Archive for the ‘Republic for united States’ Category

We Need Your Help! RJ Hender Dies With Family By His Side May 20, 2016

Saturday, May 21st, 2016

5/21/2016 Ryan Hender

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

Robert Hender has devoted his life to serving in many capacities, including right here on this very website www.morningliberty.com. 5 of his 11 kids still live at home with him and depend on him financially. They suffered extreme financial hardship as his body deteriorated during the last few years of his life. Suffering from a genetic liver disease, knowing there was no cure, he pushed forward often without his own feelings considered.  The selfless work that he did for over 10 years was his way of serving his country, he believed that with all of his soul even until his dying breath. There was never really any money in it, in fact, most months the family went without basic necessities. The family had Sub For Santa Christmases for the last 18 years, but dad hid it really well. 

About 2 years ago he started having weekly surgeries to relieve the pressure off of his liver. He was on the liver transplant list at the University of Utah, and was waiting for a donor. We were told that most people die on the transplant list, but we had hope. As he worsened, he lost his voice almost completely, and was unable to continue being a radio talk show host, which he loved so much. He then dedicated his time to continuing his work on his website, which he was still hard at work maintaining until just days before “the worst week of my life”.  

On May 14th I got word f rom my younger sisters that my dad was exhibiting symptoms of a stroke. He was taken to a Hospital in Provo Utah where it was determined that his ammonia levels were dangerously high. His liver function was diminishing. He stabilized after a brief stay at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center and was released to go home. Less than 24 hours later, his wife found him unresponsive in his favorite chair. 

He was taken by helicopter back to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center where at first things looked optimistic, but then things took a turn for the worst. Having been on life support since 9am, his body was giving out. Around 9pm we were told that he only had hours to live. His kidneys had stopped functioning, and his seizures were getting closer together, and worsening. 12:00am May 20, 2016 he was taken off life support and left to his own devices. With his family by his side, he went peacefully back to his Father in Heaven at 12:15am May 20, 2016. 

He leaves behind his wife Virginia, and 11 kids, 5 of which were financially dependent on him. Without his miniscule disability check coming in, the family is now displaced from their home of 8 years, and forced to start life over again without the one person that held them all together. His wife, who had recently started working part time at Walmart, still not even able to cover basic necessities is now left with no option but to uproot her family and start life over 2 hours away from the place they called home for so many years because where they once lived, there is not sufficient work to support a family. 

Robert did not have life insurance, nor was he able to prepare in any way for what might happen to his kids if he were to leave them this early. We are scrambling to figure out how we can pay for a burial at all, let alone how the little ones (youngest being 10) will be able to get back to life as normal. 

We are asking for your help, in any way you can. This is a desperate cry for help, and we would not be asking if it wasn't 100% necessary. Time is of the essence. We were able to find a mortuary that is inexpensive, but due to this they do require payment in full before they can even schedule the funeral. 

We have setup a GoFundMe campaign to help collect funds to pay for final expenses. Click here to donate. 

 

Thank you so much for reading this, it means the world. 

 

-Ryan Hender

 

Help Fund Funeral Services For RJ Hender

Friday, May 20th, 2016

5/20/2016 Robert Hender

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

 

Robert Albert Hender Jr. AKA “RJ”

 

Born in October 1960 in Seattle Washington, the oldest of 5 children. Early in life, Robert was responsible for caring for his younger siblings, who loved him dearly. 

 

Though he desired strongly to serve an LDS mission, Robert was unable to due to reasons beyond his control. He instead dedicated his life to serving others with his best asset, his voice. Robert loved to sing, and had a great singing voice, he also served in the local media in several capacities, including but not limited to KPAX TV, KTKK Radio, and he took on the world with his website www.morningliberty.com

 

A father of 11 kids, of which 5 currently live at home and depend on him fully, he set aside his own wants and continued to serve the community, his country. For years he worked tirelessly in radio, and through his website to bring to the forefront news that the rest of the world ignored. Robert was no stranger to controversial topics, in fact there were many radio stations that silenced him for being willing to openly discuss topics that mainstream media ignored. The selfless work that he did for over 10 years was his way of serving his country, he believed that with all of his soul even until his dying breath. There was never really any money in it, in fact, most months the family went without basic necessities. 

 

7 years ago, Robert found out that he was suffering from a genetic liver condition referred to as Alpha One Antitripsin Deficiency (A1AD) that would eventually take his life. He spent as much quality time with his family as he could, knowing that his time could be up at any moment. About 2 years ago he started having weekly surgeries to relieve the pressure off of his liver. He was on the liver transplant list at the University of Utah, and was waiting for a donor. As he worsened, he lost his voice almost completely, and was unable to continue being a radio talk show host, which he loved so much. He then dedicated his time to continuing his work on his website, which he was still hard at work maintaining until just days before “the worst week of my life”.  

 

On May 14th I got word f rom my younger sisters that my dad was exhibiting symptoms of a stroke. He was taken to a Hospital in Provo Utah where it was determined that his ammonia levels were dangerously high. His liver function was diminishing. He stabilized after a brief stay at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center and was released to go home. Less than 24 hours later, his wife found him unresponsive in his favorite chair. 

 

He was taken by helicopter back to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center where at first things looked optimistic, but then things took a turn for the worst. Having been on life support since 9am, his body was giving out. Around 9pm we were told that he only had hours to live. His kidneys had stopped functioning, and his seizures were getting closer together, and worsening. 12:00am May 20, 2016 he was taken off life support and left to his own devices. With his family by his side, he went peacefully back to his Father in Heaven at 12:15am May 20, 2016. 

 

He leaves behind his wife Virginia, and 11 kids, 5 of which were financially dependent on him. Without his disability check coming in, the family is now displaced from their home of 8 years, and forced to start life over again without the one person that held them all together. His wife, who had recently started working part time at Walmart, still not even able to cover basic necessities is now left with no option but to uproot her family and start life over 2 hours away from the place they called home for so many years. 

 

Robert did not have life insurance, nor was he able to prepare in any way for what might happen to his kids if he were to leave them this early. We are scrambling to figure out how we can pay for a burial at all, let alone how the little ones (youngest being 10) will be able to get back to life as normal. 

 

We are asking for your help, in any way you can. This is a desperate cry for help, and we would not be asking if it wasn't 100% necessary. Time is of the essence. If you can help in any way, we would be eternally grateful. I wish it didn’t come to this. 

 

We have setup a GoFundMe campaign to help collect funds to pay for final expenses. Click here to donate. 

 

Thank you so much for reading this, it means the world. 

 

-Ryan Hender

 

 

Technology Changing New World DisOrder Plans – Int’l Free Market Liberty

Tuesday, January 26th, 2016

Gary North – LewRockwell.com
Mon, Jan 25, 2016
Subject; Int'l Free Market Liberty
www.MorningLiberty.com

Every January, the richest people in the world get together to meet at Davos, Switzerland, at the World Economic Forum.

Also present are the best and the brightest in the Keynesian community, whose plane fares and hotel rooms are taken care of. These are the hired hands.

Every year, everyone hopes he is going to hear some great speech that will transform his business or his career. Everybody thinks at the end of the sessions that he must have missed the big speech, once again, the same way he missed it last year.

Austrian school economists are not invited to the festivities. That’s because they don’t think that Keynesian central planning and Keynesian central banking have much of a future. They keep saying so, and this message is not congenial to the World Economic Forum.

This year, the preliminary press releases about some of the major speeches indicate that the New World Order really is bordering on the New World Disorder. The acolytes of central planning are losing control, and they are now admitting it.

NETWORKS: PERSONAL VS. DIGITAL

The international old boy network is figuring out that they are being replaced by digital networks. They are like the specialist traders in the commodity futures pits, who for over a century screamed and used hand signals to communicate their buy and sell decisions. These people have been replaced by computer networks. The same thing is now happening to the New World Order.

You may think I am exaggerating. So, let me quote from an article from a representative of the New World Order, the Director of the European branch of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Keynesian model is based on the idea that committees of specialists are in a position to make better decisions than market forces are. Market competition just cannot get the job done, the Keynesians insist. Their problem is this: market competition now is based on computer networks, and the grand designs of the central planners and welfare state advocates are steadily losing ground. This has created great consternation in high places.

For example, labor markets are being revolutionized by computerization and robots which are funded by the very people who are showing up at Davos, and who are getting rich off of this development.

True revolutionary change is a rapid, fluid, and inherently indeterminate process. But there has been no indication so far that transformative economic change will lead to the types of policies — for example, a minimum basic income, greater investment in public goods, heightened multilateral cooperation, and closer regional integration — that would promote political stability.

In other words, computerization is creating international economic cooperation. Digital networks are spreading across geographical borders. But, horror of horrors, there is no international agency with sanctions comparable to those possessed by national governments. So, as trade, digital money, information, and almost everything else that makes the world go round is becoming multinational, the central planners are losing control. Central planning has always been limited to national sovereignties, and national sovereignties are losing control over the flow of funds, the flow of goods, and the flow of information.

Simultaneously, in reaction to this, a new domestic nationalism is upset about international trade. It is upset about open borders. So, instead of turning over power, as in the past, the representatives of the voters have decided to reclaim power from the old boy multinational network. The NWO sees this coming.

On the contrary, rather than embrace the new global connectivity, there is a yearning to build fences and walls, resist trade deals, and restore national independence.

So, on the one hand, internationalization is taking place outside the boundaries of Keynesian central planning. It is taking place in tax havens, and this process is accelerating. Keynesianism does not have much ability to allocate assets across national borders. Meanwhile, those forces politically that are gaining strength today are doing so at the expense of the multinational worldview of the kinds of people who show up at Davos.

In short, the New World order is damned if it does, damned if it doesn’t. The internationalism of the free market is undermining national control by national political and bureaucratic government planning agencies. Meanwhile, political forces are moving in the direction of undermining the international institutional arrangements that had been the tools of multi-nationalism used by Keynesian international planners and opponents of national sovereignty.

These people do not know how to deal with this twofold problem. To the extent that the economy goes multinational, the New World Order loses power. Why? Because there is no international agency that possesses anything like the ability to impose sanctions across national borders. So, the digital economy is working against them. It is working against central banking, too.

But the politics of nationalism is no longer based on the kinds of chummy connections that have characterized the Council on Foreign Relations and its various clones in other nations. The nationalism that is rising up around the world is not New World Order Keynesian nationalism, but rather an older nationalism that favors national sovereignty, not sweetheart deals across borders that were initiated by government-employed bureaucrats on behalf of multinational conglomerates.

DC Fraud – United States Is a Delaware Corporation for Profit

Friday, February 14th, 2014

Radical In the Twilight Zone – Eric Williams
Fri, Feb 14, 2014
Subject: DC USofA Misrepresentation
www.MorningLiberty.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcfZzx8xY0#t=35 – Who Owns You?

Tons of great information
http://www.usavsus.info

http://www.gangsofamerica.com/gangsofamerica.pdf 

Special review jural society based on Federalist Paper #10

http://occupy-our-courts.org/wp/special-session-of-jural-society-for-preparation-document-based-on-federalist-paper-10/

Is the United States A Delaware Corporation? Or more Rat Poison?

When I posted the three essays written by JC Collins, I received an email
from group member Paul G., chastising me for failing to point out to all you
group members that the Government in Washington, D.C., is not actually a
government, that it is a corporate fraud pretending to be acting for us
while actually guiding us, through "rational" manipulation, into the one
world government Mr. Collins was warning us about.

I do agree with Paul on his point that whomever is in control of this
country, are continually manipulating everyone they possibly can through the
ploy of rationalization.

As a quick example, there were no airplanes involved in the 9/11/01 attack
on the World Trade Center; and the buildings there did not collapse; they
were destroyed my molecular disassociation – they effectively, simply
disappeared into thin air. Goggle for Dr. Judy Woods book, "Where Did The
Towers GO?"

Paul even went so far as accusing me of "indirectly promoting the One World
Government" because of my failure to mention, to promulgate the false
information that our government has been supplanted by a Delaware
corporation known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

[Actually, this point is true, our government HAS been supplanted by a
Delaware corporation known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ED]

Due to the massive prevalence of Rat Poison on every Pay-Tri-Idiot web site
I have ever visited, it has been some time since I last checked to see what
all those PAY-Tri-Idiots are currently up to, but due to this chastisement I
Goggled around a bit and I am totally astonished at the degree of total
misinformation and downright lies about what has led or guided our country
onto this cliff, and what individuals can or must do in order to extricate
themselves from the clutches of the wannabe slave-masters.

I truly do hate to step on anyone's toes but sometimes it is necessary to go
a little further and cut some of these PAY-Tri-Idiots off at the knees- or
perhaps their neck would be more appropriate.

For some of you newer Group members, you may need for me to tell you a
little more about me that older members are aware of.

First, and of more importance than you youngsters are able to comprehend, I
am 80 years old and still 100% physically and intellectually active. Second,
I have been in this Freedom fight since 1964, before many of you were even
born.

I have been through all the PAY-Tri-Idiocy that not only does not work, it
makes no sense and complicates the road to Freedom to such an extent that it
is actually impossible for most of those who are concerned to even try.

What is the real truth? There are so many complicated versions of the truth
"out there" that it is impossible to figure it out. I know because I found
that same confusion back in the mid and late 1960s when I was new to the
Freedom fight, campaigning for Barry Goldwater for President.

However, it really came together for me in the late 1960's when I became one
of the most outspoken leaders of the income tax rebellion in Southern
California.

As a result of that I was charged criminally in 1969 by the IRS for
willfully failing to file or pay income tax.

The IRS claimed I owed $240K in unpaid taxes, interest and penalties. I went
to trial on those criminal charges in Federal Court in Los Angeles,
California in 1970.

I walked into that court all by myself, without an attorney or filing even
one single piece of paper. I walked out in less than five minutes and I have
never ever filed or paid or been bothered by the IRS since.

I have been a radio talk show host for several years in the past on both RBN
and WTPRN, where I talked about this IRS victory more times than anyone
could count, and I have still not been bothered by the IRS.

When I was in that Federal Court I was asked four questions by the judge,
"Was I at that time renouncing my citizenship; where was I born; what did my
mother tell me; what was on my birth certificate."

I responded to the first question by asking how could I renounce that which
I had never applied for. To the other three I responded by telling him that
as I was an infant at the time I was born I had no way to know any of the
facts of my birth or who my mother was.

As a result the judge said he was taking the matter under consideration and
that I would be notified. That was forty-four years ago and I am still
waiting.

Dear Members, how many individuals in the Freedom movement do you know that
can claim such a victory?

What I learned from that is K.I.S.S. – KEEP IT SIMPLE!! DON'T BE STUPID!!
And one more very important point. I do not herein present anything that is
my mere opinion. Everything I present is self evident, mathematically
certain.

All humans born on this planet are born politically independent, no matter
what country they are born in. The problem is that all children are
indoctrinated by the society and government they are born in, to believe
whatever best suits that government, and this practice is very much utilized
in the united States of America!!!

Everything I now see in the Freedom Movement is so complicated that it is
totally STUPID!! Such as the claim that this country is a corporation and
because of that everyone is required to comply with contract law.

[Just because this country is a corporation, doesn't mean that everyone is
required to comply with contract law; anyone who knowingly,
under-standingly, and with full disclosure makes a contract can be lawfully
held to his agreement under common contract law; it's a question of honor,
not the status of the government, ED]

There is some truth to the foregoing but that truth has absolutely nothing
to do with whether or not this society is controlled by a corporation or by
the Constitution. I could not be more convinced that Obama and all previous
Presidents, is or were following the CONstitution; it is all right there in
the Fourteenth Amendment if you will just take the time to read it and pay
attention to the words! Including the wording of the Preamble, where the
purpose of the CONstitution is declared and estab-lished.

PAY ATTENTION TO THE #@!&?&% WORDS!

And, please remind yourself that I beat the IRS in Federal Court in less
than five minutes and I filed not one single piece of paper. At that time I
had a driver license and SS# and traveled on the roads and used ZIP codes
and Federal Reserve Notes but that judge did not ask any of that.

Neither did he make an issue of my name or me having a birth certificate.

Neither had I filed any manner of document with any government entity to
copyright my name or rescind my driver license or SS# or employ any of the
other PAY-Tri-Idiot adhesion contract avoiding or negating procedures
insisted upon by th PAY-Tri-Idiot "Leaders" of today.

K.I.S.S!!

There seems to be a universal agreement among the current PAY-Tri-Idiot
"Leaders" that the purpose of the Congressional Act of 1871 was to enable
certain unidentified members of Congress to be able to entice foreign
bankers to rescue the Civil War bankrupt united States by assigning to such
bankers, slave master control over the general population of the united
States.

As a side issue, you may notice that I did not capitalize the word "united"
in the previous paragraph. I wrote it that way there and other places in
this essay just to ridicule the PAY-Tri-Idiots who make an issue of
capitalization. All of that PAY-Tri-Idiocy is nonsense.

The only thing that matters is your political status and you cannot lose
that inadvertently due to unwittingly made errors as claimed by the
PAY-Tri-Idiot "Leaders" on their Rat Poison infested web sites.

But, back to the Act of 1871:

For those Group Members who are not familiar with the Act of 1871, it is
simply the creation of a municipal corporate government for the Washington,
D.C. area; enacted to relieve Congress from the necessity of continually
dealing with such day to day governing tasks as trash collection, road
maintenance and street sweeping.

Of course there is more to it than that but nothing in the Act is beyond the
reasonable authority assigned to any other municipal government in the
united States.

The Act is quite lengthy, and I had read it before, several years ago, and
dismissed it then as being of no significance, but due to the current
prevalence of references to it, I took the time to read it again, every
word, trying to find something to justify the Pay-Tri-Idiot's claim that
this Act had negated the original Constitution, created a new corporate
Constitution, and replaced the upper and lower case "Organic":

"Constitution FOR the united States of America", with an all caps Corporate
version:

"THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."

The Pay-Tri-Idiots placing great emphases in their claim that the replacing
of the word "for" with the word "of" has some major significance, when in
fact there was no change, and if there were, it would have had no
significant impact.

Additionally, in the Act of 1871, the Congress reserved to itself full
authority to negate or modify as it determined appropriate, any action of
the corporate government Congress created under this Act.

I don't know where to start.

Explaining misrepresentations and lies always takes considerably more words
than did the presentation of the misrepresentations or lies.

There is nothing in the original Constitution that declares how that
document shall be styled, so why all the fuss about how it might be
referred. The PAY-Tri-Idiots hang their Constitutional change of name claim
on the ending words of the Preamble, where the Framers wrote, "… do ordain
and establish this constitution for the united States of America."

It must be acknowledged and understood that the Constitution's Framers had
no authority to declare that the Constitution they had created and were
presenting was thereby automatically a replacement for the Articles of
Confederation.

We need to remind ourselves that the delegates had been sent to the
convention to amend the Articles of Confederation, NOT to create a
replacement for such Articles.

When it was agreed among several of the delegates that it would be more
appropriate to redesign the organization between the states rather than try
to make the Articles more workable, several of the delegates refused to
participate and departed from the meeting. My point here is that at best,
all the Framers of the Constitution could do was present their creation to
the Several States for their consideration, to be adopted by them or not.

Therefore it was appropriate for the Founders to style their creation as
being ordained by them, FOR the consider-ation of the Legislatures of the
Several States.

There is no reasonable justification to claim that the manner in which the
Framers wrote that last line of the Preamble was intended by them to be the
name of the Constitution. All the Founders were doing there was stating who
they were presenting their creation to.

What is alarming to me is that the current PAY-Tri-Idiot Leaders who are
promoting this swill have failed to discern the much more significant
content of the Preamble, being the statement setting forth and establishing
the purpose of the Constitution, which is as follows, in relevant part: "We
the People of the united States, in order to secure the Blessings of Liberty
to Ourselves and OUR Posterity, do ordain and establish this
constitution…"

How can this critically important message be missed? This wording is clearly
limiting and exclusionary. This constitutes a declaration that the purpose
of the Constitution was/is to secure the Blessings of Liberty to the People
of the united States and THEIR Posterity, TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS,
INTENTIONALLY EXCLUDING citizens of the united States.

Additionally, here, in this Preamble, the Founders created a specific
political class, a superior political class, to be known as The People of
the United States. Then, in Section Two of Article One they also quietly and
surreptitiously created the subservient political class, citizens of the
united States.

[I see it, rather as The People of the constitutional united States, and the
subservient political class, citizens of the unconstitutional United States,
Inc., ED]

Then we have all the blather about "restoring the republic"! What? – Are all
of these PAY-Tri-Idiot Leaders totally brain dead? Do any of you know what a
republic is? Are they not aware that the name of Communist China is, "The
People's Republic of China?"; And that the name of North Korea is, "The
People's Democratic Republic of Korea"?; And that there are about one
hundred other totalitarian dictatorships on this planet with the word
"republic" in their official names?

So how is the Republic of the United States similar to all these
totalitarian dictator republics? All of them have two political classes, (1)
a superior class to make the rules and (2) a subservient class to follow
those rules, Gee, just like here in the United States, and these
PAY-Tri-Idiots want to "restore our republic"?

And once more, in regard to the standing of the Founders who wrote the
Constitution, we must remind ourselves that the original Constitution
included a provision providing that it would only become in effect when
ratified by nine of the [13] states, and would have no authority over any
state that did not ratify it at the outset, until such states might later
agree. The point here, again, is that the Founders were thereby
acknowledging that they did not have standing to declare the Constitution
they were presenting was, due to their presentation, declared to be the
Constitution of the United States of America. Their only "authority" was to
present it FOR the consideration of the Several States.

Therefore it was reasonable and appropriate for the Founders to write at the
end of the Preamble, that they were ordaining and establishing this
constitution for [the consideration of] the united States of America.

It is likewise appropriate that after the Constitution was ratified by nine
of the [13] member states, thereby then being appropriately declared by such
states as being the Constitution of the united States of America.

It must be remembered here that the united States of America had been
created with the adoption of the Articles of Confederation; and that the
several States had been created individually, even prior to that.

As I recall, in the Articles of Confederation, the term United States was
included fifty-five times, while the term, United States of America was
entered only one time.

Additionally, with all the PAY-Tri-Idiot claims of significance of
capitalization style in legal documents, when writing the Articles of
Confederation, in Article One thereof, the Framers of those Articles wrote:

"The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America".
Please take notice that they capitalized the word "United" in this article;
and, they likewise capitalized both words in the fifty-five time's the term
"United States" was used in such Articles; and they "misspelled" Stile, [or
used the wrong STYLE of the word. Tsk, tsk!]

But back to the Pay-Tri-Idiot claim that the Congressional Act of 1871, to
create a municipal government for Washington, D.C., caused the United States
to become a corporation, whereby all citizens are thereafter subject to
contract law, and must apply for and be issued a driver license before being
allowed to operate a motor vehicle, such claim is total nonsense!

When are these PAY-Tri-Idiots going to get down to Fundamental, Basic
Principles?

How can it matter how those purporting to be in control style themselves?
The one and only question is, "How does a free born individual become
subservient to any entity of any style what-so-ever?"

It is noted and claimed by some of these PAY-Tri-Idiots that political
subservience is traditional, that such subservience is properly the custom
and practice of all organized societies, recognized from time immemorial.

That it is properly the "policy" of society, that all those born in an area
where there is an established organization of some sort, that all those born
in that area are born with and owe allegiance to that social organization.

Well, that may very well have been the way it was when there was some sort
of monarch (dictator) in control, but our Founding Fathers were supposed to
have created an entirely new form of social organization here, where
everyone was going to be politically free and independent (NOT the style of
a republic), where the commoners were going to be in control.

Where consent of the governed was going to be the style of the organization.
The question that comes to my mind is what is it that constitutes "consent
of the governed?"

To me, it means I cannot be required to do anything I would not choose to do
if not commanded. The Thirteenth Amendment prohibits involuntary servitude.
This Constitutional provision is critically important, however it does not
create what it protects; being the Natural state of a human at birth, to be
politically independent with no birth acquired obligation of political
loyalty.

The Thirteenth Amendment is nothing more than the codification of Natural
Law. "Involuntary servitude shall not exist in the united States!"

How many must be required to do something against their will before it can
be acknowledged as being involuntary servitude? If that number is more than
one, then a police state is in operation!

These PAY-Tri-Idiots do not seem to understand that the word "citizen"
carries with it an inherent recognition of political subservience to an
acknowledged political superior.

It makes no difference what government code sections are brought forward
because none of them apply to me unless and until I willingly, knowingly and
intentionally, having been fully informed of the negative consequences
thereof prior thereto, voluntarily agreed to submit myself to the authority
of any manner or style of anyone or any organization that may assert itself.
(The ending worded as it is to encompass any variety of societal master that
the PAY-Tri-Idiots want to conjure up).

So how does an individual who was born free and politically independent
become subservient to an artificial entity?

In this country it is through the birth certificate driver license ploy.

It is important to understand that no one owns their [government assigned]
name, or the birth certificate created as a record of their birth. This is
self evident when it is considered and acknowledged that when we are born
we, as infants, have no ability to intellectually take notice of any of the
events taking place or instigated by our birth.

As "our" names were conjured up by our parents, it would be our parents who
were the original owners of our name. However, our parents entered no claim
of ownership of our name on the birth certificate, thereby effectively
abandoning their rightful claim of such ownership.

The state governments then use their abandoned property statutes to become
the owner of the names entered on all birth certificates filed with the
state government.

In Arkansas where I live it is under Title 18, Chapter 28, Section 202.
Section 202 pertains to all property not specifically provided for in
previous Sections. Section 202 provides that after five years of no access
by the last known owner all such property is deemed to be abandoned and
owned by the state.

Then the individual, having been "properly" indoctrinated in the government
schools, upon reaching the age of sixteen years, trots his or her self down
to the state's driver license issuing office where the individual presents
"his" or "her" birth certificate, whereby the applicant is unknowingly
applying for a franchise to use that government owned name as the applicant's
"true legal name".

That, Dear Reader, is the long and short of how everyone in this country has
become subservient to the authority purporting to be in charge of this
society.

It actually has nothing to do with the driver license itself. Prior to your
voluntary presentation of that birth certificate to apply for a franchise to
use that state owned name, and the issuance to you of that franchise, there
was no legal contractual relationship between you and the artificial entity
you voluntarily initiated an application to be subservient to, whereby you
could be required to apply for and be issued a driver licence or to conform
to any other rule or regulation promulgated by the state, or whatever manner
of description that the PAY-Tri-Idiots want to assign to those purporting to
have such authority.

It makes no difference whether the so called "Organic" Constitution is in
operation or not, or whether there is some manner of corporation or not. All
that matters is, did you voluntarily present that birth certificate or were
you forced to do so? Who was it that held a gun to you head and threatened
your life if you did not present that birth certificate in order for you to
be issued a driver license?

Please pay attention. Did you in any way participate in the selection of the
name entered on that birth certificate? Did you file that birth certificate
with the state? Of course not – you were a new born human infant and, pay
attention, there is absolutely NOTHING on that birth certificate that could
connect it to you! Neither the name on the birth certificate nor the birth
certificate itself can possibly be your property!

At the time your parents (I presume), came up with the name and entered it
on the birth certificate and filed that document with the state, the name on
that birth certificate would have been owned by your parents, however they
failed to enter any ownership claim on the birth certificate, so they
effectively abandoned the ownership thereof to the state.

Among all the salient points here is the fact that you, Dear Reader, cannot
possibly claim any ownership interest in that state owned name so if you
file a copyright claim on that name you could be charged with theft of state
owned property.

This is all so simple. Hidden right out there in plain sight. All anyone has
to do to get off the government's flypaper is stop using that government
owned name!

Did you intend to volunteer yourself into a condition of servitude when you
applied for your driver license? It can readily be understood that your mere
act of applying for that driver license was, in and of itself, a voluntary
act of servitude? Where were you forced to apply?

The Federal Thirteenth Amend-ment prohibits involuntary servitude but most
certainly does not prohibit voluntary servitude!

Prior to you initiating your application for the franchise to use that
government owned name and the government's acquiescence to your voluntary
request, the state did not have a superior contractual relationship over you
wherein the state could require you to apply for and be issued a driver
license or require you to comply in any way with any other state mandated
obligation.

It makes no difference how your subservient status is characterized, be it
as a state or U.S. citizen or simply as a non specified subservient
contractual agreement. The point is you initiated it and all the state did
was grant your request.

If we all had paid attention to the wording of the Preamble and the
protections set forth in the Bill of Rights, we would have discerned that
all the protections set forth therein are specifically applicable only to
the People of the United States and THEIR Posterity, to the exclusion of any
and all other political status.

So where is our remedy?

Keep it simple!! Only use their laws or statutes or Constitutional
provi-sions against them. My favorite is the Federal Thirteenth Amendment
and or Section Twenty-seven of Article Two of the Arkansas Constitution,
which prohibits involuntary servitude in Arkansas.

The wording thereof puts the burden of proof on them! Prove I volunteered!
Where is the proof from the State's files, that I had volunteered myself to
be under the authority of the state (or whatever it might be, or call
itself).

If I were to be issued a traffic citation, to "appear" in a court of no
record (as most traffic courts are), then I would file a NOTICE (NOT a
motion), informing them that I was challenging the political jurisdiction of
the State (not the court – the State), to present its proof that I had
volunteered to submit myself to its political dominion [its jurisdiction,
ED].

I would not include any information about me or my political status. It is
not for me to claim or prove anything; the burden of proof, according to
their Thirteenth Amendment and their Appellate and Supreme Court decisions,
is on the state (the accusing party).

I would include a statement that it was [is] their responsibility to prove I
was [am] operating under a state owned franchise or other authority; and,
that according to their rules, they are required to present their proof of
jurisdiction on the record, in writing.

That according to their rules (Appellate Court and Supreme Court case law),
they are not allowed to merely declare they have jurisdiction, they are
required to present such proof on the record, in writing. Further, that
until I receive written information presenting proof that I had volunteered
myself to be under their political domain, I will consider the matter
closed.

I would use their case number or citation number or, perhaps, include a copy
of the citation. I would style myself, Eric Williams, Wrongly Accused.

I would serve a copy on the prosecutor, and on the court with a proof of
service, and have the court clerk file stamp my copy; and send a copy to the
police officer or his department, with a proof of service to the court.

I would file these documents ASAP, after receiving the citation. I would
also serve and file copies by registered mail, return receipt.

And all this malarkey about not using zip codes or two letter state
abbrevia-tions, is more PAY-Tri-Idiocy!

I know from which I speak. As I mentioned herein above, I was criminally
charged by the IRS in 1970 for wilful failure to file or pay income tax. I
went to Federal Court in Los Angeles, California, all by myself, without
filing even one piece of paper, and walked out in less than five minutes
because neither the court nor IRS could establish I was under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Government.

All of the PAY-Tri-Idiot contention that the Act of 1871 caused the
Constitution to be trashed is totally bogus.

Everything Obama and previous Presidents have done against U.S. citizens is
authorized under the Fourteenth Amendment. If there was ever any doubt as to
the synonymy of the words "People" and "citizen", such doubt is most
definitely clarified by the, "…and subject to the jurisdiction thereof…"
clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

This wording allows the Executive Branch of government to do as it pleases
with "citizens" of the United States, with such citizens having absolutely
no Constitutional pro-tections of any nature or description.

Pay attention to the actual words, not to the conjecture of non thinking
PAY-Tri-Idiots who want to sell you something that you do not need and only
gets you mired deeper into the government's flypaper.

The government intentionally lied to you as a child, in the government's
indoctrination centers known as public schools, indoctrinating you to
believe you were born into United States citizenship; and the PAY-Tri-Idiots
are further indoctrinating you to believe State Citizenship is better. Every
manner of "citizenship" constitutes an acknowledgment of subservience to a
political superior – NO THANKS!!

I claim to be and therefore I am of the Posterity of the People of the
Preamble, and everyone reading this has the ability to make the same claim.
However I am not going to include my status info in the NOTICES I serve on
the Court, Prosecutor or police officer. I am not going to give them
anything they might call upon me to prove. Keep the burden on them, they are
the entity claiming jurisdiction over me.

The Preamble establishes that the purpose of the Constitution and the
government created thereunder was / is, to secure the Blessings of Liberty
to those of us who claim to be of the Posterity of the People of the United
States.

The fact that the government has fraudulently indoctrinated us and has
fashioned this society in such a manner that it is impossible to function
therein without a driver license (as an ID card) or SS#, that we are thereby
authorized to use such documents with no obligation of servitude by
application of the Law of Necessity, in accordance with the custom and
practice as established under their rules and court decisions.

Please read the Supreme Court Case, Holy Trinity Church vs. United States.

I am, Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone.

RyanHenderFilms

Chemtrails, Conspiracy Theory Or Truth You Be The Judge

Monday, January 20th, 2014

www.globalmarchagainstchemtrailsandgeoengineering.com
Mon, Jan 20, 2014
Subject: Chemtrails In America
www.MorningLiberty.com 

Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri.

". For more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada’s citizens have been subjected to a 24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other dangerous ingredients. None of this was reported by any mainstream media.

The US Department of Defense [DOD] and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with what are known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering).

These differ vastly from the usual plane contrails that evaporate rather quickly in the sky. Chemtrails do not dissipate. Rather, planes (fitted with special nozzles) release aerosols “lines” in the sky that do not evaporate. Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel (or often “checkerboard” patterns) overhead; and soon the sky is blanketed with many grayish-white lines [miles and miles long, although this is changing].

At first, these lines are thin; but soon they expand and, in a short time, merge together. Our once-blue sky has vanished and has been replaced by a grayish-white toxic haze that blots out and greatly diminishes our usual sunshine.

We must organize peacefully. PEACEFULLY is the operative word.If these many-pronged aerosol attacks by military and commercial planes can spray these horrific toxins on us, year after year with impunity –against all laws– then it is absolutely imperative that we organize peacefully. As Peter Dale Scott notes in Jason Bermas’ new DVD “Invisible Empire”: we must use the Internet and our peaceful intellectual powers to come together and shut this nightmare down. It is possible to do this."

YouTube Preview Image

http://globalmarchagainstchemtrailsandgeoengineering.com/index.html

The GMO (Genetically modified foods) Geoengineering connection. One of the toxic contents in the chemicals they use for making these man made clouds is Aluminum. Test results from all around the world are confirming that Aluminum is poisoning the soils and killing off all natural plants and seeds on a global level. Monsanto knows that and has made an Aluminum resistant seed that will flourish in the high aluminum soils. This is no mistake.  It is part of the larger evil plan. This is the GMO and Geoengineering connection.

Our governments and scientists have been lying to us about the facts around global warming. They have been keeping the public in the dark about the largest global ecological disaster the world has ever seen because they have no plan B, and time is running out quicker then computer models have predicted!

We do have a plan B: It is called stopping all forms of Aerosol Chemtrail Geoengineering and SRM Geoengineering. Register your clouds is Aluminum And Geoengineering protest and educational event for your area today.

 

Aug. 10,2013

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/best-ever-chemtrail-evidence

Hats off to the man who captured and recorded the most convincing piece of evidence to date that 'Silver'-'Aluminium' or Silver-like 'Heavy Metal' particles are falling directly down from our skies like snowflakes and straight upon our heads.

We know it's been going on for years, but so many chemtrails have been debunked or ridiculed by both genuine and trolling skeptics, – and why 'chemtrails' keep getting dismissed by the masses. This film footage seems to have captured what is really falling from our skies, – and it's not looking healthy at that!!

Though there are many minerals, that when filmed like this directly into the sun, will look iridescent.

It's tiny iridescent particles such as this that has killied millions of people around the world; coal/iron/copper/silver/gold-miners, quarrymen and anyone who worked [or still works in this field – is killing millions worlwide] with asbestos, etc. – it's because they are so tiny particles, that we cannot do anything else; – other than to breath them in!

Whatever is falling down on us, we are 100% breathing that shit in, even if it wasn't anything sinister, i.e. being done deliberately – [which it is though!] it's got to be seriously dangerous to our health.

Though because we are unable to check the sources they have been using for samples, many people are skeptical about it.  That's what is so good about this video above, it clearly shows the particles falling.

Further tests with witnesses involved need to be carried out to see what's precisely in those particles, – many people on Youtube have made similar test on particles they have alleged to have captured and then examined under microscope.  There's even been expert laboratory tests carried out; proving extremely high levels of dangerous Barium have been found in the sample seen in the news clip item below, – though they too question the validity of the sample. 

This is why witnesses need to be used who can independently vouch they have seen the whole process; – as there are different ways how to gather and then test it.

It's no secret there are all kinds of chemical pollutants in the air, among them; Neodymium, Barium, Bismuth and Aluminium which is the same element group.  

Barium enema's are common, often used on suspected cancer patients as it glows in the intestines, and thought not to be too toxic used this way.  However, it's a completely different story if you was to ingest or breath it in, it will kill you in strong enough doses – either instantly or over a period of time, though is at the rate the video shows – heavy particulates relentlessly falling down from the skies, then who can say what period of time this really is?

According to experts and some commenters have picked up on, it is said; Bismurth is diamagnetic which means it is being used in the production of particles which can be steered through plasma and electromagnetic fields. It creates a field in opposition of an externally applied magnetic field, causing a repulsive effect (levitation). It has to do with multipole expansions, vector potential in electromagnetism and gravitational waves; i.e. some mathematicians are having a whale of a time.

Barium Crystals are very refractive, reflective and fluorescent (shiny colours like in the vidoe above).

Vaporised metallic crystals are used for imaging, atmospheric studies and reflectivity.  Metallic powders are combined in colloidal fuels and superheated and expelled into the air where they recombine into compounds that are useful for radar imaging, weather remediation, weather modification, stratospheric studies; i.e. – dual technologies…

Apart from other unknown chemicals being sprayed into the atmosphere; Barium nanoparticles are used in aerosols and therefore probably being sparyed into the skies via chemtrails.

Proof that Chemtrails contain High Levels of Barium

Some debunkers say along the lines; "Anything sprayed over your head will not fall on you, as it will remain in the upper atmosphere for a long time. Then there is the matter of wind; something sprayed will be blown by the wind for miles and miles before settling out." 

D'oh! – "Blown by the wind for miles and miles before settling out!"  The morons, so if it's not falling on your back yard that day because it's blown away; – then what about all the shit released miles ahead of where they live and when it's at the right distance away to now settle and fall down then on them!!

Chemtrail Tanks?  Some argue they are simply "Ballast Barrells", yet they are clearly tanks and hardly represent the inner seating struture of a commercial passenger aircraft, though it is obviously one, though been converted.

Okay, so let's give them the benefit of doubt and say that's what they are; 'Ballast Barrels' – then what are these next airplanes carrying…, ballast my ass!

There is much debate as to why on earth would the elite "spray their own"? – Then to try and understand this, it would help to understand Geo-Enginering & Trans-Humanism.  In the below excellent video – around the 1:35 time – there's a good explanation about chemtrails and as to why "they" are doing this to us and 'themselves'!

Whilst many of us live 'in the day', 'the present', there are those working on way in the future and this is very likely what the future will hold. 

The Georgia Stones = a population of 500,000,000, the eradication of billions of humans is yet to come to meet this recommendation; – the 'ideal' sustainable population the world should carry and care for in the future.

And if they wanted to get really nasty they could spray whatever and whenever they want, as in the days of "Agent Orange"…

Agent Orange. American Chemical and Biological Warfare

Agent Orange. The effects of chemical spraying during the Vietnam War. The struggle of US Veterans and the long-term consequences for the citizens of Vietnam.

To read more on this and to see the film; Trans-Humanism / Genetic Modification of all Life / Nano-Technology / HAARP / Geoengineering, alongside incredible footage of orbs caught lurking in the clouds, – and more great shots people have added; – checkout the original article; http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/great-shot-of-inside-chemtrail-air…

Perhaps the above shots of chemtrail tanks and planes are "old hat" and that "cloud-making-orbs" are the future!!??

 

www.thrivemovement.com/chemtrails-how-they-affect-you-and-what-you-can-do.blog

Harold Saive • December 2013
"As a pilot and climate investigator, I have found the relative humidity above 30,000 feet is rarely saturated with high relative humidity to generate persistent contrails. To an experience observer, almost everything that looks like a chemtrail is actually a chemtrail. You can check the high altitude conditions for relative humidity yourself as reported twice daily. "

Amitabha • October 2013
FACEBOOK DOESN'T WANT YOU TO SEE THIS VIDEO I 
MADE! Facebook is blocking the sharing of videos and articles about 
Chemtrails! Please watch this and learn more about what's really going 
on in our skies and the reason for it. Notice that the thumbnail and name of this video doesn't show up. It shows up in Google+ and I know my friend Sweetbuttercup Bliss's partner Emmanhuel's videos about chemtrails have also been blocked. 

CHEMTRAILS SMOKESCREEN FOR FALSE FLAG FAKE RAPTURE ALIEN INVASION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrxgikW74TM

 

Same Sex Marriage Still Up For Debate – Utah No Longer The 18th State To Allow It

Thursday, January 9th, 2014

Reuters
Thurs, Jan 9, 2014
Subject: Same Sex Marriage 
www.MorningLiberty.com

 

(Reuters) – Utah will not recognize, at least for now, the marriages of gay couples who rushed to wed after a federal judge's ruling briefly legalized gay unions in the conservative, predominantly Mormon state, the governor's office said on Wednesday.

The state's decision comes as a blow to roughly 1,400 same-sex couples who tied the knot after U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby ruled on December 20 that a state ban on gay marriage violated the U.S. Constitution. His ruling was later put on hold by the U.S. Supreme Court pending an appeal.

"Based on counsel from the Attorney General's Office regarding the Supreme Court decision, state recognition of same-sex marital status is ON HOLD until further notice," Republican Governor Gary Herbert's chief of staff wrote in a statement.

Utah temporarily became the 18th U.S. state to permit gay marriage when Shelby ruled for three same-sex couples who filed a lawsuit challenging a voter-passed amendment to the Utah constitution that defined marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay on Monday, pending appeal of the ruling, preventing new same-sex marriages from being performed in the state. Following that decision, married same-sex couples who wed after Shelby's decision expressed concern the state might not recognize their marriages as valid.

Shelby's ruling had jolted many of Utah's 2.8 million residents, nearly two-thirds of whom are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which teaches that traditional marriage is an institution ordained by God.

'I'M HURT'

Las Vegas couple Reed Abplanalp-Cowan and Gregory Abplanalp-Cowan came to Utah to wed because they own property and two businesses in the state. They have three children adopted in other states and are trying to adopt a fourth – a girl – from Utah, which bars gay couples from adopting.

"I'm hurt, very hurt," said Reed Abplanalp-Cowan hours after the announcement. "I'm sad for my family personally. I'm sad for the impact on my children."

Salt Lake City couple Paul and Tony Butterfield married in California in 2008 but their union was not recognized in Utah, and on December 23 they wed again in that state. They called their attorney on Wednesday seeking advice about what to do, as did the Abplanalp-Cowans.

"For the governor to just overturn a court-mandated judgment just blows my mind," said Paul Butterfield, who is raising 11-year-old twin boys with his partner of 18 years.

The American Civil Liberties of Utah, which supports the effort to bring gay marriage to the state, expressed disappointment in Utah's decision not to recognize the weddings performed in recent weeks.

The governor's office, in explaining how the state would handle the existing marriages, said state agencies should follow "current laws that prohibit the state from recognizing same-sex marriages."

As an example of how the policy would be applied, it said that if a married same-sex couple in Utah had already changed their names on their drivers' licenses the changes would not be revoked, but such couples would not be able to now apply to change their names on the state-issued identification.

FEW OPTIONS?

Salt Lake City-based family law attorney Tanya Peters said she thinks Utah acted irresponsibly, saying she had expected Utah to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify the scope of its stay order before deciding it would not recognize same-sex marriages.

"Now what happens is that the state of Utah has opened itself up to civil rights lawsuits," said Peters, who said she has already been called by both gay friends and clients seeking advice. "You can't just simply wave a wand and say those marriages don't exist."

Bill Duncan, director of the conservative Marriage Law Foundation in Utah, said he was not surprised by Utah's decision. "I don't know that the governor had many options. That period during which there was no (judicial) stay issued created a lot of uncertainty," he said.

University of Utah law professor Clifford Rosky said the state's decision could leave gay couples and their families in limbo for months, if not years, by interrupting applications for health insurance or retirement benefits for state employees and halting adoption petitions of some families.

"This is an unprecedented step, which inflicts severe harm on more than 1,000 families," Rosky said. "The state has not been harmed at all by recognizing these marriages, but the harm to these families as a result of having the protections of marriage taken away is devastating."

It is not known how many Utah couples sought benefits from state or federal agencies or private entities like banks or insurance companies over the past few weeks. Herbert's office said it has directed state agencies not to proceed with granting any new requests for benefits from newly married gay couples. There was no word on what would happen to requests already pending.

Rosky said federal agencies and private companies could decide on their own whether to grant marriage benefits.

"It would be hard for me to believe that the federal government would not recognize these marriages," he said. "They were authorized by a federal court order and issued in accordance with Utah law at the time."

(Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston, Bernadette Baum, Steve Orlofsky and Cynthia Osterman)

ADHD a Fake Disorder, According to Neurologist

Wednesday, January 8th, 2014

Washington Times
Wed, Jan 8, 2014
Subject: ADHD fake disease
www.MorningLiberty.com

 

Zero: That’s the percent of children suffering from attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, a neurologist said in his new book, “ADHD Does Not Exist: The Truth About Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder.”
The book’s due out in February — and controversy is already generating, The New York Post reported.
Author Richard Saul said that over the course of his long career, and treatment of patients complaining of problems related to short attention spans and an inability to focus, he’s come to one conclusion: ADHD is only a collection of symptoms, not a disease or disorder in itself. It shouldn’t be listed as a separate disorder in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, he said, The New York Post reported.
The number of ADHD diagnoses has increased in recent years simply because doctors are failing to probe deeply enough and question patients about related health matters — and because ADHD has become an embraced, accepted catch-all diagnosis, he said. And more bluntly: Mr. Saul said parents seek an easy way to get their children to sit down and shut up, and the treatments for ADHD — Adderall and Ritalian — do the trick.
But those drugs are dangerous and addictive stimulants, and they shouldn’t be prescribed so cavalierly, he said. For instance, one in nine children are now labeled as ADHD, and two thirds of them have been put on a stimulant, The New York Post reported.
“ADHD makes a great excuse,” Mr. Saul said, The New York Post reported. “The diagnosis can be an easy-to-reach-for crutch. Moreover, there’s an attractive element to an ADHD diagnosis, especially in adults. It can be exciting to think of oneself as involved in many things at once, rather than stuck in a boring rut.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/6/adhd-fake-disorder-neurologist-turned-author-says/#ixzz2ppHQNkr1 

NSA using Apple’s iPhone to remotely access sensitive information

Thursday, January 2nd, 2014

Thur, January 2, 2014
Subject: NSA using Apple's iPhone to remotely access sensitive information
www.MorningLiberty.com

 

Google+

New documents revealed on Monday show the U.S. National Security Agency has the capability of deploying software implants on Apple's iPhone that grants remote access to on-board assets like SMS messages, location data and microphone audio. 

DROUPOUTJEEP

http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/12/30/nsa-worked-on-iphone-spyware-to-remotely-monitor-users-leaked-documents-show
Section of leaked DROUPOUTJEEP document.   Source: Der Spiegel

In a talk at the Chaos Communications Congress in Germany, security researcher Jacob Appelbaum summarized the NSA's iPhone-targeting spyware program called "DROPOUTJEEP" as part of a broader discussion dealing with the agency's controversial electronic surveillance initiative, reports The Daily Dot. 

As it pertains to Apple's smartphone, the findings — concurrently published by German magazine Der Spiegel — are limited to a single top secret document dating back to 2008. The page details DROPOUTJEEP's basic operational structure and capabilities, which include the interception of SMS messages, access to on-board data, microphone activation and approximate positioning via cell tower location. All communication takes place covertly over SMS or GPRS data protocols. 

While a startling revelation, DROPOUTJEEP's proliferation within the iPhone community is largely unknown. The NSA boasts a 100 percent success rate for implanting the spyware on iOS devices, Appelbaum said, but the document suggests physical contact with a target phone is required to implant the surreptitious software. In practice, the method is likely similar to a consumer jailbreak looking for root device access.

To this point, Appelbaum alludes to complicit involvement by Apple, but tempers his — so far baseless — allegation with "I can't really prove it."

I don't really believe that Apple didn't help them," Appelbaum said. "I can't really prove it yet, but [the NSA] literally claim that anytime they target an iOS device, that it will succeed for implantation. Either they have a huge collection of exploits that work against Apple products, meaning that they are hoarding information about critical systems that American companies produce and sabotaging them, or Apple sabotaged it themselves. Not sure which one it is. I’d like to believe that since Apple didn’t join the PRISM program until after Steve Jobs died, that maybe it’s just that they write [expletive redacted] software. We know that's true.

Der Spiegel asserts specialized NSA Tailored Access Operations (TAO) teams intercept incoming device shipments, carefully open packages and install spyware before sending the "bugged" units along to end users. 

A more efficient delivery mechanism is remote installation, something the NSA said was being "pursued for future release." Once again, it is unknown if the agency moved forward with such a system in the intervening five years since the document was first issued. 

Video of Appelbaum's talk with iPhone discussion starting at around 44:30:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Google+

UPDATE

http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/12/31/apple-says-it-was-unaware-of-nsas-iphone-spying-vows-to-defend-customers-privacy

Apple on Tuesday reacted to news that the U.S. National Security Agency has worked on iPhone spyware to remotely monitor users, saying it has not cooperated with the agency on such projects and was not previously aware of those attempts.

DROUPOUTJEEP
Section of leaked DROUPOUTJEEP document.  | Source: Der Spiegel

In an official company statement provided to AllThingsD, Apple vowed to use its resources "to stay ahead of malicious hackers and defend our customers from security attacks, regardless of who's behind them." The statement came after new documents showed the NSA has the capability of deploying software implants on the iPhone to grant access to onboard assets such as text messages, location data, and even microphone audio.

While Apple was previously unaware of the NSA's spyware, the company said it's constantly working to make its products more secure. The iPhone maker said that any reports about potential security issues on its products prompt Apple to "thoroughly investigate and take appropriate steps" in order to protect its customers.

The statement also declared Apple's product security as "industry-leading," and boasted that great effort is placed on making it easy for customers to be able to easily keep their software up to date. To that end, the most recent data from Apple shows that 78 percent of iPhone, iPad and iPod touch users are using iOS 7, the company's latest mobile operating system.

The leaked documents reveal that the NSA's iPhone-targeting spyware program is called "DROPOUTJEEP," and it began in 2008. Capabilities of the software include the interception of SMS text messages, access to onboard data, microphone activation, and approximate positioning via cell tower location.

The NSA boasts a 100 percent success rate in implanting its spyware on iOS devices, but the leaked documents suggest that physical contact with a target phone is required to implant the software.

Apple's full statement in response is included below.

Apple has never worked with the NSA to create a backdoor in any of our products, including iPhone. Additionally, we have been unaware of this alleged NSA program targeting our products. We care deeply about our customers' privacy and security. Our team is continuously working to make our products even more secure, and we make it easy for customers to keep their software up to date with the latest advancements. Whenever we hear about attempts to undermine Apple's industry-leading security, we thoroughly investigate and take appropriate steps to protect our customers. We will continue to use our resources to stay ahead of malicious hackers and defend our customers from security attacks, regardless of who's behind them.

 

Google+

Duck Dynasty Star Phil Robertson Silenced Indefinitely

Wednesday, December 25th, 2013

J. Matt Barber
Mon. Dec, 23, 2013
Subject: Duck Dynasty Star Phil Robertson Silenced Indefinitely
www.MorningLiberty.com
 

 

Google+

As widely reported, Phil Robertson, the patriarch in A&E’s breakaway hit “Duck Dynasty,” recently ran a-fowl of homosexual pressure groups, ruffling “progressive” feathers throughout concentrated pockets of deep blue America. He remains suspended “indefinitely” for candidly summarizing, in a recent interview with GQ Magazine, the millennia-long “Love the sinner, hate the sin” biblical stance on homosexual practice.

“It seems like, to me, a vagina ­ as a man ­ would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,” he bluntly opined. “I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes!”

Dudes worldwide ­ save self-styled “gays,” Pajama Boy and a few liberal men actually rumored to be heterosexual ­ responded: “Eww! I know, right.”

“You know what I’m saying?” continued Robertson. “But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical,” he noted.

Robertson also addressed other sins, paraphrasing 1 Corinthians 6:9-10: “Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers ­ they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

“I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because they are different from me,” he later added. “We are all created by the Almighty, and like Him, I love all of humanity.”

Barring a handful of “progressive” revisionists, Christian theologians have since observed that, while Robertson’s position on sexual sin is 100 percent biblically, morally and biologically correct, it is, nonetheless, precisely 0 percent politically correct.

Furthermore, Robertson seems to have been quoting directly from the rare, though accurate, “Louisiana Revised Standard Living Translation.”

Even so, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) was outraged. GLAAD spokesman Francis Twinklebean offered a scathing, though typically insightful, analysis of Robertson’s opinion: “Quack quack quack bigot,” said Twinklebean. “Quack quack vile quack intolerance quack quack homophobia quack,” he added, finally demanding: “A&E must fire Phil Robertson.”

The “gay”-activist Human Rights Campaign (HRC) was no less distressed, as evidenced by HRC mouthpiece Randy Van Grindr: “The First Amendment? That’s so 1776,” he said. “This is 2013. Speech isn’t free, you know. Intolerance will not be tolerated. Give us our pound of flesh! A&E must fire Phil Robertson.”

A&E, which had already begun censoring the cast’s Christian speech with fake bleeps to cover words like “Jesus” and “Christ,” dutifully complied. “We’re just sick of all this redneck Jesusy stuff,” A&E representative Moe Ronic told reporters. “And besides, making truckloads of money is really overrated,” he added, referencing the show’s No. 1 all-time ranking.

“In fact,” he continued, “just the other day I was sharing an Appletini with Bob, our program director, and he was pining for the good ol’ days ­ back when we had ratings like MSNBC’s ‘Winter Solstice Generic Holiday Special.’

“You know, more money means more work ­ what, with the bookkeeping and all,” he pointed out. “Most of us at A&E are actually quite excited to get back to the utter irrelevance and obscurity from whence we came.”

Meanwhile, the Fox Network and a bevy of cable channels have reportedly lined up with drool bibs to pounce on the show should relations with A&E go deeper south.

A Fox source offered comment on condition of anonymity: “Remember that time someone disagreed with Christianity and got fired?” he asked. “Me neither. A&E needs the Robertsons more than they need A&E.”

Still, questions remained as to who’s got it right on homosexuality; GLAAD, HRC and other “progressives,” or Phil Robertson and Christianity. To get answers, we went straight to the Source: God, Author of all truth, sovereign Creator of the universe and Maker of mankind.

God said to relax. The issue has been long settled.

All sexual sin ­ adultery, fornication, bestiality, incest and, yes, the practice of homosexuality ­ is “contrary to sound doctrine,” He noted unequivocally (1 Timothy 1:10). “Guys, when I said, ‘You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination,’ I meant it,” He added (Leviticus 18:22).

The Creator then offered an urgent admonition to GLAAD, HRC and others living under both sexual deception and the unrepentant homosexual lifestyle. He warned that unnatural behaviors beget natural consequences: “Because of this, [I] gave [you] over to shameful lusts. Even [you ladies] exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way [you fellas] also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. [You’ve] committed shameful acts with other men, and [have] received in [yourselves] the due penalty for [your] error” (Romans 1:26-27).

Still, being both wholly righteous and merciful beyond measure, The Heavenly Father then offered hope for homosexuals, as well as for every other sinner on the planet (that would be all of us). He was quick to point out that no one person is better than another, and that He loves us all, not because of our sins ­ to include the “intrinsically disordered” homosexual identity and lifestyle ­ but in spite of them. “None is righteous, no, not one,” He said (Romans 3:10).

We are all lost and in need of the Savior, He further urged (especially yours truly), saying, with specific reference to homosexuality, adultery and other forms of sexual immorality: “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by [My Spirit]” (1 Corinthians 6:11).

As untold thousands ­ likely millions ­ of former homosexuals will attest, through the unmatched grace of Christ, there can be freedom from all forms of bondage to sin ­ even “LGBT” behavior.

Meanwhile, since the Duck flap hit, Jesus Himself has reportedly reached out to Phil Robertson with a Word of encouragement. He told him to keep fishing for souls and hunting for ducks. He said that Robertson shouldn’t sweat the small stuff ­ like the ongoing assault for speaking truth in love.

“Phil,” He said, “You will be hated by everyone because of me, but [if you] stand firm to the end, [you] will be saved” (Matthew 10:22).

“Oh, and by the way,” Jesus added: “Well done my good and faithful servant.”

Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war.

 

R. Hender
Mon. Dec, 23, 2013
Subject: Duck Dynasty Star Phil Robertson Silenced Indefinitely
www.MorningLiberty.com

I am sick and tired of hearing both sides of the gay rights argument argument; it makes me absolutely sick that we have to even discuss this subject. I have kept my mouth shut, but I will no longer.

For me, I really don’t care what gays do, but I have a huge problem with the push for “equality” that is going on right now in this country.

This country was founded on Christian principles, “In God We Trust”. The institution of marriage is a spiritual, and religious institution. Many gay rights advocates argue that those against the movement are trying to “make marriage a religious institution”, and that we need a “separation of church and state”.

In Malachi 2:14 we see that marriage is a holy covenant before God. In the Jewish custom, God's people signed a written agreement at the time of the marriage to seal the covenant. The marriage ceremony, therefore, is meant to be a public demonstration of a couple's commitment to a covenant relationship. It's not the "ceremony" that's important in a marriage; it's the couple's covenant commitment before God and men.

That being said, the movement to adjust the “marriage” laws in this country is contrary to the very root of the word.

The gay rights movement started with one thing in mind, equality. We were born unequal, we die unequal. Should also raise the minimum wage for those who have not made an effort to earn a better living? Should those at the bottom of the “food chain” have the same luxuries of someone who has taken the time, and put forth the expense of going to college? There is a large percentage of the population of college grads that don’t make the money that they deserve, but it’s fair to increase minimum wage for those who won’t make the effort to better their own lives?

There are too many people in this country on welfare. Many of them, refuse to do anything different. The definition of insanity “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Welfare is there for families who need it, and I know several families who need it. I also know other families who purposely not look for work, who purposely maintain the bare minimum employment levels so they don’t lose their benefits. It is entirely too easy for lazy people in this country to get things they don’t deserve.

I used to know a guy who was on welfare; he lived with his parents, girlfriend, and some other people under one roof. The father sold drugs as a way to make money, only because the income was not tracked. They got food stamp, and financial benefits which paid their bills. The son, who is my age, would go to 7/11 every day before work and load up on snacks. Not just for him, but for everyone at work. He would buy us each a 1-liter bottle of soda, donuts, and whatever else he desired.

Someone who earns his own living thinks very differently of money than someone who gets it handed to him each month. Just the same as some homeless people commit crimes so they will be imprisoned, many on welfare do the bare minimum because by doing so, they can have their essentials met.

The guy I am speaking of, owned a big screen tv, several gaming systems, always had new name brand clothing, and always had a wallet full of cash.

Shouldn’t I have the same six-figure income that a doctor has? Shouldn’t I get paid the same as an attorney, CPA, or Rocket Scientist? I want to live in that $3,000,000 house on the hill, shouldn’t I be able to go up there and demand the key? Of course not! We get paid based on our abilities!

Women who perform the same job, at the same capacity should get paid the same as men. That is where sexual equality should end. Over the years, I have heard many references to the statement “chivalry is dead”, and yes, it is dying. When I first started dating my wife, I tried opening up her door, and doing other things for her. She refused to have me do it, so many people I knew thought that I was simply a jerk. The gigantic movement towards total equality between men and women is killing chivalry. It is also killing the ideals of a great father. The mainstream media, movies, and TV shows in recent years have gone to great lengths to show men as idiots, lazy, and incompetent.

When a child makes a mistake, we teach by positive reinforcement right? Yet with television, the exemplary man/father is slowly dying and it makes me sick.

You may say that each one of these subjects is separate, but I beg you to truly think about it.

I am a man; I want to marry a woman. I am sure; women out there want to marry a man. Each tiny little step towards equality is one step closer to me marrying a man. I like my feminine wife. I like her dresses and skirts, I like the makeup, I like that she’s softer than I am. Why would anyone want anything else?

You’ve heard the saying “opposites attract”. Grab two magnets, each one has a north and a south pole. Point the south poles towards each other, try to push them towards each other. What happens? They repel each other. God knew what he was doing when he put us here on earth. He wanted us to be different.

Have you heard of Communism?

Communism (from Latin communis – common, universal) is a socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless,[1][2] and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.[3] This movement, in its Marxist–Leninist interpretations, significantly influenced the history of the 20th century, which saw intense rivalry between the "socialist world" (socialist states ruled by communist parties) and the "Western world" (countries with capitalist economies).[4]

Each step towards “equality” is one step closer to COMMUNISM. It sounds extreme, but it’s a fact. One little thing today, something else tomorrow. Eventually, we’re a communist country with no morals and everyone lives in poverty.

 

 

 

 

Google+

 

Sovereign Inhabitant – Kurt Kallenbach Explains Admiralty Law

Monday, December 2nd, 2013

Kurt Kallenbach
Sun, Dec 1, 2013
Subject: Sovereign Inhabitant on Admiralty Law plus other Laws
www.MorningLiberty.com

 

Google+

Hi Patriots:

Sovereign Inhabitant is a friend of Dean Clifford's, but an American, and he is also educating people on Admiralty Law!  This man is a Attorney of Law (Lawyer)!

Here he covers the Season of Treason – in multiple parts!

Part #1:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXmY-EYYy8s   – Part 1
Part #2:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8JTqpTl2qo   – Part 11
Part #3:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtvZUSXpDE8   – America's Cancer
Part #4:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo4iX8dF4s0   – The Kings House
 
The Season of Treason:  (Full Summary Video)

Full:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LxY_H5V0Kw

Note:  Season of Treason can be seen in multiple parts which is more in depth than the Summary Video linked above!  Go look up Season of Treason, Parts 1 – through – 35 or more in You Tube!  Plus there are even more of these videos that cover other things in depth!  Therefore, go look them up and watch them all!  It will not be done overnight, therefore watch a few everyday, and by the end of December you will have seen them all!  This is more important than watching old re-runs of Christmas Movies!

Have your Black's Law Dictionary handy!

The more you, yours, and others know, the safer we all can be!

Your Internet Paul Revere,