, as the government decides what to do about uprisings aimed
at forcing democratic elections…"
Well, the voice must be right, because we're seeing the pictures. If the voice
said the riots were due to garbage-pickup cancellations, the viewer would believe
that, too.
We see Building #7 of the WTC collapse. Must have been the result of a fire. The
anchor tells us so. Words over pictures.
We see footage of Lee Harvey Oswald inside the Dallas police station. The anchor
tells he's about to be transferred, under heavy guard, to another location. Oswald
must be guilty, because we're seeing him in a police station, and the anchor just
said "under heavy guard."
Staged news.
It mirrors what the human mind, in an infantile state, is always doing: looking
at the world and seeking a brief summary to explain what that world is, at any given
Since the dawn of time, untold billions of people have been urging a "television
anchor" to "explain the pictures."
The news gives them that precise thing, that precise solution, every night.
"Well, Mr. Jones," the doctor says, as he pins X-rays to a screen in his office.
"See this? Right here? We'll need to start chemo immediately, and then we may
have to remove most of your brain, and as a follow-up, take out one eye."
Sure, why not? The patient saw the pictures and the anchor explained them.
After watching and listening to a month or two of news planted with key words, the
population is ready to see the President or one of his minions step up to a microphone
and say, "Quantitative easing…sequester…"
Reaction? "Oh, yes, that's right, I've heard those words before. Good."
A month later, those two terms disappear, as if they'd never existed.
Eventually, people get the idea and do it for themselves. They see things, they
invent one-liners to explain them.
They're their own anchors. They short-cut and undermine their own experience with
vapid summaries of what it all means.
And then, of course, when the news cuts to commercial, the fake products takes over:
"Well, every night they're showing the same brand names, so those brands must be
better than the unnamed alternatives."
Which devolves into: "I like this commercial better than that commercial. This
is a great commercial. Let's have a contest and vote on the best commercial."
"Hello. I'm staged reality and I'm doing ads to promote me."
For "intelligent" viewers, there is another sober mainstream choice, a safety valve:
PBS. That newscast tends to show more pictures from foreign lands.
"Yes, I watch PBS because they understand the planet is interconnected. It isn't
just about America. That's good."
Sure it's good, if you want the same thin-context or false-context reporting on
events in other countries. Instead of the two minutes NBC might give you about
momentous happenings in Iraq, PBS will give you four minutes, plus congenial experts
commenting abstractly, employing longer words.
PBS' experts seem kinder and gentler. "They're nice and they're more relaxed.
I like that."
Yes, the PBS experts are taking Valium, and they're not drinking as much coffee
as the CBS experts.
Anchors deliver the long con every night on the tube, between commercials.
They're marketing thin context.

And of course, the "science" promoted on the network news is also derived from
efforts at major government agencies, such as the CDC.
The anchor says, "Medical experts are now taking a heavier approach to parents who
refuse to vaccinate their children and deny the benefits of vaccines."
What sits behind that statement?
The announcement of so-called epidemics and outbreaks are part of a strategy for
marketing vaccines. It's obvious.
For example, read this from the World Health Organization Fact Sheet, Number 11,
dated March 2014:
"Influenza occurs globally…Worldwide, these annual epidemics are estimated to
result in about 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness, and about 250,000 to 500,000
Now consider the recent "measles outbreak" in the US. 150 cases, and no deaths.
In the case of worldwide flu, WHO and the CDC choose not to hype and propagandize;
but in the case of the measles, it's suddenly all hands on deck and fear, fear,
Because it's time. It's time to inflate the seriousness of a standard childhood
disease. It's time to focus on "the children." It's time, once again, to offset
the massive rebellion against vaccination exploding in the US population. It's
time to engender fear. It's time to attack anti-vaccination researchers. It's
time to take another step in the direction of mandating vaccines. It's time to
introduce bills in legislatures that cancel legal exemptions from vaccines and cancel
freedom of choice. It's time for more medical fascism. It's time to paint parents
who don't vaccinate as terrorists. It's time to paint their children as little
biowar weapons loose in the community.
It's time to advance the medical police state.
And oh yes, it's time to divert attention away from the fact that even conventional
researchers and the CDC admit this year's flu vaccine is geared to the wrong virus
and is useless (but you should take it anyway).
The designation of "outbreaks" and "epidemics" is arbitrary. "We'll take THIS as
an epidemic and we'll ignore THAT as an epidemic."
It's very much like marketing, because it is marketing.
"Let's see, Bob. Which one of the items in our sales catalog should we push hard
this quarter? The bikini or the leather boots?"
"You know, we haven't hyped the measles vaccine for a while. How about an outbreak
of measles? Can we sell that? Focus on the kiddies? We'll need about 100 cases,
we'll say they all came from one source, like a playground or an amusement park,
and we'll claim it's very, very serious…"
"Do we have a good front man to go on television and promote the fear factor? How
about that maniac who thinks any kid can handle 10,000 vaccines? Or the schmuck
from UCLA. Maybe a woman doctor, a mother with three kids. You know, soapy dopey."
When the propaganda pros decide which way to go…they issue a statement, a press
release, and this release is picked up by the news shows:
"Medical experts are criticizing parents who refuse to vaccinate their children
and deny the proven benefits of vaccines."
There are various forms of mind control. The one I'm describing here—the thinning
of context—is universal. It confounds the mind by pretending depth doesn't exist
and is merely a fantasy.
The mind, before it is trained away from it, is always interested in depth.
Another way of putting it: the mind naturally wants more space, not less. Only
constant conditioning can change this.
Eventually, when you say "mind," people think you're referring to the brain, or
they don't know what you're talking about at all.
Mind control by eradicating the concept of mind. That's quite a trick.

Open Border Assault – Planned Chaos by the State

Llewellyn H Rockwell Jr
Fri, Nov 13, 2015
Subject; Open Border Assault to Private Property

Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal

This talk was delivered at the Mises Circle in Phoenix, AZ, on November 7, 2015.

Whether we’re talking about illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America, or birthright citizenship, or the migrants coming from the Middle East and Africa, the subject of immigration has been in the news and widely discussed for months now. It is an issue fraught with potentially perilous consequences, so it is especially important for libertarians to understand it correctly. This Mises Circle, which is devoted to a consideration of where we ought to go from here, seems like an opportune moment to take up this momentous question.

I should note at the outset that in searching for the correct answer to this vexing problem I do not seek to claim originality. To the contrary, I draw much of what follows from two of the people whose work is indispensable to a proper understanding of the free society: Murray N. Rothbard and Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Some libertarians have assumed that the correct libertarian position on immigration must be “open borders,” or the completely unrestricted movement of people. Superficially, this appears correct: surely we believe in letting people go wherever they like!

But hold on a minute. Think about “freedom of speech,” another principle people associate with libertarians. Do we really believe in freedom of speech as an abstract principle? That would mean I have the right to yell all during a movie, or the right to disrupt a Church service, or the right to enter your home and shout obscenities at you.

What we believe in are private property rights. No one has “freedom of speech” on my property, since I set the rules, and in the last resort I can expel someone. He can say whatever he likes on his own property, and on the property of anyone who cares to listen to him, but not on mine.

The same principle holds for freedom of movement. Libertarians do not believe in any such principle in the abstract. I do not have the right to wander into your house, or into your gated community, or into Disneyworld, or onto your private beach, or onto Jay-Z ‘s private island. As with “freedom of speech,” private property is the relevant factor here. I can move onto any property I myself own or whose owner wishes to have me. I cannot simply go wherever I like.

Now if all the parcels of land in the whole world were privately owned, the solution to the so-called immigration problem would be evident. In fact, it might be more accurate to say that there would be no immigration problem in the first place. Everyone moving somewhere new would have to have the consent of the owner of that place.

When the state and its so-called public property enter the picture, though, things become murky, and it takes extra effort to uncover the proper libertarian position. I’d like to try to do that today.

Shortly before his death, Murray Rothbard published an article called “Nations by Consent: Decomposing the Nation State.” He had begun rethinking the assumption that libertarianism committed us to open borders.

He noted, for instance, the large number of ethnic Russians whom Stalin settled in Estonia. This was not done so that Baltic people could enjoy the fruits of diversity. It never is. It was done in an attempt to destroy an existing culture, and in the process to make a people more docile and less likely to cause problems for the Soviet empire.

Murray wondered: does libertarianism require me to support this, much less to celebrate it? Or might there be more to the immigration question after all?

And here Murray posed the problem just as I have: in a fully private-property society, people would have to be invited onto whatever property they traveled through or settled on.

If every piece of land in a country were owned by some person, group, or corporation, this would mean that no person could enter unless invited to enter and allowed to rent or purchase property. A totally privatized country would be as closed as the particular property owners desire. It seems clear, then, that the regime of open borders that exists de facto in the U.S. amd Western Europe really amounts to a compulsory opening by the central state, the state in charge of all streets and public land areas, and does not genuinely reflect the wishes of the proprietors.

In the current situation, on the other hand, immigrants have access to public roads, public transportation, public buildings, and so on. Combine this with the state’s other curtailments of private property rights, and the result is artificial demographic shifts that would not occur in a free market. Property owners are forced to associate and do business with individuals they might otherwise avoid.

“Commercial property owners such as stores, hotels, and restaurants are no longer free to exclude or restrict access as they see fit,” writes Hans. “Employers can no longer hire or fire who they wish. In the housing market, landlords are no longer free to exclude unwanted tenants. Furthermore, restrictive covenants are compelled to accept members and actions in violation of their very own rules and regulations.”

Hans continues:

By admitting someone onto its territory, the state also permits this person to proceed on public roads and lands to every domestic resident’s doorsteps, to make use of all public facilities and services (such as hospitals and schools), and to access every commercial establishment, employment, and residential housing, protected by a multitude of nondiscrimination laws.

It is rather unfashionable to express concern for the rights of property owners, but whether the principle is popular or not, a transaction between two people should not occur unless both of those people want it to. This is the very core of libertarian principle.

In order to make sense of all this and reach the appropriate libertarian conclusion, we have to look more closely at what public property really is and who, if anyone, can be said to be its true owner. Hans has devoted some of his own work to precisely this question. There are two positions we must reject: that public property is owned by the government, or that public property is unowned, and is therefore comparable to land in the state of nature, before individual property titles to particular parcels of land have been established.

Certainly we cannot say public property is owned by the government, since government may not legitimately own anything. Government acquires its property by force, usually via the intermediary of taxation. A libertarian cannot accept that kind of property acquisition as morally legitimate, since it involves the initiation of force (the extraction of tax dollars) on innocent people. Hence government’s pretended property titles are illegitimate.

But neither can we say that public property is unowned. Property in the possession of a thief is not unowned, even if at the moment it does not happen to be held by the rightful owner. The same goes for so-called public property. It was purchased and developed by means of money seized from the taxpayers. They are the true owners.

(This, incidentally, was the correct way to approach de-socialization in the former communist regimes of eastern Europe. All those industries were the property of the people who had been looted to build them, and those people should have received shares in proportion to their contribution, to the extent it could have been determined.)

In an anarcho-capitalist world, with all property privately owned, “immigration” would be up to each individual property owner to decide. Right now, on the other hand, immigration decisions are made by a central authority, with the wishes of property owners completely disregarded. The correct way to proceed, therefore, is to decentralize decision-making on immigration to the lowest possible level, so that we approach ever more closely the proper libertarian position, in which individual property owners consent to the various movements of peoples.

Ralph Raico, our great libertarian historian, once wrote:

Free immigration would appear to be in a different category from other policy decisions, in that its consequences permanently and radically alter the very composition of the democratic political body that makes those decisions. In fact, the liberal order, where and to the degree that it exists, is the product of a highly complex cultural development. One wonders, for instance, what would become of the liberal society of Switzerland under a regime of “open borders.”

Switzerland is in fact an interesting example. Before the European Union got involved, the immigration policy of Switzerland approached the kind of system we are describing here. In Switzerland, localities decided on immigration, and immigrants or their employers had to pay to admit a prospective migrant. In this way, residents could better ensure that their communities would be populated by people who would add value and who would not stick them with the bill for a laundry list of “benefits.”

Obviously, in a pure open borders system, the Western welfare states would simply be overrun by foreigners seeking tax dollars. As libertarians, we should of course celebrate the demise of the welfare state. But to expect a sudden devotion to laissez faire to be the likely outcome of a collapse in the welfare state is to indulge in naïveté of an especially preposterous kind.

Can we conclude that an immigrant should be considered “invited” by the mere fact that he has been hired by an employer? No, says Hans, because the employer does not assume the full cost associated with his new employee. The employer partially externalizes the costs of that employee on the taxpaying public:

Equipped with a work permit, the immigrant is allowed to make free use of every public facility: roads, parks, hospitals, schools, and no landlord, businessman, or private associate is permitted to discriminate against him as regards housing, employment, accommodation, and association. That is, the immigrant comes invited with a substantial fringe benefits package paid for not (or only partially) by the immigrant employer (who allegedly has extended the invitation), but by other domestic proprietors as taxpayers who had no say in the invitation whatsoever.

These migrations, in short, are not market outcomes. They would not occur on a free market. What we are witnessing are examples of subsidized movement. Libertarians defending these mass migrations as if they were market phenomena are only helping to discredit and undermine the true free market.

Moreover, as Hans points out, the “free immigration” position is not analogous to free trade, as some libertarians have erroneously claimed. In the case of goods being traded from one place to another, there is always and necessarily a willing recipient. The same is not true for “free immigration.”

To be sure, it is fashionable in the US to laugh at words of caution about mass immigration. Why, people made predictions about previous waves of immigration, we’re told, and we all know those didn’t come true. Now for one thing, those waves were all followed by swift and substantial immigration reductions, during which time society adapted to these pre-welfare state population movements. There is virtually no prospect of any such reductions today. For another, it is a fallacy to claim that because some people incorrectly predicted a particular outcome at a particular time, therefore that outcome is impossible, and anyone issuing words of caution about it is a contemptible fool.

The fact is, politically enforced multiculturalism has an exceptionally poor track record. The 20th century affords failure after predictable failure. Whether it’s Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, or Pakistan and Bangladesh, or Malaysia and Singapore, or the countless places with ethnic and religious divides that have not yet been resolved to this day, the evidence suggests something rather different from the tale of universal brotherhood that is such a staple of leftist folklore.

No doubt some of the new arrivals will be perfectly decent people, despite the US government’s lack of interest in encouraging immigration among the skilled and capable. But some will not. The three great crime waves in US history – which began in 1850, 1900, and 1960 – coincided with periods of mass immigration.

Crime isn’t the only reason people may legitimately wish to resist mass immigration. If four million Americans showed up in Singapore, that country’s culture and society would be changed forever. And no, it is not true that libertarianism would in that case require the people of Singapore to shrug their shoulders and say it was nice having our society while it lasted but all good things must come to an end. No one in Singapore would want that outcome, and in a free society, they would actively prevent it.

In other words, it’s bad enough we have to be looted, spied on, and kicked around by the state. Should we also have to pay for the privilege of cultural destructionism, an outcome the vast majority of the state’s taxpaying subjects do not want and would actively prevent if they lived in a free society and were allowed to do so?

The very cultures that the incoming migrants are said to enrich us with could not have developed had they been constantly bombarded with waves of immigration by peoples of radically different cultures. So the multicultural argument doesn’t even make sense.

It is impossible to believe that the U.S. or Europe will be a freer place after several more decades of uninterrupted mass immigration. Given the immigration patterns that the US and EU governments encourage, the long-term result will be to make the constituencies for continued government growth so large as to be practically unstoppable. Open-borders libertarians active at that time will scratch their heads and claim not to understand why their promotion of free markets is having so little success. Everybody else will know the answer

Global Financial Terror by Secret New World DisOrder Committee
Fri, Nov 13, 2015
Subject; Global Financial Terror

Meet the Secretive Committees that Run the Global Economy

This whole thing has been going on for a couple of centuries but here are the last few decades showing some of the players.

There exists an overlapping and highly integrated network of institutions, committees and secret meetings of ad-hoc groups that collectively run the global economy. This network consists of finance ministries, central banks, international organizations and the various conferences and confabs that bring them together. This network is responsible for facilitating global financial diplomacy and managing the architecture of global financial governance. In short: it is the most powerful and informal political structure in the world.

With the United States at the center of the system, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve Bank are the two most important American institutions in global financial governance – and the Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairperson are the world’s two most powerful financial diplomats. Both institutions are headquartered in Washington, D.C., just down the street from the headquarters of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Group, two global financial bodies created in 1944 to manage the world economy on behalf of the rich Western nations that founded them.

Twice a year, the IMF and the World Bank host large international conferences. The Spring Membership Meeting, typically held in April, and the Annual membership meeting draw a crowd consisting of most of the finance ministers and central bank governors from the IMF’s 188 member nations, representing the Fund’s Governing Board. They descend on D.C. where the meetings are typically held (though occasionally they are hosted in other countries as well), and draw scores of journalists, academics and thousands of bankers and financiers who are eager to meet, greet, wine, dine and make deals with the political decision-makers of the global economy.

The top five shareholders of the IMF (United States, Japan, Germany, France and U.K.) reflect the membership of an ad-hoc group of finance ministers that began meeting in 1973, thereafter known as the Group of Five (G-5). At the time, U.S. Treasury Secretary George Shultz described the group as “a channel for informal and very frank communication on monetary and other issues, both of a long-term and more immediate character.” But the G-5 was hardly the first of such groups.

In 1962, the Group of Ten (G-10) was formed as a meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors from the rich industrial nations, including the U.S., West Germany, Japan, France, U.K., Italy, Canada, Belgium, Sweden, Netherlands (and eventually Switzerland, although the name remained the same). The G-10 would meet alongside the leaders of the IMF, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

Following the U.S. unilateral decision to end the Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971, a series of committees and groups were established to provide forums for major economies of the world to negotiate forming a new monetary system, and to integrate developing economies into the institutional apparatus of global financial governance. The Group of Ten was utilized as one such forum.

In 1972, the G-10 laid the groundwork for the establishment of a special Committee of 20 to be formed within the IMF, whose membership reflected the composition of the IMF Executive Board, but at the ministerial level – giving it a much higher level of political authority than the board, which is composed of mid-level officials from their respective national finance ministries. The committee would include most G-10 members alongside several developing country representatives, and was formally institutionalized in late 1974 as the “Interim Committee” of the IMF.

(Although the Group of Five was formed in 1973, it wasn’t until 1975 that it held the first meeting at the head of state level, with the addition of Italy to the group. The following year, Canada was invited to participate, and thereafter it was known as the Group of Seven (G-7), effectively functioning as the steering committee for the global economy.)

Fast forward to the mid-1990s, when the G-7 nations instructed the Group of Ten to consult with emerging market economies on ways to reform the global financial architecture in cooperation with major international organizations like the IMF, World Bank, OECD, and BIS, which were increasingly opening their membership and ownership positions to large emerging market economies.

The idea was thus: If developed countries give developing countries a stake in the existing system, they won’t use their new-found wealth and power to oppose that system. And all the while, the West was to remain at the center. Through crisis and collapse and “rescue” efforts led by the IMF, BIS and World Bank, developing and emerging market economies were encouraged to accept Western economic “advice” on how to manage their economies. If they wanted bailouts in the form of loans from international institutions, those countries had to follow conditions that demanded a total restructuring of their economies and societies along G-7 lines – designed to transform them into modern “market economies” capable of integrating into the larger global economy.

The groundwork was laid out over the following years, and in the course of 1999, the IMF’s Interim Committee was reformed into the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC). The G-10 organized several seminars involving major emerging market economies and, together with the G-7, formed a new group known as the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), a meeting group of central bankers, finance ministers and regulators who were handed responsibility for maintaining financial stability in the world. Finally, 1999 also saw the organizing efforts of the G-7 result in the formation of yet another forum, the Group of Twenty (G-20).

The G-20 was born in December of 1999 at a meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors from the G-7 nations, along with Russia, China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, Korea, Australia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, Argentina and the European Union. The event was attended by top officials from the IMF, World Bank and the European Central Bank. But despite all the international noise, the G20 was largely the initiative of two men: Canadian Finance Minister Paul Martin and U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers.

The G-7, or G-8 once Russia was invited in, remained the main forum for global economic leadership. But in the midst of the global financial crisis in 2008, the G-20 was the group convened by U.S. President George W. Bush, who brought together heads of state for the first meeting that took place in Washington on November 15. That meeting produced an agreement among G-20 nations to pump trillions of dollars into their economies in order to bail out their banking systems.

In 2010, then-President of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, explained at a meeting of the Institute of International Finance (IIF) that the G-20 had emerged “as the prime group for global economic governance.”

Speaking to a crowd of hundreds of the world’s most powerful bankers and financiers, Trichet explained, “Global economic governance embraces supranational institutions – such as the IMF – as well as informal groupings – such as the G-7 and the G-20. Both are necessary, and both are complementary.” Trichet praised the evolving system as “moving decisively towards a much more inclusive system of global governance, encompassing key emerging economies as well as the industrialized countries.”

To this day, the hierarchy of global economic governance follows a familiar pattern. Take the IMF’s meetings, where 188 of the world’s finance ministers and central bankers meet. The International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC) holds a meeting, functioning as the steering committee to the Fund. And prior to IMFC meetings, the G-20 finance ministers and central bank governors hold a series of meetings, including a joint meeting with the IMFC, as they already have a significant crossover of membership.

But before the G-20 meets, the ministers and governors of the G-7 nations typically meet privately for an hour or so, attempting to form a common position or strategy in dealing with the wider groupings of the G-20 and IMFC, in which all G-7 nations are represented at the ministerial level. The chiefs of the world’s major international organizations (IMF, World Bank, OECD, WTO, BIS) participate in almost all of these meetings, acting as advisers to and receiving high-level political direction from these groups.

The hierarchy of global economic governance emanates out of the United States, in close cooperation with Germany, Japan and the other members of the Group of Seven. From there, it networks through the Group of Twenty and the IMFC, which in turn collectively function as the steering committee for the world’s major international organizations, and act as the board of directors of the global economy.

American Troops Used as Cannon-Fodder for Banker Wars

Dr James Preston
Fri, Nov 13, 2015
Subject; Pentagon Divided Over Foreign wars

Divided Loyalties inside the Pentagon
There is growing dissent inside the Pentagon associated with the divided political loyalties of various factions.

Slowly but surely more and more Pentagon officials and their subordinates are beginning to wake up and understand that they have been seduced to fight foreign wars of aggression for the World’s largest Organized Crime Syndicate.

And that they have done this for the large Wall Street Banks, their associated “no bid” defense contractors, and for the state of Israel.

And they are beginning to understand that all this has been a big trick pulled on them by Traitors within their ranks who used Gladio-style, inside-job, engineered synthetic terror on 9-11-01 to attack America and then wrongly blamed it on innocent foreign Mideast nations. And they did all this in order to deceive America to fight illegal, unConstitutional, unprovoked, unjust wars.

Not only do these foreign wars of aggression violate the Geneva Conventions but constitute crimes against humanity under International Law besides being completely illegal and unConstitutional.

Many folk inside the Pentagon are now just beginning to understand that the American Military has served as the policemen, enforcers and cannon-fodder for these Banks and their associated defense contractors.

And that this has all been done to generate obscene profits and gain cheap access to other nation’s natural resources with absolutely no concern for the lives or welfare of heroic American Soldiers or their families. And much of the medical care provided by the VA is insufficient and in too many cases disgraceful with lost and missing records.

Some insiders have even suggested that the Top Policy-Makers that really have been running the American Military want lots of dead and wounded American Soldiers coming home with ongoing disabilities and a high suicide count.

And that various high tech eugenics have been used to provide this intended result including contaminated, debased vaccines, exposure to depleted uranium, known to be able to cause reproductive/genetic damage and earlier death from higher rates of cancer.

It is becoming more and more clear that there is a high level plot to kill, wound and disable America’s best youth and weaken their military by busing them as cannon fodder to fight wars for israel and the Banksters. It can actually be shown quite conclusively that all wars are banker’s wars in the final analysis.

This disgusting realization that General Smedley Butler was correct when he claimed that all war is a racket for Wall Street shocks the conscience into life for many able to gain such an understanding and have not lost their souls.

Naturally most Pentagon Officials, Officers of high rank and civilian employees enjoy the high positions and status they have attained. This motivates them to stay true believers of the party lines and ideologies their superiors expect.

And we know for sure that the majority of Pentagon Officers would stop serving the *Khazarian Mafia who hijacked the Pentagon if they actually understood that this is what happened, that is that the pentagon was infiltrated and hijacked by highly connected individuals who had divided loyalties and were serving another nation more than America.

What has been lacking has been access to the truth of who really runs the Pentagon and how they infiltrated it and hijacked and under what power they were able to do so.

All these facts are now coming out for the first time after being forbidden and suppressed for many years thanks to a new faction of America-firsters which has emerged within the Pentagon and American Intel.

These America-firsters have worked very hard for a number if years to get the real truth out about this infiltration and hijacking of the pentagon and the USG’s hijacking too which has been done by the same groups of Traitors who serve the World’s biggest Organized crime Syndicate.

Finally their work is attaining serious results. The American masses as well as many Pentagon Officials are now learning how our nation’s highest echelons were infiltrated and hijacked by the Khazarian Mafia and its subordinates the Bush Crime Cabal (aka the BCC) and the Israeli-American “Israeli-first” Dual Citizen Traitors (aka the Zios).

As this hidden truth is now becoming known and obvious to all, it can no longer be denied that High Treason has been committed in the Pentagon’s High Command Structure surround 9-11-01 and all the subsequent wars it triggered. Nor can it be denied that thousands of the best American Soldiers have been needlessly sacrificed, killed, horribly wounded and disabled for nothing but the evil profits of the Banksters and their war contractors.

As you can imagine as this truth sweeps through the Pentagon and the US Military, dissidence and rage grows by the day. And this realization is now spreading throughout the Pentagon at breakneck speed.

The truth that the Pentagon High Command and the US Administration were deeply involved in the attack on America and managed the stand-down on 9-11-01 is so clear cut, so definite, and so compelling that it can no longer be denied by anyone that takes the time to carefully consider that basic evidence.

The Pentagon High Command has worked very hard with the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM), the Administration and Congress to contain these terrible deep dark secrets and prevent the American masses and American Military from finding them out. To learn of the specifics of either of these secrets is usually a mind-boggling shock to the system for anyone that finds out, especially the second secret.

The first dark secret is that the Pentagon High Command has been infiltrated and hijacked by the World’s largest Opium Cartel and manipulated into helping the CIA and the Mossad, using the DEA and US Customs as cover to become the World’s largest illegal drug traffickers.

The second deep dark secret even more terrible for America if you can imagine that is that the Pentagon High Command assisted the Mossad and the Israeli-American “Israeli-first” Dual Citizens and the US Administration in their attack on America on 9-11-01.

On this terrible day, about 3,000 innocent civilians were mass-murdered, with about 39,000 later dying of the radiation fallout and asbestos poisoning and strange cancers. Right now about 70,000 are fighting for their very lives from this after-pollution and fallout of this Gladio-style, False-flag, Inside-job attack on NYC.

This kind of corruption in the Pentagon is nothing new, it got quite dirtied up in the Vietnam war with drug trafficking, search and destroy missions, and other mass-assassinations under the Operation Phoenix.

We now know for certain based on declassified documents that the Naval Intel and the US Administration had already cracked the purple code and and had numerous spotters who knew that the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor.

There were even newspaper articles saying such before hand suggesting an attack was imminent. What did the US navy do? They pulled the carriers out of port and left the old ships as targets. And Naval Intel went to the mountains in Hawaii with their families for an early annual picnic.

The Pentagon has protected the opium crop in Afghanistan for the Khazarian Mafia and the USAF has flown them out using remote controlled Global hawks. That is one of the main reasons the US Military was used to invade Afghanistan, but there are more.

There s a lot more to the story, click on the link of the original story and read and follow the videos.

America’s Patriots Have Abandoned their Duty – Who Shall Claim America?

Judge Anna Von Reitz
Fri, Nov 13, 2015
Subject; Americans Have Abandoned their Duty

Please note that this is an IMPORTANT Announcement — one that everyone on
Earth should read and understand. Superficially, it addresses the action
of Dr. Henderson, Ad Hoc of the World Court, abolishing 501 (c) 3
corporations. More explicitly, it addresses the nature of the Evil we are

Please, let all be aware, that there is a war going on.

Those involved are of two groups—- men allied with the Creator versus men
allied with the Created.

This is one way to explain it— men allied with Life and the Living versus
men allied with things other men created—- money and corporations.

It is a battle, quite literally, between the Living and the Dead.

Thus we have the Book of Life and the Book of the Dead….. and people will
be hard-tested to prove where they stand.

We have a choice between all that is truly valuable— life, health,
family, food, homes, communities—- and the illusion of corporations,
money and stocks and bonds and all else that substitutes itself for what
is actual.

For thousands of years, Mankind has been living in an illusion,
half-asleep, unconscious, manipulated, abused.

It's time to wake up and hear the birds sing.

This past week an attempt was made to bring a claim of abandonment against
our entire nation. The rats attempted to do to our entire country what
they have done against us as individuals. They have attempted to claim to
the UN that we are not a sovereign nation because their own service
corporation doing business as the "United States, Inc." is bankrupted and
no successor to contract has been appointed. They also mounted a claim
saying that we are not a sovereign nation because we allegedly have no
currency in circulation.

We had to rebut and rebuke them before the UN Security Council. That is how
bad it is.

This new action by Dr. Henderson outlaws NGO's and other forms of
"non-profit corporations" and prevents them from being used to launder
money and for other nefarious purposes while allowing the operators to
claim that they are "non-profit corporations", a status that has long
shielded them from prosecution and accountability.

Organizations like "Planned Parenthood" and "American Bar Association" will
either have to abide by the rules of the World Trust— which has very
strict accountability requirements—-or function in private association
capacity, in which case, they are 100% liable for their actions and enjoy
no protection as a public franchise.

This automatically puts a kabosh on there being any advantage to using
non-profits for institutionalized money laundering, slave trafficking, drug
transport, etc., and allows means to shut down and hold accountable any
organization that indulges in this sort of criminality whether it is a
hospital, a mosque, a glee club, or a sewing circle.

Some people— especially bankers and politicians—- will claim that this
is an attack on the churches and other religious and charitable
organizations. I don't see it that way at all. I see it as a return to
true religious freedom and the accountability that goes with it.

One of the most profoundly disturbing aspects of the research and
investigations we have conducted is that religious and non-profit
corporations have been widely used as "storefronts" for the most vile sorts
of criminality imaginable. This is no doubt partially a result of the
desire of the perpetrators to hide their activities from public view. They
have specifically targeted churches and charities for bases of operation,
and then, when caught, have claimed protection of their assets as
non-profit corporations.

Those days are at an end.

It would be good to pause a moment and review something that has long been
misunderstood by American Churches, Synagogues, Temples, Mosques, etc.
These organizations have established themselves as "non-profit
corporations" in order to secure what they believed to be tax exempt
status. In truth, they were never subject to any kind of tax to begin
with. They were always naturally tax exempt as long as they remained
private associations of believers.

It was the act of incorporating that made them subject to taxation in the
first place and it was then claiming to be a "non-profit" that allowed them
to escape taxation—-but bear in mind—-that secondary "exemption" was
granted as a privilege by Congress and it could just as easily be removed
by Congress.

This circumstance gave the governmental services corporations leverage over
the churches and granted administrative capacities to them, all designed to
coercively threaten and control these and other religious institutions. If
the non-profits didn't do what the "government" wanted, they were
threatened with loss of their tax exempt status and various other

So much for religious freedom in America.

Churches and other religious institutions and non-profit organizations can
now enjoy their natural tax-free status without interference or coercion.
At the same time, they will be fully accountable for what they do. If they
preach violence and crime and make money selling drugs and under-age porn
on the side, they will be shut down. Those responsible will be prosecuted
as criminals and their own assets will be forfeit along with the assets of
any such institution.

Freedom of religion like all freedoms comes at a price— responsibility
for our actions and their impact on the lives of others.

This marks the beginning of an effort by many nations to clean up this
mess. Get out your sponges, mops, and buckets, realizing that this is just
the beginning of a process of restoration on a worldwide basis. It's not
"just" America that got off-track. Virtually all the nations that were
ever part of the British Empire including Britain, Scotland, Ireland,
United States of America and India, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, plus
the nations of Western Europe, and Japan—have all been impacted by the
same evils, and those have then adversely affected the entire Earth.

Our world is a physical body. When one organ is afflicted, the entire body
suffers. In this case many "organs"—- many nations— have been infected
with the equivalent of a disease. That disease is a very ancient system of
predation and enslavement that was first organized in the Kingdom of
Ancient Summer, migrated to Babylon and Persia, then to the Levant and
North Africa, then following the Punic Wars it traveled from Carthage to
Rome and the British Isles.

This disease known as "idolatry" is the by-product of a sea-faring religion
that was spread worldwide by the Phoenicians many centuries ago.The
Phoenicians were sailors and they worshiped the god of the sea the Greeks
called "Poseidon". We more commonly know this "one-eyed god" as Satan. If
you recall statues and representations of Poseidon in Greek temples you
will see the familiar horns, scaly tail, cloven feet on land, and trident
we now (and still) associate with the Devil. This religion was known as
Druidism in the British Isles and Satanism elsewhere, but it is always
characterized by the same things: worship in "sacred groves", infanticide,
sex as a sacrament, dualistic "either/or" thinking patterns, the use of two
"goads" to drive public opinion and control people (think of the Democratic
and Republican political parties), pretending to "be" one's enemies—
called "mirroring" (think of the Federal United States pretending to be the
Continental United States), sacrifices of burned flesh (think of 9/11),
endless fraud schemes, and lies.

This is literally the "religion" of all pirates and criminals, and it is
tied inextricably to the Sea. Thus, we are told that the "Great Serpent"
was cast down into the *Sea*.

We must all be aware that with one exception, Natural Law, all forms of law
come from religion. It should not surprise anyone, then, that Mosaic Law
and Christian Canon has given rise to the Law of the Land, while Satanism
and the infamous "Jewish-but-not Jewish" Talmud, is the basis of the Law of
the Sea.

The Talmud is specifically the "law" of the sea-going Tribe of Dan, whose
tribal banner has always prominently displayed the serpent emblem. This is
the "synagogue of Satan" that Christ referred to, and anyone who has ever
read the Talmud will agree that it is one of the most vile, diabolical,
profane, evil, and hate-filled documents ever produced by the hand of man.
Unfortunately for all of us, it continues to exercise its influence on the
Law of the Sea—that is, international law including commercial law—
until the current day. It's grand temple on land is located in the separate
international city-state of Westminster, known as the Inner City of London,
and is known as the Crown Temple. The Bar Associations and banks are all
allied with the Crown Temple and many elite bankers and lawyers secretively
worship Satan, Mammon, and Semiramis, aka, the Mother of Harlots and all
Abominations, Ashtoreth, Cybele, Isis, —and here in America, the Statue
of Liberty. Remember that "liberty" comes from the same root word as
"libertine" and is what British sailors receive when they reach a port of
call—-it has nothing to do with freedom.

This infamous religion has been suppressed for many generations, but has
continued on in the practices and beliefs of many so-called Secret
Societies, especially in certain sects of the Freemasons and the Roman Cult
within the Catholic Church. Just as the Tribe of Dan represents only
one-thirteenth of the Tribes, less than ten percent of the membership of
the Freemasons and Roman Catholic Church have been initiated into the
profane practices of these ancient pagan belief systems— so don't get out
the pitchforks and start poking people who merely belong to a Masonic Lodge
or a Catholic Church. It's also worth noting that other churches and
fraternal organizations have also been involved. I am only citing two of
the main sources of mental, spiritual, and emotional miasma.

The vicious and perverted nature of this peculiar religion has made it
powerful but not popular, and its practicioners have long presented it as
knowledge possessed only by the "elites" and have forbidden their members
to speak of it on pain of death. However, we may speak of it, because we
were never initiated into their Death Cult, never took a Bar Oath, have no
obligation to them, and have our knowledge of it from completely different
sources. Please note that both George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were
Freemasons. So were many high-ranking SS officers.

All this is necessary prelude to understanding what is going on in the
world and why Americans must be on their toes, watchful, and determined to
leave Babylon behind. This basic knowledge about religion and law is also
the foundation needed to understand that the entire concept of money is
based on the idolatry practiced by this ancient, foreign, and profane
religion. Money, whether stamped gold coins or printed paper credit
chits— is an idol, literally a graven image, and those who chase after it
are worshipers of Mammon — the god of money and all such vain illusions.

This is why it is written that you cannot serve both the True God and
Mammon. You can't honor Truth and Falsehood in the same breath. And money
by definition is a falsehood— a fraud— because it presents itself as a
substitute for other things that it is not: labor and commodities.

The object of money used as a substitute "representing" labor and
commodities is to cheat and chisel a portion of both from the process of
trading goods and services. The purveyors of "money" are manufacturers of
idols, no less than Ishmael, the Idol Maker of Tabriz. Nations under the
Cain-anite spell then "value" their money and compete in terms of which
idol is greater, more powerful, more popular—-and therefore, perceived to
be more valuable. This results in the daily betting game known as
"international exchange rates". Note the words "perceived" and "value"
—- no form of money has any very great actual value attached to it, not
even gold. You can be sure that if *any* form of money had actual value
equal to its perceived value, it would quickly disappear, because those
manufacturing such "money" could not possibly make a profit otherwise.

It may be disturbing for men of many faiths to realize, but we have been
worshiping graven images—idols—all along, no different than it was in
ancient Babylon.

The further object of the religion of Babylon was to enslave men for the
enrichment of the so-called "elites". This is what Abraham was fleeing
when he left Ur. This is what Moses was leaving behind when he led his
people out of Egypt. This is what Jesus was objecting to when he drove
out the Moneychangers.

By fraud and deceit, the practitioners of these ancient and profane
religious cults have endeavored to take over the whole world and establish
a "Kingdom of the Dead" in the midst of the living. They have very nearly
accomplished their ends by obtaining misrepresented commercial contracts
and licenses and pretending that their victims have knowingly and willingly
agreed to give up their status as living men and women and to function as
dead "things"—- as corporations, estate trusts, cooperatives,
foundations, even transmitting utilities, all defined as "franchises"
belonging to parent trusts and corporations owned and operated by the
perpetrators of these fiduciary trust fraud schemes.

The essence of the coercive identity theft that takes place while we are
still babes in our cradles has been explained elsewhere. I note only that
the perpetrators have gone so far as to try to pull the same fraud against
the whole Continental United States and to seize our assets as "abandoned
property". This necessitated raising an objection and filing both a
renewed Declaration of Joint Sovereignty and Sovereign Letters Patent.
Original copies of the attached documents were filed as of Friday, November
6. Additional copies are being forwarded to additional recipients.

Please keep copies of the attached documents in safe places throughout
America and post this information as widely as possible, being especially
sure to inform your religious leaders. This is your proof that a claim was
entered in your behalf asserting that We, the People, are alive and well,
that we object to any presumption of civil death, bankruptcy, or other
false claim, that we have repudiated the odious debts fabricated and
charged against us and every other American, and that we have duly informed
the UN Trust Committee– North America, the UN Security Council, and the
Principal Contracting Powers involved.

Hillary Clinton Big Lies – Hillary Espionage Exploits Continue

Andrew P Napolitano
Sat, Nov 7, 2015
Subject; FBI Refusing to Indict Hillary Clinton for Espionage

The self-inflicted wounds of Hillary Rodham Clinton just keep manifesting themselves. She has two serious issues that have arisen in the past week; one is political and the other is legal. Both have deception at their root.

Her political problem is one of credibility. We know from her emails that she informed her daughter Chelsea and the then-prime minister of Egypt within 12 hours of the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, that he had been killed in Benghazi by al-Qaida. We know from the public record that the Obama administration’s narrative blamed the killings of the ambassador and his guards on an anonymous crowd’s spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muhammad video.

Over this past weekend we learned that her own embassy staff in Tripoli told her senior staff in Washington the day after the killings that the video was not an issue, and very few Libyans had seen it. We also know from her emails that the CIA informed her within 24 hours of the ambassador’s murder that it had been planned by al-Qaida 12 days before the actual killings.

Nevertheless, she persisted in blaming the video. When she received the bodies of Ambassador Stevens and his three bodyguards at Andrews Air Force base three days after their murders, she told the media and the families of the deceased assembled there that the four Americans had been killed by a spontaneous mob reacting to a cheap 15-minute anti-Muhammad video.

Clinton’s sordid behavior throughout this unhappy affair reveals a cavalier attitude about the truth and a ready willingness to deceive the public for short-term political gain. This might not harm her political aspirations with her base in the Democratic Party; but it will be a serious political problem for her with independent voters, without whose support she simply cannot be elected.

Yet, her name might not appear on any ballot in 2016.

That’s because, each time she addresses these issues — her involvement in Benghazi and her emails — her legal problems get worse. We already know that the FBI has been investigating her for espionage (the failure to secure state secrets), destruction of government property and obstruction of justice (wiping her computer server clean of governmental emails that were and are the property of the federal government), and perjury (lying to a federal judge about whether she returned all governmental emails to the State Department).

Now, she has added new potential perjury and misleading Congress issues because of her deceptive testimony to the House Benghazi committee. In 2011, when President Obama persuaded NATO to enact and enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, he sent American intelligence agents on the ground. Since they were not military and were not shooting at Libyan government forces, he could plausibly argue that he had not put “boots” on the ground. Clinton, however, decided that she could accelerate the departure of the Libyan strongman, Col. Moammar Gadhafi, by arming some of the Libyan rebel groups that were attempting to oppose him and thus helping them to shoot at government forces.

So, in violation of federal law and the U.N. arms embargo on Libya she authorized the shipment of American arms to Qatar, knowing they’d be passed off to Libyan rebels, some of whom were al-Qaida, a few of whom killed Ambassador Stevens using American-made weapons. When asked about this, she said she knew nothing of it. The emails underlying this are in the public domain. Clinton not only knew of the arms-to-Libyan-rebels deal, she authored and authorized it. She lied about this under oath.

After surveying the damage done to his regime and his family by NATO bombings, Col. Kaddafi made known his wish to negotiate a peaceful departure from Libya. When his wish was presented to Clinton, a source in the room with Clinton has revealed that she silently made the “off with his head” hand motion by moving her hand quickly across her neck. She could do that because she knew the rebels were well equipped with American arms with which to kill him. She didn’t care that many of the rebels were al-Qaida or that arming them was a felony. She lied about this under oath.

My Fox News colleagues Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne have scrutinized Clinton’s testimony with respect to her friend and adviser Sidney Blumenthal. Recall that President Obama vetoed Clinton’s wish to hire him as her State Department senior adviser. So she had the Clinton Foundation pay him a greater salary than the State Department would have, and he became her silent de facto advisor.

They emailed each other hundreds of times during her tenure. He provided intelligence to her, which he obtained from a security company on the ground in Libya in which he had a financial interest. He advised her on how to present herself to the media. He even advocated the parameters of the Libyan no-fly zone and she acted upon his recommendations. Yet she told the committee he was “just a friend.” She was highly deceptive and criminally misleading about this under oath.

It is difficult to believe that the federal prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Clinton will not recommend that she be indicted. Inexplicably, she seems to have forgotten that they were monitoring what she said under oath to the Benghazi committee. By lying under oath, and by misleading Congress, she gave that team additional areas to investigate and on which to recommend indictments.

When those recommendations are made known, no ballot will bear her name.

Reprinted with the author’s permission.