Posts Tagged ‘Trilateral Commission’

Top 33 Conspiracy Facts – Risking It All for Truth

Sunday, April 8th, 2012

 Eddie Sage

Thur, Apr 5, 2012

Subject: 33 Conspiracy Theories that Turned Out to be True

33 Conspirracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True

By Eddie Sage on 28 November 2011


Most people can’t resist getting the details on the latest conspiracy theories, no matter how far-fetched they may seem. At the same time, many people quickly denounce any conspiracy theory as untrue … and sometimes as unpatriotic or just plain ridiculous.   Lets not forget all of the thousands of conspiracies out of Wall Street like Bernie Madoff and many others to commit fraud and extortion, among many crimes of conspiracy.  USA Today reports that over 75% of personal ads in the paper and on craigslist are married couples posing as single for a one night affair.  When someone knocks on your door to sell you a set of knives or phone cards, anything for that matter, do they have a profit motive?  What is conspiracy other than just a scary way of saying “alternative agenda”?  When 2 friends go to a bar and begin to plan their wingman approach on 2 girls they see at the bar, how often are they planning on lying to those girls?  “I own a small business and am in town for a short while.  Oh yeah, you look beautiful.”

Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy. However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.  To conspire means “to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end.”  The term “conspiracy theory” is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from “the people”.

To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature.  Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions.  Certainly we can all agree on this.  So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore?  Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding.  Or am I?

Skeptics are important in achieving an objective view of reality, however, skeptism is not the same as reinforcing the official storyline.  In fact, a conspiracy theory can be argued as an alternative to the official or “mainstream” story of events.  Therefore, when skeptics attempt to ridicule a conspiracy theory by using the official story as a means of proving the conspiracy wrong, in effect, they are just reinforcing the original “mainstream” view of history, and actually not being skeptical.  This is not skeptism, it is just a convenient way for the establishment view of things to be seen as the correct version, all the time, every time.  In fact, it is common for “hit pieces” or “debunking articles” to pick extremely fringe and not very populated conspiracy theories.  This in turn makes all conspiracies on a subject matter look crazy.  Skeptics magazine and Popular Mechanics, among many others, did this with 9/11.  They referred to less than 10% of the many different conspiracy theories about 9/11 and picked the less popular ones, in fact, they picked the fringe, highly improbable points that only a few people make.  This was used as the “final investigation” for looking into the conspiracy theories.  Convenient, huh?

In fact, if one were to look into conspiracy theories, they will largely find that thinking about a conspiracy is associated with lunacy and paranoia.  Some websites suggest it as an illness.  It is also not surprising to see so many people on the internet writing about conspiracy theories in a condescending tone, usually with the words “kool-aid,” “crack pot,” or “nut job” in their articulation.  This must be obvious to anyone that emotionally writing about such serious matter insults the reader more than the conspiracy theorist because there is no need to resort to this kind of behavior.  It is employed often with an “expert” who will say something along the lines of, “for these conspiracies to be true, you would need hundreds if not thousands of people to be involved.  It’s just not conceivable.”

I find it extremely odd that the assumption is on thousands of participants in a conspiracy.  I, for one, find it hard to believe any conspiracy involving more than a handful of people but the fact remains that there have been conspiracies in our world, proven and not made up, that involved many hundreds of people.  It’s not a matter of opinion, it’s a matter of fact.

One more thing to consider, have you noticed that if the conspiracy is involving powerful interests with the ability to bribe, threaten or manipulate major institutions (like the mafia, big corporations or government) then don’t you find it odd when people use one of those as the “credible” counter-argument?  What I mean is, if you are discussing a conspiracy about the mafia, and someone hands you a debunking article that was written by the mafia, it doesn’t seem like it would take rocket science to look at that with serious criticism and credibility.  This is the case with many conspiracies.  In fact, I am handed debunking pieces all the time written in many cases by the conspirators in question.  Doesn’t this seem odd to anybody else but me?

While intelligent cynicism certainly can be healthy, though, some of the greatest discoveries of all time were initially received (often with great vitriol) as blasphemous conspiracy theories — think of the revelation that the earth was not the center of the universe, or that the world was not flat but actually round.

What follows are some of these most shocking modern conspiracy theories that turned out true after thorough investigation by our society.  Some through congressional hearings, others through investigative journalism.  Many of these, however, were just admitted to by those involved.  These are just 33 of them, and I still had a long list of others to add.  There are a total of 33 in this article.  Many of these are listed with original and credible news clips on the matter, as well as documentaries.

1. The Dreyfus Affair:

In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).

2. The Mafia:

This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society’s secrets to law enforcement officials.  What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world.


 In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a “truth serum” to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.

A short video about MK-ULTRA from a documentary called Secrets of the CIA:

4. Operation Mockingbird:

Also in the 1950s to ’70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.


5. Manhattan Project:

The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer.  The project’s roots lay in scientists’ fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret.  With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history.  Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that.  The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years.  Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.

6. Asbestos:

Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.

7. Watergate:

 Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn’t until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.

8. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study:

 The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.

9. Operation Northwoods:

In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

Author James Bamford, “A Pretext For War”, discusses the declassified “Operation Northwoods” documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:

10. 1990 Testimony of Nayirah: 

A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.  It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait.  Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.  The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”

11. Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s:

  COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI’s stated motivation at the time was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.”  According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women’s rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled “New Left”, including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those “seeking independence for Puerto Rico.” The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert “white hate groups,” including the Ku Klux Klan and National States’ Rights Party.  The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders.

12. The Iran-Contra Affair:

In 1985 and ’86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.
13. The BCCI Scandal: 

The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets.  In the late 1980′s BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed.  BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a “$20-billion-plus heist”.  Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been “set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection.”

14. CIA Drug Running in LA:

Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others.  In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury Newspublished Webb’s “Dark Alliance”, a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. “Dark Alliance” received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury Newswebsite received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became “the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade.”

15. Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened:

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats.  This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War.  After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese.  The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”.  In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…”  In truth, Hanoi’s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.  In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.”  In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick’s ship’s log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the “apparent ambush”—was in fact unfounded.  In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2.  In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator’s report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one.  In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.

16. The Business Plot:

  In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we’re talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one.  Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932.  Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934. Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages.  Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America’s entry into World War II.  In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler’s allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.

On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This “Bonus Army” was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time. A few days after Butler’s arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur.  Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year’s election.  In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. “Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism.” Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.

17. July 20, 1944 Conspiracy to Assassinate Hitler:

Among another 20 some odd attempts, this one was one of the largest conspiracies involving hundreds of loyalists in the highest echelons of Hitler’s inner circle.  Near the end of WWII, things were rapidly going south for Germany and the time seemed ripe for guilt-ridden Nazi officers to assassinate Hitler and overthrow his government. Colonel Henning von Tresckow recruited Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg to join the conspiracy in 1944.  The plot to take out Hitler and then all of his loyal officers was called Operation Valkyrie.  The plan was to use the Continuity of Government Proceedings during an assassination on Hitler’s life to take over full control of the government in Germany.  The assassination would be blamed on the Nazi SS and therefore allow Stauffenberg to take full control of all aspects of the government.  It almost worked.  In July 1944, Stauffenberg was promoted so that he could now start attending military strategy meetings with Hitler himself. On more than one occasion Stauffenberg planned to kill Hitler at such a meeting with a briefcase bomb, but he always held off because he also wanted to take out Hitler’s two right-hand men, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. On July 20, he went for it anyway and exploded a bomb inside Hitler’s conference room with a remote detonator. Hitler survived only minor injuries.

18. Operation Ajax:

For years, Britain had a spiffy trade deal with Iran regarding their prodigious oil fields. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was basically a giant money machine for the Anglo half, while the Iranian half got shafted. That all changed in 1951 when Iran nationalized the AIOC and the Iranian parliament elected Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister. Mossadegh was relatively secular, something that pissed of Iranian clerics, but he was also very nationalistic.  He was a democratically elected, pro American figure but the West saw his nationalizing of the oil fields a communist move(something Mossadegh thought was the right of the people to profit and pay for services in the country with).  Those oil fields were under the control of British Petroleum, but unfortunately Mossadegh overruled this long standing business control.  The United States sent Kermit Roosevelt, FDR’s nephew and CIA coordinator in to figure out the mess.  The best he could come up with was to confront Mossadegh and have him overthrown and this was accomplished by bringing in what the agency refers to as “jackals.”  The United States backed the return of the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal dictators the country had ever seen and intentionally overthrew years before with the democratic leader, Mossadegh.  Until 1979, that is, when a pissed off Iranian populace finally revolted and replaced the monarchy with an anti-West Islamic Republic.  The result was a violently anti-American revolution lead by the Ayatollah Khomeini which overthrew the Shah and took hostage US Embassy workers, many of whom were involved in the plot with Kermit Roosevelt that installed the Shah.  The planning for the Coup took place largely in that embassy, but Americans were told this was due to the rise of radical Islam and rise of democracy hating Muslims, which of course was far from the truth.

19.  Operation Snow White:

Some time during the 1970s, the Church of Scientology decided that they’d had enough.  Apparently, the Church of Scientology managed to perform the largest infiltration of the United States government in history. Ever.  5,000 of Scientology’s crack commandos wiretapped and burglarized various agencies. They stole hundreds of documents, mainly from the IRS. No critic was spared, and in the end, 136 organizations, agencies and foreign embassies were infiltrated.

20. Operation Gladio:

Gladio is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO “stay-behind” operation in Italy after World War II, intended to continue anti-communist resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organizations, “Operation Gladio” is used as an informal name for all stay-behind organizations, sometimes called “Super NATO”.  The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter.  What can we prove about that role?  Thousands of documents, depositions and testimony as well as recorded conversations and admission by the highest levels of government in Italy.  That’s about as credible as it gets, regardless of the CIA’s adamant denial it ever happened.   What took place?  The shooting of innocent civilians, terrorism and assassinations all blamed on leftist communists were actually apart of well coordinated, “black operations.”  Black operations are typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol.

“The right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.”  Black ops missions often fit into the deniable category, a situation in which there is no claim of responsibility for the action, and/or a false flag operation is used to give the appearance that another actor was responsible, or – most often – black operations involve extensive arrangements so as to be able to hide the fact that the black operation ever occurred. Black military operations, or paramilitary operations, can be used by various secret services to achieve or attempt to achieve an unusually sensitive goal. The methods used in black operations are also used in unconventional warfare. Depending on the precise situation in a given case, and the level of authoritarianism of the national government or other responsible party, some tasks will be conducted as black operations, while there are usually other activities that can be admitted openly. Black operations may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one’s own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, etc.  Since 9/11, many black operations and long time unethical standings have been approved for legality in the war on terror.  In other words, since September 11th, 2001, it is no a longer conspiracy for any of this to occur, a simple decision by a top level military or CIA official is enough, without oversight or even one thread of admission by the Government or Private conspirators.  Much of the Black operations today are performed by private contract companies like Blackwater (now Xe).

21. The CIA Assassinates A Lot Of People (Church Committee):

The Church Committee is the common term referring to the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the CIA and FBI after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair.  The Committee uncovered, among many other things, that the CIA had violated its charter to perform only gathering of intelligence.  For example, the assassinations of Allende in Chile and Mossadegh in Iran. Assassinations against Central and South American leaders and revolutionaries, as well as Africa, Middle East and East Asia.  The list was tremendous.  They even declassified a “Heart Attack Gun” the Agency had made for the use of killing someone without it being detected.  Cancer, car accidents, skiing accidents, suicide, boating accidents, heart attacks, and just plain being shot were common assassination methods.  The hearings, although recorded in full in congressional record, the mainstream media and official policies, is still largely not taught in American schools on recent history.  The American public still has no idea this was ever actually confirmed or even took place.  It is common for people to still refer to any of these assassinations as a joke or made up conspiracy.

Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon which caused heart attacks.

22. The New World Order:

This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will. The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group.  Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage.  They receive no media coverage.  The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what?

[efoods]Discussions at the meetings include the economy, world affairs, war and in general, world policy.  After the financial collapse, the Bilderberg played a key role in proposing that the world prepare for a new world order and have a standard world currency.  This was propsed shortly after by almost all attendees of the Bilderberg meeting.  During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term “new world order” to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic or liberal proposals for global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and N.A.T.O., and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism.  In the aftermath of the two World Wars, progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice.  American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein, on page 405, he wrote:

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents … to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement bent on creating a “real” new world order. A number of Fabian socialist intellectuals, such as British writer H. G. Wells in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined the term “new world order” as a synonym for the establishment of a full-fledged social democratic world government.  In the 1960s, a great deal of right-wing conspiracist attention, by groups like the John Birch Society and the Liberty Lobby, focused on the United Nations as the vehicle for creating the “One World Government”, and contributed to a conservative movement for United States withdrawal from the U.N.. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, “international bankers” would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated “international Jewish banking conspiracy” masterminded by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.  American televangelist Pat Robertson with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.

After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term “new world order” in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a “New Bretton Woods”, which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that “conspiracy theorists were right”.  In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists, such as American radio host Alex Jones, who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.

23. Kennedy Assassination

– the 2nd Investigation by Congress Few People Know About, United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA): The HSCA was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated by a conspiracy involving the mob, and potentially the CIA.  The House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a “probable conspiracy,” though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby’s mafia connections and potential CIA and/or FBI connections to Oswald.  To this day, many conspiracy deniers are unaware that the Congressional investigation into JFK’s assassination concluded beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was a conspiracy.  What made them come to this conclusion?  Aside from reading the report, many witnesses (some of whom were CIA agents and station chiefs in Dallas that morning) were killed the night before testifying.  For example, George de Mohrenschildt was a petroleum geologist who befriended Lee Harvey Oswald during the months preceding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy.  He also worked for the CIA.  He also blew his brains out the night before he was to testify to the committee.  The committee also uncovered, among many things, that Oswald left the marines where he learned how to speak fluent Russian (at the height of the cold war).  He was given money by the State Department to travel to Russia where he stopped off in Japan at a top secret US Military facility.  The Warren Commission even mentioned this part.  What most people do not know is that he probably was working in the Cold War infiltrating the Russians as either a “dangle,” “double agent,” or “defector” of some kind.  What is interesting is that upon his return he got more money from the State Department to buy a house and work with an ex FBI Chief and CIA officials in training anti-Castro Cubans for an invasion.  In Louisiana, where he was working, the CIA was involved in Operation Mongoose, Where Oswald worked under CIA Agent David Ferrie, who killed himself before testifying in a trial on the Assassination as well.  Operation Mongoose worked closely with Southern Mafia figures largely because the casinos in Cuba, which were shut down after Fidel obtained control over the country, were epicenters for control on the island.  The CIA even hired the mafia to assassinate Fidel on many occasions, 3 attempts which failed are common knowledge.  What is funny is that figures who worked very close with Oswald either ended up dead (over 100 of them connected to the assassination died within a few years of unusual circumstances) or they ended up in other conspiracies.

For instance, E Howard Hunt (CIA Agent) confessed to being involved in the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy on his deathbed.  E Howard Hunt was one of the Watergate Burglars.  Barry Seal, who worked with Oswald and Ferrie ended up being one of the largest cocaine smugglers in the United States during Iran Contra, as a key player for the agency and informant for the DEA.  There is so much more to get into, but there just isn’t enough time.  Oswald’s tax returns are still classified top secret to this day.  Why?  Perhaps he was still getting $$ from the United States, which places him on the payroll.  That money trail leads to figures, many of whom were murdered, that would have blown the story wide open.  For 14 years, most didn’t know this.  The HSCA investigaitons by congress went against the findings of the Warren Commission and both reports are from the same source, Congressional Committees.  Which is true?  Why do we only teach one to our children in school?


24. 1919 World Series Conspiracy:

The 1919 World Series (often referred to as the Black Sox Scandal) resulted in the most famous scandal in baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the Black Sox) were accused of throwing the series against the Cincinnati Reds.  Details of the scandal remain controversial, and the extent to which each player was involved varied. It was, however, front-page news across the country when the story was uncovered late in the 1920 season, and despite being acquitted of criminal charges (throwing baseball games was technically not a crime), the eight players were banned from organized baseball (i.e. the leagues subject to the National Agreement) for life.  There are hundreds of other conspiracies involving throwing games, sporting matches and large scale entertainment events.  It is common knowledge for many, this list would have to go into the thousands if we included all of them.

25. Karen Silkwood:

  Karen was an American labor union activist and chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plant near Crescent, Oklahoma, United States. Silkwood’s job was making plutonium pellets for nuclear reactor fuel rods.  After being hired at Kerr-McGee, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union local and took part in a strike at the plant. After the strike ended, she was elected to the union’s bargaining committee and assigned to investigate health and safety issues. She discovered what she believed to be numerous violations of health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment and improper storage of samples. She also believed the lack of sufficient shower facilities could increase the risk of employee contamination.  In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about these issues, alleging that safety standards had slipped because of a production speedup which resulted in employees being given tasks for which they were poorly trained. She also alleged that Kerr-McGee employees handled the fuel rods improperly and that the company falsified inspection records.  On November 5, 1974, Silkwood performed a routine self-check and found almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. She was decontaminated at the plant and sent home with a testing kit to collect urine and feces for further analysis. Oddly, though there was plutonium on the exterior surfaces (the ones she touched) of the gloves she had been using, the gloves did not have any holes.

This suggests the contamination did not come from inside the glove box, but from some other source, in other words, someone was trying to poison her.  The next morning, as she headed to a union negotiation meeting, she again tested positive for plutonium. This was surprising because she had only performed paperwork duties that morning. She was given a more intense decontamination. The following day, November 7, 1974, as she entered the plant, she was found to be dangerously contaminated — even expelling contaminated air from her lungs. A health physics team accompanied her back to her home and found plutonium traces on several surfaces — especially in the bathroom and the refrigerator. The house was later stripped and decontaminated. Silkwood, her partner and housemate were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory for in-depth testing to determine the extent of the contamination in their bodies.  Later that evening, Silkwood’s body was found in her car, which had run off the road and struck a culvert. The car contained no documents. She was pronounced dead at the scene from a “classic, one-car sleeping-driver accident”

26. CIA Drug Smuggling in Arkansas:

August 23, 1987, in a rural community just south of Little Rock, police officers murdered two teenage boys because they witnessed a police-protected drug drop.  The drop was part of a drug smuggling operation based at a small airport in Mena, Arkansas. The Mena operation was set up in the early 1980′s by the notorious drug smuggler, Barry Seal. Facing prison after a drug conviction in Florida, Seal flew to Washington, D.C., where he put together a deal that allowed him to avoid prison by becoming an informant for the government. As a government informant against drug smugglers, Seal testified he worked for the CIA and the DEA. In one federal court case, he testified that his income from March 1984 to August 1985, was between $700,000 and $800,000. This period was AFTER making his deal with the government. Seal testified that nearly $600,000 of this came from smuggling drugs while working for — and with the permission of the DEA. In addition to his duties as an informant, Seal was used by CIA operatives to help finance the Nicaraguan Contras. The CIA connection to the Mena operation was undeniable when a cargo plane given to Seal by the CIA was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of weapons. In spite of the evidence, every investigator who has tried to expose the crimes of Mena has been professionally destroyed, and those involved in drug smuggling operations have received continued protection from state and federal authorities.

27. Bohemian Grove:

For years, many conspiracy theorists were saying that the rich and powerful met every year in the woods and worshiped a giant stone owl in an occult fashion.  It turns out, ABC, CBS, NBC, and many other credible news agencies investigated this and found out, its true.  It is said to be just all fun and games, like brotherhood style fraternity stuff.

Bohemian Grove Secrecy Upheld, Nixon Speech 7-30-1971, NBC


28. Operation Paperclip:

Operation Paperclip was the code name for the 1945 Office of Strategic Services, Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency recruitment of German scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after VE Day.  President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he expressly ordered that anyone found “to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism” would be excluded.  These included Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold, who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a “menace to the security of the Allied Forces.” All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds “bleached” by the military; false employment histories were provided, and their previous Nazi affiliations were expunged from the record. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name.

29. The Round Table:

British businessman Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an “Imperial Federation” to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, of 1877, written at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal:  “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labor and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.”

In his later wills, a more mature Rhodes abandoned the idea and instead concentrated on what became the Rhodes Scholarship, which had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in 1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared world view among future British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at the University of Oxford.  Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end, Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and, with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to elicit their support. The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949 but it would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner and Curtis.  The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period.

Originally envisioned as a British-American group of scholars and diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S. secretary of state, Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on 29 July 1921. The first of the council’s projects was a quarterly journal launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs.  Some believe that the Council on Foreign Relations is a front organization for the Round Table as a tool of the “Anglo-American Establishment”, which they believe has been plotting from 1900 on to rule the world. The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of the American Old Right (Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to substantiate this view, even though he argued that the Establishment is not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic elites in the United Kingdom and the United States. Quigley also argued that, although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today it is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.

American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiographyMemoirs wherein, on page 405, he wrote: “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents … to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”  Barkun argues that this statement is partly facetious (the claim of “conspiracy” or “treason”) and partly serious – the desire to encourage trilateral cooperation among the U.S., Europe, and Japan, for example – an ideal that used to be a hallmark of the internationalist wing of the Republican Party when there was an internationalist wing.  However, the statement is taken at face value and widely cited by conspiracy theorists as proof that the Council on Foreign Relations (itself alleged to be a front for an “international banking cabal”, as well as, it is claimed, the sponsor of many “globalist” think tanks such as the Trilateral Commission) uses its role as the brain trust of American presidents, senators and representatives to manipulate them into supporting a New World Order.

Conspiracy theorists fear that the international bankers of financial capitalism are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”.  In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered:  “I don’t think that I really feel that we need a world government. We need governments of the world that work together and collaborate. But, I can’t imagine that there would be any likelihood or even that it would be desirable to have a single government elected by the people of the world … There have been people, ever since I’ve had any kind of position in the world, who have accused me of being ruler of the world. I have to say that I think for the large part, I would have to decide to describe them as crackpots. It makes no sense whatsoever, and isn’t true, and won’t be true, and to raise it as a serious issue seems to me to be irresponsible.”  Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup, argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an “imperial brain trust”, which has, for decades, played a central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the post-WWII international order and the Cold War, by determining what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table; while others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere policy discussion forum, which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy planning. The latter argue that it has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the group; all the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates and speakers; and as far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access to its historical archives.

30. The Illuminati:

The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded on May 1st, 1776, in Ingolstadt (Upper Bavaria), by Adam Weishaupt, who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. The movement consisted of freethinkers, secularists, liberals, republicans and pro-feminists, recruited in the Masonic Lodges of Germany, who sought to promote perfectionism through mystery schools. As a result, in 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the monarchy and state religion.  In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati survived their suppression and became the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being enlightened absolutists who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a world revolution in order to globalize the most radical ideals of the Enlightenment: anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent.  Although many say that the Illuminati was disbanded and destroyed  so long ago, it is well known that the Rothschild dynasty following the family’s involvement in the secret order in Bavaria received much attention for its major takeover of Europe’s central banks.  The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s wealth and evidence suggests it has funded both sides of major wars, including the United States Civil War.

31. The Trilateral Commission:

  The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations.  In July 1972, Rockefeller called his first meeting, which was held at Rockefeller’s Pocantico compound in New York’s Hudson Valley. It was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and industry.  Its first executive committee meeting was held in Tokyo in October 1973. The Trilateral Commission was officially initiated, holding biannual meetings.  A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975 meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade and Finance, said: “Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.” Another Commission document read:  “The overriding goal is to make the world safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides for each country against external and internal threats which will constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national government into the international exchange of both economic and non-economic goods.”

32. Big Brother or the Shadow Government:

  It is also called the “Deep State” by Peter Dale Scott, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.   A shadow government is a “government-in-waiting” that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event.  It turned out this was true on 9/11, when it was told to us by our mainstream media.  For years, this was ridiculed as a silly, crazy conspiracy theory and, like the others listed here, turned out to be 100% true.  It is also called the Continuity of Government.  The Continuity of Government (COG) is the principle of establishing defined procedures that allow a government to continue its essential operations in case of nuclear war or other catastrophic event.  Since the end of the cold war, the policies and procedures for the COG have been altered according to realistic threats of that time.  These include but are not limited to a possible coup or overthrow by right wing terrorist groups, a terrorist attack in general, an assassination, and so on.  Believe it or not the COG has been in effect since 2001.  After 9/11, it went into action.  Now here is the kicker, many of the figures in Iran Contra, the Watergate Scandal, the alleged conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and many others listed here are indeed members of the COG.  This is its own conspiracy as well.

The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World is a book written by Air Force Col. L fletcher Prouty, published in 1973.  From 1955 to 1963 Prouty was the “Focal Point Officer” for contacts between the CIA and the Pentagon on matters relating to military support for “black operations” but he was not assigned to the CIA and was not bound by any oath of secrecy. (From the first page of the 1974 Printing) It was one of the first tell-all books about the inner workings of the CIA and was an important influence on the Oliver Stone movie JFK. But the main thrust of the book is how the CIA started as a think tank to analyze intelligence gathered from military sources but has grown to the monster it has become. The CIA had no authority to run their own agents or to carry out covert operations but they quickly did both and much more. This book tells about things they actually did and a lot about how the operate.  In Prouty’s own words, from the 1997 edition ofThe Secret TeamThis is the fundamental game of the Secret Team. They have this power because they control secrecy and secret intelligence and because they have the ability to take advantage of the most modern communications system in the world, of global transportation systems, of quantities of weapons of all kinds, and when needed, the full support of a world-wide U.S. military supporting base structure. They can use the finest intelligence system in the world, and most importantly, they have been able to operate under the canopy of an assumed, ever-present enemy called “Communism.” It will be interesting to see what “enemy” develops in the years ahead. It appears that “UFO’s and Aliens” are being primed to fulfill that role for the future. To top all of this, there is the fact that the CIA, itself, has assumed the right to generate and direct secret operations. “ He is not the first to allege that UFOs and Aliens are going to be used as a threat against the world to globalize the planet under One government.

Bill Moyers, the American journalist and public commentator, has served as White House Press Secretary in the United States President Lyndon B. Johnson Administration from 1965 to 1967. He worked as a news commentator on television for ten years. Moyers has had an extensive involvement with public television, producing documentaries and news journal programs. He has won numerous awards and honorary degrees. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media. Since 1990, Moyers has been President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.  He is considered by many to be a very credible outlet for the truth.  He released a documetnary titled, The Secret Government, which exposed the inner workings of a secret government much more vast that most people would ever imagine. Though originally broadcast in 1987, it is even more relevant today. Interviews with respected top military, intelligence, and government insiders reveal both the history and secret objectives of powerful groups in the hidden shadows of our government.

For another powerful, highly revealing documentary on the manipulations of the secret government produced by BBC. The intrepid BBC team clearly shows how the War on Terror is largely a fabrication. For those interested in very detailed information on the composition of the shadow or secret government from a less well-known source.

33. The Federal Reserve Bank:

The fundamental promise of a central bank like the Federal Reserve is economic stability.  The theory is that manipulating the value of the currency allows financial booms to go higher, and crashes to be more mild.  If growth becomes speculative and unsustainable, the central bank can make the price of money go up and force some deleveraging of risky investments – again, promising to make the crashes more mild.  The period leading up to the American revolution was characterized by increasingly authoritarian legislation from England.  Acts passed in 1764 had a particularly harsh effect on the previously robust colonial economy.  The Sugar Act was in effect a tax cut on easily smuggled molasses, and a new tax on commodities that England more directly controlled trade over.  The navy would be used in increased capacity to enforce trade laws and collect duties.  Perhaps even more significant than the militarization and expansion of taxes was the Currency Act passed later in the year 1764.

“The colonies suffered a constant shortage of currency with which to conduct trade. There were no gold or silver mines and currency could only be obtained through trade as regulated by Great Britain. Many of the colonies felt no alternative to printing their own paper money in the form of Bills of Credit.”   The result was a true free market of currency – each bank competed, exchange rates fluctuated wildly, and merchants were hesitant to accept these notes as payment.  Of course, they didn’t have 24-hour digital Forex markets, but I’ll hold off opinions on the viability of unregulated currency for another time.  England’s response was to seize control of the colonial money supply – forbidding banks, cities, and colony governments from printing their own.  This law, passed so soon after the Sugar Act, started to really bring revolutionary tension inside the colonies to a higher level.  American bankers had learned early on that debasing a currency through inflation is a helpful way to pay off perpetual trade deficits – but Britain proved that the buyer of the currency would only take the deal for so long…  Following the (first) American Revolution, the “First Bank of the United States” was chartered to pay off collective war debts, and effectively distribute the cost of the revolution proportionately throughout all of the states.  Although the bank had vocal and harsh skeptics, it only controlled about 20% of the nation’s money supply.

Compared to today’s central bank, it was nothing.  Thomas Jefferson argued vocally against the institution of the bank, mostly citing constitutional concerns and the limitations of government found in the 10th amendment.  There was one additional quote that hints at the deeper structural flaw of a central bank in a supposedly free capitalist economy.  “the existing banks will, without a doubt, enter into arrangements for lending their agency, and the more favorable, as there will be a competition among them for it; whereas the bill delivers us up bound to the national bank, who are free to refuse all arrangement, but on their own terms, and the public not free, on such refusal, to employ any other bank” –Thomas Jefferson.  Basically, the existing banks will fight over gaining favor with the central bank – rather than improving their performance relative to a free market.  The profit margins associated with collusion would obviously outweigh the potential profits gained from legitimate business.  The Second Bank of the United States was passed five years after the first bank’s charter expired.  An early enemy of central banking, President James Madison, was looking for a way to stabilize the currency in 1816.  This bank was also quite temporary – it would only stay in operation until 1833 when President Andrew Jackson would end federal deposits at the institution.

The charter expired in 1836 and the private corporation was bankrupt and liquidated by 1841.  While the South had been the major opponent of central banking systems, the end of the Civil War allowed for (and also made necessary) the system of national banks that would dominate the next fifty years.  The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) says that this post-war period of a unified national currency and system of national banks “worked well.” [3]  Taxes on state banks were imposed to encourage people to use the national banks – but liquidity problems persisted as the money supply did not match the economic cycles.  Overall, the American economy continued to grow faster than Europe, but the period did not bring economic stability by any stretch of the imagination.  Several panics and runs on the bank – and it became a fact of life under this system of competing nationalized banks.  In 1873, 1893, 1901, and 1907 significant panics caused a series of bank failures.

The new system wasn’t stable at all, in fact, many suspected it was wraught with fraud and manipulation.  The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis is not shy about attributing the causes of the Panic of 1907 to financial manipulation from the existing banking establishment.  “If Knickerbocker Trust would falter, then Congress and the public would lose faith in all trust companies and banks would stand to gain, the bankers reasoned.”  In timing with natural economic cycles, major banks including J.P. Morgan and Chase launched an all-out assault on Heinze’s Knickerbocker Trust.  Financial institutions on the inside started silently selling off assets in the competitor, and headlines about a few bad loans started making top spots in the newspapers.  The run on Knickerbocker turned into a general panic – and the Federal Government would come to the rescue of its privately owned “National Banks.”  During the Panic of 1907, “Depositors ‘run’ on the Knickerbocker Bank. J.P. Morgan and James Stillman of First National City Bank (Citibank) act as a “central bank,” providing liquidity … [to stop the bank run]  President Theodore Roosevelt provides Morgan with $25 million in government funds … to control the panic. Morgan, acting as a one-man central bank, decides which firms will fail and which firms will survive.”  How did JP Morgan get so powerful that the government would provide them with funding to increase their power?  They had key influence with positions inside the Administrations.

They had senators, congressmen, lobbyists, media moguls all working for them.  In 1886, a group of millionaires purchased Jekyll Island and converted it into a winter retreat and hunting ground, the USA’s most exclusive club. By 1900, the club’s roster represented 1/6th of the world’s wealth. Names like Astor, Vanderbilt, Morgan, Pulitzer and Gould filled the club’s register. Non- members, regardless of stature, were not allowed. Dignitaries like Winston Churchill and President McKinley were refused admission.  In 1908, the year after a national money panic purportedly created by J. P. Morgan, Congress established, in 1908, a National Monetary Authority. In 1910 another, more secretive, group was formed consisting of the chiefs of major corporations and banks in this country. The group left secretly by rail from Hoboken, New Jersey, and traveled anonymously to the hunting lodge on Jekyll Island.  In fact, the Clubhouse/hotel on the island has two conference rooms named for the “Federal Reserve.”  The meeting was so secret that none referred to the other by his last name. Why the need for secrecy?

Frank Vanderlip wrote later in the Saturday Evening Post, “…it would have been fatal to Senator Aldrich’s plan to have it known that he was calling on anybody from Wall Street to help him in preparing his bill…I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.”  At Jekyll Island, the true draftsman for the Federal Reserve was Paul Warburg. The plan was simple. The new central bank could not be called a central bank because America did not want one, so it had to be given a deceptive name. Ostensibly, the bank was to be controlled by Congress, but a majority of its members were to be selected by the private banks that would own its stock.  To keep the public from thinking that the Federal Reserve would be controlled from New York, a system of twelve regional banks was designed. Given the concentration of money and credit in New York, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York controlled the system, making the regional concept initially nothing but a ruse.

The board and chairman were to be selected by the President, but in the words of Colonel Edward House, the board would serve such a term as to “put them out of the power of the President.” The power over the creation of money was to be taken from the people and placed in the hands of private bankers who could expand or contract credit as they felt best suited their needs.  Why the opposition to a central bank?  Americans at the time knew of the destruction to the economy the European central banks had caused to their respective countries and to countries who became their debtors. They saw the large- scale government deficit spending and debt creation that occurred in Europe.  But European financial moguls didn’t rest until the New World was within their orbit. In 1902, Paul Warburg, a friend and associate of the Rothschilds and an expert on European central banking, came to this country as a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and Company.

He married the daughter of Solomon Loeb, one of the founders of the firm. The head of Kuhn, Loeb was Jacob Schiff, whose gift of $20 million in gold to the struggling Russian communists in 1917 no doubt saved their revolution.  The Fed controls the banking system in the USA, not the Congress nor the people indirectly (as the Constitution dictates). The U.S. central bank strategy is a product of European banking interests.  Government interventionists got their wish in 1913 with the Federal Reserve (and income tax amendment).  Just in time, too, because the nation needed a new source of unlimited cash to finance both sides of WW1 and eventually our own entry to the war.  After the war, with both sides owing us debt through the federal reserve backed banks, the center of finance moved from London to New York.  But did the Federal Reserve reign in the money trusts and interlocking directorates?  Not by a long shot.  If anything, the Federal Reserve granted new powers to the National Banks by permitting overseas branches and new types of banking services.  The greatest gift to the bankers, was a virtually unlimited supply of loans when they experience liquidity problems.

From the early 1920s to 1929, the monetary supply expanded at a rapid pace and the nation experienced wild economic growth.  Curiously, however, the number of banks started to decline for the first time in American history.  Toward the end of the period, speculation and loose money had propelled asset and equity prices to unreal levels.  The stock market crashed, and as the banks struggled with liquidity problems, the Federal Reserve actually cut the money supply.  Without a doubt, this is the greatest financial panic and economic collapse in American history – and it never could have happened  on this scale without the Fed’s intervention.  The number of banks crashed and a few of the old robber barons’ banks managed to swoop in and grab up thousands of competitors for pennies on the dollar.


For links, videos and special comments you can find on web link here:


Top 5 Illuminati Tools of Control – America’s NWO Soldiers

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011


Fri, Dec 16, 2011

Subject: Great Plan of the Illuminati

Andrew Gavin Marshall Date: Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM

The Council on Foreign Relations and the 'Grand Area' of the American Empire

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:35

by Andrew Gavin Marshall

Recently by Andrew Gavin Marshall:

The Rockefeller World, Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission



NOTE: The following is a brief six-page excerpt from a 60-page chapter on the origins of the American Empire at the end of World War II. The chapter, nearly complete, is one of several chapters in a book being funded and facilitated through The People’s Book Project, which is aimed at producing a multi-volume book on a modern history of institutions and ideas of power and resistance. Included within the volumes are: the emergence of nation-states, capitalism, and central banking; the rise of the European empires and colonization; the emergence of new dynastic powers, namely the banking and industrial families of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, et. al.; the development of the mass education system as a means of social control; the emergence and evolution of university education, the social sciences, and the formation of new concepts of social control and methods of social engineering; the development, purpose, and effects of philanthropic foundations on society; the emergence and evolution of the consumer culture, advertising, public relations, and advanced systems of propaganda; the development of the “modern institutional society”, with an examination of the different brands in Communist, Fascist, and Liberal Democratic states; the development and intent of the Welfare State, social services, and management of the poor; the effect of two world wars, and the formation of the American Empire with its political, military, intelligence, economic, financial, and cultural apparatus and institutions of expansion, including the American foundations, think tanks, World Bank, IMF, UN, NATO, CIA, Pentagon, etc.; the role of international think tanks like the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission in shaping and re-shaping world order and expanding dominance and control of the world; the formation of an apparatus of global governance and the ideology of globalism; population control and the environmental movement; and finally the emergence, evolution, and role of science, technology, psychology, and psychiatry on the development of a global scientific dictatorship… and what we can do to change all of this!

The above is not even an exhaustive list of the scope of this multi-volume book. Over 500 pages has been written thus far, and there is a great deal more to go, at which point the end result will be broken up into relevant sections as a complete volume on the modern history of ideas and institutions of power in our world, asking and answering the questions: What is the nature of our global society? How did we get here? Who brought us here? When did this begin? Where are we going? Why? … and what can we do to change it.

The People’s Book Project is currently in need of support, as it has run out of funds. Please donate to help ensure that this project can move forward and help support an effort to provide a new examination of our world, and a new understanding in how we can go about changing it! Thank you.

Chapter Excerpt: The Making of the American Empire

The process of establishing an American Empire during and after World War II was not – as has been postulated (by those who even admit there is such a thing as an “American Empire”) – an “accident” of history, something America seemingly stumbled into as a result of its unhindered economic growth and military-political position as arbiter of world peace and prosperity. A vast literature has developed in the academic realm and policy circles – particularly within Political Science and the think tank community, respectively – which postulates a notion of “American empire” or “American hegemony” as accidental, incidental, benevolent, reluctant, and desirable.

Robert Kagan is a prominent American neoconservative historian. He is a Senior Fellow at the prestigious think tank, the Brookings Institution, was a founder of the neoconservative think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), formerly worked at the State Department in the Reagan administration under Secretary of State, George Shultz, and served for over a decade as a Senior Associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and is, of course, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Kagan has written a great deal on the notion of American hegemony. As he wrote in the journal, Foreign Policy, in 1998, “the truth about America’s dominant role in the world is known to most clear-eyed international observers.” This truth, according to Kagan, “is that the benevolent hegemony exercised by the United States is good for a vast portion of the world’s population.” Samuel Huntington, another Council member and prominent American strategist, wrote that, “A world without U.S. primacy will be a world with more violence and disorder and less democracy and economic growth than a world where the United States continues to have more influence than any other country shaping global affairs.”[1] This “Benevolent Empire” – as Kagan titles his article – rests on such fundamental ideas as the notion “that American freedom depends on the survival and spread of freedom elsewhere,” and that, “American prosperity cannot occur in the absence of global prosperity.” For half a century, Kagan wrote, Americans “have been guided by the kind of enlightened self-interest that, in practice, comes dangerously close to resembling generosity.”[2]

Sebastian Mallaby, a Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Editorial Board Member and columnist at the Washington Post as well as correspondent and bureau chief for The Economist, wrote in the journal Foreign Affairs, that “empire’s are not always planned,” referring to America as “The Reluctant Imperialist.”[3] Lawrence Summers, another prominent economist, politician, and policy-maker for the Clinton and Obama administrations, referred to America as “history’s only nonimperialist superpower.”[4] Niall Ferguson, a prominent British liberal economic historian, has written extensively on the open acknowledgement of “American Empire,” but stipulates, as he did in his book Colossus, “that the United States is an empire and that this might not be wholly bad.” Referring to America as an “Unconscious Colossus,” Ferguson stressed that, “a self-conscious American imperialism might well be preferable to the available alternatives.”[5] Ferguson in fact stresses the need for Americans to “recognize the imperial characteristics of their own power today [writing in 2005] and, if possible, to learn from the achievements and failures of past empires.” This, Ferguson felt, would reduce the so-called “perils” of being an “empire in denial.”[6]

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., famed American liberal historian and adviser to President Kennedy, wrote that the United States enjoys “an informal empire – military bases, status-of-forces agreements, trade concessions, multinational corporations, cultural penetrations, and other favors,” yet, contends Schlesinger, “these are marginal to the subject of direct control,” and instead, “far from ruling an empire in the old sense,” America “has become the virtual prisoner of its client states.”[7] Some other commentators referred to America as a “virtual” or even “inadvertent” imperial power.[8]

The notion of America as a “reluctant imperialist” or a “benevolent empire” is not a new one. This has been the mainstay within the academic literature and policy-planning circles to both advocate for and justify the existence of American domination of the world. The concept of the reluctant, yet benevolent great power presents an image of a dutiful personage coming to the aid of those in need, following the responsibility which is derived from great power; that America’s rise to economic prominence – also seen as the product of free and democratic initiative and ideals (thus negating America’s long history of being a slave state and subsequently a brutal industrial society) – was the precursor to America being thrown the title of “global power,” and with that title bestowed upon it – like a child-king still unsure of his own abilities to rule – took up the activities of a global power with a desire to bring the rest of the world the same altruistic truths and enlightened ideals which made America flourish so; that America’s gift to the world was to spread freedom and democracy, in the economic, political, and social spheres. This myth has been a constant foundation for the advocacy and justification of empire. Its importance rests most especially on the ideals and global public opinion which prevailed as the great European empires waned and ultimately collapsed through two World Wars.

The colonized peoples of the world had had enough of empire, had suffered so immeasurably and consistently under its tutelage, that the concept of empire was so discredited in the eyes of the world’s majority as to be incapable of justifying in the formal imperial-colonial sense. At home, America’s domestic political situation and public opinion had been largely isolationist, seeking to refrain from an expansive foreign policy, leading many American presidents and strategists to bemoan the struggle for empire beyond the continent on the reluctance of the American people and Congress to pursue aggressive expansionism (save for the expansion across the continent, wiping out Native American populations for American Lebensraum and the slow, increasing expression of trans-sovereign rights in Latin America, long considered “America’s backyard”).

World War II, then, presented a new opportunity, and a new challenge for America in the world. The opportunity was to become the worlds most powerful empire history had ever witnessed; the challenge, then, was to justify it in explicitly anti-imperial rhetoric. America, thus, was not a reluctant or accidental empire, nor, for that matter, a benevolent one. America was chosen to be an empire; it was strategised, discussed, debated, planned and implemented. The key architects of this empire were the bankers and corporations which arose out of America’s Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century, the philanthropic foundations they established in the early 20th century, the prominent think tanks created throughout the first half of the 20th century, and the major academics, strategists and policy-makers who emerged from the foundation-funded universities, institutes, think tanks, and the business community, and who dominated the corridors of power in the planning circles that made policy.

No sooner had World War II begun than American strategists began calling for a new global American empire. Henry R. Luce, a Yale graduate and founder of Time Magazine, Life, and Fortune, was among America’s most influential publishers in the first half of the 20th century. A strong supporter of the Republican Party and virulent anti-Communist, Luce was also a staunch advocate of fascism in Europe – notably Mussolini’s Italy and Nazi Germany – as a means of preventing the spread of Communism. In 1941, Luce wrote a famous article in Life entitled, “The American Century,” in which he stated that, “the 20th Century must be to a significant degree an American Century.” Luce wrote that America has “that indefinable, unmistakable sign of leadership: prestige.” As such, unlike past empires like Rome, Genghis Khan, or Imperial Britain, “American prestige throughout the world is faith in the good intentions as well as the ultimate intelligence and ultimate strength of the whole American people.”[9] Luce felt that the “abundant life” of America should be made available “for all mankind,” as soon as mankind embraces “America’s vision.” Luce wrote:

It must be a sharing with all peoples of our Bill of Rights, our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, our magnificent industrial products, our technical skills. It must be an internationalism of the people, by the people and for the people… We must undertake now to be the Good Samaritan of the entire world.[10]


While Luce was perhaps the first theorist to posit the specific concept of “the American Century,” the actual work done to create this century (or at least the latter half of it) for America was chiefly initiated by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the prominent strategist Dean Acheson, among others. As Germany invaded Poland in 1939, Dean Acheson delivered a speech at Yale entitled, “An American Attitude Toward Foreign Affairs,” in which he articulated a vision of America in the near future, and as he later recalled, it was at the time of delivering this speech that Acheson began “work on a new postwar world system.” Acheson declared in his speech that, “Our vital interests… do not permit us to be indifferent to the outcome” of the wars erupting in Europe and Asia. The causes of the war, according to Acheson, were in “the failure of some mechanisms of the Nineteenth Century world economy,” which resulted in “this break-up of the world into exclusive areas for armed exploitation administered along oriental lines.” Recreating a world peace, posited Acheson, would require “a broader market for goods made under decent standards,” as well as “a stable international monetary system” and the removal of “exclusive preferential trade agreements.” Essentially, it was an advocacy for a global liberal economic order as the means to world peace, and without a hint of irony, Acheson then called for the immediate establishment of “a navy and air force adequate to secure us in both oceans simultaneously and with striking power sufficient to reach to the other side of each of them.”[11] Dean Acheson was also closely involved in the Council on Foreign Relations’ plans for the shaping of the post-War world order.

The Council on Foreign Relations and the “Grand Area”

Before America had even entered the war in late 1941, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was planning for America’s assumed entry into the war. The CFR effectively undertook a policy coup d’état over American foreign policy with the Second World War. When war broke out, the Council began a “strictly confidential” project called the War and Peace Studies, in which top CFR members collaborated with the US State Department in determining US policy, and the project was entirely financed by the Rockefeller Foundation.[12] The War and Peace Studies project had come up with a number of initiatives for the post-War world. One of the most important objectives it laid out was the identification of what areas of the world America would need to control in order to facilitate strong economic growth. This came to be known as the “Grand Area,” and it included:

Latin America, Europe, the colonies of the British Empire, and all of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asia was necessary as a source of raw materials for Great Britain and Japan and as a consumer of Japanese products. The American national interest was then defined in terms of the integration and defense of the Grand Area, which led to plans for the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank and eventually to the decision to defend Vietnam from a Communist takeover at all costs.[13]


In 1940, the Council on Foreign Relations also began a wide-ranging study of the war-time economic needs of the United States (prior to U.S. entry into the war), called the Financial and Economic Experts, which divided the world into four main blocs: continental Europe (which was dominated by Germany at the time), the U.S. –Western hemisphere, the United Kingdom and its colonial and commonwealth nations, and the Far-East-Pacific Area, including Japan, China, and the Dutch East Indies. The study compiled a list of each region’s main imports and exports. Upon completion of the study in the fall of 1940, the Council sent its conclusions and policy recommendations to President Roosevelt and the State Department. The conclusions stated that the United States needed larger export markets for its products, and specifically that the U.S. needed “living space” (or as the Nazi German state referred to it, Lebensraum) throughout the Western hemisphere and beyond, as well as trade and “economic integration” with the Far East and the British Empire/Commonwealth blocs. The report stated bluntly, “as a minimum, the American ‘national interests’ involved the free access to markets and raw materials in the British Empire, the Far East, and the entire Western hemisphere.”[14]

This was the foundation for the Grand Area designs of the Council in the post-War world. The Grand Area project emphasized that for America to manage the “Grand Areas” of the world, multilateral organizations would be needed to help facilitate “appropriate measures in the fields of trade, investment, and monetary arrangements.” The study further emphasized the need to maintain “military supremacy” in order to help facilitate control of these areas. As the Council’s 1940 report to the U.S. State Department stated: “The foremost requirement of the United States in a world in which it proposes to hold unquestioned power is the rapid fulfillment of a program of complete re-armament,” which would “involve increased military expenditures and other risks.”[15]

While the Grand Area project was made and designed for the United States during World War II, it included plans for the post-War world, and included continental Europe in its designs following the assumed defeat of Germany. Thus, as economist Ismael Hossein-Zadeh wrote, “making the Grand Area global.” The idea behind the “Grand Area” was “even more grandiose – one world economy dominated by the United States,” and the study itself suggested that the Grand Area “would then be an organized nucleus for building an integrated world economy after the war.”[16] As Shoup and Minter wrote in their study of the Council, Imperial Brain Trust, “the United States had to enter the war and organize a new world order satisfactory to the United States.”[17] Benevolent, indeed.

Following Pearl Harbor and the U.S. entry into the War, the Council concluded as early as 1941 that the defeat of the Axis powers was simply a matter of time. As such, they were advancing their plans for the post-War world, expanding the Grand Area to:

include the entire globe. A new world order with international political and economic institutions was projected, which would join and integrate all of the earth’s nations under the leadership of the United States. The Unification of the whole world was now the aim of the Council [on Foreign Relations] and government planners.[18]

As a part of this planning process, the U.S. Department of State formed the Advisory Committee on Postwar Foreign Policy in late December of 1941, of which the first document that was produced, “stressed the danger of another world depression and the need to provide confidence in world economic stability.” Thus, “the United States had to be involved with the internal affairs of the key industrial and raw materials-producing countries.” A key question in this was, as one postwar planner articulated, “how to create purchasing power outside of our country which would be converted into domestic purchasing power through exportation.” The idea was about “devising appropriate institutions” which would fulfill this role, ultimately resting with the formation of the IMF and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (later known as the World Bank). The postwar planners had to continually construct an idea of an international order, directed by the United States, which would not so easily resemble the formal colonial period or its methods of exerting hegemony.[19]


Recommendations of the Council suggested that such new international financial institutions were necessary in terms of “stabilizing currencies and facilitating programs of capital investment for constructive undertakings in backward and underdeveloped regions.” These plans included for the establishment of an International Reconstruction Finance Corporations and an “international investment agency which would stimulate world trade and prosperity by facilitating investment in development programs the world over.” These plans were drafted in recommendations and given to President Roosevelt and the Department of State.[20]

One Council member suggested that, “It might be wise to set up two financial institutions: one an international exchange stabilization board and one an international bank to handle short-term transactions not directly concerned with stabilization.” Thus, the Council drafted in 1941 and 1942 plans that would result in the formation of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which formally emerged from the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, an event that is commonly acknowledged as the “birthplace” of the World Bank and IMF, thus ignoring their ideological origins at the Council on Foreign Relations two-to-three years prior. The internal department committees established in the Department of State and Treasury were well represented by Council members who drew up the final plans for the creation of these two major institutions.[21]

Whereas the League of Nations had been a major objective of the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Corporation-funded Council on Foreign Relations following World War I, so too was the United Nations near the end of World War II. A steering committee consisting of U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull and five Council on Foreign Relations members was formed in 1943. One of the Council members, Isaiah Bowman,

suggested a way to solve the problem of maintaining effective control over weaker territories while avoiding overt imperial conquest. At a Council [on Foreign Relations] meeting in May 1942, he stated that the United States had to exercise the strength needed to assure “security,” and at the same time “avoid conventional forms of imperialism.” The way to do this, he argued, was to make the exercise of that power international in character through a United Nations body.[22]

The “secret steering committee,” later called the Informal Agenda Group, undertook a series of consultations and meetings with foreign governments which would be essential in creating the new institution, including the Soviet Union, Canada, and Britain, and the Charter of the United Nations was subsequently decided upon with the consent of President Roosevelt in June 1944.[23] The Informal Agenda Group was made up of six individuals, including Secretary of State Cordell Hull. All of them, with the exception of Hull, were Council members. President Roosevelt had referred to them as “my postwar advisers,” and aside from formal policy recommendations, they “served as advisers to the Secretary of State and the President on the final decisions.” By December 1943, a new member was added to the Group, Under Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., who was not only a Council member, but was also a former top executive at United States Steel and was the son of a partner in the J.P. Morgan Bank. After the Group had drafted the recommendations for a United Nations body, Secretary Hull had asked three lawyers to rule on its constitutionality. The three lawyers he chose were Charles Evan Hughes, John W. Davis, and Nathan L. Miller. Both Hughes and Davis were Council members, and John Davis was even a former President of the Council and remained as a Director.[24] John D. Rockefeller Jr. subsequently gifted the United Nations with $8.5 million in order to buy the land for its headquarters in New York City.[25]

NOTE: This was but a small sample from the chapter on the origins of the American Empire in the post-World War II world. The very same chapter includes the internal policy discussions relating to the formation of the Cold War, the establishment of the National Security State, and the advancement of policy programs aimed at securing the “Grand Areas” for American dominance around the world. The chapter also studies the emergence of the Marshall Plan, NATO, European integration, the Bilderberg Group, and a number of other institutions and ideas related to establishing and expanding a “New World Order.”


[1] Robert Kagan, “The Benevolent Empire,” Foreign Policy (No. 111, Summer 1998), page 26.

[2] Ibid, page 28.

[3] Sebastian Mallaby, “The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States, and the Case for American Empire,” Foreign Affairs (Vol. 81, No. 2, March-April 2002), page 6.

[4] Ibid, page 2.

[5] Niall Ferguson, “The Unconscious Colossus: Limits of (& Alternatives to) American Empire,” Daedalus (Vol. 134, No. 2, On Imperialism, Spring 2005), page 21.

[6] Ibid, pages 21-22.

[7] Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., “The American Empire? Not so Fast,” World Policy Journal (Vol. 22, No. 1, Spring 2005), page 45.

[8] Michael Cox, “Empire by Denial: The Strange Case of the United States,” International Affairs (Vol. 81, No. 1, January 2005), page 18.

[9] Geir Lundestad, “‘Empire by Invitation’ in the American Century,” Diplomatic History (Vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 1999), page 189.

[10] Bruce Cumings, “The American Century and the Third World,” Diplomatic History (Vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 1999), page 356.

[11] Ibid, pages 358-359.

[12] CFR, War and Peace. CFR History:

[13] Joan Roelofs, Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism (New York: State University of New York Press, 2003), page 74.

[14] Ismael Hossein-Zadeh, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pages 43-45.

[15] Ibid, page 45.

[16] Ibid, page 46.

[17] Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (Authors Choice Press, New York: 2004), page 118.

[18] Ismael Hossein-Zadeh, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), page 48.

[19] Ibid, pages 49-51.

[20] Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (Authors Choice Press, New York: 2004), pages 166-167.

[21] Ibid, pages 168-169.

[22] Joan Roelofs, Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism (New York: State University of New York Press, 2003), page 159.

[23] Ismael Hossein-Zadeh, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), page 51.

[24] Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (Authors Choice Press, New York: 2004), pages 169-171.

[25] Joan Roelofs, Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism (New York: State University of New York Press, 2003), page 160.

Reprinted with permission from Andrew Gavin Marshall's website.



December 14, 2011

Andrew Gavin Marshall is an independent researcher and writer based in Montreal, Canada, writing on a number of social, political, economic, and historical issues. He is also Project Manager of The People’s Book Project. Visit his website.

Copyright © 2011 Andrew Gavin Marshall




Top 200 NWO Thugs – Bretton Woods 2 Dismantling America

Monday, April 11th, 2011

 Pete Papaherakles

Fri  Apr 8, 2011

Subject:  George Soros Convenes Bretton Woods 2  

04-08-2011 1:18 am – Pete Papaherakles –

Internationalist billionaire George Soros is holding his international conference April 8 to April 11 at Bretton Woods, N.H., the noted birthplace of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, where he plans to “rearrange the entire financial order,” as he noted in a November 2009 article in The Japan Times Online.

This “Bretton Woods II” comes along just as the Trilateral Commission will be meeting at the same time in Washington, D.C. With an apparent goal of creating nothing less than a new global economy, Soros is spending $50 million in New Hampshire to bring together up to 200 academic, business and government policy leaders under his Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET).

As AFP goes to press, the attendees are to include ex-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and World Bank executive and Nobel Prize winner in economics Joseph Stiglitz.

The conference is slated for the Mount Washington Hotel, site of the historic 1944 Bretton Woods conference, which established the post-World War II international financial architecture.

Soros chose this site because he expects his proposed reforms to be as radical as those promoted by British economist John Maynard Keynes, the much-praised “genius” of the original Bretton Woods project.

Keynesian economics have been portrayed as a cure to the Western world’s postwar devastation, in that governments were liberated of money creation restrictions imposed by the gold standard, even while global financiers controlled much of the world’s gold like they do now. Governments, under the new paradigm after the war, were encouraged to promote economic growth and macroeconomic stability by creating more debt-based money for everything that ailed the economy—debt that has brought most of the world’s economies to the brink of bankruptcy.

Now Soros comes along as the new Keynes to save the day by proposing another miracle solution to our problems, couched in lofty doublespeak such as “reform,” “cooperation” and “equal participation.” Soros is proposing the end of sovereignty as we know it.

“Reorganizing the world order will need to extend beyond the financial system,” Soros wrote in his opinion piece.

Soros is saying that a washed-up America should be replaced by a world government with a global currency under UN rule. He also advocates that China should be top dog while we play second fiddle. What Soros doesn’t say is that two decades of outsourcing U.S. industry, opening the borders and bankrupting the economy with pointless wars and other debacles have been intentionally orchestrated so that now international bankers can tell the world the system is broken and that the individuals who broke it need to show us how to fix it.

Georgy Schwartz, aka George Soros, is a Hungarian Jew who has been described as anti-God, anti-family and anti-American. By his own admission he even helped confiscate the homes of fellow Jews in Hungary in 1944.

In an interview with Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes he said 1944 was the best year of his life. Asked by Kroft if he felt any remorse, he answered, “No, not at all; I rather enjoyed it.”

“No feelings of guilt?” asked Kroft. “No,” answered Soros, “only feelings of power.”

Soros made his first billion as a currency speculator in 1992 by shorting the British pound and causing misery to millions of hardworking British citizens. He went on to cause the 1999 Russiagate scandal, almost collapsing the Russian economy. It was described as “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.”

He did the same to Thailand and Malaysia in 1997, causing the Asian financial crisis of that time. Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad called him “a villain and a moron,” while Thailand’s PM referred to him as “Dracula.” He also helped dismantle Yugoslavia and caused major trouble in Japan, Indonesia, Georgia, Ukraine and Burma by raiding their economies.

Soros also fosters cultural degeneracy by supporting abortion rights, atheism, drug legalization, sex education, euthanasia, feminism, gun control, globalization, mass immigration, gay marriage etc. Soros funded Barack Obama’s campaign and often visits the White House.

At 81, taking down America appears to be his final challenge. “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States. The time has come for a very serious adjustment,” he said."

Economic Collapse – Treachery by British Politicians

Sunday, October 3rd, 2010

We must treat every election as a referendum.  Hitler would have done less damage to Liberty in Europe and America than these British thugs.  From across the Atlantic Pond, these are the people who have been killing our economy and our future.

America is still a Colony of England.  The Crown has handed America to the Vatican.  Under the Black Pope these Jesuit priests, CFR cowards, and Trilateral Commission thugs are guilty of Crimes Against Humanity and treason.  We all should memorize the names on these lists.  It may surprise you, who our enemies are. 

Fri  Sept 24, 2010
Subject: List of Trilateral Commission






(as of May 15, 2001)

Graham Allison, Director, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University
G. Allen Andreas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Illinois
Michael H. Armacost, President, The Brookings Institution; former U.S. Ambassador to Japan; former U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs
C. Michael Armstrong, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, AT&T
D. Euan Baird, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Schlumberger Limited
C. Fred Bergsten*, Director, Institute for International Economics; former U.S. Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs
Susan V. Berresford, President, The Ford Foundation, New York
Conrad M. Black, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Hollinger International Inc., Hollinger Canadian Publishing Holdings Inc. and Southam Inc., Toronto
new Geoffrey T. Boisi, Vice Chairman, J.P. Morgan Chase, New York; Co-Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Morgan
new Stephen W. Bosworth, Dean, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University; former U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Korea
Harold Brown, Counselor, Center for Strategic and International Studies; General Partner, Warburg Pincus & Company, New York; former U.S. Secretary of Defense
John H. Bryan, Chairman, Sara Lee Corporation.
Zbigniew Brzezinski*, Counselor, Centerfor Strategic and International Studies; Robert Osgood Professor of American Foreign Affairs, Paul Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University; former Assistant to the Presidentfor National Security Affairs
Gerhard Casper, President Emeritus, Stanford University, California
William T. Coleman, Jr., Senior Partner and Senior Counselor, O'Melveny & Myers, Washington, D.C.; former U.S. Secretary of Transportation
Richard N. Cooper, Maurits C. Boas Professor of International Economics, Harvard University; former Chairman, National Intelligence Council; former U.S. Under-Secretary of State for Economic Affairs
E. Gerald Corrigan, Managing Director, Goldman, Sachs & Co.; former President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Dennis D. Dammerman, Vice Chairman and Executive Officer, General Electric Company
new Lodewijk J. R. de Vink, Chairman, Global Health Care Partners; former Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Warner-Lambert Company
André Desmarais, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Power Corporation of Canada, Montréal; Deputy Chairman, Power Financial Corporation
John M. Deutch, Institute Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; former Director, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency; former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense
Peter C. Dobell, Founding Director, Parliamentary Centre, Ottawa
Wendy K. Dobson, Professor and Director, Institute for International Business, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; former Associate Deputy Minister of Finance
Jessica P. Einhorn*, Consultant, Clark and Weinstock, Washington, D.C.; former Managing Director for Finance and Resource Mobilization, World Bank
Jeffrey Epstein, President, J. Epstein & Company, Inc.; President, N.A. Property Inc., New York
William T. Esrey, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Sprint Corporation
Dianne Feinstein, Member, U.S. Senate
new Sandra Feldman, President, American Federation of Teachers, Washington, D. C.
Martin S. Feldstein, George F. Baker Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President and Chief Executive Officer, National Bureau of Economic Research; former Chairman, President's Council of Economic Advisors
Stanley Fischer, First Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D. C.
Thomas S. Foley*, Partner, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld; former U.S. Ambassador to Japan; former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
L. Yves Fortier*, Senior Partner and Chairman, Ogilvy Renault, Barristers and Solicitors, Montréal; former Canadian Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations
Stephen Friedman, Senior Principal, MMC Capital, Inc., New York; former Chairman, Goldman Sachs & Co.
Richard N. Gardner, Professor of Law and International Organization, Columbia Law School, New York; Of Counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP; former U.S. Ambassador to Italy and to Spain
David Gergen, Public Service Professor of Public Leadership, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Editor-at-Large, U.S. News and World Report
Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, International Business Machines
Peter C. Godsoe, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Bank of Nova Scotia
Allan E. Gotlieb*, Senior Consultant, Stikeman Elliott, Toronto; former Canadian Ambassador to the United States
Bill Graham, Member of Canadian House of Commons; Chairman of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade
William H. Gray, III, President and Chief Executive Officer, United Negro College Fund; former Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
Maurice R. Greenberg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, American International Group, Inc.
Robert D. Haas*, Chairman, Levi Strauss & Co., San Francisco
new William A. Haseltine, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Carla A. Hills, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Hills & Company, Washington, D.C.; former U.S. Trade Representative; former U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Richard Holbrooke, Counselor, Council on Foreign Relations, New York; former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; former Vice Chairman of Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation; former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Canadian Affairs, and for East Asian and Pacific Affairs; former U.S. Ambassador to Germany
Jarnes R. Houghton, Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Corning Incorporated
Jarnes A. Johnson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Johnson Capital Partners; Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board, Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Washington, D.C.
new Alejandro Junco de la Vega, Publisher, E1 Sol, E1 Norte, and Reforrna, Mexico
Henry A. Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc., New York; former U.S. Secretary of State; former U.S. Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
Kenneth L. Lay, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Enron Corp., Houston
Jim Leach, Member, U.S. House of Representatzves
Gerald M. Levin, Chief Executive Officer, AOL Time Wamer, Inc.
Winston Lord, Chairman, International Rescue Committee; former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs; former U.S. Ambassador to China
E. Peter Lougheed, Senior Partner, Bennett Jones, Barristers & Solicitors, Calgary; former Premier of Alberta
new Roy MacLaren, Former Canadian High Commissioner, London; former Canadian Minister of lnternational Trade
Whitney MacMillan, Chairman Emeritus, Cargill, Inc.
Antonio Madero, Presidente Ejecutivo del Consejo, San Luis Corporacion, S.A. de C. V., Mexico
Jessica T. Mathews, President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C
Deryck C. Maughan, Vice Chairman, Citigroup, New York; former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Salomon Brothers Inc.
Jay Mazur, President, Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), AFL-CIO, New York; Vice President, AFL-CIO and Chairman, AFL-CIO International Affairs Committee
H. Harrison McCain, Chairman of the Board, McCain Foods Limited, Canada
Hugh L. McColl, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, BankAmerica Corporation, North Carolina
William J. McDonough, President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
new Henry A. McKinnell, President and Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer, Inc.
Lucio A. Noto, Former Vice Chairman, ExxonMobil; former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Mobil Corporation
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.*, Dean, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs
William J. Perry, Michael and Barbara Berberian Professor, Stanford University; former U.S. Secretary of Defense
Franklin D. Raines, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Federal National Mortgage Association; former Director, Office of Management and Budget, Office of the U.S. President
Charles B. Rangel, Member, U.S. House of Representatives
Lee R. Raymond, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ExxonMobil Corporation
new Hardey Richardson, President and Chief Executive Officer, James Richardson & Sons, Ltd, Winnipeg
Charles S. Robb, Former Member of United States Senate
John D. Rockefeller IV, Member, U.S. Senate
William V. Roth, Jr., Former Member of United States Senate
new Luis Rubio, Director-General, Center of Research for Development (CIDAC), Mexico
George F. Russell, Jr., Chairman, Frank Russell Company, Tacoma, Washington
new Arthur F. Ryan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Newark
Henry B. Schacht, Chairman and Chief Executive, Lucent Technologies; former Director and Senior Advisor, E.M Warburg, Pincus & Co., LLP
Raymond G.H. Seitz, Vice Chairman, Europe, Lehman Brothers International, London; former U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom
new Jaime Serra, SAI Derecho & Economia, Mexico City; former Mexican Minister of Trade
Gordon Smith, Director, Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, British Columbia; Chairman, Board of Governors, International Development Research Centre; former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada and Personal Representative of the Prime Minister to the Economic Summit
George Soros, Chairman, Soros Fund Management LLC, New York; Chairman, The Open Society lnstitute
Ronald D. Southern, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ATCO Group, Calgary, Alberta
new Luis Tellez, Executive Vice President, Sociedad de Fomento Industrial (DESC); former Minister of Energy, Mexico
new G. Richard Thoman, Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Xerox Corporation; Senior Advisor, Evercore Partners
Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Dean, Haus School of Business, University of California, Berkeley; former Head, National Economic Council; former Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers
Paul A. Volcker*, Former Chairman, Wolfensohn & Co., Inc.; Frederick H. Schultz Professor Emeritus, International Economic Policy, Princeton University; former Chairman, Board of Govemors, U.S. Federal Reserve System
Glenn E. Watts, President Emeritus, Communication Workers of America
Henry Wendt, Former Chairman, Global Health Care Partners, Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette; former Chairman, SmithKline Beecham
L. R. Wilson, Chairman of the Board of CAE Inc., Toronto; former Chairman of the Board, BCEInc.
new Lorenzo H. Zambrano*, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Cemex, S.A. de C. V., Mexico
new Ernesto Zedillo, Former President of Mexico
Mortimer B. Zuckerman, Chairman and Co-Founder of Boston Properties; Chairman and Editor-in-Chief, U.S. News & World Report, New York

*Executive Committee



Former Members In Public Service

Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States
Paula J. Dobriansky, Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs
Alan Greenspan, Chairrnan, Board of Governors, U.S. Federal Reserve
Richard N. Haass, Director, Policy Planning Staff: U.S. Department of State
Paul Wolfowitz, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense
Robert B. Zoellick, United States Trade Representative


for the original source CLICK HERE

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap." Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),
Greg L-W.
For all my contact details & Blogs: CLICK HERE


Greg Lance-Watkins: CLICK HERE
TheMidnightGroup: CLICK HERE

‘The arrogance and hubris of corrupt politicians will be responsible for every drop of blood spilt in the Wars of Disassociation, if Britain does not leave the EU.

The ugly, centralised, undemocratic supra national policies being imposed by the centralised and largely unelected decisionmakers of The EU for alien aims, ailien values and to suit alien needs stand every possibility of creating 200,000,000 deaths across EUrope as a result of the blind arrogance and hubris of the idiologues in the central dictatorship, and their economic illiteracy marching hand in glove with the idiocy of The CAP & The CFP – both policies which deliver bills, destroy lives and denude food stocks.

The EU, due to the political idiocy and corruption of its undemocratic leaders, is now a net importer of food, no longer able to feed itself and with a decreasing range of over priced goods, of little use to the rest of the world, to sell with which to counter the net financial drain of endless imports.  

British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit of their own agenda and greed, have done more damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.

The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain more than the armies of Hitler and the Franco – German – Italian axis of 1939 – 1945.

 Until we gain our liberty, restore our sovereignty, repatriate our democracy and reinstate our Justice system and our borders – defended by our Police and Military armed with sustainable and obtainable weaponry.

Treat every election as a referendum.

Don't spoil your Ballot Paper by wasting it on a self serving Politician in ANY election until we are liberated from the EU and are a Free Sovereign peoples, with independent control of our own borders, making and managing Law &
Justice for our own benefit, in our own elected Westminster Parliament where we can fire our politicians at the ballot box, if they fail to represent OUR best interests and de-centralise their powers.


Make your vote count Write on YOUR ballot Paper in EVERY Election:  

NWO – Imagine a Big Bed

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

We continue to take stabs in the dark at What and Who are behind the move towards Fascism and their NWO.  Some times I call them " The Committee of They, " the faceless, nameless people who are behind all of the events that are designed to kill, steal and destroy. 

Yes, these people are in bed together.  Their NWO would create a Major Disorder for us and for themselves.  Barry Soetoro is now one of them, the Undertaker himself.  You and I have a need to know, even a right to be aware of who these people are and what it is that they are up to.  Secrecy has been protecting their Demonic Plans for too long.

Gruber Haans  
Mon Aug 2, 2010
Subject; TPTB – The Committee of They

One who interferes with another's liberty does so at his peril

See For Yourself – Selected
Elites & Their NWO Affiliations

Note – Some of the below are deceased but it is important to note their
'memberships' to better
understand their 'contributions' in history.
BB – Bilderberger
TC – Trilateralist
CFR – Council on Foreign Relations
M – Mason
RS – Rhodes Scholar
S&B – Skull & Bones
Aaron, David L. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No, 8.
Abrams, Elliot (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Aburdene, Odeh Felix (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Albright, Madeleine Korbel (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1,
No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8, Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10, Vol. 1,
No. 11.
Allaire, Paul Arthur (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Allbritton, Joe Lewis (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Allen, Jodi T. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Allison, Jr., Graham Tilletly (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Altschul, Arthur Goodhart (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Andreas, Dwayne Orville (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Arledge, Roone (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Armstrong, C. Michael (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Arres, Jr., Robert E. (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Austin, Roy Leslie (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Baeza, Mario Leon (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Baker, Jr., Howard H. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Baker III, James A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Bashawaty, Albert C. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Battle, Lucius Durham (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Bensten, Lloyd (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Berger, Samuel R. "Sandy" (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1,
No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No.12.
Bergsten, C. Fred (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Birge, Robert Richards (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Birkelund, John Peter (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Bockstoce, John R. (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Bouscaren, Michael Frederic (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Bradley, Bill (CFR/RS)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol.
1, No. 10.
Bradley, Edward R. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Brinkley, David (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Brock III, William E. (CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Brokaw, Thomas "Tom" John (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No.
7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Brown, Christopher Walworth (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Brown, George Clifford (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Bryson, John E. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1. No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Buck III, Charles Henry (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Buckley, Jr., William Frank (BB/CFR/S&B 1950)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Bundy, McGeorge (BB/CFR/S&B 1950)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Burke, James E. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Burton, Daniel (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Bush, George Herbert Walker (CFR/M/S&B1948/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 3; Vol. 1, No.
4; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No.
9; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Bush, George Walker (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1. No. 3; Vol. 1, No.
4; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No.
9; Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Caputo, Lisa M. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Carlucci III, Frank C. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Carter, Ashton B. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Carter, Jimmy (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol.
1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Casey, William ("Bill") (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Chao, Elaine (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Chafee, John Hubbard (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Cheney, Richard "Dick" B. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Clark, Wesley Kanne (CFR)–Vol.1, No12.
Clay, Lucius (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Clinton, William Jefferson (BB/CFR/RS/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1. No. 3;
Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 10. Vol; 1, No.12
Cohen, Eliot A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Cohen, Kenneth Saul (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Cohen, William Sebastian (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 2, Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1,
No. 9; Vol. 1, No.12
Coleman, Jr., William Thaddeas (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Conable, Jr., Barber (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Cosgrove, Jr., Thomas Francis (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Cowdry, Rex William (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Cowles, Jr., John (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Crowe, Jr., William J. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Cross, Alan W. (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Crystal, Lester Martin (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Cullum, Lee (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Currie, Lauchlin (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Cutler, Lloyd (CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Dalby, Michael Thomas (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Dam, Kenneth W. (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Danforth, John C. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Demares II, Frank Edward (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
de Menil, Lois Pattison (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Deutch, John Mark (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Dewey, Thomas E. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Dillon, Clarence Douglas (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Djerejian, Edward Peter (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Dobriansky, Paula (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Dodd, Christopher J. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10;
Vol. 1, No. 11.
Dole, Robert "Bob" (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Donahue, Thomas Reilly (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Dowling, Brian J. (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Duberstein, Kenneth M. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Dulany, Peggy (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Eagleburger, Laurence S. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Einhorn, Jessica P. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Eisenhower, Dwight D. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Epstein, Jeffrey E. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Etra, Donald (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Feinstein, Dianne (BB/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Feldstein, Martin Stuart (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Foley, Thomas Stephen (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Ford, Jr., Gerald Rudolph (BB/CFR/33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No 10.
Franklin, George S. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Freedman, Lawrence (BBGB)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Fresco, Paolo (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Friedman, Stephen (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Friedman, Thomas L. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Frye, Alton (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Fuller, Henry W. (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Fukuyama, Francis(CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Funabashi, Yoichi (TCJ)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gaddis, John Lewis (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Gallico III, G. Gregory (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Gardner, Richard Newton (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Garment, Lloyd (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Garthoff, Raymond L. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Gelb, Leslie Howard (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Gelb, Richard Lee (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gephardt, Richard "Dick" Andrew (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 6, Vol.
1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9.
Gergen, David R. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Gerstner, Louis V. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Gigot, Paul (BB/CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7, Vol. 1, No. 11.
Gingrich, Newton L. (CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Glenn, John H. (TC)–Vol. 1. No. 1; Vol. 1, No. 6.
Goodpaster, Andrew Jackson (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Gore Jr., Albert (CFR/M)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1. No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol.
1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gordon, Albert Hamilton (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gotlieb, Allen E. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Graham, Billy (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Graham, Katherine (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Greenberg, Maurice R. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1. No. 11.
Greenberg, Sanford David (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Greenspan, Alan (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gutfreund, John H. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Gutherie, Robert K. (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Haas, Peter E. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Haas, Robert D. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Hamilton, Lee Herbert (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Harpel, James W. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Haskins, Caryl Parker (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Heck, Charles B. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Heinz II, H.J. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Hewitt, William Alexander. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Hill, J. Tomilson (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Hillen, John (CFR Fellow)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Hills, Carla Anderson (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Hilsman, Roger (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Hoge, Jr., James Fulton (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Holbrooke, Richard C. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 1; Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1,
No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Hormats, Robert D. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Howard, James Ernest (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Huber, Richard Leslie (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Hurford, John Boyce (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Humphrey, Hubert (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Hunter, Robert (BB/CFR)–Vol.1, No. 12.
Hussein, King (33rd M)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1. No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5.
Hyde, Henry (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Ingersoll, Robert Stephen (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Inman, Bobby Ray (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Irving, Clark Kent (RS)–Vol. 1. No. 3.
Isaacson, Walter Seff (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Istel, Yves-Andre (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Jackson, Jessie (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Jacobs, Eli S. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Jennings, Peter (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Johnston, Bennett (BB)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Jordan, Jr., Vernon Eulion (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 9.
Kahn, Harry (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kalb, Bernard (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kaplan, Gilbert E. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kaplan, Helene L. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kartman, Charles (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4.
Kaufman, Henry (CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kellogg, David (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Kelly, James P. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Kemp, Jack (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Kennedy, John F. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kent, The Duke of (M)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Kerry, Sen. John Forbes (CFR/S&B 1966)–Vol. 1. No. 1; Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol.
1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Khalizad, Zalmay (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
King, Jr., John A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
King, Larry (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 10, Vol. 1,
No. 11.
Kissinger, Sir Henry Alfred (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol.
1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Kolar, Button Ward (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Kord, Lawrence J. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Kravis, Henry R. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Kristol, Irving (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Kristol, William (BB)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Laidley, Forrest David (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Laird, Melvin Robert (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Lauder, Leonard A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Leach, James Albert Smith (CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Lehrer, Jim Charles (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Levin, Gerald M. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Lewis, Bernard (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
LeoGrande, William Mark (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Levine, Irvin Raskin (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Lichtblau, John H. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Lieberman, Joseph I. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10;
Vol. 1, No. 11.
Lipper, Kenneth (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Livingston, Richard H.B. (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Lord, Bettee Bao (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Lord, Winston (BB/CFR/S&B 1959/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Lowenfeld, Andreas Frank (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Lowenthal, Abraham Frederic (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Luers, William Henry (CFR)–Vol. 1, No.3.
Linder, Harold F. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Lugar, Senator Richard (RS)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 5;
Vol. 1, No. 8.
Luzzatto, Anne R. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Madden, B. Patrick (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Mai, Vincent A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Mann, Thomas Edward (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Marron, Donald Baird (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Mathias, Jr., Charles McCormick (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Maxwell, Kenneth (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
McCloy, John Jay (BB/CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
McColough, C. Peter (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
McCracken, Paul Winston (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
McDermott, James A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
McDonough, William J. (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 11.
McNamara, Robert Strange (BB/CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol.
1, No. 10.
Meron, Theodor (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Miller, Wentworth Earl (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Mischcon, Lord Victor (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Mitchell, George John (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Moskow, Michael H. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Moyers, Bill D. (BB/CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Murdock, Deroy (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3.
Murray, Janice L. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Nixon, Richard M. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Norton, Eleanor Holmes (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Noto, Lucio A. (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Nunn, Sam (BB)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Nye, Jr., Joseph S. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Oksenberg, Michael (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
O'Leary, John Joseph (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
O'Neill, Paul H. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Ornstein, Norman Jay (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Packard, David (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Perkins, James A. (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Perle, Richard Norman (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Pershing, Richard Warren (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Peters, Michael P. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Peterson, Peter G. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Phelan, Jr., John J. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Picker, Harvey (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Preston, Lewis Thompson (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Pye, Lucian Wilmot (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Rabin, Yitzhak (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol.
1, No. 11.
Rangel, Charles B. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Rather, Dan (CFR)–Vol. 1, No.3; Vol. 1, No. 7.
Raymond, Lee R. (CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Reagan, Ronald (33rd M)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Reed, John Shed (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 9.
Regan, Donald Thomas (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Reich, Robert (RS)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Richardson, Elliot Lee (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Rivlin, Alice Mitchell (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Rockefeller, David (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1. No. 10.
Ross, Arthur (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Ross, Dennis B. (CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 10.
Rostow, Walt Whitman (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Roth, Jr., William V. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Rubin, James P. (CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1,
No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8, Vol. 1, No. 11.
Rubin, Robert E. (BB)–Vol. 1. No. 1; Vol. 1. No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1,
No. 10.
Rudman, Warren Bruce (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Rumsey, David McIver (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Rumsfeld, Donald H. (BB)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Ryan, Jr., John Thomas (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Saleh, Muhammad Ahmed (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Satloff, Robert Barry (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Savage, Frank (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Sawyer, Diane (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 7; Vol. 1,
No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Scalapino, Robert A. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Scheffer, David J. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4.
Schlesinger, Jr., Arthur (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 5.
Schlesinger, James Rodney (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Schmidt, Thomas Carr (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Schollander, Donald Arthur (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Schroder, Patricia Scott (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Schwarzman, Stephen Allen (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Scowcraft, Brent (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Selander, Duane Arthur (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Sesno, Frank (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Shalala, Donna E. (CFR/TC)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Singer, Ronald Leonard (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Sisco, Joseph John (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Sitrick, James Baker (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Smith, Frederick W. (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Smith, Stephen Grant (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Smith, William Young (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6.
Sorensen, Theodore Chaikin (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Soros, George (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 1; Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol.
1, No. 7; Vol. 1, No. 8; Vol. 1, No. 9; Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Soros, Paul (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Spencer, Edson W. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Stanberry, Jr., William Burks (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Stephanopoulos, George R. (CFR/RS)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1,
No. 10.
Stockman, David Allen (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Summers, Lawrence H. (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 6.
Taft, Jr., Robert (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Talbott, Strobe (CFR/RS/TC)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No.12.
Taylor, Arthur W. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Tenet, George J. (CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol.
1, No. 6.
Thomas III, Evan (CFR)– Vol. 1, No. 8.
Thomas, Jr., Lee B. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Thompson, Jr., William McIlwaine (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Thorne, Brinkley Atimpson (S&B 1968)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Thorne, David Hoadley (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Tisch, Laurence Alan (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Torricelli, Robert (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 9.
Train, Russell Errol (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Truman, Edwin M. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4.
Turner, Ted (M)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Utley, Garrick (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Vance, Cyrus R. (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Vargish, Thomas (S&B 1966)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Volker, Paul A. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Walker, William N. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Wallace, Martha R. (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Walters, Barbara (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 4; Vol. 1, No. 9.
Warburg, Paul M. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 3; Vol. 1, No. 5.
Watts, Glenn Ellis (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
Wedgewood, Ruth N. Glushien (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8, Vol. 1, No. 10.
Weinberger, Caspar Willard (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Welch, John "Jack" F. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Weyerhauser, George Hunt (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Whitaker, Mark (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Wiener, Malcolm Hewitt (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Will, George (TC)–Vol. 1, No. 5; Vol. 1, No. 10; Vol. 1, No. 11.
Wolfensohn, James David (BB/CFR)–Vol. 1. No. 2; Vol. 1, No. 6; Vol. 1, No.
7; Vol. 1, No. 8.
Woodlock, Douglas Preston (S&B 1969)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Woolsey, R. James (CFR/RS)–Vol. 1, No. 7.
Young, Andrew (CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 8.
Zelikow, Philip D. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Zilkha, Ezra K. (CFR)–Vol. 1, No. 10.
Zoellick, Robert B. (BB/CFR/TC)–Vol. 1, No. 11.
On Aug 1, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Tom Gambill wrote:

Zep Tepi

The First Time of Osiris

The Golden Age

A New Order of the Ages

Novus Ordo Seclorum

New World Order



President George Bush in a speech to Congress on SEPTEMBER 11, (9/11) 1990, SAID THIS: "[The war in Iraq is] a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times…a New World Order can emerge."

In his September 21, 1992 speech to the United Nations, President George Bush announced that foreign troops, would occupy America and train for a New World Order Army. He stated:

"Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations. … If multinational units are to work together, they must train together. … Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications." New World Order and E.L.F. Psychotronic Tyranny


Official Term of the New World Order

  "A supranational authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a world development fund that would make funds available to free and communist nations alike; an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order" (McAlvany Intelligence Advisory)

The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent. (Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976) In 1981 Congressmen McDonald calls for comprehensive congressional investigation of the CFR and Trilateral Commission. Congress is urged to investigate these organizations. Congressman McDonald was killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets in 1983

  Zep Tepi / The First Time of Osiris / The Golden Age / A New Order of the Ages / Novus Ordo Seclorum / New World Order / Globalization. Different names, same agenda. It is the restoration of that corrupt "Golden Age" of incarnate demons which the Egyptian mystery religion represented and continues to represent. It is an ancient violent and immoral world which developed before the Flood which New Age spirit guides are seeking to re-establish, but which will be swept away by the War of Armageddon. The term "Golden Age" is a very misleading one, as is the term "spirituality" when used in conjunction with Adam Weishaupt whose "spirituality" was referred to as "horrifying." The Illuminati's fundamental principles pervert the noble meaning of spirituality, and are working for the establishment of a "horrifying" "Golden Age." New Age Army Expose, Psychic Warrior Subversion Exposed



The New World Order Map



  WASHINGTON –– Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said Sunday that the country is "on the edge of a golden age of prosperity," describing the current economic slowdown as an "adjustment period."


  "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." — President George Bush (January 1991)

  The New World Order program has been on the drawing board for many decades, despite denials and smears from the proponents, the insidious world domination and control preparations continue being set in place, the secretive terms of One World, New World Order, New International Economic Order etc have now been replaced with the more public term of Globalization.

    In hundreds of books, articles, and speeches in the 20th century, many influential and powerful people, including many in Congress, have called for a New World Order, and the surrender of U.S. sovereignty and individual freedoms to a one world government, usually involving the U.N. military and the transfer of it to a one world U.N. army. TREASON: THE NEW WORLD ORDER By Author Gurudas

  "Lets forgive the Nazi war criminals" (George Bush, New York Times, April, 14, 1990)

  1993 December 20. George Bush was knighted by the Queen on as a Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath. This was for his leadership in the Gulf War, when he sent American solders to die for England's interest of their petroleum in Kuwait. Order Of The Garter

  Circumstantial evidence suggesting that then vice-president George Bush may have been involved with the attempt on the life of former President Reagan… the close connections between the family of convicted would-be assassin John Hinckley and the Bush family as well as Hinckley's Nazi background. David Emory's Talk Radio (On NAZIs)

  I personally have learned of a few related incidents. I have come across reports of National Guardsmen undergoing specialized house-to-house search and seizure training and urban warfare tactics. I was also told that two men who managed to sneak into a Federal military plane 'graveyard' outside of Phoenix, Arizona had came across several freight train box-cars in which they discovered what they estimated to be from 2 to 3 million brand-new SHACKLES that were apparently being stored there, just waiting to be used!  Civil War Is About To Begin In The United States

  The extent of the American Government's [the corporate fascist military-industrial 'government' as opposed to the Constitutional or electorate 'government'] betrayal of her citizens can be further evidenced in the fact that these Chinese and Russian forces are RECEIVING PAYMENT FOR THEIR PRE-INVASION ACTIVITIES THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND… ISSUED ON AMERICAN GOVERNMENT CHECKS. In anticipation of the coming invasion from Russia and China [and German – U.N forces, etc.] Canada has even gone so far as to disband its Western Coast Guard Division, thus they are open to amphibious invasion of America from the West. This was openly evidenced recently through the presentation of a documentary report over the BBC television in London which detailed amphibious assault forces practicing war maneuvers and strategy in the Formosa Straits. When BBC newsmen were permitted to interview these soldiers in training, they repeatedly asked them the following question. "What are you preparing to use this training for?" The shocking, consistent reply was "FOR THE COMING INVASION OF AMERICA!" When it became clear that a gaff in security was created by airing this broadcast over television in England, its scheduled re-broadcast for the next day in London was hastily canceled. The Final Invasion Of The United States

  1983 Peter Hoagland, Nebraska State Senator and Humanist, speaking on radio in 1983 with the great American Pastor and Patriot Everett Silevan said: "Fundamental, Bible believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one world global society and their children will not fit in."

  As I walked through the crowd toward Reagan, I saw familiar faces associated with the "Order of the Rose." ("The Order of the Rose" was an emblem of those ushering in the New World Order. "Orders from the Rose" were orders from George Bush.) Across the room, Bill and Bob Bennett were laughing with Dick Cheney. Then Governor of Pennsylvania. Dick Thornburgh was engaged in conversation with Arlen Spector. Within the farthest reaches of my expanded peripheral vision, I saw George Bush talking with his U.N. confidant Madeleine Albright. (Reagan first introduced me to U.N. Ambassador Madeleine Albright as "my mentor" in Jesuit operations in the Caribbean.) Knowing I could see him as though I had eyes in the back of my head, Bush subtly signaled me to join them. "You know Madeleine Albright," Bush began. Expertly using terminology from previously instilled Catholic Jesuit beliefs, he continued, "She's the reverend mother of all sisters (slaves). She's so close to God that an order from her is an order from him." Albright snickered, apparently impressed with Bush's "witty" manipulation of program verbiage. "She rose in the U.N. through me to implement the New World peace process." (Trance Formation of America, The true life story of a CIA Mind Control Slave by Cathy O'Brien, pg 176)

  According to some insiders, the New World Order would already be history if they didn't fear the possibility of an honest & constitutional U.S. Military.

  The Judas attitude of the Administration is symbolized in an article written by Bill Clinton's very close friend, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, titled: "The Birth of the Global Nation." Talbott strongly attacked American national sovereignty, stating: "NATIONAL AS WE KNOW IT WILL BE OBSOLETE: ALL STATES WILL RECOGNIZE A SINGLE, GLOBAL" (666) "AUTHORITY," (7\20/92 Time Magazine).

  The Zioniststhe Jesuits are the Great Zionists. They control all of the historical High Zionists—Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir. Zionism is a Masonic term, coined by the Jesuits. They are the rulers; they are the Protocols; they are the Elders of Zion. So the Zionists are, indeed, evil and wicked; but they are controlled by Rome. The Jews are not all Zionists. Black Pope

The foreign troops are coming, which was the goal of Oslo to begin with. At  Genoa, today, Bush agreed to bring the UN-NATO troops to Israel. Tomorrow he meets the pope to sanctify the end of Israel's hegemony. Tonight three Arabs were murdered by "Jews," which is short for "Shabak." The troops, we will be told, will protect both sides from violent murder. The New World Order arrives in Israel and very soon. (Barry Chamish)

The goal of the CFR was to influence all aspects of society in such a way that one day Americans would wake up and find themselves in a ONE NEW WORLD SYSTEM “whether they liked it or not.”  Their hope was to get Americans to the point where entering a world government would seem natural and so that they would blink and miss what it is their naked eyes were truly seeing.  LUCIFER'S Network: Master’s Of The New World Order

In the last fifty years Big Brother has been able to slowly erode the basic freedoms of all American citizens by hiding behind such cliché's as " national security risk " to throw innocent people in prison with the most flimsy, if not fabricated evidence. When the government claims that a case involves a national security threat, it's power increases tremendously. Government investigators have the power to:

1. Order wire taps or a search without a warrant.
2. Restrict the discovery of evidence to who may see it.
3. Impede the accessed defense lawyers access to their client or require that an entire jury have security clearance.
4. In short, they can throw you in jail for as long as they wish too with any false or fabricated accusation against you.

But none of the wicked shall understand [that the End of the Age is upon them]." [Daniel 12:10

Unfortunately, what many so-called religious authorities fail to tell when arguing against self-defense by quoting this bit of scripture is that there are several words in the Hebrew language which express the verb "kill." The Hebrew word used in this commandment ALWAYS means "murder" and ONLY in what would now be called a "pre-meditated" murder at that.

Unfortunately, the word "kill" has changed since the time of King James when the first major translation of the Bible into English was carried out. The "kill" would more properly be translated as "murder" as far as modern English usage is concerned and, in fact, many modern translations of the Bible generally use "murder" in this passage. Check it out in a modern language translation of the Bible or–better yet–with someone who knows Hebrew.

This Bible passage deals with murder, not self-defense and it's a grave mistake to interpret is as prohibiting self-defense. Thus the commandment is simply "Thou shalt not MURDER." (And any religious leader using this as an argument against self-defense should be dismissed as a liar or sent back for more theological training.)  PRAISE THE LORD AND (PLEASE DO) PASS THE AMMUNITION A must read


New World Order Centers:


Denver Colorado, Western Sector. Atlanta Georgia, Eastern Sector.


Pine Gap – Alice Springs, Australia. This base is a massive multi-leveled facility run by the "Club of Rome" which, like the 'Bildeberger' organization, is reputedly a cover for the Bavarian Illuminati.


Still Don't Believe in a New World Order?


Stop The New World Order


  "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation." (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations)

Every person in the world has been assigned an 18 digit tracking number, which consists of 3 groups of 6 numbers. The first 3 numbers assigned in the BEAST computer to everyone are 666. The next is one’s national code. The U.S. national code is 110. Then the next 3 numbers are your telephone area code, and then finally your 9 digit Social Security number. The code then is 666 + Nation code + Tel. area code + social security no. = BEAST I.D. no. for an individual. Chapter 11 Internal Controls

"Is there a number or mark planned for the hand or forehead in a new cashless society? Yes, and I have seen the machines that are now ready to put it into operation.” Ralph Nader

WASHINGTONA number of immigration bills (including S.269 and H.R. 2202), and the Commission on Immigration Reform have proposed that the United States adopt a computer data base of every person in the United States to verify whether the person is eligible to work or is eligible for certain benefits ACLU Opposes National ID System and Computer Registry


Mark of the Beast!!






Population Control



Albert Pikes Masonic Master Plan


Centuries of Planning!


Their Worship of Numerology

Windows Logo Sporting the Occult Numbers 11,13 and 33


Offsite / Online Links



  A timid little man ventured into a biker bar in the Bronx and, clearing his throat, asked, "Um, err, which of you gentlemen owns the Doberman tied outside to the parking meter?" A giant of a man wearing biker leathers with his body hair growing out of the seams turned slowly on his stool. He looked down at the quivering little man and said, "It's my dog. Why?" "Well," squeaked the little man, very nervous, "I believe my dog just killed it, sir." "What?" roared the big man in disbelief. "What in the hell kind of dog do you have?" "Sir," answered the little man, "It's a four-week-old puppy." "Bull!" roared the biker, "How could your puppy kill my Doberman?" "It appears that he choked on it, sir."

 "One who interferes with another's liberty does so at his peril" (University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 75, p491, April 1927)

On Aug 1, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Tom Gambill wrote:

what do they do in short to sound engineer.


N W O – Committee of 300 – The Queen is at the Top of the N W O Foodchain

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

Morning Liberty Interview

At RBN Wed Morning June 9th

R J speaks with Brian Parkinson


     Today I had the opportunity to speak with Brian Parkinson, On the Air at

     Brian is another man who has lost everything because of attempts on his life for his Stand for America. 

     As a kid Brian's father was a Police Captain in New Jersey.  Brian had many opportunities to hear discussions about corrupt Mayors and Dirty Cops in his house and around his neighborhood.  JFK was assasinated when Brian was 9 years old and that event has had an overhwelming influence in his life.  Brian determined at a young age to Learn All He Could and to Prepare in Every Way so that he may stop the criminals of America from doing harm to our liberties.  Brian Parkinson is very skilled in martial arts and he knows about 14 languages. 

     Brian was there when Osama was walking paces at the World Trade Center, and Brian chased Osama off the grounds.

     Brian believes that about 10% of America serve the N W O and this Committee of 300.  Many of Americans still believe that events in America occur randomly, without any pre planning or design. 

     Brian Parkinson was invited to be a part of 1 of the 3 Assasination Teams that are at the disposal of The Queen.  Yes, Brian claims that Elizabeth 2 is the Top of the Foodchain for the N W O and the Bilderberg Group.  Brian claims that all of these organizations are in place to perpetuate Satanic policy for the earth, even the Freemasons and Tri Lats and the Illuminati. 

     It's not easy to find lines in the sand that divide the Jesuit Priests and their Black Pope and the Skull & Bones people or the Freemasons or the Illuminati or the Bilderberg Group or the Committee of 300 or any of their other organizations. 

     If somebody is invited to be a Made Member of this Committee of 300 then they get to participate in Profiteering. 

     In bed together are the C I A and M I 6 and the Taliban and the Mossad and Henry Kissinger. 

     Most of Americans still have no idea how evil their designs are, the people who man these Rothchilds, Satanic Bankster Organizations.  The demise of America is high on their list of plans. 

     George Bush Sr is a member of the Committee of 300 and George Bush Jr and Bill Clinton.  If you and I knew the membership of this exclusive Committee it may surprise you.  Many of these people operate in High Office positions by day and then participate in Dark and Evil Satanic Events by night.  Yes, according to Brian Parkinson they help one another and are in concert with each other to fulfill their own Evil Designs and to fulfill the Orders of the Queen. 

     There are at least 3 Assasination Teams.  Team A operates as Cobra Vector 1, out of New York.  Team B operates as Zebra Rattler 2, out of the midwest and California.  Team C operates out of Switzerland and London.  Each assasination tema has 12 highly trained personnel with a massive support system. 

     It takes massive sums of money to fund these ridiculous, Black-Op activities therefore they participate and even are in control of the trafficing of drugs and weapons all over the world. 

     Many national trends and events were set up by these N W O thugs, like the contention between Mexican Illegals pouring across the border into America.  The racial bonfire over illegal aliens is an issue they have been trying to create.  Turing Al Qaeda and the Taliban into a Boogy Man was all designed and is now being implemented by them.  The so-called War on Drugs is a fake and was designed and is now being implemented fo their profit and more gains in Power and Control.  War is Money to them, the N W O designers and this Committee of 300. 

     Brian Parkinson claims that even the new Health Care Bill that has become thelaw in America was a part of a Big Business Grant, by the Queen?  Wow!  Does that mean that the U S Constitution could be a Contract with London?  It appears that from the beginning of America as a nation, the Royal Family in England still considered America as a Colony to them? 

     Was the attack on the Gulf Oil Platform a false flag event?  Some people have made claims that Dick Cheney gave orders to a Black Water team to place explosives on the platform. 

     As early as 1991 Brian saw with his own eyes the N W O plans to exterminate 2/3 of Americans. 

     As President Obama was speaking to West Point Grads Barry spoke on how we must have a New International Order. 

     Currently terrorists are sneaking in to America from the Canada border along with the Mexican border. 

     Brian has risked everything, to Stand Up for you and me. 

     America needs you and me to Stand now.

     May God bless America.  We ought to be blessing America, with our lives too.

Be Free,  Robert Hender,   R J     7am – 9am  C T  weekdays