Archive for the ‘Freemasonry/Illuminati’ Category

London & New York Devils Calling for God of Marduk – Lucifer’s Minions Causing Judgement

Friday, April 1st, 2016

Judge Anna Von Reitz
Thur, March 31, 2016
Subject; London & New York Satanic Worshipers Bringing Judgement

Is Nimrod About To Be Raised From the Dead As Satanic Portals Open Globally This Year?

As announced in the New York Times, the same people who put a statue of the
"Mother of All Whores" —- Ashtoreth—- in the middle of New York Harbor
and passed it off as "The Statue of Liberty"—–have been hard at work to
invoke their ancient Babylonian "god", Marduk.

They want the Lord of Libertines and Criminals to visit London and New
York, and they are convinced that if they rebuild the Arches of the Temple
of Marduk, he will come: Lucifer, himself, in the flesh. They want to
worship him.

Picture a great big, glowing red Bull's Eye painted on New York and London,
because that is what these deluded monsters are doing and which the rest of
you are ignorantly allowing.

How ingenious of the Great Gardener.

You don't have to pull the weeds or struggle to identify them among the
wheat. Just stand aside and let them all gather together for a party.
Then bring out the Flame Thrower.

When the Hebrews entered Canaan they were given a very odd directive. They
were told to kill everyone and everything— even the domestic animals.
None were to be spared. But the Hebrews looked around and hey, everything
looked good. The animals appeared healthy and the women were good
looking…..what a waste! It didn't make sense to them.

So they ignored the instructions they were given by the One Holy One.

As a result, the ancient evils of Sumeria survived and thrived and
continued. The vampiric entities that fed upon the innocent in ancient
Canaan infested the minds of new generations and led directly to what is
going on today.

Dust off your Bibles, people. Read what it says about the King of Sidon
and the weeping of the Merchants.

On that basis alone, in view of what these idiots are doing in New York and
London, I will get out my crystal ball and foretell the destruction of both
New York and London. It will either result as the natural outcome of
hosting Lucifer and his minions, or, as a result of the One Holy One acting
to get rid of these vermin once and for all— but it will come, either

Mark it on your calendars and don't blame the Muslims for it.

People look at me and stare and say, but, but, but—– you are a scientist
and judge, how can you believe in such drivel? There's no "devil" and no
"god" either. It's all just overactive imaginations and snake oil

Those who know me will agree that I am a skeptic's skeptic, so, indeed,
what gives?

There are, at least by my count, 648 prophecies in the Bible. All but a
handful have been fulfilled.

I rest my case.

IF there's no God and no Devil, then there is, self-evidently, a very
well-organized multi-generational stage crew of people devoted to the Bible
as a playscript and they are determined to carry it off: Act One….Act
Two….Act Three…

As I am writing this at the end of 2016, the Lords of the Admiralty are
still in operation. The King of Sidon still sits on his throne. The City
of Westminster, also known as the Inner City of London, still exists and is
chugging along, happily enslaving and defrauding the rest of the world.
It's all business as usual, except…..

Well, for the last several weeks merchant shipping worldwide has been at a
standstill…. the ships are standing afar off…..

Just as it says in the Bible.

Top 48 Pill Pushers Bribing Congress – PhRMA Lobby to Raise Prices

Friday, April 1st, 2016

Julie Wilson
Thur, Mar 31, 2016
Subject; PhRMA Bribery to Congress for Big Pharma

(NaturalNews) The long, drawn-out political circus that accompanies a presidential election can be exhausting to say the least, especially when, as usual, the candidates are far from representing the public's needs and wants.

But thanks to social media and alternative news outlets, some genuinely important matters have made their way to the surface and served as talking points among this year's 2016 presidential candidates, i.e. unwarranted and unethical price hikes on pharmaceutical drugs.

Nearly all of the candidates have commented on Big Pharma's ugly practice of hiking up the price on important life-saving drugs, but regardless of whether or not those statements are rhetorical in nature is a moot point, because now, the issue is front and center.

Big Pharma throws its weight around in Washington

As a result, Big Pharma has launched a public relations campaign aimed at lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

A new report by The Hill details a plan by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, to use top level scientists and researchers to sway lawmakers away from policy changes that could ultimately hinder the industry's lucrative business model.

Representing 48 pharmaceutical companies, PhRMA is one of the largest and most influential lobbying organizations in Washington, according to SourceWatch. It has a history of concealing its lobbying and PR activities by paying other organizations to act as a front group, including the United Seniors Association and the Consumer Alliance.

PhRMA serves on the corporate board of the right-winged American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a powerful bill mill in which "corporations hand state legislators their wishlists to benefit their bottom line."

ALEC was behind 2011 Wisconsin Act 2, which according to SourceWatch's reporting sought to limit "the ability to hold corporations accountable for causing injury or death" and to "make it easier for corporations like drugmakers to escape liability for manufacturing dangerous products or products with insufficient warnings about hazards."

"Focused on defense"

Over the last eight months, PhRMA has gone on the defense with a campaign led by the group's president and CEO Steve Ubli, "who has been working to spot clean" Big Pharma's public image.

Part of its strategy includes distancing itself from drug companies under fire for massive price hikes, including Martin Shkreli's former company Turing Pharmaceuticals, as well as Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Gilead, the latter of which began selling a hepatitis C drug at $1,000 per pill.

PhRMA is also working to "push out the federal policy changes" it believes can "limit price increases," The Hill reports.

"When I talk about going on offense, yes I want to educate about the myopic debate, the misinformation about the way the market is working, but I'm referring to a sort of proactive agenda," said Ubli.

Making the rules

Earlier this month the group released a 10-page "policy platform" of desired federal policy changes, which included a pitch for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to weaken its criteria for clinical trials.

The 21st Century Cures Act, already passed by the House, may give PhRMA exactly what it wants.

Also called H.R.6, the bill could weaken the approval process for prescription drugs and medical devices, allowing the latter to gain approval based simply on an article from a "peer-reviewed" medical journal, according to reports.

Safety testing by manufacturers is largely omitted under the 21st Century Cures Act. Drug and device makers could receive FDA approval for products based solely on the anecdotal experiences of individuals.

This is arguably why PhRMA wants "offices on Capitol Hill" to "get face time with the patients who have benefited from some of the newest, and most costly, drugs." Their new multi-million-dollar campaign "From Hopes to Cures" hit the airwaves beginning in 2016 and is aimed directly at lawmakers in Washington.

Old Clinton Gang Games Target Trump Events for Boosting Hillary

Sunday, March 27th, 2016

Jon Rappoport
Sat, Mar 26, 2016
Subject; George Soros $8mil Boosting Hillary

"Those who cannot remember 1968 are condemned to repeat 1968."

History comes around again to bite you like a louse in a hotel-room bedsheet, long after management was supposed to have sanitized the place.
In 1968, 10,000 anti-war protestors at the Chicago Democratic Convention went up against local police and National Guardsmen. The violent riots had a reverse effect.

Americans, aghast at what they were seeing on their television sets, turned out
in droves a few months later and elected Republican pro-war candidate Richard Nixon. It was odd, to say the least, that the protest groups chose to show up at the Democratic Convention. The hand-picked Presidential nominee, Hubert Humphrey, was in favor of continuing the Vietnam War, but the Republicans were a greater threat in that regard.

The days of violence in Chicago made Nixon giggle. He couldn't have asked for a better show, and now we have, funded in part by George Soros, ramping up their nationwide protests against Trump. They're clearly pointing toward the Republican Convention in July in Cleveland. Their whole strategy depends on how much blame for their protests and violence can be successfully attributed to Trump himself—which is the clear media strategy.

The standard line is: Trump started this whole thing with his incendiary statements about immigration and Muslims; therefore, everything that happens after that is his fault. He is the prime mover. The protests are merely a response to him. "The blood is on his hands."

If that can be sold, and if the action in Cleveland in July can rise to a new height of violence, then a significant number of fence-sitting voters would decide to opt for Hillary, who will, of course, position herself as the peacemaker and the uniter.

It doesn't matter that she's never met a war she didn't like (or could invent).
She's the "calm force that will lead the nation into eight years of collective
tolerance and sanity." In other words, Hillary stands to benefit the most from the planned and highly organized attacks on Trump.

It's not hard to trace a connection between Soros, one of the money men behind, and Hillary Clinton. Just for starters, as Politico noted, on 1/31/16 ("George Soros donates $8 million to boost Hillary"): "George Soros in December donated $6 million to the leading super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, marking the return of the billionaire
financier as among the biggest givers in all of American politics. The massive check brings to $8 million the Hungarian-born investor's total 2015 giving to pro-Clinton groups."

Apparently, though, these obvious connections don't rate major coverage in mainstream media. Let's see: the man who funds the group who is organizing protests against Trump is also funding the candidate who stands to gain the most from the protests. No, nothing important here. Just a coincidence.
The 2016 election season in America is devolving to resemble what happened in 1968.

It remains to be seen whether the '68 reverse/rebound Nixon victory will now turn into the Hillary victory. Hillary, Soros, MoveOn, and their media allies (the useful idiots) are betting it will. They think it's their game to run and control. How far could the anti-Trump forces go this summer? How far could they go in pushing an agenda of "societal change," which demands a government-centered solution for all ills and problems? "The government must transform America on behalf of equality"—whatever that generality is supposed to mean.
The basic thrust of these forces would be to raise government power to new heights, fantasizing that it would somehow be turned toward "broad positive outcomes for the underclass."

Well, for instruction, we can look back to another event that occurred in the summer of the 1968, in Paris. Most Americans don't even remember it, but it was a searing stroke across the landscape. Its vision, if you can call it that, extended further than anything that could happen now in America—and the stunning outcome is one of those "teachable moments." From Wikipedia ("May 1968 events in France"): "The volatile period of civil unrest in France during May 1968 was punctuated by demonstrations and massive general strikes as well as the occupation of universities and factories across France. At the height of its fervor, it virtually brought the entire economy of France to a dramatic halt."

"The unrest began with a series of student occupation [of colleges] protests against capitalism, consumerism and traditional institutions, values and order. It then spread to factories with [Leftist union] strikes involving 11 million workers, more than 22% of the total population of France at the time, for two continuous weeks."

"The student occupations and wildcat general strikes initiated across France were met with forceful confrontation by university administrators and police. The de Gaulle administration's attempts to quell those strikes by police action only inflamed the situation further, leading to street battles with the police in the Latin Quarter, followed by the spread of general strikes and occupations throughout France. De Gaulle went to a French military base in Germany, and after returning dissolved the National Assembly, and called for new parliamentary elections for 23 June 1968.

Violence evaporated almost as quickly as it arose. Workers went back to their jobs, and when the elections were finally held in June, the Gaullist party emerged even stronger than before." (emphasis added) In other words, government power rose to a new height. That was the outcome. That was how this towering rebellion came to a close.

If, in the summer of 2016, the "forces of change" in America stage vast protests and initiate violence, on the pretext that they are trying to defeat Donald Trump, the result will be a mandate for federal government to assume more control.

Hillary Clinton, would certainly embrace that mandate with open arms.
She would be the Nixon and the De Gaulle. She would call her power agenda "uniting the people" or "equality together" or "it takes a village" or "respect for diverse points of view and cultures" or "a new day for America."

Whatever she calls it, it would be 1968 all over again.

Trump the Choice of Americans – Status Quo Elites Keep Trying to Stop Trump

Sunday, March 27th, 2016

Dr Eowyn
Sat, Mar 26, 2016
Subject; Secret Stop Trump Globalist Meetings

Billionaires at that secret ‘Stop Trump’ Sea Island meeting

In 1910, a group of banksters and politicos secretly met on Jekyll Island and birthed the Federal Reserve — a strange public-private hybrid of privately-owned banks that act as America’s central bank with limited government supervision. (See “Federal Reserve’s Secret Taxpayer-Funded $12 Trillion Bail-Out of Global Banks“)

In early March 2016, another group of extremely wealthy élites also met secretly on an island a mere skip, hop, and jump away from the infamous Jekyll Island, this time to devise a plot against Donald Trump. (See Trail Dust’s “About the Saint Simon’s Island Meeting“)

In yet another sign that Establishment Republicans are extremely worried about a Trump presidential candidacy, a group of billionaires and Republican political élites attended the secretive annual World Forum of the neo-con American Enterprise Institute (AEI), held in a luxury resort on Sea Island, Georgia, March 3-6, 2016.

As reported by Huffington Post, the main topic at the closed-to-the-press meeting was “How to stop Republican front-runner Donald Trump.”

Borrowing the opening lines of nothing less than Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto — and entirely oblivious to the irony of a conservative mouthing a communist — Bill Kristol, founder of the supposedly-conservative magazine Weekly Standard, wrote in an emailed report from the AEI meeting:

“A specter was haunting the World Forum — the specter of Donald Trump. There was much unhappiness about his emergence, a good deal of talk, some of it insightful and thoughtful, about why he’s done so well, and many expressions of hope that he would be defeated.”

GOP political guru Karl Rove gave a presentation outlining Trump’s weaknesses. Rove insisted voters would have a hard time seeing Trump as “presidential,” which must be why they are turning out in droves to vote for him. [Sarc]

Here’s a list of the AEI World Forum attendees:

(1) High-tech billionaires:

Apple CEO Tim Cook
Google co-founder Larry Page
Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean Parker
Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk
(2) GOP political élites:

Political guru Karl Rove
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky)
House Speaker Paul Ryan
Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.).
Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (Mich.)
Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas)
Kevin McCarthy (Calif.)
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.),
Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.)
Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas)
Diane Black (Tenn.)

In addition to the Sea Island meeting, according to Bloomberg, there are yet other “stop Trump” conspiracies: “A trio of conservative groups not affiliated with any candidate has spent about $28 million against [Trump], mostly on negative ads that aired in the past few weeks. So far, the effort has failed to dent his popularity.”

According to FEC filings, contributors to the “stop Trump” conservative groups include:

The Warren brothers, Stephens and Jackson, who gave a total of $3.5 million last month to two of the groups, on top of $500,000 last year. Stephens Warren has given a total of $300,000 to super-PACs supporting Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, and Chris Christie, all of whom have since dropped out.
The Ricketts family of Omaha, Nebraska have given $5 million since January.
New York hedge-fund manager Paul Singer gave $1 million.
San Francisco investor William Oberndorf gave $500,000.
Club for Growth: A super-PAC run by Club for Growth (CFG), a powerful conservative group that pushes for limited government and lower taxes, is one of the first organizations to take on Trump. According to The New York Times, the super PAC raised $4 million in February, three times as much as it had raised any other month this election cycle. Donors include:

The Warren brothers gave $2.5 million in February.
Richard Uihlein, an Illinois shipping-supplies manufacturer who backed Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign last year, gave the Club for Growth $500,000.
Richard Gaby, who gave $50,000 to a super PAC backing former Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana.
Robert Arnott, a California-based investor who has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into groups backing Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
Robert Mercer, who backs Ted Cruz, gave $100,000.
A political network led by billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch, which is the biggest and deepest-pocketed independent political force in the conservative world.
ZeroHedge observes:

To beat Trump, you need to figure out how to tap into the same anger and yes, in some cases the same perceived narrow-mindedness, of his support base and you need to give them an alternative that addresses their concerns without resorting to the same type of bombastic rhetoric that so alarms the frontrunner’s detractors.

Like it or not, Trump’s support base are voters. They’re also Americans. It’s more important to understand what they want and why than it is to disparage the man they think should lead the country. Until someone in the GOP figures that out, the party won’t stand a chance of stopping Trump.

Top 257,000 Veteran Criminals? – Obama’s Gun Ban List

Sunday, March 27th, 2016

Tim Devaney –
Sat, Mar 26, 2016
Subject; Obama's VA Mentally Defective Slippery Slope

GOP targets veterans gun ban

The Obama administration is facing congressional scrutiny for blocking more than a quarter-million military veterans from owning guns.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has reported more than 257,000 former members of the military who cannot manage their finances to the FBI’s list of people who are not allowed to own guns, Republicans claim, even though "it has nothing to do with regulating firearms.”


"The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is effectively a national gun ban list and placement on the list precludes the ownership and possession of firearms,” Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote in a recent letter to VA Secretary Robert McDonald.
The VA is responsible for appointing a fiduciary to help veterans who it determines cannot manage their own finances, but the agency is also taking the additional step of reporting these veterans to the “mental defective” category of the FBI’s background check system, even if they do not pose a danger to society, the senators allege.

The senators called the practice “highly suspect” and said veterans' ability to manage their own finances is “totally unrelated” to whether they should be prohibited from owning a gun.

"Under the current practice, a VA finding that concludes a veteran requires a fiduciary to administer benefit payments effectively voids his Second Amendment rights,” the senators wrote.

"At no time in the process does the VA determine a veteran to be a danger to themself or others, a key determinant for whether someone is a 'mental defective,’ precluding the right to own firearms,” they added.

In a separate letter to Senate appropriators, Grassley requested lawmakers block the VA from continuing this practice in the upcoming budget negotiations.

Grassley also complained about the practice in another letter sent last year to the Justice Department.

Republicans hope the congressional inquiries will pressure the VA to stop the practice.

The VA noted in a statement to The Hill that it is legally required to report veterans who are "mentally incompetent" to the FBI, which then decides whether to prohibit these former soldiers from owning guns.

"From time to time, media has reported that VA 'confiscates' veterans' firearms," a VA spokesman said in a statement. "This is simply not true. VA has no authority to confiscate or 'seize' anyone’s firearms."

Top 5 Monsanto Crimes – Monsanto Evil History by Hateful People

Monday, March 21st, 2016

Mike Adams
Mon, Mar 21, 2016
Subject; Monsanto Global Terrorism

The complete history of Monsanto; the world's most EVIL Corporation

(NaturalNews) How much do you really know about Monsanto beyond the fact that the corporation is extremely evil? Most people's knowledge of Monsanto barely scratches the surface. Monsanto is far more than just a dangerous threat to humanity that profits from weedkiller chemicals linked to cancer; it's also the same entity that gave rise to Agent Orange, saccharin, aspartame, deadly PCBs and pesticides with dioxins.

The entire history of Monsanto has been one of creating deadly, toxic chemicals that devastate human populations and then lying about their toxicity (while profiting from their widespread use that poisons the planet). There is no single greater chemical threat to humanity that exists on this planet right now than the Monsanto corporation, and its chemical poisons are faithfully mirrored by the poisonous personalities and sleaze tactics of its attack dogs who troll the internet to discredit all scientists and activists that oppose Monsanto's "chemical domination" agenda. (Much of Wikipedia is now run by biotech trolls, by the way, who specialize in internet disinfo terrorism tactics like the hit piece recently waged against GM Watch.)

A website called The Last American Vagabond has published a comprehensive history of Monsanto, and it's so good that I'm reprinting some of it here (while encouraging you to see the full article there).

Here's the beginning of it:

Of all the mega-corps running amok, Monsanto has consistently outperformed its rivals, earning the crown as "most evil corporation on Earth!" Not content to simply rest upon its throne of destruction, it remains focused on newer, more scientifically innovative ways to harm the planet and its people.

As true champions of evil, they won't stop until…well, until they're stopped! But what is Monsanto and how did they get to be so obscenely evil in the first place? I think that's the best place to start this journey, so grab a few non-GMO snacks or beverages and let's go for a ride into the deep, murky sewers of their dark past.

1901: The company is founded by John Francis Queeny, a member of the Knights of Malta, a thirty year pharmaceutical veteran married to Olga Mendez Monsanto, for which Monsanto Chemical Works is named. The company's first product is chemical saccharin, sold to Coca-Cola as an artificial sweetener.

Even then, the government knew saccharin was poisonous and sued to stop its manufacture but lost in court, thus opening the Monsanto Pandora's Box to begin poisoning the world through the soft drink.

1920s: Monsanto expands into industrial chemicals and drugs, becoming the world's largest maker of aspirin, acetylsalicyclic acid, (toxic of course). This is also the time when things began to go horribly wrong for the planet in a hurry with the introduction of their polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

Even though PCBs were eventually banned after fifty years for causing such devastation, it is still present in just about all animal and human blood and tissue cells across the globe. Documents introduced in court later showed Monsanto was fully aware of the deadly effects, but criminally hid them from the public to keep the PCB gravy-train going full speed!

1930s: Created its first hybrid seed corn and expands into detergents, soaps, industrial cleaning products, synthetic rubbers and plastics. Oh yes, all toxic of course!

1940s: They begin research on uranium to be used for the Manhattan Project's first atomic bomb, which would later be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands of Japanese, Korean and US Military servicemen and poisoning millions more.

The company continues its unabated killing spree by creating pesticides for agriculture containing deadly dioxin, which poisons the food and water supplies. It was later discovered Monsanto failed to disclose that dioxin was used in a wide range of their products because doing so would force them to acknowledge that it had created an environmental Hell on Earth.

1950s: Closely aligned with The Walt Disney Company, Monsanto creates several attractions at Disney's Tomorrowland, espousing the glories of chemicals and plastics. Their "House of the Future" is constructed entirely of toxic plastic that is not biodegradable as they had asserted. What, Monsanto lied? I'm shocked!

1960s: Monsanto, along with chemical partner-in-crime DOW Chemical, produces dioxin-laced Agent Orange for use in the U.S.'s Vietnam invasion. The results? Over 3 million people contaminated, a half-million Vietnamese civilians dead, a half-million Vietnamese babies born with birth defects and thousands of U.S. military veterans suffering or dying from its effects to this day!

Monsanto is hauled into court again and internal memos show they knew the deadly effects of dioxin in Agent Orange when they sold it to the government. Outrageously though, Monsanto is allowed to present their own "research" that concluded dioxin was safe and posed no negative health concerns whatsoever. Satisfied, the bought and paid for courts side with Monsanto and throws the case out. Afterwards, it comes to light that Monsanto lied about the findings and their real research concluded that dioxin kills very effectively.

Monsanto partners with I.G. Farben, makers of Bayer aspirin and the Third Reich's go-to chemical manufacturer producing deadly Zyklon-B gas during World War II. Together, the companies use their collective expertise to introduce aspartame, another extremely deadly neurotoxin, into the food supply. When questions surface regarding the toxicity of saccharin, Monsanto exploits this opportunity to introduce yet another of its deadly poisons onto an unsuspecting public.

Ted Cruz In Bed With Invisible Gov’t – CFR Big Brothers Advising Cruz

Monday, March 21st, 2016

Warren Mass
Mon, Mar 21, 2016
Subject; Ted Cruz CFR Establishment Puppet

In a statement released on March 17, the campaign of presidential candidate Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) announced “a high-profile national security coalition that will advise Cruz (shown) on foreign policy issues.” The announcement spotlighted three members of the team — former Senator Jim Talent (R-Mo.), former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, and former Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abrams.

Of these, Abrams is the most problematic for constitutional conservatives, who are Cruz’s staunchest supporters, since Abrams is the very personification of the “Washington establishment” that Cruz has frequently condemned.

The biographical information for Abrams offered in the Cruz announcement notes:

Elliott Abrams was an assistant secretary of state in the Reagan administration and a deputy national security advisor in the George W. Bush administration; he is a senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Apparently, the Cruz campaign believes (perhaps justifiably so) that so few conservatives know anything about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that it is no longer considered to be politically risky for a conservative, self-proclaimed “anti-establishment” candidate to openly place a man who is not merely a CFR member — but a CFR senior fellow — in a prominent slot.

Maybe Christian economist Gary North was correct about the relative obscurity of the CFR when he wrote in a column for four years ago:

The story of the CFR is well known to those of us who have been in the conservative wing of the party for over 50 years. It has been over half a century since Dan Smoot wrote The Invisible Government (1960). In late 1964, Robert Welch of the John Birch Society shifted his entire life’s work from anti-Communism to anti-conspiracy, and forced the restructuring of the Birch Society’s magazine, American Opinion. The story of the CFR/Federal Reserve alliance has been known to the hard-core Right for a generation. But it is still not known to the standard conservative, who came into the movement in 1980 or later. [Emphasis added.]

We will get back to the CFR shortly, and also look at some of the other members of Cruz’s new National Security Team. This statement from Cruz was included in the announcement:

I am honored and humbled to have a range of respected voices willing to offer their best advice. These are trusted friends who will form a core of our broader national security team. After two terms of a failed Obama-Clinton foreign policy, our allies are confused and frightened, and our enemies are looking for opportunities. This is the moment for all those who believe in a strong America that is secure at home and respected abroad to come together and craft a new path forward.

Chad Sweet, a former DHS and CIA official and chairman of the Ted Cruz for President Campaign, said of the new advisors: “The national security experts who are endorsing him today are all highly respected professionals who share Senator Cruz’s vision of how we will restore America’s leadership in the world.”

Of the two other members of Cruz’s new team mentioned prominently in the announcement, Talent was a foreign policy advisor to Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney during his failed 2012 campaign and was perhaps the only Romney advisor with any type of conservative credentials, serving as a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

The other, Andrew McCarthy, a former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, is a contributing editor to the neoconservative journal National Review. Back in 2012, McCarthy rashly criticized The New American for our exposé of the attacks on liberty posed by the extraordinary power granted the president of the United States by the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act). (A complete account of McCarthy’s attack on The New American is found in the article: “Is The New American “Absurd” to Expose the NDAA? One Writer Says Yes.”)

Two other members of the team are also CFR members:

Stewart Baker, who served as assistant secretary for policy at DHS, as general counsel of the National Security Agency, and as general counsel of the bipartisan commission that investigated intelligence failures involving WMD and Iraq, and

Michael Pillsbury, who was a Reagan campaign advisor in 1980, served as assistant undersecretary of defense for policy planning under President Reagan, and is the author of three books on China.

The others represent varying degrees of conservatism or neo-conservatism. A representative sampling includes:

Ilan Berman, vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council, which includes on its board of directors, Robert McFarlane, former national security advisor to Ronald Reagan, who is a CFR member, and Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House and a CFR member.

Mike Gonzalez, a former speechwriter for the Bush administration and editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal, Charles “Cully” Stimson, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Detainee Affairs, and Steven Groves are fellows at the Heritage Foundation, giving them conservative credentials they share with Jim Talent.

Mary Habeck is a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where she studies al-Qaeda, ISIS, and jihadi-salafism. AEI is regarded by many as the most influential think tank associated with neoconservatism. Irving Kristol, the “godfather of neoconservatism,” was a senior fellow at AEI.

While some members of the Cruz advisory team, especially those associated with the Heritage Foundation, genuinely qualify as conservatives, the presence of CFR members Abrams, Baker, and Pillsbury does seem to be a larger number than mere coincidence might suggest.

As for why the presence of these CFR members should concern Cruz’s constitutionally conservative supporters, it is necessary to expand on North’s statement quoted above: “The story of the CFR is well known to those of us who have been in the conservative wing of the party for over 50 years: To provide a condensed version of that story, it is necessary to go back to the time of the CFR’s founding, in 1921. The beginnings of the CFR originated in the closing years of World War I, when President Woodrow Wilson commissioned a group of about 150 scholars called “The Inquiry” to develop a plan for the world after the defeat of Germany. A key part of this plan was the creation of a League of Nations. However, the U.S. Senate, fearful that membership in such a world body would threaten U.S. sovereignty, voted to reject membership in the league on November 19, 1919.

In an attempt to further Wilson’s aims, members of the international group of scholars formed the CFR in New York on July 29, 1921. Following World War II, CFR members were instrumental in forming the United Nations to replace the League of Nations, and this time were successful in getting the United States to enter this world body. Since then, CFR members have become very influential in steering the course of U.S. foreign policy in an internationalist, interventionist direction, and it members have occupied key Cabinet positions in both Democratic and Republican administrations. CFR members have included political leaders from both parties, more than a dozen secretaries of state, CIA and national security directors, and leading financial, academic, and media figures.

Blood Sucking Corp USofA – Looting 80% from America’s Poor & 98% Foreign Aid

Monday, March 21st, 2016

Judge Anna Von Reitz
Mon, Mar 21, 2016
Subject; USofA Corporate Identity Theft

The UN Corporation doing business as the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES doing business as the STATE OF ALASKA, The Federal Reserve doing business as the Federal Reserve System doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, doing business as the State of Alaska, the FEDERAL RESERVE doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.) doing business as ALASKA….. the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, the WASHINGTON DC MUNICIPALITY, the U.S.A. (Inc.), the U.S. Corp, The United States of America (Inc.), E Pluribus Unum the United States of America (Inc.)……

Do you realize that roughly 80% of what Americans have paid to support the poor and disabled in this country—- public assistance, aid for orphans, the unemployed, the mentally ill, people with chronic diseases, the elderly, paralyzed veterans—- has been siphoned off by these above-named corporate vermin, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies and affiliates?

We paid for all these programs with the intention of taking care of everyone, and instead, these criminals have been like rats in a grain storage silo, putting out just enough to give a storefront appearance that these programs were real and helping people, while secretively embezzling from the poorest and most vulnerable Americans.

Just as bad, 98% of what Americans have paid to support the poor in other countries around the world—–vast amounts of foreign aid—-have been siphoned off and squandered by these criminals. We have given and given and given with the intention of helping people in the Third World and paid for programs to build bridges and drill water wells and provide homes and livestock and electrical generators and transportation and roads and fishing boats and clothing and medicine and entire hospitals and schools and supplies of every kind, plus food of all kinds——and where has it gone? Mostly stolen by the thieves in Washington, DC, but then also stolen by their counterparts in other countries.

They have fed upon the innocent and helpless both going and coming—- stealing the benefit of our giving from the people we intended it for, and thereby stealing from us as well. They have had a "two for one" theft scheme going, in which the Americans are thought to be hard-hearted and greedy and selfish, and the people in the Third World are thought to be ungrateful, lazy, and incompetent, with neither party realizing that criminally dishonest middlemen have been the problem all along.

Embezzlers. Thieves. Con artists. Imposters. And these duplicitous vermin have been the "face of America" to the rest of the world. They have sent their commercial mercenary armies into other countries around the world and raped and pillaged and stolen and polluted and pedaled their wares of guns and armaments and drugs and alcohol and every kind of immorality and they have done this in the names of America and Americans while we have been kept isolated and "dumbed down on the farm back home"—– believing in "our government" and Mom and apple pie.

It is indeed disgusting to contemplate what these criminals have gotten away with and what the rest of the world must think of us as a result.

The best that can be said for it is that we know now. We are waking up. For many people this process is very hard and unpleasant, like being awakened from a sound sleep with a bucket of cold water. For a while— weeks or months depending upon how deeply indoctrinated people are, how loathe they are to admit the truth—- they rampage around striking out at friend and foe alike, disoriented and unable to know the difference, still half-asleep and grumpy like hibernating bears in the spring time.

And then something happens. Some little thing goes "click" in their brains and they realize The Truth. All at once. It is not uncommon for grown men to break down and weep when this happens. Boom. The American Dream has been unlawfully converted by these scum bags into the American Lie.

Once they wake up, people know for sure that they are unhappy and have been unhappy for a long time. They know that they are not free and that they live in fear of unaccountable "agencies" like the FBI and IRS and FEMA and DHS —-foreign commercial mercenaries and bill collectors operating under old trade names and brand names, pretending to be part of a lawful government that is long gone. The newly awakened gradually own up to the fact that they are constantly being harassed and exploited and manipulated and disrespected and extorted and intimidated and misrepresented by people who are supposed to be providing them with "essential governmental services". They realize they are being robbed—and worse, blamed for all this evil by the rest of the world.

When I first realized all this it felt like I had a big block of ice in my stomach. There was no fire, no outburst, no tears, no fear, no great emotion—- just icy cold stillness and hardness. I felt my jaw solidify into a rock. I realized in that moment that it truly didn't matter if I lived or died, how much it cost, how long it took—-and this is what I mean when I twist the words of King George V and tell people— "Keep calm and get even." Don't flinch. Don't let your emotions run wild. Feel no fear. Don't worry. The Devil has been living in your house for a long time. The only difference is that now you know he is there.

We are dealing with the British Raj here. The same vermin that Gandhi had to face in India. The same ones who mowed down the wives and daughters at Amritsar. The same ones who kept people from taking salt from the sea, which they needed to live and which had always been their right to harvest generation unto generation. The same ones who enslaved the Indian people by the hundred millions to feed Westminster, the British Crown Corporation, and the Queen — have been sitting here polishing their boots in America — feeding off of us and using our sons and daughters as fodder in their wars for profit, stealing and manipulating our natural resources. pawning off their phony paper promises "in equitable exchange" for our silver and gold, bullying us, and misrepresenting us to the rest of the world so that at the end of the day after all this abuse at their hands, we would be blamed by the rest of the world for all the evil these criminals have committed in our names.

And when I say, "in our names"—-I mean it literally. Several years ago I obtained a copy of "my" Master File kept by the IRS and learned that—- supposedly— I was running a rum distillery in Barbados. That is a pretty good trick for a grandma who has never visited the Caribbean. I was pretty high up in the management, too—-hauling down the equivalent of $180,000.00 a year in salary that I somehow never received. Imagine all the other Americans who are going about their lives on dairy farms and working in small businesses and clerking at grocery stores who are being grossly, purposefully, with malice-aforethought lied about like this?

Just recently I was given more "official government records"—- this time records related to my dead father's estate. He has been dead since 1981, but somehow, "he" is still paying no less than nine (9) mortgages out of estate trust accounts established "in his name" —–and all for people I never heard of and who are not part of our family.

How is this possible? When we are mere babies in our cradles undeclared agents of these foreign corporations —- the IMF and the British Crown Corporation — come to new Mothers in the guise of hospital workers and force them to sign paperwork seeming to admit that they are all unwed mothers, all "donating" their babies to the "State" corporation as "wards of the State". I was told that if I didn't sign this paperwork, my son would not be released to my care. He would be placed in "State sponsored Foster Care" and I would never see him again.

I was a completely responsible 40 year old adult with a good income, a husband, a home, everything—- and they pretended that I was an irresponsible, indigent, unwed mother seeking to offload my unwanted baby and willingly giving him to the tender mercies of the "STATE OF ALASKA"—- the local franchise of the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES (INC.).

They did what they always do. They seized upon his name, copyrighted it as property of the British Commercial Corporation, and began spinning off all sorts of corporate "personas" named after my son.

First, there was a "state level" foreign situs trust doing business as Eric Jon Belcher. And then there was a Roman Inferior (Cestui Que Vie) Trust operated out of Puerto Rico doing business as ERIC JON BELCHER. And then, most recently, Mr. Obama decided to create a public transmitting utility called Eric J. Belcher— also in Puerto Rico—-all owned and operated by the British Crown Corporation and its various subsidiaries, franchises, and affiliates *and created for their benefit.*

They have issued performance bonds in my son's name under the pretense that he is or ever was their ward and have obligated him to pay off their mortgages, accept their debts, pay their taxes, buy their services, accept conscription into their commercial mercenary forces, obey every whim of their "Congress", back their promissory notes with his private property and labor, and so on and on in an endless recitation of enslavement and false claims and breach of trust.

I want the world to know that all and any paperwork I signed at Providence Medical Center in November of 1996 I signed under the most detestable and inexcusable duress imaginable, under threat of forcible kidnapping of my infant son. Any contract express or implied arising from such practices and seeming to obligate me or my son is nothing but fraud on the face of it and always has been. The British Crown Corporation, the UN Corporation, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies, and affiliates are guilty of malicious tort fraud of the worst kind.

These corporations are under demand to release our copyrighted names, trademarks, and private estates to our control free and clear, without tax, lien, debt, attachment, encumbrance, obligation, deed, claim, or colorable title of any kind. And then we will talk about what else they owe us.

Every corporation involved in this enslavement and kidnapping racket, all those preying upon babies and new mothers, deserve to be liquidated and have their assets distributed to their Priority Creditors—–the American People. Those responsible for promoting and continuing to implement this institutionalized fraud and enslavement scheme need to be arrested as criminals and prosecuted to the fullest extent of both national and international law.

People everywhere need to be aware of what has gone on here, who is responsible, and what we are all facing. It's not "the Americans"—-its a nest of vicious and cowardly criminals who have insinuated themselves and pretended to represent us, while bilking us and everyone else for their own profit.

2016 Financial Storms – Lord Rothschild Says

Friday, March 18th, 2016

Sean Adi-Tabatabai
Thur, Mar 17, 2016
Subject; 2016 Financial Trouble

Lord Rothschild Warns Of ‘Big Problems In 2016’

Lord Rothschild has issued a stark warning to investors, saying that 2016 is likely to be a very difficult year for the world economy.

In his letter to investors, Rothschild warns, “not surprisingly, market conditions have deteriorated further…So much so that the wind is certainly not behind us; indeed we may well be in the eye of a storm.” On this basis, Rothschild highlights a “daunting litany of problems,” warning those who are optimistically sanguine about the US economy that “2016 is likely to turn out to be more difficult than the second half of 2015.”

In my half-yearly statement I sounded a note of caution, ending up by writing that “the climate is one where the wind may well not be behind us”; indeed we became increasingly concerned about global equity markets during the last quarter of 2015, reducing our exposure to equities as the economic outlook darkened and many companies reported disappointing earnings. Meanwhile central banks’ policy makers became more pessimistic in their economic forecasts for, despite unprecedented monetary stimulus, growth remained anaemic.

Not surprisingly, market conditions have deteriorated further. So much so that the wind is certainly not behind us; indeed we may well be in the eye of a storm.

The litany of problems which confronts investors is daunting:

The QE tap is in the course of being turned off and in any event its impact in stimulating asset prices is coming to an end.
There’s the slowing down to an unknown extent in China.
The situation in the Middle East is likely to be unresolvable at least for some time ahead.
Progress of the US and European economies is disappointing.
The Greek situation remains fraught with the country now having to cope with the challenge of unprecedented immigration.
Over the last few years we have witnessed an explosion in debt, much of it repayable in revalued dollars by emerging market countries at the time of a collapse in commodity prices. Countries like Brazil, Russia, Nigeria, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are, as a result, deeply troubled.
In the UK we have an unsettled political situation as we attempt to deal with the possibility of Brexit in the coming months.

There are, however, some influential and thoughtful investment managers who remain sanguine about markets in 2016 on the grounds that the US economy is in decent shape – outside of manufacturing – while they feel that economic conditions may be improving. To them, the decline in these markets may have more to do with sentiment than substance. Others are less optimistic but feel that the odds remain against these potential difficulties materialising in a form which would undermine global equity markets.

However our view is that 2016 is likely to turn out to be more difficult than the second half of 2015. Our policy will be towards a greater emphasis on seeking absolute returns. We will remain highly selective when considering public and private investment opportunities. Reflecting this policy, our quoted equity exposure has been reduced to 43% of net asset value.

There’s an old saying that in difficult times the return of capital takes precedence over the return on capital. Our principle will therefore be to exercise caution in all things in the current year, while remaining agile where opportunities present themselves. Problems have a habit of creating opportunities and I remain confident of our ability to identify and profit from them during 2016.

GMO Dark Side – Consumers Demand GMO Labels

Friday, March 18th, 2016

Julie Wilson –
Thur, Mar 17, 2016
Subject; The Dark GMO Act in Congress

Senate set to vote on DARK Act TODAY, bill would criminalize any and all claims that say non-GMO food is safer
Thursday, March 03, 2016 by: Julie Wilson staff writer
Tags: DARK Act, GMO labeling, United Sates Senate
Facebook (1,539)Twitter
(NaturalNews) A piece of legislation that would prohibit states from enacting GMO-labeling laws, as well as make it difficult for companies wishing to voluntarily label GMOs, is expected to hit the Senate floor for a vote today. The Senate vote has been dreaded by the Right to Know movement ever since it passed the House of Representatives 275–150 in mid-July.

Authored by Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS), the bill has been labeled the "Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act" by healthy food advocates because it eliminates a person's right to know exactly what is in their food.

The newly "introduced legislation [is] intended to preempt state GMO labeling laws – and it's expected to come to a floor vote TOMORROW," said the Environmental Working Group in an action alert email sent on March 15, 2016.

The clock is ticking
"This is our LAST CHANCE to stand up for GMO labeling and keep Big Food and Monsanto's allies in Congress from robbing us of our right to know," warned EWG in the email. "Americans should have the same right as citizens of 64 other countries to know whether or not their food contains genetically engineered ingredients."

You can take action now by sending a message to the Senate and voicing your support for GMO-labeling here.

One of the worst components of the DARK Act is that it would reverse any GMO-labeling laws already passed by individual states. Therefore, Vermont's GMO-labeling law, scheduled to take effect July 1, would be nullified.

"The DARK Act is Big Government's desperate effort to stifle free speech about food, and if passed, it would usher in a new Dark Ages of totalitarian, government mandated censorship and oppression of food transparency," said Mike Adams of Natural News, author of the new book Food Forensics and lab science director of CWC Labs.

"This DARK Act effort is the opposite of science; it is the desperate hiding of facts from consumers so that people are denied factual information about what they are eating. Every U.S. Senator who votes for this bill will be publicly exposed and shamed as 'food traitors' to America's moms and dads who are merely trying to understand what they're feeding their own children."

DARK Act favors Big Food and the world's seed monopolies
The DARK Act was largely backed by Republicans when it passed the House last summer. Only 12 Republicans voted against it, acknowledging its "infringement of states' rights and local control," reported EcoWatch.

"If the United States Senate votes to censor and cover up this information in order to protect the financial interests of Monsanto, then that Senate will forfeit every last ounce of credibility it might have possessed. If the DARK Act passes, the U.S. Senate effectively declares a FOOD WAR on the American people," Adams added.

The DARK Act, an outright attack on America's health, is so sinister that its passing is almost unimaginable, particularly when you consider the fact that society is more interested in clean, healthy and organic food than ever before.

More than 40 percent of consumers are either avoiding or reducing GMOs in their diet, a group primarily led by millennials and parents of children under eight-years-old, according to a report[PDF] produced by Whole Foods.

The report also found that more than half of people living in China, Russia, Germany and Brazil are concerned about GMOs.

Not only are organic labels on the rise, but so are GMO-free stamps. "Organic claims were more prevalent on new product in 2011 and 2012, but in 2013 GMO-Free claims made up a larger percentage of all food launches."

GMO-free labels increased from 19 percent to 45 percent over a one-year period between 2012 and 2013. It's difficult to say what might happen to one of the world's fastest growing markets if the DARK Act were to pass.