Dane Wigington & RevMichelleHopkins
Mon, July 15, 2013
Subject: NWo FEMA Camp Mass Graves Discovered
RevMichelleHopkins Discovered FEMA Camp Mass Graves http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvpB_LN-r2o&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs
Dane Wigington shows us how, On Purpose, the earth and all life is being destryed http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a2x6TEeknfo
IT IS ALLLLLLL CORPORATISM FOLKS
IGNORE HIS EXPLETIVES PLEASE
CT CORP SYSTEM
This information was forwarded from a friend and I did some checking
Holy Shi ! These are some very bad guys. This is huge. The top of the heap.
Listed as CT CORPORATION SYSTEM on Idaho Secy of State – 1936.
Their registered agent is the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY which is the registered agent for just about every corporation in the country and the world. CT CORP SYS is also a registered agent. Says they're a a foreign (to Idaho) corporation, a Delaware CORP, but Delaware Secy of State's business entity database is closed until tomorrow.
Actually, they are one and the same! The largest in the world! AGENT INFORMATION The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 New Castle County (also known as CT Corporation System) http://corp.delaware.gov/agents/a9000010.shtml
More: CT, or the Corporation Trust Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary ofWolters Kluwer, a multi-national information services company based in the Netherlands with operations in over 35 countries. CT is the umbrella brand for two businesses: CT Corporation and CT Lien Solutions. CT Corporation is the largest registered agent service firm in the world representing hundreds of thousands of business entities worldwide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CT_%28company%29
Trying to open their Certificate of Authority but it is taking it's time. Got it. Wowzers! They work for the "Members of the Bar!"
Their address is the same as Eberle, Berlin law firm here in Boise. My ex-brother in law used to work for them.
I just pulled out a section of thie Certificate (page 2 of the PDF), if it displays correctly, notice it refers to the "Government of the United States" (I have their DUNS number) and "any or all of the states, districts, territories, or colonies of the United States of America." If it doesn't display, I attached the PDF file.
OH SHI ! The very next page, with regard to property, refers to the same States etc but they are Capitalized! And they are of the "United States" NOT the "United States of America!" Converted in one paragraph! And just before that they declare what they want to do. To serve Members of the Bar in their plans and plots to own everything, everywhere. And they are doing it.
They want to control ALL of the property in the world. Period. If the above excerpts do not display, open the attachment and read if for yourself.
At the end it says they accepted the provisions of the Idaho Constitution and that acceptance was signed and notarized in New Jersey which is where this predatory corporate velociraptor was founded first in the States. Now they are a Delaware Corp and they are registered to transact business in every State. But they are ultimately based in the Netherlands.
Here's the bridge of their ship!
Wolters Kluwer’s ultimate parent company is Wolters Kluwer nv. In 2002, Wolters Kluwer nv abolished the voluntary application of the structure regime (“structuurregeling”). As a consequence, the structure regime became applicable to Wolters Kluwer Nederland bv, which is the parent company of the Dutch operating subsidiaries. Wolters Kluwer International Holding bv is the (in)direct parent company of subsidiaries operating outside of the Netherlands.
Their corporate structure throughout the world is like "Falken's Maze!" The Netherlands is the source of the "mercantile" system. The Merchants. Merchant Law. The Guilds. And yes, the most evil one of all, "The Lawyers Guild."
Look back at the purpose of this megalithic monster: To OWN everything! Everywhere! CT is the "brand" for two businesses, one of which is "CT Lien Solutions." If they can't own it, they'll slap a lien on it.
I need a drink. A double.
I think we all need to step back, take a deep breath, consider this demonic Goliath and realize what we are all "up against." I have repeatedly referred to the criminal conspiracy of the Bar association, and have advocated for their abolition, but this is a whole new ballgame. This "umbrella brand" and its "ultimate parent company," Wolters Kluwer nv, involves every corporation, every judge, every attorney in the master plan to take everything they can, from anybody they can, anywhere they can, and to do it "legally."
Have a look at all the "private companies" I found while researching. You may find some of the company "Names" surprising. I did.
Judges and other private companies, Federal and State. Wowzers!
And did you know that we had a "branch" office of the Supreme Court here in Boise Idaho?
Also found another new website to search on! FIND THE COMPANY!
The US DISTRICT COURT is one of the JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO! HUH?! How is that even possible?!
ALSO TRADED AS!
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Also Traded as UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 550 W FORT ST, BOISE, ID
So . . . what are they trading, and can I buy some?
SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF THE
Also Traded as US DISTRICT COURT
550 WEST FORT ST MSC 042, BOISE, ID
MSC means "Mail Stop Code" and 042 is the Bankruptcy Court. No way it has ANYTHING to do with the SUPREME COURT. The Bankruptcy Court is an adjunct court created by Congress. The Supreme Court was created by the Constitution!
Excerpts from Northern Pipeline v Marathon Pipeline:
We conclude that 28 U.S.C. 1471 (1976 ed., Supp. IV), as added by 241(a) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1978, has impermissibly removed most, if not all, of "the essential attributes of the judicial power" from the Art. III district court, and has vested those attributes in a non-Art. III adjunct. Such a grant of jurisdiction cannot be sustained as an exercise of Congress' power to create adjuncts to Art. III courts.
The flaw in appellants' analysis is that it provides no limiting principle. It thus threatens to supplant completely our system of adjudication in independent Art. III tribunals and replace it with a system of "specialized" legislative courts
Congress does not have the same power to create adjuncts to adjudicate constitutionally recognized rights and state-created rights as it does to adjudicate rights that it creates. The grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy courts cannot be sustained as an exercise of Congress' power to create adjuncts to Art. III courts.
Marathon sought dismissal of the suit on the ground that the Act unconstitutionally conferred Art. III judicial power upon judges who lacked life tenure and protection against salary diminution. The Bankruptcy Court denied the motion to dismiss, but on appeal the District Court granted the motion.
The judgment is affirmed.
So what in blazes is going on here? What does it all mean? Judges and Courts are companies. And when are we going to put an end to it?
I must sound like a broken record? And does anyone, in this age of CDs, iTunes, MP3s and other digital downloads even know what that means?
Nevertheless, here I go again . . .
It is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment.” Even if they could, I.C. 59-703 (9) states,
“"Public office" means any position in which the normal and usual duties are conducted on behalf of a governmental entity.”
The Clearfield Doctrine is explicit. The corporation registered and known as THE CITY OF BOISE CITY is listed as a ”CORPORATION” in the IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE’S BUSINESS ENTITY database and is, therefore, “an entity entirely separate from government.” Notwithstanding any other Idaho Code section that is also superseded by Federal law, the alleged officers are NOT even employees of a “governmental entity.”
“ . . . the government descended to the level of a mere private corporation and takes on the character of a mere private citizen . . . For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an entity entirely separate from government.” Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheat. 22 U.S. 904, U.S. v. Erie Ry Co., 106 U.S. 327; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
“When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation.” U.S. v. Burr. 309 U.S. 22; See 22 U.S.C.A. 286e. Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia. 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. Seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103.
An officer is defined as
“a person appointed or elected to a position of responsibility or authority in government or aprivate organization.” Random House Webster’s Dictionary of the Law, p. 307.
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen. This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it, like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the party upon whom the payment and performance are made and thereby, willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes. For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” ” Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and takes on the character of a mere private citizen [where private corporate commercial paper (securities) are concerned]“. . . “For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an entity ENTIRELY separate from government.” Bank of US v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904, 6 L. Ed. 24
Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904; 6 L. Ed. 24, (1824), the Court stated, in part: “The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty… exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter.”
"Governments lose their immunity and descend to level of private corporations when involved in commercial activity enforcing negotiable instruments, as in fines, penalties, assessments, bails, taxes, the remedy lies in the hand of the state and its municipalities seeking remedy." –Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241.
stare decisis . . . let the decision stand.
I don't want to be their "customer."
I remain yours,
Pro Libertate Patriae,
"For the Liberty of My Country,"