Archive for the ‘Gun Control’ Category

We Need Your Help! RJ Hender Dies With Family By His Side May 20, 2016

Saturday, May 21st, 2016

5/21/2016 Ryan Hender

Salt Lake City, Utah


Robert Hender has devoted his life to serving in many capacities, including right here on this very website 5 of his 11 kids still live at home with him and depend on him financially. They suffered extreme financial hardship as his body deteriorated during the last few years of his life. Suffering from a genetic liver disease, knowing there was no cure, he pushed forward often without his own feelings considered.  The selfless work that he did for over 10 years was his way of serving his country, he believed that with all of his soul even until his dying breath. There was never really any money in it, in fact, most months the family went without basic necessities. The family had Sub For Santa Christmases for the last 18 years, but dad hid it really well. 

About 2 years ago he started having weekly surgeries to relieve the pressure off of his liver. He was on the liver transplant list at the University of Utah, and was waiting for a donor. We were told that most people die on the transplant list, but we had hope. As he worsened, he lost his voice almost completely, and was unable to continue being a radio talk show host, which he loved so much. He then dedicated his time to continuing his work on his website, which he was still hard at work maintaining until just days before “the worst week of my life”.  

On May 14th I got word f rom my younger sisters that my dad was exhibiting symptoms of a stroke. He was taken to a Hospital in Provo Utah where it was determined that his ammonia levels were dangerously high. His liver function was diminishing. He stabilized after a brief stay at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center and was released to go home. Less than 24 hours later, his wife found him unresponsive in his favorite chair. 

He was taken by helicopter back to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center where at first things looked optimistic, but then things took a turn for the worst. Having been on life support since 9am, his body was giving out. Around 9pm we were told that he only had hours to live. His kidneys had stopped functioning, and his seizures were getting closer together, and worsening. 12:00am May 20, 2016 he was taken off life support and left to his own devices. With his family by his side, he went peacefully back to his Father in Heaven at 12:15am May 20, 2016. 

He leaves behind his wife Virginia, and 11 kids, 5 of which were financially dependent on him. Without his miniscule disability check coming in, the family is now displaced from their home of 8 years, and forced to start life over again without the one person that held them all together. His wife, who had recently started working part time at Walmart, still not even able to cover basic necessities is now left with no option but to uproot her family and start life over 2 hours away from the place they called home for so many years because where they once lived, there is not sufficient work to support a family. 

Robert did not have life insurance, nor was he able to prepare in any way for what might happen to his kids if he were to leave them this early. We are scrambling to figure out how we can pay for a burial at all, let alone how the little ones (youngest being 10) will be able to get back to life as normal. 

We are asking for your help, in any way you can. This is a desperate cry for help, and we would not be asking if it wasn't 100% necessary. Time is of the essence. We were able to find a mortuary that is inexpensive, but due to this they do require payment in full before they can even schedule the funeral. 

We have setup a GoFundMe campaign to help collect funds to pay for final expenses. Click here to donate. 


Thank you so much for reading this, it means the world. 


-Ryan Hender


Help Fund Funeral Services For RJ Hender

Friday, May 20th, 2016

5/20/2016 Robert Hender

Salt Lake City, Utah



Robert Albert Hender Jr. AKA “RJ”


Born in October 1960 in Seattle Washington, the oldest of 5 children. Early in life, Robert was responsible for caring for his younger siblings, who loved him dearly. 


Though he desired strongly to serve an LDS mission, Robert was unable to due to reasons beyond his control. He instead dedicated his life to serving others with his best asset, his voice. Robert loved to sing, and had a great singing voice, he also served in the local media in several capacities, including but not limited to KPAX TV, KTKK Radio, and he took on the world with his website


A father of 11 kids, of which 5 currently live at home and depend on him fully, he set aside his own wants and continued to serve the community, his country. For years he worked tirelessly in radio, and through his website to bring to the forefront news that the rest of the world ignored. Robert was no stranger to controversial topics, in fact there were many radio stations that silenced him for being willing to openly discuss topics that mainstream media ignored. The selfless work that he did for over 10 years was his way of serving his country, he believed that with all of his soul even until his dying breath. There was never really any money in it, in fact, most months the family went without basic necessities. 


7 years ago, Robert found out that he was suffering from a genetic liver condition referred to as Alpha One Antitripsin Deficiency (A1AD) that would eventually take his life. He spent as much quality time with his family as he could, knowing that his time could be up at any moment. About 2 years ago he started having weekly surgeries to relieve the pressure off of his liver. He was on the liver transplant list at the University of Utah, and was waiting for a donor. As he worsened, he lost his voice almost completely, and was unable to continue being a radio talk show host, which he loved so much. He then dedicated his time to continuing his work on his website, which he was still hard at work maintaining until just days before “the worst week of my life”.  


On May 14th I got word f rom my younger sisters that my dad was exhibiting symptoms of a stroke. He was taken to a Hospital in Provo Utah where it was determined that his ammonia levels were dangerously high. His liver function was diminishing. He stabilized after a brief stay at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center and was released to go home. Less than 24 hours later, his wife found him unresponsive in his favorite chair. 


He was taken by helicopter back to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center where at first things looked optimistic, but then things took a turn for the worst. Having been on life support since 9am, his body was giving out. Around 9pm we were told that he only had hours to live. His kidneys had stopped functioning, and his seizures were getting closer together, and worsening. 12:00am May 20, 2016 he was taken off life support and left to his own devices. With his family by his side, he went peacefully back to his Father in Heaven at 12:15am May 20, 2016. 


He leaves behind his wife Virginia, and 11 kids, 5 of which were financially dependent on him. Without his disability check coming in, the family is now displaced from their home of 8 years, and forced to start life over again without the one person that held them all together. His wife, who had recently started working part time at Walmart, still not even able to cover basic necessities is now left with no option but to uproot her family and start life over 2 hours away from the place they called home for so many years. 


Robert did not have life insurance, nor was he able to prepare in any way for what might happen to his kids if he were to leave them this early. We are scrambling to figure out how we can pay for a burial at all, let alone how the little ones (youngest being 10) will be able to get back to life as normal. 


We are asking for your help, in any way you can. This is a desperate cry for help, and we would not be asking if it wasn't 100% necessary. Time is of the essence. If you can help in any way, we would be eternally grateful. I wish it didn’t come to this. 


We have setup a GoFundMe campaign to help collect funds to pay for final expenses. Click here to donate. 


Thank you so much for reading this, it means the world. 


-Ryan Hender



155yrs Lincoln Martial Law – 2 Wolves & 1 Lamb Discuss Lunch Options

Thursday, April 28th, 2016

Judge Anna Von Reitz
Wed, Apr 27, 2016
Subject; Lincoln Martial Law Plans

April 22, 2016

To: Don Young, Lisa Murkowski, and Dan Sullivan

c/o “Alaska Congressional Delegation”

702 Hart Senate Building, Washington, DC 20510

US Certified Receipt: 7006 0810 0003 3541 5755

709 Hart Senate Building, Washington, DC 20510

US Certified Receipt: 7013 3020 0002 1837 0399

2314 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

US Certified Receipt: 7013 3020 0002 1837 0412

From: Anna Maria Riezinger, Grandmother

I am writing to you today pursuant to my duty to fully inform you.

1. Please be informed that you do not represent me and that I am not your
employee. I am in fact your employer and benefactor and am a Beneficiary
of the United States Trust which you are all supposed to be administering
as Trustees in my behalf; also be informed that ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER and
ANNA M. RIEZINGER and all other franchises created or thought to be created
and operated under these names owe their allegiance to the land of
Wisconsin, are of age, and are voluntarily expatriated from any allegiance,
obligation, or association with the corporation doing business as the
UNITED STATES and equally expatriated from any allegiance, obligation, or
association with the corporation doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF


The living Americans who are the respective Holders in Due Course of these
given names and the underlying Trade Names formed in Upper and Lower Case
and all other derivative names, labels, accounts, assets and vessels in
commerce associated with them are American State Nationals owing their
singular allegiance to the land of their birth.

This is your Notice of these facts.

2. In April of 1861, Lincoln forced the remaining (Northern States)
members of Congress back into Session as Commander-in-Chief under martial
law, and this has remained the situation ever since. Despite three public
declarations by President Andrew Johnson declaring the land jurisdiction to
be at peace, no peace was ever actually declared and no Peace Treaty ending
the Civil War has ever been signed, with the result that our nation has
remained at constant “war” of one kind or another for 150 years. This has
caused incalculable damage to millions of people worldwide and the deaths
and deprivations of millions of Americans, too. The blame for this
continuing outrage against humanity rests firmly on the shoulders of your
predecessors and now upon your shoulders.

Resume operation of the proper civil government owed to us under
international treaty or stand revealed before the entire world as a nothing
more than a despicable corporate military dictatorship being run by
international banks under color of law.

This is your Notice of these facts.

3. June of 1864– the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning
of “state, States and United States” to mean “the territories and District
of Columbia”. (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864


“US Territories” means “portions of the United States that are not within
the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states. Includes all
federal installations”—military bases, docks, courthouses, arsenals, etc.

This was never changed, so, all references to “state, States, and United
States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must
be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”.

You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used
prior to and then after the passage of this 1864 corporate law.

Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly
still believe them to mean— after 1864 in Federal Code—they generally
meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning.

This is your Notice of these facts.

4. In 1871-78 an additional meaning was given to “United States” via a
process set in motion by the Act of 1871:

The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session
III, Chapter 62 , page 419,
Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US
Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.”

Though the Act of 1871 was repealed, its legislative intent was merely
chopped up and subsequently passed via this process:

“An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of
Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and
continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871,
as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9,
1878, *Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of
Columbia* . . .* 1873–’74 *(in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p.
2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1
(Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .

As the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered
by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up the
“United States Corp”.

This process of legislation created a private corporation owned by the
actual government of the District of Columbia.

Thus the only government created was that of *any private corporation* which
determines its own administrative rules and structures…….that is, the
US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the adopted doing business name
of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)— it is also the
name of a private corporation (District of Columbia *Municipal Corporation*)
that was created by the acting Congress via the Act of 1877 and as amended
ever since.

This is confirmed by Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), which states
unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as
just demonstrated from the public records.

This is your Notice of these facts.

5. In 1945, the United States Supreme Court addressed the meaning of
“United States” for what it termed the “final time” and offered the

“The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. (1)
It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous
to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may designate
the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the
territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the
collective name of the states which are united by and under the
Constitution.” — Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945)
(This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s
Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.)

Thus we have a total of five definitions of “United States” in common use
within the federal government– the three given above, the one adopted in
1864, and the one coming out of the Acts of 1871-78.

This is your Notice of these facts.

6. The same duplicitous word-smithing was done with the words “United
States of America”— with the same result.

From — *A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the
United States.* By John Bouvier, published 1856:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given):

“(1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United
States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and

(Fifth meaning): “(5)—The United States of America are a corporation
endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive
property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit
can be brought against the United States without authority of law.”

So, even before the “US, Inc.” there was the “USA, Inc.” and both of these
entities are referenced in what follows.

This is your Notice of these facts.

7. Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the
government of “the Territories and District of Columbia” have “citizens”?

1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of
the United States (”United States” meaning “territories and District of
Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in
that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” (That
is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created by
legislative action.)

1875 – This definition of “*United States*” as a Corporation *has its own
citizens* (seeUnited States v. Cruikshank
92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.

1953 – Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 “A citizen of the United States
is a citizen of the federal government…”

1967 – *Congressional Record* , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A
“citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a
co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, *cestui
que* trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment
, which upholds the debt of the USA
and US Inc. in Section 4

Yes, the UNITED STATES Corporation has “citizens”.

This is your Notice of these facts.

8. Can “citizens of the UNITED STATES” be corporations? Yes.

Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are
citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign country. *If the
party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is
incorporated or is doing business.* If diversity of citizenship exists, it
places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III,
section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

See above definition of “citizen of the United States” from the 1967
Congressional Record— “a civilly dead entity defined as a private
constructive cestui que trust which “upholds the debt” of both the USA,
Inc. and the US, Inc.”

This is your Notice of these facts.

9. What is a cestui que vie trust? It’s a trust formed when the actual
owner of property is “unknown, presumed dead, lost to accident, natural
disaster, or missing at sea” and the State then seizes control of their
property assets and presumes to be the owner and beneficiary of their

So where are all these “missing people” coming from?

From the Bureau of Vital Statistics, which has been busily and fraudulently
seizing upon American babies and declaring them civilly dead almost at

This is your Notice of these facts.

10. What has been done here is nothing less than slavery by proxy:

A corporate franchise has been named after each one of us, and then, we
have been coerced and deceived into accepting the debts of that franchise
via a “similar names” deceit.

Prior to 1933 a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named
after a living man called “John Frederick Doe” and this Foreign Situs
Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt USA,
Inc’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and
forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation. In 1999 that
bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it.

Beginning in 1944 the US. Inc. similarly named a Cestui Que Vie Trust
after the living man John Frederick Doe and called it “JOHN FREDERICK DOE”
and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts and
“removed” to Puerto Rico. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was
then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this corporate franchise,

This past year, 2015, President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized
under the laws of the United Nations City-State) announced the creation of
a new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”— and created a franchise
of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility named “JOHN F. DOE” operated
under the laws of Puerto Rico.

Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given
name “John Frederick Doe” and who is in fact the owner and executor of his
name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to
false charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history.

All this violence, all this fraud, all this insufferable abuse of our trust
and good faith is draped around your necks and is now on public display.

This is your Notice of these facts.

11. What is the “UNITED STATES” with respect to the states of the Union
and the People thereof?

It’s a private mostly foreign-owned corporation subject to the Clearfield
Doctrine, nothing more or less, and the same applies to the USA, Inc. when
doing business on our soil. The same applies to all their various “State”
franchises, including the “STATE OF ALASKA” (US, INC.) and “ALASKA” (USA,

These corporations and their “State” franchises are all being operated as
criminal syndicates.

This is your Notice of these facts.

12. Fraud vitiates everything. It destroys all contracts and
presumptions. It taints everything it touches. All Americans subjected to
this undisclosed process in Breach of Trust and Constitution have been
defrauded and mischaracterized and deprived of their lawful status as
living people and as American State Nationals. This has been done
secretively and under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure so as to
facilitate identity and credit theft and the practice of personage and
barratry against the victims.

All “consent” obtained by any process under these conditions is null and
void *ab initio *and no excuse of war or emergency may be introduced as no
such powers were ever granted under* The Constitution for the united States
of America*. There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and
it is recognized as crime in all venues and jurisdictions of law, national
and international and global.

This is your Notice of these facts.

13. Such mischaracterization and capitulation of the peaceful and
non-combatant American People living on the land of the American States is
additionally a war crime, which has been committed against them by the US,
Inc. and the USA, Inc. and their respective corporate officers.

This is your Notice of these facts.

14. Such abuse, theft, misrepresentation, unlawful conversion, inland
piracy, kidnapping, press-ganging and racketeering is also in deplorable
violation of both national and international law and in violation of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Universal Right of
Self-Declaration and numerous other Declarations and Conventions of the
United Nations which the United States has agreed to and signed.

This is your Notice of these facts.

15. Is the “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of
the Union?

We quote The Informer:

“No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws;
but they are well understood to be facts which must, like other facts, be
proved before they can be received in a court of justice. [cites omitted]
It is equally well settled that the*several states of the Union are to be
considered as in this respect foreign to each other*, and that the courts
of one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take
judicial notice of, the laws of another state.”

[Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535]

[6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)]

Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In
re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894). The authors of Corpus Juris
Secundum (“CJS”), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to
arrive at the following conclusion about the “foreign” corporate status of
the federal government:

*“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect
to a state.” * [citing In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479,
affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287] [19
C.J.S. 883]

Before you get the idea that this meaning of “foreign” is now totally
antiquated, consider the current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth
Edition, which defines “foreign state” very clearly, as follows:

“The several United States*** are considered “foreign” to each other
except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. … The
term “foreign nations,” as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of
foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed
to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is
brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the
sense of that rule.”

And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50
States as “countries”. When a State court in Alaska needed a federal judge
to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that
possible. In its reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the
“Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact states”.
Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as

(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so
authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection
(a) …. [!!!]

[28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]” — End quote.

Each one of the sovereign states of the Union is in fact its own nation
having its own distinct character, local law, and government apart from any
franchises owned and operated under color of law by either the US, Inc. or
the USA, Inc. offering to pose as the lawful government of the people, for
the people and by the people of these United States.

This is your Notice of these facts.

16. Was it ever the intent of the Founders of this Country that any
Congress operating in any capacity whatsoever would ever be granted any
right of despotism over the People via any means, mechanism, or pretense?

The Preamble of the actual Constitution which is a trust indenture forever
obligating the government of the United States however that government is
defined gives the answer, which was further elucidated by the Bill of

As all the foregoing demonstrates you are each and collectively in Breach
of Trust and in Commercial and Administrative Default with respect to your
presumed Public Offices and are operating as the administrators of an
international crime syndicate with respect to the people and states of the
Union you are hired to protect and which you have freely claimed to

This is your Notice of these facts.

17. The seedbed of these crimes against Americans has been the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has been used as a staging ground for
these heinous activities by the British Crown and its operatives, and the
United Nations Corporation (UN Corp) –not to be confused with the United
Nations— which has sought by various means of similar fraud and force to
impose its administration upon us and all other sovereign nations.

This is your Notice of these facts.

18. We have informed the Secretary General of the United Nations and the
United States Secretary of State and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and hereby
give Notice to the United States Congress that these acts of virulent crime
against the American people and the states of the Union and all claims and
presumptions based upon them must come to an immediate and permanent stop.

Full disclosure and remedy must be provided to all natural-born American
State Nationals and all their vessels in commerce must receive full cure
and maintenance without further obfuscation, avoidance, or delay.

The operations of the Trustees of the insolvent UNITED STATES, INC. and the
administrators of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. must be brought under
control and forced to comply with both national and international law. If
President Obama objects, he must be impeached without further excuse or

This is your Notice of these facts.

18. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States or its
government however defined who fails to take immediate and forceful action
to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the American
people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of treason
against the same.

This is your Notice of these facts.

19. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States of America or
its government however defined who fails to take immediate and forceful
action to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the
American people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of
treason against the same.

This is your Notice of these facts.

20. Operatives of the British Crown and UN Corporation staged initially in
Puerto Rico and now operating out of Florida are implementing a propaganda
campaign against the peaceful non-combatant people of the states of the
Union and again mischaracterizing them as “sovereign citizens”.

This is an oxymoron demonstrating the complete ignorance of those applying
such a label to American State Nationals. It is not possible to be or to
act as a “sovereign” and at the same time to be or to act as a “citizen”.

The apparent motive for this PR campaign is to excuse the taking of violent
action against the American people and against their states of the Union
and to provoke an armed insurrection which would then give these same
corporate crime syndicates a plausible excuse for killing their creditors.

This is precisely what happened in Nazi Germany and it is threatening to
happen here and now.

Any attempt on the part of the Trustees of the bankrupt and insolvent
UNITED STATES or on the part of the operators of THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA to provoke such a contest or make such false claims against their
creditors will be instantly and internationally recognized for the specious
and self-interested crime that it is.

This is your Notice of these facts.

21. As the “United States Congress” is uniquely and specifically
responsible for the administration and indeed, the misadministration, of
the Territories and the District of Columbia, it is incumbent upon each one
of you to put an end to the international crimes being perpetuated by and
within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico against the people of the United
States and to put an end to the efforts of the British Crown and UN
Corporation to further parasitize and mischaracterize and misrepresent us.
Failure to do so will have permanent and extremely unpleasant results for
all parties engaged in this international crime spree.

This is your Notice of these facts.

22. “The free, sovereign and independent people of the United States”
–quote the Definitive Treaty of Peace, 1783, are still alive and well and
competent to act in their own behalf and in behalf of their sovereign

We have kept our part of the constitutional bargain and paid for the
services we agreed to receive and also a great many “services” that we did
not agree to receive and for which we do not owe. We have loyally stood
by the British and French Governments through two World Wars, and this
present miasma is the thanks we have received for our support.

The mechanism and implementation of these commercial frauds and personage
practices against the unsuspecting people and organic states of the Union
was provided by the British Government and by undeclared foreign agents,
especially by members of the American Bar Association acting in violation
of the 1947 Bar Association Treaty.

The presumptions being exercised against us by the so-called “governments”
of these corporations dba UNITED STATES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
have become intolerable and we find the constitutional contract has been
Dishonored by those entrusted to act as our fiduciary Deputies, Trustees,
and Administrators.

An immediate cessation of all hostile actions and presumptions against the
people and the states of the Union and an immediate declaration of peace
formally ending the Civil War and all other “wars” is called for. Any
failure to provide this and all other appropriate remedies will result in
the liquidation of the offending corporations via arbitration.

We created the “United States” and the “United States of America” by our
sovereign Will and as the creators we are uniquely endowed to take against
the Will and to amend the Will and to destroy the Will if we so desire.
By the misadministration, duplicity, dishonor, and dishonesty of your
predecessors we have not been served; any continuance of these false claims
and practices against American State Nationals and the states of the Union
will not be tolerated and will be subject to international prosecution as
virulent crimes amounting to identity theft, credit theft, press-ganging
and inland piracy against these United States and the people of the United

This is your Notice of these facts.

23. All prosecutions against birthright Americans under the false pretense
that they have agreed via any undisclosed or implied contract to act as
“citizens of the United States” or agreed to cede their estates, assets,
names or any other property naturally belonging to them to the UNITED
STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are acts of international fraud and
inland piracy and are subject to the death penalty for anyone caught
intentionally and knowingly participating in or enforcing such crimes under
color of law.

The execution of foreign pirates caught in the act may be summarily carried
out under Citizens Arrest or by any lawfully elected Sheriff or any duly
appointed Federal Marshall under the Public and Organic Law of this nation.

This is your Notice of these facts.

24. All birthright American State Nationals presently accused of any white
collar, statutory, or victimless crime being held under false pretenses as
“citizens of the United States” must be given full disclosure and released
without further delay.

This is your Notice of these facts.

25. All property and rights and material interests naturally and lawfully
belonging to birthright American State Nationals must be promptly returned
to them and returned to the land recording districts of these United States
and to the administration of the actual organic states and people, together
will all escrow accounts, interest, tithes, and fees owed to them.

We suggest that the administration of THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE be
properly informed and pressed into service to discharge all outstanding
debts owed by the fraudulently established individual UNITED STATES
franchises operated under the given NAMES of American State Nationals and
obliged to deliver all copyrights, trademarks, titles, deeds, credit and
other assets owed to and naturally belonging to the people of these United
States without further obfuscation or delay.

This is your Notice of these facts.

26. In the interests of national and international peace and decency you
are being “requested and required” to do the job that the trusting American
people elected you to do in good faith as Trustees and fiduciary Deputies.
Failure to do so will be your individual and personal admission of willful
treason against these United States and against the people of these United

No further excuses or word games are acceptable. The officers of the
British Crown among the Delegates either act with Honor and fulfill their
obligations owed to these United States and to the people thereof, or they
shall be recognized as pirates subject to the penalties of both our Public
Law and the international Law of Admiralty.

This is your Notice of these facts.

27. We wish to draw your attention to the ravages and rampages taking
place in the so-called western compact States and the atrocities being
willfully committed against American State Nationals and their private
property interests in those states by agencies of the UNITED STATES.

An innocent rancher named Robert LaVoy Finicum has been waylaid and
murdered by men receiving their paychecks on our dole as agents of a
corporation merely doing business as the “GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES”
and its subsidiaries including the “BLM” and the “FBI”. These federal
agents have acted as criminals and under false presumptions on our soil.

We call for their immediate arrest and re-education.

Any continuance of this violent racketeering is completely unacceptable and
will not be tolerated.

However Congress has seen fit to organize its administration of the
“territories and District of Columbia” its agencies clearly have no right
whatsoever to attack, commandeer, address, or otherwise infringe upon the
people of this country.

Similarly, American State Nationals including Ammon and Clive Bundy and
other western state ranchers have been mischaracterized as “citizens of the
United States” while in fact being people of these United States.

We are not amused by the convenient and apparent acts of personage and
barratry — crimes under both national and international law— which are
being promoted by the Trustees of the UNITED STATES and the misnamed
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (INC) in their attempts to collect on odious debts
owed in fact by their own corporation(s).

What is being attempted is clearly a Reverse Trust Fraud Scheme in which
the Trustees of our nation are attempting to act as the Beneficiaries and
are mischaracterizing the actual Beneficiaries of the United States Trust
as the Trustees of a foreign trust we never consensually agreed to
participate in and to which we have no natural affiliation at all—the
Public Charitable Trust set up to provide welfare to displaced Negro
plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War.

We suggest that the Congress release the western state ranchers and honor
its obligations and redirect its erring employees and inform the creditors
of the UNITED STATES of the actual status of these affairs without any
further argument or delay.

It may result in embarrassment, inconvenience, and considerable
international negotiation to resolve, but all the governments of the world
are in one way or another in similar condition and the International Year
of Jubilee provides an excellent opportunity for these festering wounds and
causes of criminality to be recognized and healed without further
bloodshed, violence, or crime.

This is your Notice of these facts.

28. The Congress which is responsible for the operations of the
“government of the United States”— that is, the US, Inc. acting as the
government of the “territories and District of Columbia” —and the various
Presidents have committed a great many sins against the people of our
nation and their organic states of the Union, including but not limited to
all the items addressed in this Notice.

Beginning in 1933 the members of Congress have conspired with the Office of
the President and the Governors of Federal State franchises of the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA to embezzle from and defraud the American people.

This was done primarily by legislative actions taken under color of law,
including the Emergency Banking Acts, the Trading With The Enemy Act, and
much more.

As part of the historical fraud upon the people, the US, Inc. and the USA,
Inc. colluded to set up a fiat currency to be exchanged on a “dollar for
dollar” basis— a worthless Promissory Note issued by a cartel of
international banks doing business as the “Federal Reserve” while in fact
having no association with our lawful government—in exchange for an
American Silver Dollar. This amounted to the exchange of a piece of paper
backed by the good faith of criminals for an ounce of fine silver.

As you all have cause to know, the Federal Reserve bankrupted the old
Federal Reserve System and skipped town owing these United States and the
people of these United States trillions of dollars worth of gold and silver.

The Federal Reserve’s most recent iteration now proposes to use our labor
and our assets to back more “Notes”—- and repeat the same scam, only
owing to the fact that they have already embezzled our precious metals,
they now wish to up the ante and more overtly control and enslave us.

This is your Notice that we are not now and never were chattels, slaves,
livestock, nor corporate franchises of the UNITED STATES nor of THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA nor any other fictitious entity you care to name and we
are not subject to your statutory rule except by fraud, personage, barratry
and criminal mercenary force.

Put another way–the United States belongs to us. We do not belong to it.
We are the Priority Creditors, first, last, and always. Any further
attack, embezzlement, misrepresentation, collusion of banks, false claims,
or legal chicanery undertaken against us or our interests will be
recognized as an Act of War against innocent Third Party non-combatants and
you will be held individually and personally and commercially 100% liable.

If this is not apparent to you, you should immediately step down from any
office or pretension of office related to us or our lawful government in
any way.

This is your Notice of these facts.

29. In full view of the national identity and credit theft which has been
engineered jointly by the UNITED STATES and USA against the people of these
United States and the states of the Union, the present members of Congress
must either abdicate and make way for new and more competent deputies
elected directly and by paper ballot by the people of these United States
or do the right thing and clean up this mess once and for all.

International criminal prosecution of the Federal Reserve and the IMF and
all the colluding banking institutions including the World Bank and IBRD
which received American gold and silver assets as their payoff for the 1933
fraud is necessary. As already noted, fraud has no statute of limitation
and is a crime across all jurisdictions and venues of law worldwide.

Immediate confiscation of the assets of these banks and the assets of
shareholders and subsidiaries of these banks is appropriate and necessary
for our national security—and as you should now be aware, if our national
security goes, so does that of the “territories and District of Columbia”.

Proper administration and discipline of the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the
be another start in the right direction. The BLM, FBI, and other
“agencies” are here to serve the public, and if not, they are here to be

Immediate re-issuance of American Silver Dollars as both our international
and your domestic currency is required as a first step toward honest trade.

Disengagement from all Middle Eastern conflicts is demanded and you are
advised that no contract to serve in the “US military” is binding as a
result of the same fraud and personage scheme herein otherwise described.

Complete immediate cessation of spraying aluminum oxide and other poisonous
industrial wastes on our land and on us is demanded without apology.

Complete immediate cessation of the addition of fluoride, another poisonous
industrial waste of the aluminum industry to our drinking water, is also
demanded without apology.

The closure of most if not all foreign military bases which have been
created under the auspices of the US, Inc. and the return of the land and
buildings to the host countries needs to be negotiated posthaste.

Our borders need to be sealed and protected and our assets secured against
foreign invaders and if they are not promptly defended and honored by you
as members of “Congress” you will stand revealed before the entire world as
officers of a corporate crime syndicate subject to immediate liquidation.

If President Obama objects to any of this remedial program ordered by the
people of these United States and the states of the Union, it is your duty
so long as you assume any office related to these United States to impeach
him without further delay and remove him from any office having or
pretending any authority whatsoever related to us. Notice given to you is
notice to your agents and agencies, and notice given to your agents and
agencies is notice to you.

Most sincerely and by my hand and under my seal,

by:_______________________________Anna Maria Riezinger, all rights reserved.

c/o Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska

Postal Code Extension 99652


Ashton Carter
US Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000

via US Certified Mail #7013 3020 0002 1837 0405

Joint Chiefs

9999 Joint Staff


Washington, DC 20318-9999

via US Certified Mail #7013 3020 0002 1837 0429

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon

c/o United Nations Secretariat

New York, NY 10017

via US Certified Mail # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5465

Old Clinton Gang Games Target Trump Events for Boosting Hillary

Sunday, March 27th, 2016

Jon Rappoport
Sat, Mar 26, 2016
Subject; George Soros $8mil Boosting Hillary

"Those who cannot remember 1968 are condemned to repeat 1968."

History comes around again to bite you like a louse in a hotel-room bedsheet, long after management was supposed to have sanitized the place.
In 1968, 10,000 anti-war protestors at the Chicago Democratic Convention went up against local police and National Guardsmen. The violent riots had a reverse effect.

Americans, aghast at what they were seeing on their television sets, turned out
in droves a few months later and elected Republican pro-war candidate Richard Nixon. It was odd, to say the least, that the protest groups chose to show up at the Democratic Convention. The hand-picked Presidential nominee, Hubert Humphrey, was in favor of continuing the Vietnam War, but the Republicans were a greater threat in that regard.

The days of violence in Chicago made Nixon giggle. He couldn't have asked for a better show, and now we have, funded in part by George Soros, ramping up their nationwide protests against Trump. They're clearly pointing toward the Republican Convention in July in Cleveland. Their whole strategy depends on how much blame for their protests and violence can be successfully attributed to Trump himself—which is the clear media strategy.

The standard line is: Trump started this whole thing with his incendiary statements about immigration and Muslims; therefore, everything that happens after that is his fault. He is the prime mover. The protests are merely a response to him. "The blood is on his hands."

If that can be sold, and if the action in Cleveland in July can rise to a new height of violence, then a significant number of fence-sitting voters would decide to opt for Hillary, who will, of course, position herself as the peacemaker and the uniter.

It doesn't matter that she's never met a war she didn't like (or could invent).
She's the "calm force that will lead the nation into eight years of collective
tolerance and sanity." In other words, Hillary stands to benefit the most from the planned and highly organized attacks on Trump.

It's not hard to trace a connection between Soros, one of the money men behind, and Hillary Clinton. Just for starters, as Politico noted, on 1/31/16 ("George Soros donates $8 million to boost Hillary"): "George Soros in December donated $6 million to the leading super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, marking the return of the billionaire
financier as among the biggest givers in all of American politics. The massive check brings to $8 million the Hungarian-born investor's total 2015 giving to pro-Clinton groups."

Apparently, though, these obvious connections don't rate major coverage in mainstream media. Let's see: the man who funds the group who is organizing protests against Trump is also funding the candidate who stands to gain the most from the protests. No, nothing important here. Just a coincidence.
The 2016 election season in America is devolving to resemble what happened in 1968.

It remains to be seen whether the '68 reverse/rebound Nixon victory will now turn into the Hillary victory. Hillary, Soros, MoveOn, and their media allies (the useful idiots) are betting it will. They think it's their game to run and control. How far could the anti-Trump forces go this summer? How far could they go in pushing an agenda of "societal change," which demands a government-centered solution for all ills and problems? "The government must transform America on behalf of equality"—whatever that generality is supposed to mean.
The basic thrust of these forces would be to raise government power to new heights, fantasizing that it would somehow be turned toward "broad positive outcomes for the underclass."

Well, for instruction, we can look back to another event that occurred in the summer of the 1968, in Paris. Most Americans don't even remember it, but it was a searing stroke across the landscape. Its vision, if you can call it that, extended further than anything that could happen now in America—and the stunning outcome is one of those "teachable moments." From Wikipedia ("May 1968 events in France"): "The volatile period of civil unrest in France during May 1968 was punctuated by demonstrations and massive general strikes as well as the occupation of universities and factories across France. At the height of its fervor, it virtually brought the entire economy of France to a dramatic halt."

"The unrest began with a series of student occupation [of colleges] protests against capitalism, consumerism and traditional institutions, values and order. It then spread to factories with [Leftist union] strikes involving 11 million workers, more than 22% of the total population of France at the time, for two continuous weeks."

"The student occupations and wildcat general strikes initiated across France were met with forceful confrontation by university administrators and police. The de Gaulle administration's attempts to quell those strikes by police action only inflamed the situation further, leading to street battles with the police in the Latin Quarter, followed by the spread of general strikes and occupations throughout France. De Gaulle went to a French military base in Germany, and after returning dissolved the National Assembly, and called for new parliamentary elections for 23 June 1968.

Violence evaporated almost as quickly as it arose. Workers went back to their jobs, and when the elections were finally held in June, the Gaullist party emerged even stronger than before." (emphasis added) In other words, government power rose to a new height. That was the outcome. That was how this towering rebellion came to a close.

If, in the summer of 2016, the "forces of change" in America stage vast protests and initiate violence, on the pretext that they are trying to defeat Donald Trump, the result will be a mandate for federal government to assume more control.

Hillary Clinton, would certainly embrace that mandate with open arms.
She would be the Nixon and the De Gaulle. She would call her power agenda "uniting the people" or "equality together" or "it takes a village" or "respect for diverse points of view and cultures" or "a new day for America."

Whatever she calls it, it would be 1968 all over again.

Top 257,000 Veteran Criminals? – Obama’s Gun Ban List

Sunday, March 27th, 2016

Tim Devaney –
Sat, Mar 26, 2016
Subject; Obama's VA Mentally Defective Slippery Slope

GOP targets veterans gun ban

The Obama administration is facing congressional scrutiny for blocking more than a quarter-million military veterans from owning guns.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has reported more than 257,000 former members of the military who cannot manage their finances to the FBI’s list of people who are not allowed to own guns, Republicans claim, even though "it has nothing to do with regulating firearms.”


"The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is effectively a national gun ban list and placement on the list precludes the ownership and possession of firearms,” Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote in a recent letter to VA Secretary Robert McDonald.
The VA is responsible for appointing a fiduciary to help veterans who it determines cannot manage their own finances, but the agency is also taking the additional step of reporting these veterans to the “mental defective” category of the FBI’s background check system, even if they do not pose a danger to society, the senators allege.

The senators called the practice “highly suspect” and said veterans' ability to manage their own finances is “totally unrelated” to whether they should be prohibited from owning a gun.

"Under the current practice, a VA finding that concludes a veteran requires a fiduciary to administer benefit payments effectively voids his Second Amendment rights,” the senators wrote.

"At no time in the process does the VA determine a veteran to be a danger to themself or others, a key determinant for whether someone is a 'mental defective,’ precluding the right to own firearms,” they added.

In a separate letter to Senate appropriators, Grassley requested lawmakers block the VA from continuing this practice in the upcoming budget negotiations.

Grassley also complained about the practice in another letter sent last year to the Justice Department.

Republicans hope the congressional inquiries will pressure the VA to stop the practice.

The VA noted in a statement to The Hill that it is legally required to report veterans who are "mentally incompetent" to the FBI, which then decides whether to prohibit these former soldiers from owning guns.

"From time to time, media has reported that VA 'confiscates' veterans' firearms," a VA spokesman said in a statement. "This is simply not true. VA has no authority to confiscate or 'seize' anyone’s firearms."

Top 5 Lying FBI Agents – Robert LaVoy Finicum’s Blood Cries for Justice

Friday, March 18th, 2016

Les Zaitz
Thur, Mar 17, 2016
Subject; FBI Hostage Rescue Team Hiding Finicum Evidence

Bullet casings disappear from LaVoy Finicum shooting scene, sources say

Two bullet casings that might have proven an FBI agent shot at Robert "LaVoy" Finicum apparently disappeared from the scene shortly after the Jan. 26 highway confrontation turned deadly, according to law enforcement sources and newly released police reports.

Five FBI agents assigned to the traffic stop told investigators that none of them fired at Finicum's Dodge pickup after it crashed at their roadblock. Oregon investigators, however, concluded that one agent fired twice at the truck, hitting it once in the roof and missing on the second shot.

A state trooper later described to investigators seeing two rifle casings in the area where the agents were posted. Detectives tasked with collecting evidence didn't find the casings, police reports indicate.

FBI aerial surveillance video shows that before the detectives could get there, the FBI agents searched the area with flashlights and then huddled, according to law enforcement sources who have seen the video. The group then broke and one agent appeared to bend over twice and pick up something near where the two shots likely were taken, the sources told The Oregonian/OregonLive.

The findings fill gaps left by authorities last week when they released the results of their investigation into Finicum's death. Deschutes County Sheriff Shane Nelson and Malheur County District Attorney Dan Norris, who supervised the investigation, said two state troopers were justified in using deadly force to stop Finicum, one of the leaders of the takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

They also announced they had evidence that an FBI agent fired at Finicum's truck but didn't disclose the shots. The agent and four of his colleagues then took "specific actions" afterward, they said, but offered no other details.

Nelson and Norris alerted federal officials to their findings. The FBI agents now are under criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department's inspector general.

Former FBI agents and criminal justice experts have said they're baffled why elite FBI agents might hide the shots.

Greg Bretzing, special agent in charge of the Portland FBI office, cautioned at a news conference last week, "The question of who fired these shots has not been resolved."

He declined comment Tuesday "to preserve the integrity" of the federal investigation.

Finicum's shooting came after FBI agents from the national Hostage Rescue Team and state troopers stopped leaders of the Jan. 2 refuge takeover as they were bound for a community meeting in John Day, 100 miles north of the bird sanctuary.

Finicum was driving his 2015 Dodge truck that also carried Ryan W. Payne, 32, of Anaconda, Montana, Ryan C. Bundy, 43, of Mesquite, Nevada, Shawna J. Cox, 59, of Kanab, Utah, and Victoria Sharp, 18, of Lakeside, Montana. In a Jeep behind them were Ammon E. Bundy, 40, of Emmett, Idaho, Brian "Booda" Cavailer, 44, of Bunkerville, Nevada, and Mark C. McConnell, 37, of Buckeye, Arizona.

All three men in the Jeep surrendered as did Payne in Finicum's truck. But then Finicum took off, crashing into a snowbank along U.S. 395 when he encountered a police roadblock. He got out and two troopers shot him from behind when they saw him reach into his jacket while turning toward a third trooper armed with a Taser. Finicum later was found to be carrying a loaded 9mm handgun.

The episode was captured on FBI aerial surveillance video. Two days after the shooting, FBI officials released a 26-minute segment of the video to quell rumors about how Finicum died. But the video continues for another hour, law enforcement sources said, capturing the subsequent actions of the FBI agents.

The police reports show that investigators, who saw the full FBI video the day after the shooting, suspected something was amiss. They searched two FBI pickups used at the roadblock, looking for bullet casings, according to a detective's report. They didn't find any.

In the days following, detectives asked at least three state troopers what bullet casings they had seen after the shooting and whether they had seen anyone pick them up.

One trooper – identified only as Officer 5 – told investigators that he saw two rifle casings in the area of the roadblock. He described them both as copper-colored.

An investigator asked him, according to the interview transcript: "Did you happen to see anybody, um, picking anything up? Like, specifically, the rifle brass?"

The trooper responded: "No."

The color of the casings could be a crucial detail. Troopers use state-issued ammunition that comes in silver-colored casings.

At the time Finicum crashed, four FBI agents were posted at the roadblock. One was nearly run over by Finicum and two more were between an FBI pickup and Finicum's now-stopped truck. A state trooper also was nearby after firing three shots as the Dodge roared toward the roadblock. The shots hit the truck, but injured no one.

Police reports document that detectives didn't arrive at the roadblock to collect evidence until just before 7 p.m. on the day of the shooting. That was nearly 90 minutes after the FBI video showed the agents looking around where they had been posted. Evidence logs don't list any copper casings found at the scene.

Investigators later concluded that an FBI agent fired at Finicum after they examined the truck and cellphone video taken by Shawna Cox as she sat in the back seat of Finicum's truck. They said they could account for three bullet strikes on Finicum's truck coming from a trooper who was trying to stop the speeding pickup. They couldn't account for a fourth bullet through the roof.

Forensic specialists from the Oregon State Police conducted a ballistic trajectory analysis to determine the path of the bullet. Their calculations produced an estimate that traced the path back toward where two FBI agents were standing at the time the shot was fired. They pinned down that instant by synchronizing the moment when the Cox video recorded the round striking the truck with the overhead FBI video showing the location of all the officers.

State police specialists typically use trajectory rods and protractors to calculate a bullet's path. Such trajectory analysis is standard police practice.

Michael Haag, a national ballistics expert with the Albuquerque Police Department, hasn't studied the Finicum case but explained the trajectory procedure. A bullet hole alone usually won't determine the caliber of a round or the distance it traveled, he said.

A trajectory rod – plastic or metal – is fitted into the bullet hole and then aligned with a second hole created by the bullet, he said. Specialists then calculate the trajectory. They usually add a margin of error of 5 degrees either way — a national standard — and then graph a cone expanding out from the hole toward the source of the shot.

The investigators last week released an image of the trajectory cone for the hole in the truck roof. The Oregonian/OregonLive independently applied that cone to the FBI's overhead video and the Cox video at the time the shot struck the roof. The resulting image placed one FBI agent in the trajectory roughly 15 feet from Finicum's pickup. A second agent, standing behind him, also is partially in the cone.

Investigators, using precise measurements of vehicle locations and law enforcement positions, concluded that the first agent was the one who fired into Finicum's roof.

The FBI video shows two other FBI agents nearby as well as the state trooper who fired three times at Finicum's truck. None of those three is near the trajectory plotted by forensics experts.

Investigators checked the trooper's weapon after the shooting to account for the rounds he said he had loaded.

According to his interview transcript, he had 29 rounds in his AR-15 before the shooting. The police inventory showed his rifle had 24 rounds afterward, accounting for three shots at the truck and then two at Finicum.

Weapons carried by the FBI weren't checked because no one saw an agent shoot and none said they had, law enforcement sources said.

A law enforcement sketch shows the first several shots fired at the truck driven by LaVoy Finicum. Officials release results of the police investigation into the death of Robert "LaVoy" Finicum at the Deschutes County Sheriff's office, Mar. 8, 2016

Top 76 Forgotten Murders – Hillary Clinton Ordered WACO Massacre

Tuesday, March 8th, 2016

Kirk F MacKenzie
Tue, Mar 8, 2016
Subject; Killer Hillary Ordered WACO Massacre

Hillary Ordered The Final Massacre At Waco

Hillary, not Bill, not Janet Reno, not Webb Hubbell, not Vince Foster was the one who ordered the final assault. Final death count: 76 Branch Davidians, including 21 children and two pregnant women.

Hillary was the one who ordered the FUBAR final assault on the holed-up Branch
Davidians in Waco on April 19th, 1993. The final death count from this disastrous fiasco was 76 Branch Davidians, including 21 children and two pregnant women. The appalling disaster at Waco was what motivated Timothy McVeigh to participate in the terrorist-type bombings in Oklahoma City, two years later on April 19, 1995.

Hillary was putting pressure on Vince Foster (her longtime boyfriend, sexual
partner and emotional husband) and Webb Hubbell who was the #3 guy at Justice
Department, to have a forceful resolution to the Waco standoff.

One big reason Hillary place Hubbell in the #3 spot at the Justice Department was so that he would not have to go through a Senate confirmation hearing where the ugly and probably true details about Hubbell being the biological father of Chelsea might be revealed in this process. Carl Bernstein in his book on Hillary gets close to this, "Foster vaguely repeated his fear that the confirmation process would hurt Hillary. He seemed to know something that Nussbaum didn't." [Bernstein, A Woman in Charge, p. 253] Likewise Hillary placed Vince Foster, her longtime lover and emotional husband, at the #2 spot in the office of White House counsel, although Vince (Hillary's best friend) was really superior in power over White House counsel Bernie Nussbaum. Vince basically was the one who "vetted" Nussbaum for the spot.

"Give me a reason not to do this," Janet Reno is said to have begged aides shortly before orders were issued in the final assault. After the complete disaster of the final assault on the Branch Davidians, Bill Clinton was refusing to face the media, and Janet Reno stepped out to take full responsibility in front of the cameras. But the real "Woman in Charge" responsible for the deaths of 76 Branch Davidians, including 21 children and two pregnant women was was Hillary, not Janet Reno.

During an interview in early February 2001 the former White House aide Lida Tripp alleged that Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vincent Foster to resolve the Waco standoff. As a result women and children were killed. Appearing on CNN's "Larry King Live" Tripp suggested that Foster, at Mrs Clinton's direction, transmitted the order to move on the Branch Davidian's Waco compound, which culminated in a military style attack on the wooden building.

Her accusations lend weight to charges made previously by Special Forces expert and Waco investigator, Steve Barry. According to the former Special Forces member, Hillary set up a special "crises centre" in the White House to deal with Waco. Serving with her in the centre was Vincent Foster who, according to his widow was subsequently: "fueled by horror at the carnage at Waco for which the White House had ultimately been responsible."

Foster himself was found dead, from a gun-shot wound to the head, in a Virginia park three months later. Could he have known too much about Waco?

Journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard maintains that Foster had been "drafting a
letter involving Waco" on the very day of his death. Moreover Evans-Pritchard says that Foster kept a Waco file in a locked cabinet that was off limits to everyone, including his secretary.

Prior to Waco, Foster was "dignified, decent, caring, smart" says Linda Tripp. In its aftermath though, she said: "Vince was falling apart."

She was with the former White House deputy counsel when the news about Waco broke on television. "A special bulletin came on showing the atrocity at Waco and the children. And his face, his whole body slumped, and his face turned white, and he was absolutely crushed ­ knowing the part he had played."

"And he had played the part at Mrs Clinton direction," said Tripp.

Moreover, there was a marked contrast between Foster's heartfelt emotion at the Waco tragedy and Hillary Clinton's, Tripp insists: "Her reaction was heartless".

Her accusations give further weight to allegations first levelled in the 1999
documentary on the deadly confrontation, "Waco: A New Revelation." The film
featured the account of former House Waco investigator T. March Bell. "One of the interesting things that happens in an investigation is that you get anonymous phone calls," Bell explained in the film. "And we in fact received anonymous phone calls from Justice Department managers and attorneys who believe that pressure was placed on Janet Reno by Webb Hubbell, pressure that came from the first lady of the United States."

Mrs Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco stand-off came to dominate the headlines [Hillary wanted to get so-called “heath care reform” done, and Waco was taking all the headlines in spring, 1993, so Hillary forced the Waco resolution with disastrous results and a lot of death – Robert Morrow ] during the early months of the Clinton administration, said Bell. It was she, according to Bell's sources, who pressured a reluctant Janet Reno to act.

"Give me a reason not to do this," Reno is said to have begged aides shortly before orders were issued for the final assault.

Sources include: The SPOTLIGHT Oct 30 1999 and, Tripp: Hillary Directed Waco. Saturday, Feb. 10, 2001

Those who died at Waco:

We need to honor their memory. They got crushed by tanks, strangled by CS gas, burnt alive and shot – and HILLARY CLINTON was the "shot caller" of the Waco Murders.

Died February 28, 1993
Winston Blake, 28, black, British
Peter Gent, 24, white, Australian
Peter Hipsman, 28, white, American
Perry Jones, 64, white, American
Michael Schroeder, 29, white, American
Jaydean Wendell, 34, Hawaiian, American
Died April 19, 1993
Katherine Andrade, 24, white, American
Chanel Andrade, 1, white, American
Jennifer Andrade, 19, white, American
George Bennett, 35, black, British
Susan Benta, 31, black, British
Mary Jean Borst, 49, white, American
Pablo Cohen, 38, white, Israeli
Abedowalo Davies, 30, black, British
Shari Doyle, 18, white, American
Beverly Elliot, 30, black, British
Yvette Fagan, 32, black, British
Doris Fagan, 51, black, British
Lisa Marie Farris, 24, white, American
Raymond Friesen, 76, white, Canadian
Sandra Hardial, 27, black, British
Zilla Henry, 55, black, British
Vanessa Henry, 19, black, British
Phillip Henry, 22, black, British
Paulina Henry, 24, black, British
Stephen Henry, 26, black, British
Diana Henry, 28, black, British
Novellette Hipsman, 36, black, Canadian
Floyd Houtman, 61, black, American
Sherri Jewell, 43, Asian, American
David M. Jones, 38, white, American
David Koresh, 33, white, American
Rachel Koresh, 24, white, American
Cyrus Koresh, 8, white, American
Star Koresh, 6, white, American
Bobbie Lane Koresh, 2, white, American
Jeffery Little, 32, white, American
Nicole Gent Little, 24, white, Australian
and unborn child
Dayland Gent, 3, white, American
Page Gent, 1, white, American
Livingston Malcolm, 26, black, British
Diane Martin, 41, black, British
Wayne Martin, Sr., 42, black, American
Lisa Martin, 13, black, American
Sheila Martin, Jr., 15, black, American
Anita Martin, 18, black, American
Wayne Martin, Jr., 20, black, American
Julliete Martinez, 30, Mexican American
Crystal Martinez, 3, Mexican American
Isaiah Martinez, 4, Mexican American
Joseph Martinez, 8, Mexican American
Abigail Martinez, 11, Mexican American
Audrey Martinez, 13, Mexican American
John-Mark McBean, 27, black, British
Bernadette Monbelly, 31, black, British
Rosemary Morrison, 29, black, British
Melissa Morrison, 6, black, British
Sonia Murray, 29, black, American
Theresa Nobrega, 48, black, British
James Riddle, 32, white, American
Rebecca Saipaia, 24, Asian, Phillipino
Steve Schneider, 43, white, American
Judy Schneider, 41, white, American
Mayanah Schneider, 2, white, American
Clifford Sellors, 33, white, British
Scott Kojiro Sonobe, 35, Asian, American
Floracita Sonobe, 34, Asian, Phillipino
Gregory Summers, 28, white, American
Aisha Gyrfas Summers, 17, white, Australian
and unborn child
Startle Summers, 1, white, American
Lorraine Sylvia, 40, white, American
Rachel Sylvia, 12, white, American
Hollywood Sylvia, 1, white, American
Michelle Jones Thibodeau, 18, white, American
Serenity Jones, 4, white, American
Chica Jones, 2, white, American
Little One Jones, 2, white, American
Neal Vaega, 38, Somoan, New Zealander
Margarida Vaega, 47, Asian, New Zealander
Mark H. Wendell, 40, Asian, American

Scalia Climate Change Vote 96hr Countdown to Assassination

Thursday, February 18th, 2016

Jon Rappoport
Wed, Feb 17, 2016
Subject; 96 Hours to Justify Scalia Murder

Four days before he died, Supreme Court Justice Scalia voted to stall Obama's plan to force drastic climate-change rules on the American economy. The vote was 5-4. (see: The Hill, 2/13, "Greens faced with nightmare scenario at the Supreme Court")

With Scalia now gone, the vote would be 4-4.
With a new Obama Supreme Court appointee, if Obama could ram his choice through,
the vote would be 5-4 in the President's favor. Ditto, if the next President shares Obama's position. And the climate-change agenda would roll ahead. (see: The Washington Times, 2/16, "GOP showing signs of backing down from vow to block Obama SCOTUS pick")

We're not talking about small climate-change rules. We're talking about the Big
Ones. And note: such rules could very well dovetail with the Brave New World spelled out in the upcoming TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership).
It's a wedge formation, a squeeze play, a pincer movement featuring new EPA
climate-change regulations on one side, and new draconian possibilities embedded in the TPP.

If Scalia was murdered, the above agenda was sufficient reason, because the climate agenda has the force to transform life on the planet.
If Scalia's murder were a movie, he would have been told, as a warning: "You have no idea how big this thing is; you really don't understand the forces you're messing with."

Of course, most Americans don't believe a political murder along this line could
happen in real life. They can only accept it in a movie, where it makes perfect sense. That tells you something about the schizoid nature of the public mind. Adrenaline-driven in front of a screen; tranquilized and programmed to be passive and accepting of recognized authority, otherwise.

"Don't be silly. Scalia, murdered, and murdered for that reason? It couldn't happen. That's so…barbaric. We're civilized." That opinion and $6 will get you a rainbow smoothie.

Obama's climate-change plan uses the EPA to act out international agreements signed at the recent Paris summit. But in order to, yes, scam these agreements into force in the US, the EPA has to stretch and bend and distort already-existing US law. And it has done so.

However, a number of states have sued to stop the EPA, which wants to make all states cut CO2 emissions from electrical power production by 32% in the next 15 years. Aimed mainly at coal-burning plants, these regulations would create deep reductions in the overall US energy supply and output—a primary mission of the economy-wrecking Rockefeller Globalists.

The US Supreme Court, four days before Scalia's death, with his vote, declared a
narrow 5-4 halt to the Obama plan, pending a lower-court decision on the issue.
The 5-4 vote didn't knock out the plan, but it stalled it. And if Scalia had
stayed alive, his vote going forward on the Obama plan could have remained crucial.

The pending TPP, another Globalist trade treaty, contains a section that allows
endless changes and additions in the text as years pass. In other words, the passion for cutting energy production for the US, and the rest of the planet, can easily be expressed and ratified by the member nations.

The TPP also reveals a cynical attitude toward the "humanitarian goal of saving
the planet from CO2 death." Major corporations that burn coal and employ other
ways of releasing CO2 can relocate to far-off lands (e.g., Vietnam) and spew CO2
to their hearts' content, without messy environmental controls.
In other words, the true underlying Globalist scheme, vis-à-vis climate change has nothing to do with messianic rescue: it has to do with lowering energy production.

Drive economies further into despair. Move more jobs out of industrialized countries. Create further poverty and chaos.
And then bring new order in behind that—one planet, under the tight rein of one worldwide political and economic management system.
That's the true meaning of the climate-change agenda, notwithstanding solemn promises and heraldic pronouncements about replacing lost energy with new renewable technologies.

"I have an idea. Let's cut our electricity-use in our home by 30%, while we figure out how to replace it with some new source. That'll work. I'm sure of it." On top of all this, the entire manmade-warming hypothesis is riddled with fraud and guesswork dressed up to look like United Nations science. A hypothesis is supposed to be able to make useful and specific predictions. The warming hypothesis is a dud in this regard. It was never meant to be science—it was always a strategy designed to cut energy production on planet Earth, torpedo economies, heighten human suffering, and usher in an elite Globalist triumph.

This is what Justice Scalia was going up against.
If he was murdered, there was sufficient reason.
The FBI can do two kinds of investigations, depending on the orders of the Attorney General: heavy or lite.

Heavy means leaving no stone unturned. It means taking control of the Scalia's
body now and doing whatever can be done with it, in its embalmed state, to determine cause of death. It means raking wackaloon Judge Guevara over the coals, along with US marshals, to find out exactly how the verdict of "natural causes" was reached.

It means extensive interviews with everyone at Poindexter's ranch. Wall to wall forensic analysis of rooms and spaces at the ranch. And so forth and so on. Lite means a brush-off, meant to avoid any disruption in the present scenario. So far, from what I see, the FBI is doing Lite. Scalia's body should already be on an autopsy table.

There continues to be no uproar inside the Beltway about the absurd, insane, useless declaration of death by "natural causes."

And there is something else going on. It's the convenient mind-control program
that says, "Mustn't disturb the dead. Don't interrupt the expressions of sadness at his passing. Don't dishonor the man by raising questions about his possible murder. Give the family their privacy during this period of grief."
It's the passivity of the obedient mind. Whatever induced mood, fabrication, lie, omission can feed and expand that passivity…is deployed:
"We need to be more accepting. He was an old man in ill-heath. He passed away.
Natural causes. The great cycle of life. Be gentle. Nothing to see. Move along, slowly."

"Possible murder of a US Supreme Court Justice? Please, not at this time. It's
a discordant idea. Unharmonious. Let the man go gently into that good night."

Top 10 Hillary Clinton Felonies – Hillary Indictments Coming

Thursday, February 11th, 2016

Andrew P Napolitano – Lew Rockwell
Wed, Feb 10, 2016
Subject; Bill & Hillary Clinton Indictments Coming

Hillary Clinton’s nightmare is not the sudden resurgence of Bernie Sanders. It is the fidelity to the rule of law of the FBI.

The recent revelations of the receipt by Clinton of a Special Access Program email, as well as cut and pasted summaries of state secrets on her server and on her BlackBerry nearly guarantee that the FBI will recommend that the Department of Justice convene a grand jury and seek her indictment for espionage. Here is the backstory.

It seems that every week, more information comes to light about Clinton’s grave legal woes. Her worries are in two broad categories: One is her well-documented failure to safeguard state secrets and the other is her probable use of her position as secretary of state to advance financially her husband’s charitable foundation. The FBI is currently and aggressively investigating both. What I will describe below is in the state secrets category. It is apparently not new to the FBI, but it is new to the public.

Among the data that the FBI either found on the Clinton server or acquired from the State Department via its responses to Freedom of Information Act requests is a top-secret email that has been denominated Special Access Program. Top secret is the highest category of state secrets (the other categories are confidential and secret), and of the sub-parts of top secret, SAP is the most sensitive.

SAP is clothed in such secrecy that it cannot be received or opened accidentally. Clinton — who ensured all of her governmental emails came to her through her husband’s server, a nonsecure nongovernmental venue — could only have received or viewed it from that server after inputting certain codes. Those codes change at unscheduled times, such that she would need to inquire of them before inputting them.

The presence of the SAP-denominated email on her husband’s server, whether opened or not, shows a criminal indifference to her lawful obligation to maintain safely all state secrets entrusted to her care. Yet, Clinton has suggested that she is hopelessly digitally inept and may not have known what she was doing. This constitutes an attempted plausible deniability to the charge of failing to safeguard state secrets.

But in this sensitive area of the law, plausible deniability is not an available defense; no judge would permit the assertion of it in legal filings or in a courtroom, and no lawyer would permit a client to make the assertion.

This is so for two reasons. First, failure to safeguard state secrets is a crime for which the government need not prove intent. The failure can be done negligently. Thus, plausible deniability is actually an admission of negligence and, hence in this case, an admission of guilt, not a denial.

Second, Clinton signed an oath under penalty of perjury on Jan. 22, 2009, her first full day as secretary of state. In that oath, she acknowledged that she had received a full FBI briefing on the lawfully required care and keeping of state secrets. Her briefing and her oath specified that the obligation to safeguard state secrets is absolute — it cannot be avoided or evaded by forgetfulness or any other form of negligence, and that negligence can bring prosecution.

What type of data is typically protected by the SAP denomination? The most sensitive under the sun — such as the names of moles (spies working for more than one government) and their American handlers, the existence of black ops (illegal programs that the U.S. government carries out, of which it will deny knowledge if exposed), codes needed to access state secrets and ongoing intelligence gathering projects.

The crime here occurs when SAPs are exposed by residing in a nonsecure venue; it does not matter for prosecution purposes whether they fell into the wrong hands.

Clinton’s persistent mocking of the seriousness of all this is the moral equivalent of taunting alligators before crossing a stream. SAPs are so sensitive that most of the FBI agents who are investigating Clinton lack the security clearances needed to view the SAP found among her emails. Most FBI agents have never seen a SAP.

Shortly after the presence of the SAP-denominated email was made known, the State Department released another email Clinton failed to erase wherein she instructed her subordinates to take state secrets from a secure venue, to cut and paste and summarize them, and send them to her on her nonsecure venue. Such an endeavor, if carried out, is a felony — masking and then not safeguarding state secrets. Such a command to subordinates can only come from a criminal mind.

Equally as telling is a little-known 2013 speech that recently surfaced given by one of Clinton’s former subordinates. The aide revealed that Clinton and her staff regularly engaged in digital conversations about state secrets on their BlackBerries. This is not criminal if the BlackBerries were government-issued and secured. Clinton’s was neither. It was purchased at her instructions off the shelf by one of her staff.

Can anyone doubt that Clinton has failed to safeguard state secrets? If her name were Hillary Rodham instead of Hillary Rodham Clinton, she’d have been indicted months ago.

What remains of the rule of law in America? The FBI will soon tell us.

Lowell Police Chief Bill Taylor Violates 2nd Amendment – Essays Hell No

Sunday, January 31st, 2016

Cheryl Chumley –
Sat, Jan 30, 2016
Subject; Lowell Mass 30yrs 2nd Amendment Violations

A small town in Massachusetts – Lowell, located about 35 miles from Boston – has
apparently decided the best way to keep criminals from shooting and killing innocent citizens is to make residents who want unrestricted carry permits first pen essays explaining just why, and then submit those justifications to the chief of local police to grade. Those who don't obtain passing grades aren't given their permits…….

Insert "Are you kidding me" expression of disbelief here. In effect, the town of Lowell has exempted itself from the Second Amendment.

Of course, the powers-who-be don't see it that way. They see it as a necessary precaution, a way of ultimately saving citizens from crime and killers.

Or, as local Police Superintendent William Taylor told City Council members when he approached them with his brainchild notion: "We wanted to make sure we allowed people to exercise their constitutional right to carry a firearm, but do it with a balanced, reasonable approach."

And Taylor, it seems, is just the guy to determine that this constitutional right to carry in a balanced and reasonable way is being upheld, because that's who City Council members named as the grader of all these papers.

"Chief Bill Taylor has sole authority when it comes to deciding which gun permit essays make the grade," Inquisitr reported.

The background of this policy, which also includes a mandate that approved permit carriers attend firearms' safety and training classes at their own expense – up to $1,100 – is that Lowell has maintained a tight control on guns for decades, denying most all concealed carry permit applicants for the past 30 years or so. So this new gun control provision is actually being billed as a freedom.

Local authorities also say applicants don't actually have to write the essay, but doing so would certainly strengthen their appeals for permits.

Well, isn't that special. So Lowell citizens have not only been suffering under Second Amendment dings for decades, but now, in some sort of Twilight-Zone-meets-George-Orwell doublespeak scenario, they're going to be voluntarily forced to beg local officials in writing for their already-guaranteed constitutional rights – and in so doing, subtly acknowledge that this a move toward freedom?

As Jim Wallace with the Gun Owners Action League of Massachusetts said in a statement: "It is absurd. … It's like having a college professor say, 'I'm going to read your essay and if I don't like it, I'm going to give it back to you.'"

Who made the police the gate guard for the Second Amendment? As one freedom-loving patriot said of the topsy-turvy aspect of the situation: "Did the chief of police write an essay to the City [Council] explaining why he and his police force should have the right to carry?"

In America, where rights come from God, not government, that simple question goes to the nuts and bolts of the tragedy of Lowell's gun policies. Citizens, in far too many communities and in way too many cases of constitutional issues, have become conditioned to believe those in the public arena, the tax-paid servants, are above the very laws they are trusted to enforce – that they themselves are the sources and lone arbiters of rights and authorities.

The Second Amendment, based on the view of human rights the Founding Fathers all shared, is clear: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Nowhere does it speak of essays and grades and chief of police powers to determine who may carry firearms, and who may not.

© 2016 Cheryl Chumley – All Rights Reserved